1
|
Gao C, Ma B, Liu W, Zhu L. The state and consideration for skin test of β-lactam antibiotics in pediatrics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1147976. [PMID: 37396306 PMCID: PMC10308085 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1147976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
β-lactam antibiotics are the most frequently used drugs and the most common drugs that cause allergic reactions in pediatrics. The occurrence of some allergic reactions can be predicted by skin testing, especially severe adverse reactions such as anaphylactic shock. Thus, penicillin and cephalosporin skin tests are widely used to predict allergic reactions before medication in pediatrics. However, false-positive results from skin tests were more often encountered in pediatrics than in adults. In fact, many children labeled as allergic to β-lactam are not allergic to the antibiotic, leading to the use of alternative antibiotics, which are less effective and more toxic, and the increase of antibiotic resistance. There has been controversy over whether β-lactam antibiotics should be tested for skin allergies before application in children. Based on the great controversy in the implementation of β-lactam antibiotic skin tests, especially the controversial cephalosporin skin tests in pediatrics, the mechanism and reasons of anaphylaxis to β-lactam antibiotics, the significance of β-lactam antibiotic skin tests, the current state of β-lactam antibiotic skin tests at home and abroad, and the problems of domestic and international skin tests were analyzed to determine a unified standard of β-lactam antibiotic skin tests in pediatrics to prevent and decrease adverse drug reactions, avoid waste of drugs, and a large amount of manpower and material resource consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhui Gao
- Department of Pharmacy, Tianjin Children's Hospital (Children's Hospital of Tianjin University), Tianjin, China
| | - Bowen Ma
- Department of Pharmacy, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Tianjin Children's Hospital (Children's Hospital of Tianjin University), Tianjin, China
| | - Liqin Zhu
- Department of Pharmacy, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Increasing cefazolin use for surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergy-labeled patients. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY : ASHE 2023; 3:e11. [PMID: 36714293 PMCID: PMC9879898 DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective Penicillin (PCN) allergy labels affect antimicrobial selection for surgical prophylaxis. We aimed to increase the percentage of cefazolin usage in patients with PCN allergy labels undergoing orthopedic surgery from 50% to 80%. Design Quality improvement initiative. Setting Children's Mercy Kansas City (CMKC), a freestanding children's hospital. Patients Children scheduled for an orthopedic surgery (excluding spinal surgery) at CMKC who had a PCN allergy label and received a perioperative antibiotic. Methods No standardized process existed to identify and clarify PCN-allergic-labeled patients preoperatively. We developed a process for patient identification combined with a pharmacist phone interview for PCN allergy clarification. In plan-do-study-act (PDSA) part 1, we implemented a computer-generated patient list. In PDSA part 2, we combined automated identification with a phone interview. In PDSA part 3, we enhanced the patient list, making it timely and concise. In PDSA part 4, we included a PCN allergy clarification electronic survey to caregivers via the electronic medical record. Results Cefazolin use in PCN-allergic surgical patients increased from 50% to 74% following interventions. Patients who had their PCN allergy label clarified were 4 times more likely to receive cefazolin compared to those whose allergy labels were not clarified (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.68-11.61; P = 0.003). Moreover, 90% of patients received cefazolin when their PCN allergy was clarified and cefazolin was recommended. When a PCN allergy label was not clarified, only 59% of patients received cefazolin. Conclusions Appropriate clarification and documentation of PCN allergy labels increases the use of cefazolin for surgical prophylaxis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhathal S, Joseph E, Nailor MD, Goodlet KJ. Adherence and outcomes of a surgical prophylaxis guideline promoting cephalosporin use among patients with penicillin allergy. Surgery 2022; 172:1598-1603. [PMID: 35183368 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to assess adherence to a local surgical prophylaxis guideline in patients with reported penicillin allergies, which recommends cephalosporins as first-line prophylaxis. METHODS Adult patients with penicillin allergies admitted for a surgical procedure from July 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively screened, and the first surgery per admission was included. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeries using β-lactam prophylaxis. Additional outcomes included prophylaxis timing, hypersensitivity reactions, acute kidney injury, infectious complications, duration of stay, and 30-day mortality or readmission. RESULTS Among 597 procedures, 504 patients (84.4%) received a β-lactam for surgical prophylaxis, including 494 (82.3%) who received a cephalosporin. Patients in the non-β-lactam group were more likely to have a type I IgE-mediated penicillin allergy (48.4% vs 31.7%, P = .002); however, the majority with type I reactions still received β-lactams (78.0%), including in the setting of anaphylaxis or angioedema to penicillin (67.7%). Zero allergic reactions to prophylaxis antibiotics were reported in either group, and there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients receiving drugs associated with the management of allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactams was associated with inappropriate prophylaxis timing (9.7% vs 3.2%, P = .005) and postprocedural acute kidney injury (7.5% vs 0.6%, P < .001). All other outcomes were nonsignificant between the groups. CONCLUSION Among surgical patients with a documented penicillin allergy, most received cephalosporin prophylaxis as recommended by institutional guidelines, with zero allergic reactions. Receipt of non-β-lactam prophylaxis was associated with worsened outcomes. Cephalosporin prophylaxis should be preferred for surgical patients, including in the setting of true penicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salfee Bhathal
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale, AZ
| | - Eldo Joseph
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale, AZ
| | - Michael D Nailor
- Department of Pharmacy Services, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kellie J Goodlet
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prosty C, Copaescu AM, Gabrielli S, Mule P, Ben-Shoshan M. Pediatric Drug Allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2022; 42:433-452. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
5
|
Boesch TS, Eischen E, M AR, Quinn A, Dave A, Beezhold DW. Promoting β-lactam utilization through suppression of electronic medical record cross-allergy alerts. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79:S43-S52. [PMID: 35136927 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE Current literature surrounding management of patients with reported β-lactam allergies focuses on allergy delabeling. Standard clinical decision support tools have not been optimized to be compatible with the currently accepted cross-reaction rate of 1% to 2%. This potentially promotes use of non-β-lactam antibiotics, which are often not first-line therapy and may carry increased risks. The impact of electronic medical record (EMR) clinical decision support tool optimization on utilization of β-lactam antibiotics in β-lactam-allergic patients was evaluated. METHODS A retrospective pre-post β-lactam cross-allergy EMR alert suppression quality improvement intervention cohort study of β-lactam-allergic adult inpatients prescribed antibiotics was conducted. Preintervention baseline data were collected for an initial cohort admitted during September 2018. The intervention, in which clinical decision support rules were updated to display β-lactam cross-sensitivity allergy alerts only for β-lactam-allergic patients with documentation of organization-defined high-severity reactions of anaphylaxis, hives, and shortness of breath, was implemented August 20, 2019. The postintervention cohort included patients admitted during September 2019. RESULTS A 91% increase in the percentage of β-lactam-allergic patients who received a β-lactam agent at any time during their admission was noted after the intervention (26.6% vs 51%, P < 0.001). Statistically significant decreases in prescribing of alternative antibiotic classes were seen for fluoroquinolones (decrease from 45.3% to 26%, P < 0.001), aminoglycosides (decrease from 9.4% to 2.9%, P = 0.002), and aztreonam (decrease from 30% to 16.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION EMR β-lactam cross-allergy alert optimization consistent with current literature significantly improved the utilization of alternative β-lactam subclasses, mostly through β-lactam prescribing as initial therapy in β-lactam-allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teryl S Boesch
- Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, IL, USA
| | - Edward Eischen
- Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, IL, USA
| | - Amanda Ries M
- Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, IL, USA
| | - Andrea Quinn
- Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, IL, USA
| | - Ankur Dave
- Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aztreonam is not a preferred empiric antibiotic because of variable susceptibilities compared with alternative agents. In addition, it has no Gram-positive activity, necessitating coadministration with vancomycin when used empirically, and is more costly when compared with other Gram-negative active agents. Aztreonam is often given to patients with a reported penicillin allergy without further investigation into the reaction or other relevant allergy information. STUDY QUESTION How frequently is aztreonam being used inappropriately? STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective chart review at an academic medical center to assess the appropriateness of our aztreonam use. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES Our primary outcome was frequency of appropriate aztreonam use, based on a true IgE-mediated allergy reported for each patient. We evaluated whether the patients had tolerated a beta-lactam in the past, and what the reported allergic reaction was. RESULTS We included 165 patients and found that 46.7% of our aztreonam use was inappropriate, based on previous use of a beta-lactam, or no documentation of an IgE-mediated response. Of the patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy, 63 (38.2%) patients had no allergy manifestation listed, and 37 (22.4%) patients had a non-IgE-mediated allergy manifestation. Of the total population, 61 (37%) patients had tolerated a beta-lactam in the past. CONCLUSIONS Aztreonam should be avoided, except in the case of a true IgE-mediated allergic reaction. Our goal was to reduce the inappropriate use of aztreonam at our institution by one or more of the following: educating providers, reviewing aztreonam orders, requiring answering of order questions, or requiring an indication for use. Penicillin skin testing and desensitization are options as well.
Collapse
|
7
|
Neo-antigens for the serological diagnosis of IgE-mediated drug allergic reactions to antibiotics cephalosporin, carbapenem and monobactam. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16037. [PMID: 32994501 PMCID: PMC7525514 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73109-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
New antigens deriving from -lloyl and -llanyl, major and minor determinants, respectively, were produced for β-lactam antibiotics cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem and aztreonam. Twenty β-lactam antigens were produced using human serum albumin and histone H1 as carrier proteins. Antigens were tested by multiplex in vitro immunoassays and evaluated based on the detection of specific IgG and IgE in the serum samples. Both major and minor determinants were appropriate antigens for detecting specific anti-β-lactam IgG in immunised rabbit sera. In a cohort of 37 allergic patients, we observed that only the minor determinants (-llanyl antigens) were suitable for determining specific anti-β-lactam IgE antibodies with high sensitivity (< 0.01 IU/mL; 24 ng/L) and specificity (100%). These findings reveal that not only the haptenisation of β-lactam antibiotics renders improved molecular recognition events when the 4-member β-lactam ring remains unmodified, but also may contribute to develop promising minor antigens suitable for detecting specific IgE-mediated allergic reactions. This will facilitate the development of sensitive and selective multiplexed in vitro tests for drug-allergy diagnoses to antibiotics cephalosporin, carbapenem and monobactam.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H, Brehler R, Jakob T, Kreft B, Mahler V, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Ott H, Pfützner W, Röseler S, Ruëff F, Sitter H, Sunderkötter C, Trautmann A, Treudler R, Wedi B, Worm M, Brockow K. Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG). Allergol Select 2020; 4:11-43. [PMID: 32568254 PMCID: PMC7304290 DOI: 10.5414/alx02104e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) hypersensitivity was written by the German and Austrian professional associations for allergology, and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy in a consensus procedure according to the criteria of the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. BLA such as penicillins and cephalosporins represent the drug group that most frequently triggers drug allergies. However, the frequency of reports of suspected allergy in patient histories clearly exceeds the number of confirmed cases. The large number of suspected BLA allergies has a significant impact on, e.g., the quality of treatment received by the individual patient and the costs to society as a whole. Allergies to BLA are based on different immunological mechanisms and often manifest as maculopapular exanthema, as well as anaphylaxis; and there are also a number of less frequent special clinical manifestations of drug allergic reactions. All BLA have a beta-lactam ring. BLA are categorized into different classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, and beta-lactamase inhibitors with different chemical structures. Knowledge of possible cross-reactivity is of considerable clinical significance. Whereas allergy to the common beta-lactam ring occurs in only a small percentage of all BLA allergic patients, cross-reactivity due to side chain similarities, such as aminopenicillins and aminocephalosporins, and even methoxyimino cephalosporins, are more common. However, the overall picture is complex and its elucidation may require further research. Diagnostic procedures used in BLA allergy are usually made up of four components: patient history, laboratory diagnostics, skin testing (which is particularly important), and drug provocation testing. The diagnostic approach - even in cases where the need to administer a BLA is acute - is guided by patient history and risk - benefit ratio in the individual case. Here again, further studies are required to extend the present state of knowledge. Performing allergy testing for suspected BLA hypersensitivity is urgently recommended not only in the interests of providing the patient with good medical care, but also due to the immense impact of putative BLA allergies on society as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerda Wurpts
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria,
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum,
| | - Randolf Brehler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster,
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Gießen Site, Gießen,
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Vera Mahler
- Paul-Ehrlich Institute, Langen,
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen,
| | - Hans F. Merk
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Auf der Bult Children’s Hospital, Hannover,
| | - Wolfgang Pfützner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg Site, Marburg,
| | - Stefani Röseler
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich,
| | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute of Surgical Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg,
| | - Cord Sunderkötter
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Axel Trautmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg,
| | - Regina Treudler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology and Leipzig Interdisciplinary Center for Allergology – LICA-CAC, University of Leipzig, Leipzig,
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover,
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Allergy Center Charité (ACC), Berlin, and
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology am Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ariza A, Fernández T, Bogas G, Torres M, Mayorga C. How Mechanism Knowledge Can Help to Management of Drug Hypersensitivity. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00244-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Sakoulas G, Geriak M, Nizet V. Is a Reported Penicillin Allergy Sufficient Grounds to Forgo the Multidimensional Antimicrobial Benefits of β-Lactam Antibiotics? Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:157-164. [PMID: 29986019 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of patients with reported penicillin allergy are not allergic when tested or challenged. Penicillin allergy testing has been shown to significantly reduce annual healthcare expenditures. Data have emerged showing β-lactams have multidimensional antibacterial effects in vivo, far beyond what is appreciated in standard bacteriological susceptibility testing media. These include enhancing bacterial killing by the innate immune system. Supporting the clinical relevance of these secondary underappreciated effects are recent clinical and pharmacoeconomic analyses that show worse outcomes in patients with reported penicillin allergies who receive non-β-lactam antibiotics when compared to their non-penicillin-allergic counterparts. This is particularly relevant in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. This article reviews the tremendous advantages offered by β-lactam therapy and makes a strong case that the debunking of false penicillin allergies through a detailed allergy history and penicillin allergy testing should be a vital component of antimicrobial stewardship practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Sakoulas
- Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, La Jolla.,School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Victor Nizet
