N-Acetylcysteine and Sodium Bicarbonate Versus N-Acetylcysteine and Standard Hydration for the Prevention of Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiography

Hydration Strategies for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Aims

Many previous studies have examined the effect of different hydration strategies on prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), but the optimal strategy is unknown. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) of these previous studies to identify the optimal strategy.

Methods and Results

Web of Science, PubMed, OVID Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception dates to September 30, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected based on strict inclusion criteria, and a Bayesian NWM was performed using WinBUGS V.1.4.3. We finally analyzed 60 eligible RCTs, which examined 21,293 patients and 2232 CI-AKI events. Compared to intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride (reference), intravenous sodium bicarbonate (OR [95% CI]: 0.74 [0.57, 0.93]), hemodynamic guided hydration (0.41 [0.18, 0.93]), and RenalGuard guided hydration (0.32 [0.14, 0.70]) significantly reduced the occurrence of CI-AKI. Oral hydration and intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride were each noninferior to no hydration in preventing CI-AKI. Intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and hemodynamic guided hydration were each noninferior to oral hydration in preventing CI-AKI. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, the RenalGuard system was best (0.974) and hemodynamic guided hydration was second best (0.849).

Conclusion

There was substantial evidence to support the use of RenalGuard or hemodynamic guided hydration for preventing CI-AKI in high-risk patients, especially those with chronic kidney disease or cardiac dysfunction.

Do intravenous N-acetylcysteine and sodium bicarbonate prevent high osmolal contrast-induced acute kidney injury? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), singly or combined, inconsistently prevent patients exposed to radiographic contrast media from developing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).

OBJECTIVE

We asked whether intravenous isotonic saline and either NaHCO3 in 5% dextrose or else a high dose of NAC in 5% dextrose prevent CI-AKI in outpatients exposed to high-osmolal iodinated contrast medium more than does saline alone.

METHODS

This completed prospective, parallel, superiority, open-label, controlled, computer-randomized, single-center, Brazilian trial (NCT01612013) hydrated 500 adult outpatients (214 at high risk of developing CI-AKI) exposed to ioxitalamate during elective coronary angiography and ventriculography. From 1 hour before through 6 hours after exposure, 126 patients (group 1) received a high dose of NAC and saline, 125 (group 2) received NaHCO3 and saline, 124 (group 3) received both treatments, and 125 (group 4) received only saline.

RESULTS

Groups were similar with respect to age, gender, weight, pre-existing renal dysfunction, hypertension, medication, and baseline serum creatinine and serum cystatin C, but diabetes mellitus was significantly less prevalent in group 1. CI-AKI incidence 72 hours after exposure to contrast medium was 51.4% (257/500), measured as serum creatinine > (baseline+0.3 mg/dL) and/or serum cystatin C > (1.1 · baseline), and 7.6% (38/500), measured as both serum creatinine and serum cystatin C > (baseline+0.3 mg/dL) or > (1.25 · baseline). CI-AKI incidence measured less sensitively was similar among groups. Measured more sensitively, incidence in group 1 was significantly (p<0.05) lower than in groups 2 and 3 but not group 4; adjustment for confounding by infused volume equalized incidence in groups 1 and 3.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that intravenous isotonic saline and either NaHCO3 or else a high dose of NAC prevent CI-AKI in outpatients exposed to high osmolal iodinated contrast medium more than does saline alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01612013.

Role of reactive oxygen species in pathogenesis of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated enhanced hypoxia and formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the kidney following the administration of iodinated contrast media, which play a relevant role in the development of contrast media-induced nephropathy. Many studies indeed support this possibility, suggesting a protective effect of ROS scavenging or reduced ROS formation with the administration of N-acetylcysteine and bicarbonate infusion, respectively. Furthermore, most risk factors, predisposing to contrast-induced nephropathy, are prone to enhanced renal parenchymal hypoxia and ROS formation. In this review, the association of renal hypoxia and ROS-mediated injury is outlined. Generated during contrast-induced renal parenchymal hypoxia, ROS may exert direct tubular and vascular endothelial injury and might further intensify renal parenchymal hypoxia by virtue of endothelial dysfunction and dysregulation of tubular transport. Preventive strategies conceivably should include inhibition of ROS generation or ROS scavenging.

Contrast-induced nephropathy--a review of current literature and guidelines

The use of iodine-based contrast agents always entails the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The recently observed dramatic increase in the number of examinations and therapeutic procedures using iodine-based contrast media led us to conduct a thorough analysis of the growing number of scientific reports and collective works devoted to contrast-induced nephropathy, based on current definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, successful prophylaxis and guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR).

