Impact of carvedilol on the serum lipid profile

Acute and chronic metabolic effects of carvedilol in high-fructose, high-fat diet-fed mice: implication of β-arrestin2 pathway

We aimed to investigate the acute and chronic effects of carvedilol on insulin resistance in high-fructose, high-fat diet (HFrHFD) - fed mice and the implication of the β-arrestin2 pathway. The acute effect of carvedilol (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on glucose tolerance and hepatic lipid signaling in normal and insulin resistant mice was investigated. Then, the chronic effect of carvedilol on insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in HFrHFD-fed mice was examined. Changes in β-arrestin2 and its downstream signals in liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue were measured. This involved measuring phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and diacylglycerol (DAG) levels and protein kinase B (AKT) activity. Carvedilol acutely reduced fasting blood glucose levels in both normal and insulin resistant mice without significantly affecting the glucose tolerance. These acute effects were associated with increased hepatic PIP2 but decreased hepatic DAG levels. Chronic administration of carvedilol significantly ameliorated insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in HFrHFD-fed mice. These chronic effects were associated with increased β-arrestin2, PIP2, and AKT activity levels but decreased DAG levels in the classical insulin target tissues. In conclusion, carvedilol acutely maintains glucose homeostasis and chronically ameliorates insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in HFrHFD-fed mice. The insulin sensitizing effects of carvedilol are highly correlated with the upregulation of β-arrestin2 pathway.

Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure

This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.

Role of antioxidant property of carvedilol in mild to moderate hypertensive patients: A prospective open-label study

Objective:

Carvedilol is a nonselective third generation β-blocker that does not display the negative effects of traditional β-blockers. Regarding the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and distinct metabolic properties of carvedilol which are similar to that of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and paraoxonase 1 (PON1), the present study intends to investigate the effects of carvedilol treatment on malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble lectin-like ox-low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (sLOX-1) as markers of oxidative stress in association to lipid profiles, apolipoproteins (apo), and PON1 activity in hypertensive patients.

Patients and Methods:

This clinical trial study was performed on forty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Subjects were studied before and after 2 months treatment with carvedilol, 25 mg daily. Lipids and lipoproteins were measured using a biochemistry analyzer. PON and arylesterase activity were assayed using paraoxon and phenyl acetate as substrates, respectively. MDA was quantified using a chemical colorimetric assay. ELISA was used to measure sLOX-1.

Results:

Our results showed that carvedilol treatment decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure as much as forty and 16 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). It also increased HDL, total cholesterol, and serum PON1 activity (P < 0.05), but the levels of triglyceride, LDL, apo A-I, and apo B did not significantly change. There was an inverse correlation between serum PON1 activity and serum MDA.

Conclusion:

This study confirmed the antihypertensive effect of the drug and its beneficial metabolic effects through augmenting HDL and PON1 activity. We propose that the antioxidant effects of carvedilol can be partially attributed to increased PON-1 activity.

Serum Triglyceride Lowering Effect of Cilnidipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension

Background

Many epidemiological studies have established the relationship between hypertension and dyslipidemia. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are one of the first-line drugs for newly diagnosed patients with essential hypertension. Cilnidipine as a newer CCB acting by blocking both L- and N-type calcium channels possesses additional beneficial effects apart from lowering blood pressure (BP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cilnidipine in patients with essential hypertension with borderline dyslipidemia and its effects on lipid profile.

Methods

Out of 45 enrolled patients, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, only 37 completed the study. Cilnidipine was started at 10 mg/day, and then adjusted to 5 - 20 mg/day to achieve the target blood pressure.

Results

After 12 weeks of study, patients showed significant reduction in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean BP, heart rate and serum triglyceride level from baseline values (P < 0.00).

Conclusion

In clinical setting where both hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia exist, cilnidipine can be a promising drug of choice.

β-AR polymorphisms and glycemic and lipid parameters in hypertensive individuals receiving carvedilol or metoprolol

BACKGROUND

β-Blocker therapy and β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) polymorphisms are associated with increases in glucose and lipid levels. We investigated associations of common β1 and β2-AR single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with metabolic and lipid variables, and examined interactions with β-blocker treatment assignment to affect these parameters.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a double-blinded clinical trial of nondiabetic, hypertensive individuals that were randomized to receive carvedilol or metoprolol succinate. Fasting glucose, insulin, and lipid levels were measured at baseline, 3 months, and after 6 months. Genotypes for β1-AR SNPs Ser49Gly & Gly389Arg and β2-AR Arg16Gly & Gln27Glu were determined. Multivariable mixed models were used to examine associations between β-AR polymorphisms, metabolic parameters, and SNP interactions with β-blocker therapy (p(interaction)).