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.,Skaggs School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kufel WD, Justo JA, Bookstaver PB, Avery LM. Penicillin Allergy Assessment and Skin Testing in the Outpatient Setting. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7030136. [PMID: 31546887 PMCID: PMC6789533 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Penicillin allergies are among of the most commonly reported allergies, yet only 10% of these patients are truly allergic. This leads to potential inadvertent negative consequences for patients and makes treatment decisions challenging for clinicians. Thus, allergy assessment and penicillin skin testing (PST) are important management strategies to reconcile and clarify labeled penicillin allergies. While PST is more common in the inpatient setting where the results will immediately impact antibiotic management, this process is becoming of increasing importance in the outpatient setting. PST in the outpatient setting allows clinicians to proactively de-label and educate patients accordingly so beta-lactam antibiotics may be appropriately prescribed when necessary for future infections. While allergists have primarily been responsible for PST in the outpatient setting, there is an increasing role for pharmacist involvement in the process. This review highlights the importance of penicillin allergy assessments, considerations for PST in the outpatient setting, education and advocacy for patients and clinicians, and the pharmacist’s role in outpatient PST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley D Kufel
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
- Department of Medicine, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
- Department of Pharmacy, State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
| | - Julie Ann Justo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
- Department of Pharmacy, Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, SC 29203, USA.
| | - P Brandon Bookstaver
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
- Department of Pharmacy, Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, SC 29203, USA.
| | - Lisa M Avery
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wegmans School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY 14618, USA.
- Department of Pharmacy, St. Josephs Health, Syracuse, NY 13203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chastain DB, Hutzley VJ, Parekh J, Alegro JVG. Antimicrobial Desensitization: A Review of Published Protocols. PHARMACY 2019; 7:E112. [PMID: 31405062 PMCID: PMC6789802 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial desensitization represents a last-line option for patients with no alternative therapies, where the benefits of this intensive process must outweigh the potential harm from drug exposure. The goal of antimicrobial desensitization procedures is to establish a temporary state of tolerance to drugs that may otherwise cause hypersensitivity reactions. While no universal antimicrobial desensitization protocols exist, this review critically analyzes previously published desensitization protocols. The purpose of this review is to provide a greater insight for clinicians and institutions to ensure desensitization procedures are efficacious while minimizing potential for patient harm. With an increasing rate of antimicrobial resistance and the critical need to preserve antimicrobial agents, desensitization may represent another option in our antimicrobial stewardship toolkit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jay Parekh
- Roosevelt University College of Pharmacy, Schaumburg, IL 60173, USA
| | - Jason Val G Alegro
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
- Roosevelt University College of Pharmacy, Schaumburg, IL 60173, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee Y, Bradley N. Overview and Insights into Carbapenem Allergy. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7030110. [PMID: 31398843 PMCID: PMC6789495 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding antibiotic allergies and the risk of cross-sensitivity between and within antibiotic classes can have a substantial impact on patient care. The purpose of this review article is to provide insight into carbapenem allergies, describing the overall incidence, risk factors, and in-class cross-sensitivity. A PubMed search was conducted using the following search terms: carbapenem, allergy, cross-sensitivity, incidence, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, and doripenem. Article bibliographies and relevant drug monographs were also reviewed. The overall reported incidence of carbapenem allergy is 0.3%–3.7%. Risk of cross-sensitivity between penicillins and carbapenems is less than 1% in patients with a positive penicillin skin test. Data on cross-sensitivity between cephalosporins and carbapenems are limited; however, the risk appears to also be low. No clinical studies have described cross-sensitivity between the carbapenem agents thus far. The limited data available from case reports demonstrates a lack of cross-sensitivity between the individual carbapenems, suggesting that an alternative carbapenem may cautiously be used in patients with a reported carbapenem allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuman Lee
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA
| | - Nicole Bradley
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H, Brehler R, Jakob T, Kreft B, Mahler V, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Ott H, Pfützner W, Röseler S, Ruëff F, Sitter H, Sunderkötter C, Trautmann A, Treudler R, Wedi B, Worm M, Brockow K. S2k-Leitlinie: Diagnostik bei Verdacht auf eine Betalaktamantibiotika-Überempfindlichkeit. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-019-1876-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
15
|
Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-019-0100-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
16
|
Savic LC, Khan DA, Kopac P, Clarke RC, Cooke PJ, Dewachter P, Ebo DG, Garcez T, Garvey LH, Guttormsen AB, Hopkins PM, Hepner DL, Kolawole H, Krøigaard M, Laguna JJ, Marshall SD, Mertes PM, Platt PR, Rose MA, Sabato V, Sadleir PHM, Savic S, Takazawa T, Voltolini S, Volcheck GW. Management of a surgical patient with a label of penicillin allergy: narrative review and consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:e82-e94. [PMID: 30916014 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Unsubstantiated penicillin-allergy labels are common in surgical patients, and can lead to significant harm through avoidance of best first-line prophylaxis of surgical site infections and increased infection with resistant bacterial strains. Up to 98% of penicillin-allergy labels are incorrect when tested. Because of the scarcity of trained allergists in all healthcare systems, only a minority of surgical patients have the opportunity to undergo testing and de-labelling before surgery. Testing pathways can be modified and shortened in selected patients. A variety of healthcare professionals can, with appropriate training and in collaboration with allergists, provide testing for selected patients. We review how patients might be assessed, the appropriate testing strategies that can be used, and the minimum standards of safe testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Savic
- Anaesthetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - D A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - P Kopac
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - R C Clarke
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - P J Cooke
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - P Dewachter
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier de Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - D G Ebo
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
| | - T Garcez
- Department of Immunology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - L H Garvey
- Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre, Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A B Guttormsen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - P M Hopkins
- Anaesthetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D L Hepner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - H Kolawole
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Krøigaard
- Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre, Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - J J Laguna
- Allergy Unit, Allergo-Anaesthesia Unit, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, Faculty of Medicine, Alfonso X El Sabio University, ARADyAL, Madrid, Spain
| | - S D Marshall
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P M Mertes
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - P R Platt
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - M A Rose
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal North Shore Hospital, and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - V Sabato
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
| | - P H M Sadleir
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - S Savic
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - T Takazawa
- Intensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - S Voltolini
- Allergy Unit, Policlinic Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - G W Volcheck
- Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Calamelli E, Caffarelli C, Franceschini F, Saretta F, Cardinale F, Bernardini R, Liotti L, Mori F, Crisafulli G, Caimmi S, Bottau P. A practical management of children with antibiotic allergy. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:11-19. [PMID: 30830057 PMCID: PMC6502179 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i3-s.8157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
About 10% of the parents reported that their children are allergic to one drug and the betalactam antibiotics are the most frequently suspected. Even if most of the adverse events following antibiotic prescriptions to children are considered allergic, after a full allergy work-up only a few of the suspected reactions are confirmed. For this reason, many children are incorrectly labelled as "allergic" and this represents an important challenge for the choice of the antibiotic therapy in these "labelled" children, who are frequently improperly deprived of narrow-spectrum antibiotics because considered as allergic. When an allergic reaction is suspected a precise diagnosis and a choice of a safe and effective alternative is essential for the future antibiotic option. In the light of this, the main aim of this paper is to try to provide a practical approach to managing the individuals who have reported adverse reactions to antibiotics.