Radiological contrast agents are the third most common cause of nephropathy among in-patients, accounting for 11–12% of cases. CIN is connected with some clinically significant consequences, including increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalisation, increased risk of complications, potential need for dialysis and increased mortality rate. A significant increase in the number of examinations applying iodine-based contrast media in the course of inpatient procedures requires close cooperation of the clinician and radiologist, supported by knowledge of all CIN issues. In order to protect patients from contrast-induced nephropathy, it is necessary to monitor their renal function, indentify patients with risk factors, refer patients for examinations in a responsible manner, and undertake successful preventive measures.

Reactive oxygen species and the pathogenesis of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

Experimental findings in vitro and in vivo illustrate enhanced hypoxia and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the kidney following the administration of iodinated contrast media, which may play a role in the development of contrast media-induced nephropathy. Clinical studies indeed support this possibility, suggesting a protective effect of ROS scavenging or reduced ROS formation with the administration of N-acetyl cysteine and bicarbonate infusion, respectively. Furthermore, most risk factors, predisposing to contrast-induced nephropathy are prone to enhanced renal parenchymal hypoxia and ROS formation. In this review, the association of renal hypoxia and ROS-mediated injury is outlined. Generated during contrast-induced renal parenchymal hypoxia, ROS may exert direct tubular and vascular endothelial injury and might further intensify renal parenchymal hypoxia by virtue of endothelial dysfunction and dysregulation of tubular transport. Preventive strategies conceivably should include inhibition of ROS generation or ROS scavenging.

Mitigating contrast-induced acute kidney injury associated with cardiac catheterization

Contrast-induced nephropathy, also referred to as contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI), is among the most common causes of AKI, especially in patients with underlying chronic kidney disease. In addition to the increased cost engendered by the development of CIAKI, several studies have suggested the occurrence of AKI after cardiac procedures is associated with an increase in both morbidity and mortality. This increase in morbidity and mortality occurs after both intravenous and intra-arterial studies. This review focuses on relevant proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, and current prophylactic strategies, which may reduce the incidence of CIAKI during cardiac angiographic imaging studies.

Interventional procedures: best practice to avoid complications

Technological advances have allowed treatment of patients using interventional radiological imaging including the performance of multiple procedures in almost any vessel, eg, angioplasty, stenting, embolization, and coilings. Patients undergoing any procedure are at risk for complications because of contrast media, radiation exposure, vessel injury, and prolonged time in one position during the procedure. Diagnostic-only procedures minimize use of contrast medium and radiation time, and generally take about one hour to complete. On the other hand, interventional procedures can take several hours and require larger volumes of contrast medium and radiation, as well as increased time lying supine on a procedure table. This article will discuss several potential and known risks associated with interventional procedures, how to monitor for these risks, and evidence-based measures to prevent or minimize their occurrence.

Sodium bicarbonate plus isotonic saline versus saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the prophylactic measures proposed for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We aim to compare the efficacy of the combination of sodium bicarbonate and isotonic saline and that of isotonic saline alone in preventing CIN.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized double-blind controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

265 consecutive patients 18 years or older with a serum creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL or greater undergoing elective coronary angiography from August 2007 to June 2008 in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran.

INTERVENTION

Study participants were randomly assigned to receive either 75 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate added to 1 L of isotonic saline (n = 135) or isotonic saline alone (n = 130) as a bolus of 3 mL/kg for 1 hour before contrast injection, followed by an infusion of 1 mL/kg/h for 6 hours after the procedure.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was an absolute (>or=0.5 mg/dL) or relative (>or=25%) increase in serum creatinine level 48 hours after the procedure (CIN).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the bicarbonate and saline groups regarding baseline demographic and biochemical characteristics, including baseline serum creatinine level (1.63 +/- 0.32 [SD] versus 1.66 +/- 0.50 mg/dL), baseline glomerular filtration rate (46.4 +/- 12 versus 45.4 +/- 12 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and baseline urine pH (5.42 +/- 0.6 versus 5.46 +/- 0.8). Nine patients (7.4%) receiving sodium bicarbonate developed CIN as opposed to 7 patients (5.9%) in the saline group, which was not statistically different (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 3.50; P = 0.6).

