The Impact of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Drug-Associated Gastropathy: Diagnostic Criteria

Drugs are widely used to treat different diseases in modern medicine, but they are often associated with adverse events. Those located in the gastrointestinal tract are common and often mild, but they can be serious or life-threatening and determine the continuation of treatment. The stomach is often affected not only by drugs taken orally but also by those administered parenterally. Here, we review the mechanisms of damage, risk factors and specific endoscopic, histopathological and clinical features of those drugs more often involved in gastric damage, namely NSAIDs, aspirin, anticoagulants, glucocorticosteroids, anticancer drugs, oral iron preparations and proton pump inhibitors. NSAID- and aspirin-associated forms of gastric damage are widely studied and have specific features, although they are often hidden by the coexistence of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the damaging effect of anticoagulants and corticosteroids or oral iron therapy on the gastric mucosa is controversial. At the same time, the increased use of new antineoplastic drugs, such as checkpoint inhibitors, has opened up a new area of gastrointestinal damage that will be seen more frequently in the near future. We conclude that there is a need to expand and understand drug-induced gastrointestinal damage to prevent and recognize drug-associated gastropathy in a timely manner.

Risk of Post-Myocardial Infarction Pneumonia with Proton Pump Inhibitors, H2 Receptor Antagonists and Mucoprotective Agents: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study

Patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk of developing pneumonia. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) are commonly used acid-suppressive medications to the patients with MI for gastrointestinal (GI) protection, which may increase the risk for pneumonia. We evaluated whether PPI, H2RA, and mucoprotective agents without anti-acid properties increase the risk of post-MI pneumonia. We performed a retrospective cohort study based on the National Health Insurance Service—National Sample Cohort in Korea. The study included 3701 patients discharged with MI without prior history of pneumonia. During follow-up, treatments with PPI, H2RA, and mucoprotective agents were collected as time-dependent variables based on the prescription records. We performed multivariate time-dependent Cox regression analyses for the development of post-MI pneumonia. During the mean 4.85 ± 3.75 years follow-up, 999 participants developed pneumonia. In the multivariate analyses (adjusted hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval), the risk for pneumonia was significantly increased in treatment with PPI (2.25; 1.57–3.21) and H2RA (1.50; 1.16–1.93). Meanwhile, the risk for pneumonia was not increased in treatment with mucoprotective agents. When we evaluated GI bleeding event according to the medications as a secondary outcome analysis, mucoprotective agents were associated with increased GI bleeding risk, but PPI and H2RA were not. In the use of the GI medications in the treatment of patients with MI, the influence of these drugs on bleeding and pneumonia should be considered.

The interplay between gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases: a narrative review focusing on the clinical perspective

Both cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders represent considerable health burden on community clinics and hospitals with overwhelming economic cost. An overlap in the occurrence of these disorders is encountered in daily practice. Both affect each other in bidirectional manner through several mechanisms including altered hemodynamics, systemic inflammation, bacterial overgrowth and interactions and adverse effects of medications. In addition, to the known overlap in the symptoms occurrence of upper gastrointestinal tract diseases and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Awareness of this interplay and its clinical manifestations optimizes patient management, and could prevent catastrophic consequences and even save lives. In this review, we highlighted the clinical aspects of this bidirectional association between gastrointestinal and CVDs aiming to shed light on this topic and improve patients' care.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

All evidence regarding benefits and harms of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention has not been appraised yet.

STUDY QUESTION

What are the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and observational studies were identified in several databases in October 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

Rapid review with evidence appraisal using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group approach.

RESULTS

Two direct RCTs (23,021 patients) suggest that rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.24), reduces risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.38-0.92), fatal bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76), and cardiac arrest (RR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.82, 2 RCTs), but increases risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.19-1.78). In observational studies, rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99, 222,750 patients), acute myocardial infarction (RR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.48-0.78, 73,739 patients), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.45-0.92, 197,506 patients) but higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.19-1.42, 188,968 patients) and higher risk of mortality when compared with warfarin in European studies (RR 1.19, 103,270 patients in the UK; RR 2.02, 22,358 patients in Denmark) but lower risk of mortality in Taiwan (RR 0.58, 40,000 patients). Network meta-analyses and observational studies suggest that rivaroxaban is associated with higher risk of bleeding when compared with apixaban (RR 2.14, 72,586 patients), dabigatran (RR 1.24, 67,102 patients), and edoxaban (RR 1.32, 71,683 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Research on the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and effects on quality of life between rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants is urgently needed.