Collapse
|
18
|
Presumed β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-reactivity in the Operating Theater: A Practical Approach. Anesthesiology 2019; 129:335-342. [PMID: 29762180 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000002252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A β-lactam allergy is the most common suspected in-hospital drug allergy. This article aims to provide a practical approach to a patient with presumed β-lactam allergy in the perioperative setting.
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Collapse
|
19
|
Albin OR, Patel TS, Kaye KS. Meropenem-vaborbactam for adults with complicated urinary tract and other invasive infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2018; 16:865-876. [PMID: 30372359 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1542300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complicated urinary tract infections are increasingly caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) constitute a rising threat among uropathogens with significant morbidity and mortality. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a novel carbapenem and cyclic boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with potent activity against subtypes of CRE. Areas covered: This article reviews mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, existing treatment options for CRE, and the current evidence to support the use of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of infections caused by subtypes of CRE including complicated urinary tract infections. Expert commentary: Meropenem-vaborbactam is a superior treatment option for infections secondary to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing CRE. It is associated with higher rates of treatment success and lower rates of toxicity than traditional agents and demonstrates a potentially higher barrier to acquired antimicrobial resistance than ceftazidime-avibactam. At present, meropenem-vaborbactam should be regarded as a preferred treatment option for invasive infections secondary to KPC-producing CRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen R Albin
- a Department of Internal Medicine , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Twisha S Patel
- b Department of Pharmacy Services , University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Keith S Kaye
- a Department of Internal Medicine , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Drug allergy encompasses a spectrum of immunologically-mediated hypersensitivity reactions with varying mechanisms and clinical presentations. This type of adverse drug reaction not only affects patient quality of life, but may also lead to delayed treatment, unnecessary investigations, and even mortality. Given the myriad of symptoms associated with the condition, diagnosis is often challenging. Therefore, referral to an allergist experienced in the identification, diagnosis and management of drug allergy is recommended if a drug-induced allergic reaction is suspected. Diagnosis relies on a careful history and physical examination and, in some instances, skin testing and graded challenges. Induction of drug tolerance procedures may also be required. The most effective strategy for the management of drug allergy is avoidance or discontinuation of the offending drug. When available, alternative medications with unrelated chemical structures should be substituted. Cross-reactivity among drugs should be taken into consideration when choosing alternative agents. Additional therapy for drug hypersensitivity reactions is largely supportive and may include topical corticosteroids, oral antihistamines and, in severe cases, systemic corticosteroids. In the event of anaphylaxis, the treatment of choice is injectable epinephrine. If a particular drug to which the patient is allergic is indicated and there is no suitable alternative, induction of drug tolerance procedures may be considered to induce temporary tolerance to the drug. This article provides a background on drug allergy and strategies for the diagnosis and management of some of the most common drug-induced allergic reactions, such as penicillin, sulfonamides, cephalosporins, radiocontrast media, local anesthetics, general anesthetics, acetylsalicylic acid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tiffany Wong
- 3University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Mogle BT, Seabury RW, Jones Z, Miller CD, Steele JM. The Culture of Carbapenem Overconsumption: Where Does It Begin? Results of a Single-Center Survey. Hosp Pharm 2018; 54:175-179. [PMID: 31205328 DOI: 10.1177/0018578718775328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The United States has seen an increased consumption of carbapenem antibiotics in recent years. The increased utilization of these agents has potential negative consequences, including the increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Reasons for the rise in carbapenem use among providers in acute care hospitals are not well elucidated in literature. The objectives of this study were to identify factors that influence empiric carbapenem use among providers in a single academic medical center, and to assess therapeutic knowledge pertaining to carbapenem use. Methods: A cross-sectional, single-center, 9-item electronic research survey was developed independently and validated by an infectious diseases pharmacist and infectious diseases physician. The survey was distributed to email accounts of providers at a single academic medical center. Demographic data, factors affecting carbapenem prescription, and baseline therapeutic knowledge were assessed. Results: Ninety-five of 416 providers responded to the survey (response rate of 22.8%). Respondents were well distributed across all levels of training with primary roles in internal medicine and surgery. The most important factors influencing empiric carbapenem use were suspected pathogens at the site of infection, drug allergies, history of multidrug resistant organisms, severity of illness, type of infection, and local resistance rates. A recommendation from a pharmacist was selected as the most likely factor for deterring carbapenem use. Misconceptions pertaining to penicillin drug allergy and beta-lactam cross reactivity, knowledge of local resistance rates according to the institutional antibiogram, and comparative efficacy data for carbapenems were apparent across all levels of training. Conclusions: Provider misconceptions regarding several factors appear to contribute to unnecessary use of carbapenems. An opportunity exists for hospital pharmacists to improve the prescribing patterns of carbapenems by correcting provider misconceptions through education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan T Mogle
- Department of Pharmacy, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Robert W Seabury
- Department of Pharmacy, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Zachary Jones
- Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Christopher D Miller
- Department of Pharmacy, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Steele
- Department of Pharmacy, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vardakas KZ, Kalimeris GD, Triarides NA, Falagas ME. An update on adverse drug reactions related to β-lactam antibiotics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:499-508. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1462334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Z. Vardakas
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios D. Kalimeris
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos A. Triarides
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew E. Falagas
