The Relationship between Inpatient Fluoroquinolone Use and Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea

Efficacy of a Novel Prophylactic Scheme of Fosfomycin Trometamol in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Findings from a Prospective Monocentric Single-Arm Study

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel prophylactic scheme of fosfomycin trometamol in patients undergoing elective HoLEP (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) or TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) procedures for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia and undergoing elective HoLEP or TURP procedures during the period February 2022-June 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Two 3 g oral fosfomycin trometamol doses 12 h apart were administered at 8.00 p.m. on day -1 (i.e., the day before HoLEP or TURP procedure) and at 8.00 a.m. on day 0 (i.e., the day of the surgical procedure). The following outcomes were assessed: prevalence of fever occurring in the first 48 h after surgical procedure; prevalence of urological complications occurring after the surgical procedure; prevalence of proven urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or bloodstream infections (BSIs) at 14 days post-procedure; and prevalence of emergency department admission for UTI-related sepsis at 14 days post-procedure. Univariate analysis comparing patients with and without proven UTI, BSI, or emergency department admission at 14 days post-procedure was carried out. Overall, 96 patients (median age 70 years) undergoing HoLEP (82.3%) or TURP (17.7%) were prospectively included. Median (IQR) time of surgical procedure after the morning fosfomycin dose was 226.5 min (range 88.5-393.75 min). Fever in the post-surgical 48 h occurred in 3/96 patients (3.1%). Prevalence of proven UTI at 14 days was as low as 1.0% (1/96), whereas no patient had proven BSI or UTI-related sepsis requiring emergency department admission at 14 days. Our findings support the contention that a prophylactic scheme based on two doses of fosfomycin trometamol 12 h apart before surgical intervention may represent a valuable strategy for preventing infectious complications in urologic patients undergoing HoLEP or TURP. Larger definitive confirmatory studies are warranted.

Is it time to reconsider prophylactic antimicrobial use for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? a narrative review of antimicrobials in stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving procedure for multiple types of hematological cancer, autoimmune diseases, and genetic-linked metabolic diseases in humans. Recipients of HSCT transplant are at high risk of microbial infections that significantly correlate with the presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the degree of immunosuppression. Infection in HSCT patients is a leading cause of life-threatening complications and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers issues pertinent to infection in the HSCT patient, including bacterial and viral infection; strategies to reduce GVHD; infection patterns; resistance and treatment options; adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials, problems of antimicrobial resistance; perturbation of the microbiome; the role of prebiotics, probiotics, and antimicrobial peptides. We highlight potential strategies to minimize the use of antimicrobials.

EXPERT OPINION

Measures to control infection and its transmission remain significant HSCT management policy and planning issues. Transplant centers need to consider carefully prophylactic use of antimicrobials for neutropenic patients. The judicious use of appropriate antimicrobials remains a crucial part of the treatment protocol. However, antimicrobials' adverse effects cause microbiome diversity and dysbiosis and have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality.

Updated meta-analysis of controlled observational studies: proton-pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection

Attention has recently been directed toward a plausible link between Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, the results of studies on the association between CDI and PPI remain controversial. We searched the literature databases from their inception to December 2016, without restriction of language, including all controlled observational studies examining the association between acid-suppressive therapy and CDI. Pooled analysis of 50 studies showed a significant association between PPI use and risk of developing CDI (odds ratio: 1.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.39) as compared with non-users. When stratified by study patients, the relative risk of hospital-acquired CDI and community-associated CDI were 1.29 (1.14-1.44) and 1.17 (0.74-1.59). After restricting the studies according to hospital department, the relative risks of hospital-acquired CDI in ICUs and general wards were 1.43 (0.74-2.11) and 1.29 (1.13-1.45). By implementing cumulative meta-analysis, it was clear that earlier trials of CDI conducted in the early 2000s demonstrated a high degree of heterogeneity and a high percentage of negative results. Since 2011, the overall association between PPI use and risk of developing CDI has remained relatively stable within an effect size between OR 1.20 and 1.26. Our findings indicate a significant associated risk of incident CDI among PPI users, especially in general ward patients. The totality of evidence, when using cumulative meta-analysis, showed that further trials are unlikely to overturn this positive result. Therefore establishing a guideline for the use of PPIs may help in future with the control of CDI.

Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is recognized as a frequent cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and colitis. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic therapy for C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD), or C. difficile infection (CDI), being synonymous terms.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register from inception to 26 January 2017. We also searched clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrialsregister.eu for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials assessing antibiotic treatment for CDI were included in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed abstracts and full text articles for inclusion and extracted data. The risk of bias was independently rated by two authors. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We pooled data using a fixed-effect model, except where significant heterogeneity was detected, at which time a random-effects model was used. The following outcomes were sought: sustained symptomatic cure (defined as initial symptomatic response and no recurrence of CDI), sustained bacteriologic cure, adverse reactions to the intervention, death and cost.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (3215 participants) were included. The majority of studies enrolled patients with mild to moderate CDI who could tolerate oral antibiotics. Sixteen of the included studies excluded patients with severe CDI and few patients with severe CDI were included in the other six studies. Twelve different antibiotics were investigated: vancomycin, metronidazole, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifaximin, bacitracin, cadazolid, LFF517, surotomycin and fidaxomicin. Most of the studies were active comparator studies comparing vancomycin with other antibiotics. One small study compared vancomycin to placebo. There were no other studies that compared antibiotic treatment to a placebo or a 'no treatment' control group. The risk of bias was rated as high for 17 of 22 included studies. Vancomycin was found to be more effective than metronidazole for achieving symptomatic cure. Seventy-two per cent (318/444) of metronidazole patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 79% (339/428) of vancomycin patients (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97; moderate quality evidence). Fidaxomicin was found to be more effective than vancomycin for achieving symptomatic cure. Seventy-one per cent (407/572) of fidaxomicin patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 61% (361/592) of vancomycin patients (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.31; moderate quality evidence). Teicoplanin may be more effective than vancomycin for achieving a symptomatic cure. Eightly-seven per cent (48/55) of teicoplanin patients achieved symptomatic cure compared to 73% (40/55) of vancomycin patients (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; very low quality evidence). For other comparisons including the one placebo-controlled study the quality of evidence was low or very low due to imprecision and in many cases high risk of bias because of attrition and lack of blinding. One hundred and forty deaths were reported in the studies, all of which were attributed by study authors to the co-morbidities of the participants that lead to acquiring CDI. Although many other adverse events were reported during therapy, these were attributed to the participants' co-morbidities. The only adverse events directly attributed to study medication were rare nausea and transient elevation of liver enzymes. Recent cost data (July 2016) for a 10 day course of treatment shows that metronidazole 500 mg is the least expensive antibiotic with a cost of USD 13 (Health Warehouse). Vancomycin 125 mg costs USD 1779 (Walgreens for 56 tablets) compared to fidaxomicin 200 mg at USD 3453.83 or more (Optimer Pharmaceuticals) and teicoplanin at approximately USD 83.67 (GBP 71.40, British National Formulary).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in severe CDI as most studies excluded patients with severe disease. The lack of any 'no treatment' control studies does not allow for any conclusions regarding the need for antibiotic treatment in patients with mild CDI beyond withdrawal of the initiating antibiotic. Nonetheless, moderate quality evidence suggests that vancomycin is superior to metronidazole and fidaxomicin is superior to vancomycin. The differences in effectiveness between these antibiotics were not too large and the advantage of metronidazole is its far lower cost compared to the other two antibiotics. The quality of evidence for teicoplanin is very low. Adequately powered studies are needed to determine if teicoplanin performs as well as the other antibiotics. A trial comparing the two cheapest antibiotics, metronidazole and teicoplanin, would be of interest.

A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, hospitalization, and functional outcomes in residents with and without Clostridium difficile infection in US long-term care facilities

OBJECTIVE

Patients in long-term care (LTC) are at increased risk for acquiring Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We compared the characteristics and outcomes of matched cohorts with and without CDI in the LTC setting.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort design, demographic characteristics, Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0) assessments (years 2007-2010), and pharmacy records of residents were analyzed. Residents were required to have a CDI diagnosis, ≥1 MDS 2.0 assessment ≤120 days pre- and post-index event, and receipt of metronidazole (MET) or vancomycin (VAN) within ±7 days of index date. Baseline characteristics were compared between cases and controls matched 1:3 on age, gender, and index year. Cox regression (CR) analysis evaluated the relationship between CDI status, and post-index mortality and hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 1145 CDI residents were matched with 3488 non-CDI residents. A second sample used propensity score methods. CDI vs. non-CDI residents had a higher baseline comorbidity burden (Charlson score: 3.0 ± 1.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.8, respectively), and were more likely to have had a recent hospitalization (63% vs. 9%, respectively) and shorter mean pre-index continuous length of stay (cLOS) in the LTC (386.4 d ± 536.3 d vs. 568.3 d ± 567.4 d, respectively), all P < 0.0001. CR analyses of both samples indicated that CDI was strongly associated with shorter times to hospitalization and mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, P = 0.023 and 2.2, P < 0.0001, respectively; propensity-matched group). Pre-index LTC cLOS also remained an important variable in the CR analysis and was the strongest predictor of post-index hospitalization and mortality (HR = 0.999 and 0.996, respectively, P < 0.0001), indicating that residents with longer pre-index LTC cLOS had longer times to post-index hospitalization and mortality. Our reliance on the MDS records for case identification was our chief limitation; misclassification was mitigated by our requirement to include CDI treatment as part of our inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding factors that put LTC patients at risk for CDI can help guide better management and improvement of patient outcomes.