LIMITATIONS

The trial did not follow up participants to assess need for dialysis and mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy of sodium bicarbonate plus saline does not offer additional benefits over hydration with saline alone in the prevention of CIN.

Sodium bicarbonate-based hydration prevents contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy is the leading cause of in-hospital acute renal failure. This side effect of contrast agents leads to increased morbidity, mortality, and health costs. Ensuring adequate hydration prior to contrast exposure is highly effective at preventing this complication, although the optimal hydration strategy to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy still remains an unresolved issue. Former meta-analyses and several recent studies have shown conflicting results regarding the protective effect of sodium bicarbonate. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of normal saline versus sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy.

METHODS

The study searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts database, ISI Web of Science (until 15 December 2008), and conference proceedings for randomized controlled trials that compared normal saline with sodium bicarbonate-based hydration regimen regarding contrast-induced nephropathy. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 17 trials including 2,633 subjects were pooled. Pre-procedural hydration with sodium bicarbonate was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of contrast-induced nephropathy (odds ratios 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, P = 0.003). Number needed to treat to prevent one case of contrast-induced nephropathy was 16 (95% confidence interval 10-34). No significant differences in the rates of post-procedure hemodialysis (P = 0.20) or death (P = 0.53) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Sodium bicarbonate-based hydration was found to be superior to normal saline in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in this updated meta-analysis.

Sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common cause of acute kidney injury. Several preventive therapies for this injury have been tested; however, there is still no consensus on the optimal protocol.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Library databases from January 1985 to November 2008 to identify randomized controlled studies examining sodium bicarbonate as a preventive measure for CIN in humans. We also reviewed conference abstracts from cardiology nephrology and radiology meetings from 2004 to 2008. A change in serum creatinine levels defined by an absolute (>or=0.5 mg/dl) or percentage (>or=25%) increase in the serum creatinine level is defined as CIN. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of CIN, and the secondary outcome measures were: change in serum creatinine from baseline, requirement for renal replacement therapy and death.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials have investigated the role of sodium bicarbonate for prophylaxis of CIN. The overall incidence of CIN was 11.3%. Using the results from all 17 studies that compared bicarbonate versus saline, the pooled relative risk of developing CIN was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.36-0.83) in the intervention arm, indicating a significant benefit from sodium bicarbonate. The pooled relative risk of CIN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.35-0.95) when we analyzed for the studies that compared the effects sodium bicarbonate to NAC on development of CIN. There was no difference in the rates of requirement for renal replacement therapy and death.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of sodium bicarbonate appears to reduce the incidence of CIN when compared to other preventive strategies for CIN without a significant difference in the requirement of renal replacement therapy and mortality. There are study heterogeneity and publication biases. Further adequately powered randomized controlled studies are needed to determine whether sodium bicarbonate will reduce the clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., need for dialysis or death) and optimal hydration strategy in high-risk patients.

Safety and performance of targeted renal therapy: the Be-RITe! Registry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and patterns of use of targeted renal therapy (TRT) with the Benephit system. TRT, the delivery of therapeutic agents directly to the kidneys by renal arterial infusion, has the advantage of providing a higher local effective dose with potentially greater renal effects, while limiting systemic adverse effects due to renal first-pass elimination.

METHODS

The Benephit System Renal Infusion Therapy (Be-RITe!) Multicenter Registry was a post-market registry following patients treated using the Benephit systems for TRT. The registry enrolled 501 patients (332 men; mean age 72.2+/-9.5 years) at high risk for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) during coronary or peripheral angiography/intervention or cardiovascular surgery. The Mehran score was used to compare the actual to predicted incidence of CIN within 48 hours post procedure.

RESULTS

Bilateral renal artery cannulation was successful in 94.2%, with a mean cannulation time of 2.0 minutes. Either fenoldopam mesylate, sodium bicarbonate, alprostadil, or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was infused for 184+/-212 minutes. Mean creatinine levels did not change significantly (baseline, 24, and 48 hours post procedure: 1.95, 1.99, and 1.98 mg/dL, respectively; p = NS). In 285 patients who received TRT with fenoldopam and were followed for at least 48 hours, the incidence of CIN was 71% lower than predicted (8.1% actual CIN versus 28.0% predicted; p<0.0001). Only 4 (1.4%) patients required dialysis (versus the 2.6% predicted rate, p = NS).

CONCLUSION

The Benephit system and TRT during coronary and endovascular procedures in patients at high risk for renal failure is simple to use and safe. With the infusion of intrarenal fenoldopam, the incidence of CIN was significantly lower than predicted by risk score calculations.