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Davido B, Dinh A, Senard O, Calin R, Makhloufi S, Salomon J. Repurposing an old drug: aztreonam as a new treatment strategy for gonorrhoea. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 72:1466-1468. [PMID: 28137938 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether aztreonam is still an effective drug for the treatment of gonorrhoea. Methods Observational study of patients with gonorrhoea diagnosed by urine multiplex PCR, with a past medical history of allergy to β-lactams or relapse after treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin. Patients received a single 1 g dose of aztreonam in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Results Five patients (four males, one female) were enrolled, comprising two who were allergic to β-lactams and three previously treated with cephalosporins who relapsed. Median age was 38 years (range 23-51). Following treatment with aztreonam all were cured without any adverse event. All the men were free of symptoms, and the woman tested negative for gonorrhoea 1 month after treatment. Conclusion Aztreonam appears to be an effective alternative to cephalosporins in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea, particularly when patients are suspected of being infected by strains with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone or are known to be allergic to penicillin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davido
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France
| | - Aurelien Dinh
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France
| | - Olivia Senard
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France.,Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, F78180, France
| | - Ruxandra Calin
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France.,Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, F78180, France
| | - Sabrina Makhloufi
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France.,Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, F78180, France
| | - Jerome Salomon
- Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP-HP, Garches 92380, France.,Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, F78180, France.,UMR 1181, Inserm, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Al-Hasan MN, Acker EC, Kohn JE, Bookstaver PB, Justo JA. Impact of Penicillin Allergy on Empirical Carbapenem Use in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: An Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunity. Pharmacotherapy 2017; 38:42-50. [DOI: 10.1002/phar.2054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Majdi N. Al-Hasan
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine; Columbia South Carolina
- Department of Medicine; Palmetto Health USC Medical Group; Columbia South Carolina
| | - Emily C. Acker
- Department of Pharmacy; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati Ohio
| | - Joseph E. Kohn
- Department of Pharmacy; Palmetto Health Richland; Columbia South Carolina
| | - Paul Brandon Bookstaver
- Department of Pharmacy; Palmetto Health Richland; Columbia South Carolina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences; University of South College of Pharmacy; Columbia South Carolina
| | - Julie Ann Justo
- Department of Pharmacy; Palmetto Health Richland; Columbia South Carolina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences; University of South College of Pharmacy; Columbia South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krey SC, Waise J, Skrupky LP. Confronting the Challenge of Beta-Lactam Allergies: A Quasi-Experimental Study Assessing Impact of Pharmacy-Led Interventions. J Pharm Pract 2017; 32:139-146. [PMID: 29162022 DOI: 10.1177/0897190017743154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve allergy history documentation and increase the use of beta-lactams when appropriate in patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy. METHODS This pre-post study was conducted at a 167-bed tertiary care community hospital and evaluated multidisciplinary interventions on allergy documentation and antibiotic selection. Interventions included education, creation of local practice guidelines, and modified practices for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Inpatients with a reported beta-lactam allergy receiving at least 1 antibiotic for >24 hours were included; first admissions were assessed. Primary outcomes were documentation of reaction type and percentage of patients receiving non-beta-lactam therapy. Secondary outcomes included documentation of previously tolerated beta-lactams, modification of non-beta-lactam therapy, discharge antibiotics, and adverse reactions. RESULTS A total of 179 patients were included, 91 preintervention and 88 postintervention. No significant differences were observed between the before versus after groups in the percentage of patients with documentation of reaction type (90.1% vs 89.8%, P = .940) or the overall percentage of patients receiving non-beta-lactams (86.8% vs 84.1%, P = .605). However, significantly more patients in the after phase had documentation of previously tolerated beta-lactams (8.8% vs 28.4%, P = .001), and among patients receiving a non-beta-lactam, a greater percentage was subsequently switched to a beta-lactam (11.4% vs 25.7%, P = .022). One allergic reaction was documented during the study, which occurred in the before phase. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary education and local guideline implementation led by pharmacists may improve allergy documentation and antibiotic selection in patients with reported beta-lactam allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Krey
- 1 Department of Pharmacy, Aurora Medical Center-Grafton, Grafton, WI, USA
| | - Jeff Waise
- 2 Department of Pharmacy, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | - Lee P Skrupky
- 2 Department of Pharmacy, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Green Bay, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zagursky RJ, Pichichero ME. Cross-reactivity in β-Lactam Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 6:72-81.e1. [PMID: 29017833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
β-Lactam drugs (penicillins, amoxicillin, and cephalosporins) account for 42.6% of all severe drug-induced anaphylaxis. In this review, we focus on clinically significant immunologic cross-reactivity in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy to cephalosporins, and the structural involvement of the R1 and R2 chemical side chains of the cephalosporins causing IgE-mediated cross-reactivity with penicillin and other cephalosporins. Skin tests predict IgE-mediated reactions and showed cross-reactivity between penicillins and early generation cephalosporins that shared side chains, but confirmatory challenge data are lacking. Later-generation cephalosporins, which have distinct side chains, do not have any skin test cross-reactivity with penicillin/amoxicillin. There is debate as to the involvement of R2 side chains as the antigenic determinants that cause IgE-mediated hypersensitivity with various cephalosporins. Avoidance of cephalosporins, when they are the drug of choice in a penicillin-allergic individual, results in significant morbidity that outweighs the low risk of anaphylaxis. We conclude that there is ample evidence to allow the safe use of cephalosporins in patients with isolated confirmed penicillin or amoxicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Zagursky
- Rochester General Hospital Research Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Rochester, NY
| | - Michael E Pichichero
- Rochester General Hospital Research Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Rochester, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Canzani D, Hsieh K, Standland M, Hammack W, Aldeek F. UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of penicillin G and metabolites in citrus fruit using internal standards. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2017; 1044-1045:87-94. [PMID: 28088045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Revised: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Penicillin G has been applied to citrus trees as a potential treatment in the fight against Huanglongbing (HLB). Here, we have developed and validated a method to identify and quantitate penicillin G and two of its metabolites, penillic acid and penilloic acid, in citrus fruit using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). This method improves upon a previous method by incorporating isotopically labeled internal standards, namely, penillic acid-D5, and penilloic acid-D5. These standards greatly enhanced the accuracy and precision of our measurements by compensating for recovery losses, degradation, and matrix effects. When 2g of citrus fruit sample is extracted, the limits of detection (LOD) were determined to be 0.1ng/g for penicillin G and penilloic acid, and 0.25ng/g for penillic acid. At fortification levels of 0.1, 0.25, 1, and 10ng/g, absolute recoveries for penillic and penilloic acids were generally between 50-70%. Recoveries corrected with the isotopically labeled standards were approximately 90-110%. This method will be useful for the identification and quantitation of drug residues and their degradation products using isotopically labeled standards and UHPLC-MS/MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Canzani