RESULTS

The 322 subjects were mean (s.d.) 51.5 (11.2) years old. After 6 months, insulin levels increased by 35.6% on metoprolol and 9.9% on carvedilol (P = 0.015). In univariate models, the Gln27Gln genotype had higher overall insulin levels with β-blockade compared to the Glu27Glu genotype (P = 0.006). Both Arg16Gly (P = 0.012) and Gln27Glu (P = 0.037) SNPs were associated with higher triglycerides levels. An interaction between the Arg16Gly SNP and treatment was identified (p(int) = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that insulin and triglycerides may be influenced by β2-AR polymorphisms in patients taking β blockers.

Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update

β-blockers are effective antihypertensive agents and, together with diuretics, have been the cornerstone of pioneering studies showing their benefits on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a consequence of blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertension. However, evidence from recent meta-analyses have demonstrated no benefit afforded by atenolol compared with placebo in risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and a higher risk of mortality and stroke with atenolol/propranolol compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Thus, the effect of these agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients, especially their use in uncomplicated hypertension, has remained largely controversial. However, it is recognized that the clinical studies used in these meta-analyses were mainly based on the older second-generation β-blockers, such as atenolol and metoprolol. Actually, considerable heterogeneity in, eg, pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and physicochemical properties exists across the different classes of β-blockers, particularly between the second-generation and newer third-generation agents. Carvedilol is a vasodilating noncardioselective third-generation β-blocker, without the negative hemodynamic and metabolic effects of traditional β-blockers, which can be used as a cardioprotective agent. Compared with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a reduced prolonged effect on heart rate, and reduces blood pressure by decreasing vascular resistance. Studies have also shown that carvedilol exhibits favorable effects on metabolic parameters, eg, glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that it could be considered in the treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. The present report provides an overview of the main clinical studies concerning carvedilol administered as either monotherapy or in combination with another antihypertensive or more frequently a diuretic agent, with particular focus on the additional benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.

The impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on serum lipid concentrations and symptoms in patients with hyperthyroidism

BACKGROUND

Hyperthyroidism is associated with unpleasant symptoms and hypertension due to increased adrenergic tone. Therefore, beta-blockers are often used in hyperthyroid patients. While some beta-blockers (such as propronolol and metoprolol) may have unwanted effects on lipid profile, carvedilol, a new alpha- and beta-blocker, has been suggested to have some metabolic advantages with respect to lipid profiles in hypertensive patients. However, this has not been shown in hyperthyroid patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the effects of two beta-blockers (metoprolol and carvedilol) on the lipid profiles of hyperthyroid patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Thirty patients with hyperthyroidism and hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either carvedilol (n = 15) or metoprolol (n = 15). Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free T3, free T4, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride, and total cholesterol levels were measured before and following 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, TSH, and free T4 improved significantly in both treatment groups. There were no statistically significant changes in the lipid parameters in either of the two treatment groups; however, triglyceride levels slightly decreased with carvedilol treatment. There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the typical symptoms of hyperthyroidism.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol might be a preferred agent to treat hyperthyroid patients who have hypertension and dyslipidemia. This is likely due to the possible beneficial effect of carvedilol on lipid parameters, especially on triglyceride levels.

Differential effects of extended-release carvedilol and extended-release metoprolol on lipid profiles in patients with hypertension: results of the Extended-Release Carvedilol Lipid Trial

Some beta-blockers, although they are effective antihypertensive agents, may adversely effect dyslipidemia and decrease insulin sensitivity. beta-blockers without adverse metabolic effects may provide an improvement in long-term hypertension therapy. Hypertensive patients (n = 568) without diabetes, not requiring lipid-lowering therapy, were randomized to once-daily extended-release carvedilol or extended-release metoprolol and titrated to target blood pressure (BP). Co-primary endpoints were comparison between groups in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or triglycerides at 24 weeks. Extended-release carvedilol was superior to extended-release metoprolol in meeting the primary endpoint of a difference in triglycerides; the median % change in triglycerides being -8.026% (P = .0141; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -15.35, -0.67)] from baseline to 24 weeks. Triglycerides were unchanged with carvedilol and increased with metoprolol. There was no significant difference in effect on HDL. BP was similar between treatment groups. There was a significant decrease with extended-release carvedilol vs. extended-release metoprolol in insulin (-2.56 muU/mL [P = .0213; 95% CI, -4.74 to -0.38]) and c-peptide [(-0.43 ng/mL [P = .0007; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.18]). In hypertension, extended-release carvedilol resulted in lower triglycerides, insulin, and C-peptide levels compared with extended-release metoprolol. Similar effects were observed in high-risk subgroups. Both treatments were well tolerated. This differential metabolic profile could be useful in determining antihypertensive treatment options.