[Contrast induced nephropathy]

Contrast media induced nephropathy is a common complication, particularly in high risk patients, such as patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes. The majority of studies show an increased in-hospital mortality and an unfavourable long-term prognosis after manifestation of contrast media induced nephropathy. The course and the potential risk factors of this type of acute renal failure are known. Therefore, an effective prophylaxis should allow to prevent this complication. In low risk patients oral or intravenous volume expansion is probably sufficient combined with the withdrawal of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In high risk patients additional prophylactic measures are needed but their efficacy is not clearly defined. Therefore, heterogeneous recommendations exist. Hydration reduces (afferent) renovasoconstriction, the tubuloglomerular feedback, the tubulotoxic effects of contrast media (via dilution) and the oxygen radical formation. The optimal composition, timing and amount of fluid which should be administered to the patients remain unclear. Most studies show that intravenous administration of volume is more effective than oral fluid intake. The majority of studies found a benefit of isotonic sodium bicarbonate in comparison to isotonic saline solutions, even if meta-analyses displayed only a positive trend for sodium bicarbionate due to the heterogeneity of the data. Controversies exist for N-acetylcysteine, vitamin C, fenoldopam, theophylline or statins. Due to low cost and low side effects, N-Acetylcysteine is widely used. Theophyllin (given intravenously 30 minutes before contrast media injection) is renoprotective, particularly in intensive care unit patients. Very important is the reduction of contrast media volume (if possible <30 ml for diagnostic procedures and <100 ml for interventions). Iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media may have a comparable low risk for the induction of contrast media induced nephropathy. This risk is probably higher after intra-arterial as compared to intravenous administration of contrast media. Controversies exist with respect to the reduction of contrast media induced nephropathy and mortality by prophylactic hemodialysis or hemofiltration. A possible benefit of these procedures consists probably for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (stage 5). With the further increase of investigations using contrast media, with the further increase in vascular interventions, in age and comorbidities of the patients one may suggest that the problem of contrast media induced nephropathy will further increase, despite all prophylactic procedures so far recommended.

Renal Insufficiency Following Radiocontrast Exposure Trial (REINFORCE): a randomized comparison of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy

INTRODUCTION

For the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography, hydration by 0.9% sodium chloride solution and N-acetylcysteine is currently recommended. However, it is unclear whether volume supplementation with sodium bicarbonate is better than with sodium chloride when used in conjunction with nonionic, low-osmolar iopamidol. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the effects of sodium bicarbonate and sodium chloride on renal function in 145 patients exposed to nonionic iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol in a randomized study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Renal Insufficiency Following Radiocontrast Exposure is a prospective, randomized, single-center, double-blinded trial of 145 patients (age 72.6+/-6.7 years) with elevated baseline serum creatinine levels (mean 132.6+/-29.3 micromol/l). Eligible patients were randomized to either a 154 mEq/l infusion of sodium bicarbonate (n=71, group I) or sodium chloride 0.9% solution (n=74, group II). The primary endpoint was serum creatinine elevation beyond 25% or 44 micromol/l on the first or second day following exposure to the contrast medium. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, plasma viscosity, urinary enzymes alanine aminopeptidase and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and alpha1-microglobulin were measured at baseline and on days 1 and 2 after contrast medium administration.

RESULTS

An overall proportion of five CIN (3.4%) was observed with equal distribution among the groups (4.2% in sodium bicarbonate group vs. 2.7% in sodium chloride group; P=0.614). Parameters of renal function demonstrated no differences between the two hydration regimens on day 1 after angiography; even on day 2 most parameters were similar in groups I and II.

CONCLUSION

Renal Insufficiency Following Radiocontrast Exposure demonstrates a homogeneously low rate of CIN after exposure to nonionic, iso-osmolar iodixanol regardless of the use of either bicarbonate sodium or sodium chloride solution for volume supplementation. Low-toxicity contrast media and any hydration may offset potential antioxidant effects of sodium bicarbonate.