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Food Safety, 3125 Conner Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1650, United States
| | - Kevin Hsieh
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Food Safety, 3125 Conner Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1650, United States
| | - Matthew Standland
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Food Safety, 3125 Conner Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1650, United States
| | - Walter Hammack
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Food Safety, 3125 Conner Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1650, United States
| | - Fadi Aldeek
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Food Safety, 3125 Conner Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1650, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trubiano JA, Worth LJ, Urbancic K, Brown TM, Paterson DL, Lucas M, Phillips E. Return to sender: the need to re-address patient antibiotic allergy labels in Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J 2016; 46:1311-1317. [PMID: 27527526 PMCID: PMC5096978 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Antibiotic allergies are frequently reported and have significant impacts upon appropriate prescribing and clinical outcomes. We surveyed infectious diseases physicians, allergists, clinical immunologists and hospital pharmacists to evaluate antibiotic allergy knowledge and service delivery in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS An online multi-choice questionnaire was developed and endorsed by representatives of the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases (ASID). The 37-item survey was distributed in April 2015 to members of ASCIA, ASID, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. RESULTS Of 277 respondents, 94% currently use or would utilise antibiotic allergy testing (AAT) and reported seeing up to 10 patients/week labelled as antibiotic-allergic. Forty-two per cent were not aware of or did not have AAT available. Most felt that AAT would aid antibiotic selection, antibiotic appropriateness and antimicrobial stewardship (79, 69 and 61% respectively). Patients with the histories of immediate hypersensitivity were more likely to be referred than those with delayed hypersensitivities (76 vs 41%, P = 0.0001). Lack of specialist physicians (20%) and personal experience (17%) were barriers to service delivery. A multidisciplinary approach was a preferred AAT model (53%). Knowledge gaps were identified, with the majority overestimating rates of penicillin/cephalosporin (78%), penicillin/carbapenem (57%) and penicillin/monobactam (39%) cross-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS A high burden of antibiotic allergy labelling and demand for AAT is complicated by a relative lack availability or awareness of AAT services in Australia and New Zealand. Antibiotic allergy education and deployment of AAT, accessible to community and hospital-based clinicians, may improve clinical decisions and reduce antibiotic allergy impacts. A collaborative approach involving infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists and allergists/immunologists is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - L J Worth
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Urbancic
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T M Brown
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D L Paterson
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Lucas
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - E Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Crotty DJ, Chen XJC, Scipione MR, Dubrovskaya Y, Louie E, Ladapo JA, Papadopoulos J. Allergic Reactions in Hospitalized Patients With a Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy Who Receive a Cephalosporin or Meropenem. J Pharm Pract 2016; 30:42-48. [DOI: 10.1177/0897190015587254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Cefepime and meropenem are used frequently in hospitalized patients for broad-spectrum empiric coverage, however, practitioners are often reluctant to prescribe these antibiotics for patients with a self-reported nonsevere, nontype I allergic reaction to penicillin. Methods: Retrospective review of electronic medical records of adults with a self-reported allergy to penicillin who received at least 1 dose of cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, cephalexin, or meropenem to assess incidence and type of allergic reactions. Results: Of 175 patients included, 10 (6%) patients experienced an allergic reaction. The incidence for individual study drugs were cefepime 6% (6 of 96), meropenem 5% (3 of 56), cefoxitin 8% (1 of 13), ceftriaxone 0% (0 of 69), and cephalexin 0% (0 of 8). The majority of patients experienced a rash with or without pruritus and fever. Patients with a concomitant “sulfa” allergy (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-21, P = .02) or ≥3 other drug allergies (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.3-32, P = .025) were more likely to have an allergic reaction. Conclusions: In one of the largest retrospective reviews of hospitalized patients who received full dose therapy with cefepime, ceftriaxone, and meropenem, the incidence of allergic reactions was low and reactions were mild. Cefepime, ceftriaxone, and meropenem can be considered for use in patients with a self-reported nontype I penicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marco R. Scipione
- Department of Pharmacy, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Eddie Louie
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A. Ladapo
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Papadopoulos
- Department of Pharmacy, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Evaluation of a Computerized Decision Support Intervention to Decrease Use of Anti-Pseudomonal Carbapenems in Penicillin Allergic Patients. Antibiotics (Basel) 2016; 5:antibiotics5010007. [PMID: 27025522 PMCID: PMC4810409 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics5010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 12/31/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergies to β-lactam antibiotics are commonly documented in hospitalized patients; however, true allergy is uncommon. Cross-reactivity rates for advanced generation cephalosporins and carbapenems are low; particularly for patients without a history of symptoms consistent with type 1 hypersensitivity. We observed that providers preferentially prescribed antipseudomonal carbapenems (APC) over advanced generation cephalosporins for patients with β-lactam allergy history, including those with low risk for antimicrobial-resistant infections. Information was inserted into the computerized decision support system (CDSS) to aid clinicians in assessing β-lactam cross-reactivity risk and selecting appropriate therapy. A retrospective evaluation was conducted in a small hospital to assess the impact of the CDSS changes in APC prescribing. Inpatients (n = 68) who received at least one APC dose during hospitalization over a 13 month pre-intervention period were compared to inpatients who received an APC during the 15 month post-intervention period (n = 59) for documented APC indications and β-lactam allergy history. APC initiations were measured and corrected per 1000 patient-days; interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess changes in use before and after implementation. Aggregate monthly APC initiations decreased from 7.01 to 6.14 per 1000 patient-days after the implementation (p = 0.03). Post-intervention APC initiations for patients with low-risk β-lactam histories decreased from 92% to 83% (p = 0.17). No adverse events were observed in patients with low-risk β-lactam histories. The intervention was associated with a reduction in APC initiations.