Engaging Pharmacy Students, Residents, and Fellows in Antimicrobial Stewardship

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are mainly established by infectious diseases physicians and infectious diseases-trained clinical pharmacists with the goal of optimizing patients' outcomes while halting antimicrobial resistance, decreasing adverse events, and controlling health care cost. The role of the infectious diseases-trained clinical pharmacist in antimicrobial stewardship is well established; however, there are not enough formally trained pharmacists to assume the challenging responsibilities of the steward coordinator. The purpose of this article was to review the available literature and resources and propose a model to engage introductory pharmacy practice experience students, advanced pharmacy practice experience students, postgraduate year (PGY) 1 pharmacy residents, PGY2 infectious diseases pharmacy residents, and PGY2 or PGY3 infectious diseases pharmacy fellows in antimicrobial stewardship. Further studies are needed to assess and document the impact of pharmacy students and postgraduate trainees on antimicrobial stewardship programs.

The association between histamine 2 receptor antagonist use and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is an association between acid suppression therapy and development of CDI.

PURPOSE

We sought to systematically review the literature that examined the association between histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and CDI.

DATA SOURCE

We searched Medline, Current Contents, Embase, ISI Web of Science and Elsevier Scopus from 1990 to 2012 for all analytical studies that examined the association between H2RAs and CDI.

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently reviewed the studies for eligibility.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data about studies characteristics, adjusted effect estimates and quality were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-five observations from 33 eligible studies that included 201834 participants were analyzed. Studies were performed in 6 countries and nine of them were multicenter. Most studies did not specify the type or duration of H2RAs therapy. The pooled effect estimate was 1.44, 95% CI (1.22-1.7), I(2) = 70.5%. This association was consistent across different subgroups (by study design and country) and there was no evidence of publication bias. The pooled effect estimate for high quality studies was 1.39 (1.15-1.68), I2 = 72.3%. Meta-regression analysis of 10 study-level variables did not identify sources of heterogeneity. In a speculative analysis, the number needed to harm (NNH) with H2RAs at 14 days after hospital admission in patients receiving antibiotics or not was 58, 95% CI (37, 115) and 425, 95% CI (267, 848), respectively. For the general population, the NNH at 1 year was 4549, 95% CI (2860, 9097).

CONCLUSION

In this rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed an association between H2RAs and CDI. The absolute risk of CDI associated with H2RAs is highest in hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics.

Effects of ciprofloxacin on the expression and production of exotoxins by Clostridium difficile

Hypervirulent BI/NAP1/027 strains of Clostridium difficile have been associated with increased mortality of C. difficile infection (CDI). The emergence of highly fluoroquinolone (FLQ)-resistant BI/NAP1/027 strains suggests that FLQ exposure may be a risk factor for CDI development. However, the mechanism for this is not clear. We compared the effects of subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin on Toxin A and B gene expression and protein production in recent (strain 039) and historical (strain 5325) BI/NAP1/027 clinical isolates with high- and low-level ciprofloxacin resistance, respectively. In the highly ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate (strain 039), ciprofloxacin significantly and dose-dependently increased Toxin A gene expression and shifted its expression to earlier in its growth cycle; TcdB gene expression also increased but was less sensitive to low-dose ciprofloxacin. Maximal Toxin A/B production (4 ng ml(-1)) was increased twofold and occurred significantly earlier than in the untreated control. In strain 5325, ciprofloxacin at 0.25×MIC markedly increased both tcdA and tcdB expression but their temporal dynamics were unchanged. Maximal toxin production (250 ng ml(-1)) was reduced approximately threefold compared with that of the untreated control. These results demonstrate significant differences in ciprofloxacin-induced toxin gene expression and protein production among BI/NAP1/027 isolates, and offer a new paradigm for FLQ-associated CDI caused by recent, highly antibiotic-resistant strains.

Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have raised concern regarding the possible association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to perform a systematic review of incident and recurrent CDI in PPI users, and to evaluate the relative impact of concurrent antibiotic use, or switching acid suppression to histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2011 for controlled observational studies that reported on the risk of CDI with and without PPI use. We performed random effects meta-analysis and assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

We included 42 observational studies (30 case-control, 12 cohort) totalling 313,000 participants overall. Pooled analysis of 39 studies showed a statistically significant association between PPI use and risk of developing CDI, odds ratio (OR) 1.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.85, P<0.001, I(2)=85%) compared with non-users. A pooled analysis of three studies showed a significant associated risk of recurrent CDI associated with PPIs, OR 2.51 (95% CI 1.16-5.44, P=0.005, I(2)=78%). Subgroup analysis failed to fully clarify the source of the substantial statistical heterogeneity. Adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that use of H2RAs as an alternative carried a lower-risk OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.97) compared with PPIs. Conversely, concomitant use of PPI and antibiotics conferred a greater-risk OR 1.96 (95% CI 1.03-3.70) above that of PPIs alone. For PPI and antibiotics, the Rothman's synergy index was 1.36 and attributable proportion of risk from interaction 0.19, indicating an increased risk from interaction beyond the effects of each drug alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the substantial statistical and clinical heterogeneity, our findings indicate a probable association between PPI use and incident and recurrent CDI. This risk is further increased by concomitant use of antibiotics and PPI, whereas H2RAs may be less harmful.

Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile is recognized as a frequent cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy for C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (1966 to March 24, 2010), EMBASE (1980 to March 24, 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane IBD/FBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register were searched using the following search terms: "pseudomembranous colitis and randomized trial"; "Clostridium difficile and randomized trial"; "antibiotic associated diarrhea and randomized trial".

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomized, controlled trials assessing antibiotic treatment for CDAD were included in the review. The following outcomes were sought: initial resolution of diarrhea; initial conversion of stool to cytotoxin and/or culture negative; recurrence of diarrhea; recurrence of fecal evidence of CDAD; patient response to cessation of prior antibiotic therapy; emergent surgery; and death.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed abstracts and full text articles for inclusion. The risk of bias was independently rated by two authors. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived from each study and summary statistics obtained when appropriate, using a fixed effects model, except where significant heterogeneity was detected, at which time a random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies (total of 1152 participants) with CDAD were included. Nine different antibiotics were investigated: vancomycin, metronidazole, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifaximin, bacitracin and fidaxomicin (OPT-80). Most of the studies were active comparator studies comparing vancomycin with other antibiotics. The risk of bias was rated as high for 12 of 15 included studies. Patients with severe CDAD were often excluded from the included studies. In the only placebo-controlled trial vancomycin was found to be superior to placebo for treatment of CDAD for initial symptomatic cure. Initial symptomatic cure was achieved in 41% of vancomycin patients compared to 4% of placebo patients (1 study; 44 patients; RR 9.00; 95% CI 1.24 to 65.16). Vancomycin was significantly superior to placebo for initial bacteriologic response. Initial bacteriologic response was achieved in 45% of vancomycin patients compared to 4% of placebo patients (1 study; 44 patients; RR 10.00; 95% CI 1.40 to 71.62). The results of this study should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients and high risk of bias. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found between vancomycin and metronidazole, vancomycin and fusidic acid, vancomycin and nitazoxanide, or vancomycin and rifaximin. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found between metronidazole and nitazoxanide or metronidazole and fusidic acid. Vancomycin was significantly superior to bacitracin for initial bacteriologic response. Initial bacteriologic response was achieved in 48% of vancomycin patients compared to 25% of bacitracin patients (2 studies; 104 patients; RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.86). Teicoplanin, an antibiotic of limited availability and great cost, was significantly superior to vancomycin for initial bacteriologic response and cure. Initial bacteriologic response was achieved in 62% of vancomycin patients compared to 87% of teicoplanin patients (2 studies; 110 patients; RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.81). Bacteriologic cure was achieved in 45% of vancomycin patients compared to 82% of teicoplanin patients (2 studies; 110 patients; RR 1.82; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.78). These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients and the high risk of bias in the two studies in the pooled analysis. Teicoplanin was significantly superior to metronidazole for initial bacteriologic response. Initial bacteriologic response was achieved in 71% of metronidazole patients compared to 93% of teicoplanin patients (1 study; 59 patients; RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.98). This result should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients and high risk of bias in the study. Only one study investigated synergistic antibiotic combination, metronidazole and rifampin, and no advantage was demonstrated for the drug combination. This result should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients and high risk of bias in the study. Adverse events including surgery and death occurred infrequently in the included studies. There was a total of 18 deaths among 1152 patients in this systematic review. Among the studies that commented on the cause of mortality the deaths were attributed to underlying disease rather than CDAD or antibiotic treatment. One study reported a partial colectomy after failed CDAD treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence leads to uncertainty whether mild CDAD needs to be treated. The studies provide little evidence for antibiotic treatment of severe CDAD as many studies excluded these patients. Considering the two goals of therapy: improvement of the patient's clinical condition and prevention of spread of C. difficile infection to other patients, one should choose the antibiotic that brings both symptomatic cure and bacteriologic cure. A recommendation to achieve these goals cannot be made because of the small numbers of patients in the included studies and the high risk of bias in these studies, especially related to dropouts. Most of the active comparator studies found no statistically significant difference in efficacy between vancomycin and other antibiotics including metronidazole, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide or rifaximin. Teicoplanin may be an attractive choice but for its limited availability (Teicoplanin is not available in the USA) and great cost relative to the other options. More research of antibiotic treatment and other treatment modalities of CDAD is required.