Mortality associated with nephropathy after radiographic contrast exposure

OBJECTIVE

To define outcomes from contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after both intra-arterial and intravenous administration of contrast medium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-matched cohort study at Mayo Clinic's site in Rochester, MN, from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2006. All contrast procedures were evaluated for inclusion. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as creatinine elevation of 25% or more after contrast exposure or of more than 0.5 mg/dL within 7 days of contrast exposure. Cases of CIN were matched 1:3 with controls by age, sex, pre-procedure creatinine elevation, diabetes mellitus, and type of imaging procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 809 patients who developed CIN were matched to 2427 patients who did not develop CIN after contrast exposure. In multivariate analyses, CIN was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.58-4.41; P<.001) and overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.32-1.86; P<.001) after adjustment for heart failure, hypertension, medications, total hydration, iodine load, prior contrast exposure, and all matched variables during the study period. Intravenous contrast administration was a risk factor for 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.17-7.23; P=.02) and overall mortality (hazard ratio, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.89-4.82; P<.001) compared with intra-arterial administration of contrast after adjustment for heart failure, hypertension, medications, total hydration, iodine load, prior contrast exposure, and all matched variables during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-induced nephropathy after administration of contrast medium is associated with increased mortality. This risk is higher in patients in whom contrast medium is administered intravenously than in those in whom it is administered intra-arterially.

Sodium bicarbonate versus saline for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline in addition to N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in a larger population of patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention.

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy accounts for more than 10% of hospital-acquired renal failure. Recent studies suggest that hydration with sodium bicarbonate is more protective than isotonic saline in the prevention of CIN.

METHODS

The prospective, single center study included 502 patients with estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, randomized to receive infusion of either saline or sodium bicarbonate before and after iso-osmolar contrast medium administration. All patients received oral NAC 600 mg twice a day. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as an absolute increase of serum creatinine > or =0.5 mg/dl measured within 5 days.

RESULTS

Contrast-induced nephropathy occurred in 54 patients (10.8%); 25 (10%) were treated with sodium bicarbonate and 29 (11.5%) with saline (p = 0.60). In patients with CIN, the mean increase in creatinine was not significantly different in the 2 study groups (0.9 +/- 0.6 mg/dl vs. 0.7 +/- 0.2 mg/dl, respectively; p = 0.15). Only 2 patients needed temporary hemofiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydration with sodium bicarbonate plus NAC before contrast medium exposure is not more effective than hydration with isotonic saline plus NAC for prophylaxis of CIN in patients with moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction. (Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Saline for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy; NCT00606827).

Current role of sodium bicarbonate-based preprocedural hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal hydration strategy for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unknown. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of normal saline (NS) versus sodium bicarbonate hydration (NaHCO(3)) for prevention of contrast-induced AKI.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared saline-based hydration with sodium bicarbonate-based hydration regimen for prophylaxis of contrast-induced AKI. The literature search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (2000 to October 2007); conference proceedings; and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Information was extracted on study design, sample characteristics, and interventions. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary risk ratios for contrast-induced AKI, need for hemodialysis, and death.

RESULTS

Seven trials with 1,307 subjects were included. Preprocedural hydration with sodium bicarbonate was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of contrast-induced AKI (5.96% in the NaHCO(3) arm versus 17.23% in the NS arm, summary risk ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.714, P = .005). There was no difference in the rates of postprocedure hemodialysis or death. Formal testing revealed moderate heterogeneity and a strong likelihood of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Although sodium bicarbonate hydration was found to be superior to NS in prevention of contrast-induced AKI, these results are in the context of study heterogeneity and, likely, publication bias. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial is warranted to define the optimal hydration strategy in patients at high risk of contrast-induced AKI who are scheduled to undergo contrast administration.

Use of Isotonic Sodium Bicarbonate to Prevent Radiocontrast Nephropathy in Patients with Mild Pre-Existing Renal Impairment: A Meta-Analysis

Acute renal dysfunction after radiocontrast in patients with pre-existing renal impairment is not uncommon and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Isotonic sodium bicarbonate solution was first reported to reduce radiocontrast nephropathy in 2004. This first study was, however, limited by its small sample size and as such, the use of isotonic sodium bicarbonate to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy is still not widely used by many anaesthetists and intensivists. We meta-analysed relevant randomised controlled studies sourced from the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (2007 issue 4), EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (1966 to April 15, 2008) without any language restriction. The use of isotonic sodium bicarbonate was associated with a significant reduction in risk of an incremental rise in serum creatinine concentration 25% above baseline (relative risk 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11 to 0.44, P <0.0001; I 2 =0%>) and had a protective effect on the absolute change in serum creatinine concentration (weighted-mean-difference -9.4 μmol/l, 95% CI: -17.2 to -1.7, P=0.02; I 2 =0%>) and creatinine clearance (weighted-mean-difference 3.7 ml/min, 95% CI: 0.55 to 6.80, P=0.02; I 2 =57.1%) after radiocontrast. The incidence of acute renal failure requiring dialysis was low (1.4%) and was not significantly different after the use of isotonic sodium bicarbonate (relative risk 0.59, 95% CI: 0.15 to 2.42, P=0.47; I 2 =0%). With the limited data available, isotonic sodium bicarbonate appears to be safe and very effective in reducing radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with mild pre-existing renal impairment. A large randomised controlled study is needed to confirm whether isotonic bicarbonate can improve patient centred clinical outcomes.

Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT: effect on kidney function

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of iso-osmolality contrast medium compared with a low-osmolality agent on renal function (serum creatinine [SCr] and glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) in high-risk patients undergoing intravenous contrast material-enhanced CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant study was IRB-approved; formal consent was obtained. One hundred seventeen patients (83 men, 34 women; mean age, 64.3 years; range, 18-86 years) with decreased renal function underwent contrast-enhanced CT with either iso-osmolality iodixanol (n = 61) or low-osmolality iopromide (n = 56). Outcome measures were of SCr increase or GFR decrease for 3 days after CT, a SCr increase (of >or=0.5 mg/dL [44.2 micromol/L, 25%] or >or=1.0 mg/dL [88.4 micromol/L, 50%]), a GFR reduction (of >or=5 mL/min), and patient outcome at 30- and 90-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Iodixanol decreased SCr (mean +/- standard deviation) from 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.24 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 21.22) at baseline to 1.65 mg/dL +/- 0.35 (145.86 micromol/L +/- 30.94, P = .046) at day 1, 1.73 mg/dL +/- 0.53 (152.93 micromol/L +/- 46.85, not significant) at day 2, and 1.73 mg/dL +/- 0.55 (152.93 micromol/L +/- 48.62, not significant) at day 3 (not significant). Iopromide increased SCr from 1.75 mg/dL +/- 0.32 (154.7 micromol/L +/- 28.29) at baseline to 1.8 mg/dL +/- 0.42 (159.12 micromol/L +/- 15.59) at day 1, 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.49 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 43.32) at day 2, and 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.62 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 54.81) at day 3 (not significant). Iodixanol increased and iopromide decreased GFR on all 3 days after CT (not significant). Fewer patients in the iodixanol group (8.5%) than in the iopromide group (27.8%) had SCr increase 0.5 mg/dL or higher (>or=25%, P = .012). Two patients in each group had SCr increase of 1.0 mg/dL or more (not significant). More patients in the iopromide group (42.3%) than in the iodoxanol group (24.1%) had a GFR reduction of 5 mL/min or higher (P = .0426). No patient had a contrast material-related adverse event at 30- or 90-day follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous contrast material application in high-risk patients is unlikely to be associated with permanent adverse outcomes. SCr levels after contrast material administration are lower in iodixanol than iopromide groups.

Sodium bicarbonate is associated with an increased incidence of contrast nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study of 7977 patients at mayo clinic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of sodium bicarbonate in preventing contrast nephropathy needs to be evaluated in clinical settings.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, to assess the risk of contrast nephropathy associated with the use of sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and the combination of sodium bicarbonate with N-acetylcysteine from April 2004 to May 2005. Contrast nephropathy was defined as postexposure creatinine elevation of > or =25% or >0.5 mg/dl within 7 d of contrast exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 11,516 contrast exposures in 7977 patients had creatinine values available for review before and after contrast exposure. More than 90% of exposures to agents prophylactic for contrast nephropathy were available for analysis. Sodium bicarbonate was used in 268 cases, N-acetylcysteine was used in 616 cases, and both agents were used in combination in 221 cases of contrast exposure. After adjustment for total volume of hydration, medications, age, gender, prior creatinine, contrast iodine load, prior exposure to contrast material, type of imaging study, heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, multiple myeloma, and diabetes mellitus, use of sodium bicarbonate alone was associated with an increased risk of contrast nephropathy compared with no treatment (odds ratio 3.10, 95% confidence interval 2.28 to 4.18; P < 0.001). N-acetylcysteine alone and in combination with sodium bicarbonate was not associated with any significant difference in the incidence of contrast nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intravenous sodium bicarbonate was associated with increased incidence of contrast nephropathy. Use of sodium bicarbonate to prevent contrast nephropathy should be evaluated further rather than adopted into clinical practice.