Collapse
|
33
|
A multidimensional antimicrobial stewardship intervention targeting aztreonam use in patients with a reported penicillin allergy. Int J Clin Pharm 2016; 38:213-7. [PMID: 26768137 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns should be considered for antimicrobial therapy decisions. Antibiogram data can guide beta-lactam antibiotic use in the presence of a penicillin allergy, particularly when allergic cross-reactivity among antibiotic agents is unlikely. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a multidimensional antimicrobial stewardship intervention to improve antibiogram-driven antibiotic selection for patients with a reported penicillin allergy receiving aztreonam. METHODS This historically controlled, quasi-experimental study compared historical aztreonam use with prospective antibiotic selection following a pharmacist-led intervention in patients with a penicillin allergy. The impact of this intervention on aztreonam use, antimicrobial selection, patient allergy profile updates, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and antibiotic cost savings was assessed. RESULTS A significant reduction in median days of aztreonam therapy (4.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.0001) and median days of therapy per 1000 patient days (14.5 vs. 9.3; p = 0.0001) was found in the intervention group. CONCLUSION A pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship intervention facilitated antibiogram-driven antibiotic therapy while reducing aztreonam use in patients without an anaphylactic penicillin allergy. Further trials are needed to assess the utility of similar antimicrobial stewardship interventions for patients with penicillin allergy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cunha BA. No need for an initial test dose of meropenem or ertapenem in patients reporting anaphylactic reactions to penicillins. J Chemother 2015; 27:317-8. [PMID: 25566799 DOI: 10.1179/1973947814y.0000000233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
35
|
Crnogaca K, Bicanic G, Delimar D. Antibiotics in frozen bone grafts can cause allergic reactions in recipient patients. Med Hypotheses 2014; 84:107-8. [PMID: 25539901 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2014] [Accepted: 12/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Antibiotic prophylaxis is a routine procedure during total hip arthroplasty (THA), and the vast majority of cadavers within the multitissue procurement receive one or more antibiotics. Upon harvesting, bone grafts are stored in the bone banks on the temperature as low as -80°C for up to 5 years. It is shown in the literature that the antibiotics remain active and viable in the bone grafts even after being exposed to extremely low temperatures in the prolonged periods. Possibility of remnant antibiotic concentrations in the bone grafts and the fact that these antibiotic remnants maintain active even after being exposed to extremely low temperatures create the environment in which the possibility for the allergic reaction in sensitive patient receiving bone graft exists. We hypothesize that harvested bone grafts containing active antibiotic substance have the potential for local and systemic allergic reaction in sensitive recipient patients thus increasing morbidity and the costs of the treatment. Allergic reactions can mimic surgical site infections as well with the consequent substantial pitfalls in the treatment. Following that, in the setting of an assumed but not confirmed surgical site infection, the immunological evaluation on antibiotics for recipients of bone grafts could be added to the standard diagnostic algorithms. In addition, bone banks should be obliged to provide information of all potential drugs that can be found in every specific bone graft to the end users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kresimir Crnogaca
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Goran Bicanic
- University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Domagoj Delimar
- University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Penicillin is the most frequently reported cause of drug allergy, and cross-reactivity of penicillins with other beta-lactam antibiotics is an area of debate. This review evaluates the available data on immunoglobulin E-mediated penicillin hypersensitivity and cross-reactivity with cephalosporin, carbapenem, and monobactam antibiotics. A MEDLINE search was conducted from 1950 to October 2013, and selected references from review articles were also evaluated. There is a wide variety in reported incidences of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins or carbapenems, with early retrospective studies suggesting up to 41.7% and 47.4% cross-reactivity, respectively. Conversely, the use of monobactam antibiotics is frequently employed in the case of a penicillin allergy, as prescribers believe that there is no cross-reactivity between the 2 drug classes. More recent prospective studies suggest that the rates of cross-reactivity with cephalosporins and carbapenems are <5% and <1%, respectively. Similarities in penicillin and cephalosporin side chains may play a role in cross-reactivity between these classes. Cross-reactivity with monobactams is essentially negligible; however, there are some clinical data to support an interaction between ceftazidime and aztreonam, due to the similarity of their side chains. The data reviewed suggest that avoidance of other beta-lactams in patients with type 1 hypersensitivity to penicillins should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne T. Terico
- Post-Graduate Year 2 Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy Resident, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jason C. Gallagher
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kula B, Djordjevic G, Robinson JL. A systematic review: can one prescribe carbapenems to patients with IgE-mediated allergy to penicillins or cephalosporins? Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:1113-22. [PMID: 25048853 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cross-reactivity between penicillins or cephalosporins and carbapenems is anticipated as all have a beta lactam ring. However, the true incidence of immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated cross-reactivity is not known. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to collect and combine all published data on children and adults reported to have a clinical history of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to a penicillin and/or cephalosporin who were subsequently given a carbapenem. Reactions were classified as proven, suspected, or possible IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated. RESULTS Ten studies and 12 case reports describing 854 participants fit the study criteria. For patients with previous proven, suspected, or possible IgE-mediated penicillin reactions (N = 838), the incidence of any type of suspected hypersensitivity reaction to a carbapenem was 36/838 (4.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-5.9%) and the incidence of proven (1/838), suspected (0/838), or possible (19/838) IgE-mediated reactions was 20/838 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.6%-3.7%). Of the subset of patients with positive penicillin skin tests (n = 295), only 1 had a hypersensitivity reaction (0.3%; 95% CI, .06%-1.9%), and this was a possible IgE-mediated reaction. For patients with previous proven, suspected, or possible IgE-mediated cephalosporin reactions (N = 12), the incidence of any type of hypersensitivity reaction to a carbapenem was 3/12 (25%); this included 2 non-IgE-mediated reactions and 1 possible IgE-mediated reaction. CONCLUSIONS The cross-reactivity between penicillins and carbapenems for IgE-mediated reactions is very low, but caution is still advised. Cross-reactivity rates may be higher between cephalosporins and carbapenems; however, minimal data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Kula
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Gordana Djordjevic
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Joan L Robinson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pichichero ME, Zagursky R. Penicillin and cephalosporin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 112:404-12. [PMID: 24767695 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2013] [Revised: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert Zagursky
- Rochester General Hospital Research Institute, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Richter AG, Nasser SM, Krishna MT. A UK national survey of investigations for beta-lactam hypersensitivity - heterogeneity in practice and a need for national guidelines - on behalf of British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI). Clin Exp Allergy 2014; 43:941-9. [PMID: 23889247 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2012] [Revised: 02/21/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beta lactams (BL) are the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the UK and the commonest cause of hypersensitivity reactions. There are no UK guidelines for BL testing and the most relevant guidelines were devised by the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) on behalf of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. OBJECTIVE Delivery of allergy services differs across Europe, so this survey was designed to investigate how closely UK practice adhered to these guidelines. METHODS An online survey, using surveymonkey.com software, was sent to all consultants offering an allergy service in the UK and who were members of either BSACI or 'Travellers' (Immunology consultant group). RESULTS The response rate was 48% (n=81/165) and BL allergy testing was undertaken by 78% of respondents. All responders requested SsIgE, although four responders stated they rarely requested. Skin testing was undertaken by 87% of respondents who perform beta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra-dermal testing (IDT) if the former were negative or indeterminate and 6% SPT and IDT in all cases. The drugs, doses and protocols for skin testing varied considerably. Drug provocation testing was undertaken by 87% of respondents who undertake beta lactam testing with significant heterogeneity in protocols. Respondents that investigated ≤ 20 patients per year demonstrated lower adherence to ENDA recommendations compared to those who saw > 20. Following positive testing, 79% advised avoidance of all penicillins only and the remainder advised additional drug avoidance. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE This survey revealed variation in the investigation and management of BL hypersensitivity in the UK with some centres reporting procedures that could potentially put patients at risk of anaphylaxis if allergy was falsely excluded. This survey highlights an urgent need for evidence based national guidelines and standardisation of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Richter
- School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Legendre DP, Muzny CA, Marshall GD, Swiatlo E. Antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions and approaches to desensitization. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 58:1140-8. [PMID: 24368623 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Before initiating antibiotic therapy, drug hypersensitivity is an important consideration, and a common strategy is to avoid giving patients medications when a high likelihood of severe reactions exists. With an increase in antibiotic resistance and a decrease in novel antibiotics, there is greater pressure to consider antibiotics in patients with a history of adverse reactions. The major concerns include IgE-mediated, or type I, reactions, anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Some antibiotics with similar characteristics, such as cephalosporins and penicillins, may be given safely to patients with a certain allergy profile. There is still greater concern when considering antibiotics for patients with reported allergy. Desensitization is a strategy to safely induce drug tolerance to a specific drug to limit the possibility of a type I reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davey P Legendre
- Pharmacy Division, Health Management Associates, Woodstock, Georgia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wall GC, Nayima VA, Neumeister KM. Assessment of hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving carbapenem antibiotics who report a history of penicillin allergy. J Chemother 2013; 26:150-3. [DOI: 10.1179/1973947813y.0000000127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
43
|
Koliscak LP, Johnson JW, Beardsley JR, Miller DP, Williamson JC, Luther VP, Ohl CA. Optimizing empiric antibiotic therapy in patients with severe β-lactam allergy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:5918-23. [PMID: 24041892 PMCID: PMC3837866 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01202-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 09/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic selection is challenging in patients with severe β-lactam allergy due to declining reliability of alternate antibiotics. Organisms isolated from these patients may exhibit unique resistance phenotypes. The objective of this study was to determine which alternate antibiotics or combinations provide adequate empirical therapy for patients with β-lactam allergy who develop Gram-negative infections at our institution. We further sought to determine the effects of risk factors for drug resistance on empirical adequacy. A retrospective analysis was conducted for adult patients hospitalized from September 2009 to May 2010 who had a severe β-lactam allergy and a urine, blood, or respiratory culture positive for a Gram-negative organism and who met predefined criteria for infection. Patient characteristics, culture and susceptibility data, and predefined risk factors for antibiotic resistance were collected. Adequacies of β-lactam and alternate antibiotics were compared for all infections and selected subsets. The primary outcome was adequacy of each alternate antibiotic or combination for all infections. One hundred sixteen infections (40 pneumonias, 67 urinary tract infections, and 9 bacteremias) were identified. Single alternate agents were adequate less frequently than β-lactams and combination regimens. Only in cases without risk factors for resistance did single-agent regimens demonstrate acceptable adequacy rates; each factor conferred a doubling of risk for resistance. Resistance risk factors should be considered in selecting empirical antibiotics for Gram-negative pathogens in patients unable to take β-lactams due to severe allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey P. Koliscak
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Wingate University, School of Pharmacy, Wingate, North Carolina, USA
| | - James W. Johnson
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - James R. Beardsley
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David P. Miller
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C. Williamson
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vera P. Luther
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher A. Ohl
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rosini JM, Srivastava N. The 2012 guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: an update for emergency nursing. J Emerg Nurs 2013; 39:652-6. [PMID: 24054727 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
45
|
Jenkins RE, Yaseen FS, Monshi MM, Whitaker P, Meng X, Farrell J, Hamlett J, Sanderson JP, El-Ghaiesh S, Peckham D, Pirmohamed M, Park BK, Naisbitt DJ. β-Lactam Antibiotics Form Distinct Haptenic Structures on Albumin and Activate Drug-Specific T-Lymphocyte Responses in Multiallergic Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. Chem Res Toxicol 2013; 26:963-75. [DOI: 10.1021/tx400124m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind E. Jenkins
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - Fiazia S. Yaseen
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - Manal M. Monshi
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
- Faculty of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Dabab Street, Sulemania, PO
Box 59046, Riyadh 11525, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Paul Whitaker
- Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis
Unit, St. James’s Hospital, Leeds,
England
| | - Xiaoli Meng
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - John Farrell
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - Jane Hamlett
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - Joseph P. Sanderson
- Adaptimmune Limited, 57 Jubilee Avenue, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire,
OX14 4RX,
England
| | - Sabah El-Ghaiesh
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Daniel Peckham
- Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis
Unit, St. James’s Hospital, Leeds,
England
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised
Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL,
England
| | - B. Kevin Park
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| | - Dean J. Naisbitt
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science,
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, England
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013; 14:73-156. [PMID: 23461695 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 690] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dale W Bratzler
- College of Public Health, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73126-0901, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013; 70:195-283. [DOI: 10.2146/ajhp120568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1364] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
48
|
Peppard WJ, Peppard SR, Somberg L. Optimizing drug therapy in the surgical intensive care unit. Surg Clin North Am 2013; 92:1573-620. [PMID: 23153885 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This article provides a review of commonly prescribed medications in the surgical ICU, focusing on sedatives, antipsychotics, neuromuscular blocking agents, cardiovascular agents, anticoagulants, and antibiotics. A brief overview of pharmacology is followed by practical considerations to aid prescribers in selecting the best therapy within a given category of drugs to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Peppard
- Department of Pharmacy, Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Carlson A, Gregorich Z, Striker R. Telaprevir to boceprevir switch highlights lack of cross-reactivity. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 56:552-4. [PMID: 23166191 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C viral protease inhibitors increase sustained virologic response rates compared to interferon and ribavirin but also add side effects. Telaprevir and boceprevir are structurally similar, and share cross-resistant mutations. This case report highlights successful management of telaprevir skin rash and anal discomfort by switching to boceprevir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Carlson
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Santoro DO, Romão CMCA, Clementino MM. Decreased aztreonam susceptibility among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospital effluent treatment system and clinical samples. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH 2012; 22:560-570. [PMID: 22540159 DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2012.678000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospital wastewater treatment system (HWTS) and clinical specimens in a hospital of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. Forty-three isolates obtained from four of the five steps of the HWTS (n = 27) and clinical samples (n = 16) from patients were analyzed regarding their susceptibility profiles to 12 antibiotics. Clinical isolates exhibited higher resistance profiles to antibiotics than wastewater isolates. However, out of 27 isolates from sewage, 62.9% showed decreased susceptibility to aztreonam while 50% of clinical isolates were resistant to this antibiotic. Isolates were not detected at the chlorination stage but they were obtained from the following stage of the treatment revealing the capacity of regrowth after chlorinated sewage effluent. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting decreased aztreonam susceptibility among P. aeruginosa isolates from a hospital wastewater treatment system. Further investigations are being conducted by our laboratory including a larger sampling program in order to obtain more data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah O Santoro
- Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Quality Control in Health, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|