1
|
Discovering Common Elements of Empirically Supported Self-Help Interventions for Depression in Primary Care: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:869-880. [PMID: 33564943 PMCID: PMC8042082 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06449-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the efficacy of self-help cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression has been well established, its feasibility in primary care settings is limited because of time and resource constraints. The goal of this study was to identify common elements of empirically supported (i.e., proven effective in controlled research) self-help CBTs and frameworks for effective use in practice. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for self-help CBTs for depression in primary care were systematically identified in Pubmed, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL. The distillation and matching model approach was used to abstract commonly used self-help techniques (practice elements). Study contexts associated with unique combinations of intervention elements were explored, including total human support dose (total face-to-face, telephone, and personalized email contact time recommended by the protocol), effective symptom domain (depression vs. general psychological distress), and severity of depression targeted by the study. Relative contribution to intervention success was estimated for individual elements and human support by conditional probability (CP, proportion of the number of times each element appeared in a successful intervention to the number of times it was used in the interventions identified by the review). RESULTS Twenty-one interventions (12 successful) in 20 RCTs and 21 practice elements were identified. Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation, and homework assignment were elements appearing in > 80% of successful interventions. The dose of human support was positively associated with the proportion of interventions that were successful in a significant linear fashion (CPs: interventions with no support, 0.20; 1-119 min of support, 0.60; 120 min of support, 0.83; p = 0.042). In addition, human support increased the probability of success for most of the extracted elements. Only social support activation, homework assignment, and interpersonal skills were highly successful (CPs ≥ 0.60) when minimal support was provided. DISCUSSION These findings suggest that human support is an important component in creating an evidence-informed brief self-help program compatible with primary care settings.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kapoor S, Mehta M, Sagar R. Use of self-help manual for the management of obsessive–compulsive disorder: Effectiveness in Indian context. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN BEHAVIOUR 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_38_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
3
|
Shepardson RL, Buchholz LJ, Weisberg RB, Funderburk JS. Psychological interventions for anxiety in adult primary care patients: A review and recommendations for future research. J Anxiety Disord 2018; 54:71-86. [PMID: 29427898 PMCID: PMC7909724 DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Anxiety symptoms are prevalent in primary care, yet treatment rates are low. The integration of behavioral health providers into primary care via the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model offers a promising way to improve treatment options by adding a team member with the necessary skillset to deliver evidence-based psychological interventions for anxiety. We conducted a narrative review of psychological interventions for anxiety applied within adult primary care settings (k = 44) to update the literature and evaluate the fit of existing interventions with the PCBH model. The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 70.5%). Most interventions utilized cognitive-behavioral therapy (68.2%) and were delivered individually, face-to-face (52.3%). Overall, 65.9% of interventions (58.6% of RCTs, 91.7% of pre-post) were effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, and 83.3% maintained the gains at follow-up. Although it is encouraging that most interventions significantly reduced anxiety, their longer formats (i.e., number and duration of sessions) and narrow symptom targets make translation into practice difficult. Methodological limitations of the research included homogenous samples, failure to report key procedural details, pre-post designs, and restrictive eligibility criteria. We offer recommendations to guide future research to improve the likelihood of successful translation of anxiety interventions into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn L Shepardson
- Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, United States; Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
| | - Laura J Buchholz
- Center for Integrated Healthcare, VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States; Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo/State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, United States.
| | - Risa B Weisberg
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States; Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
| | - Jennifer S Funderburk
- Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, United States; Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murphy J, Goldsmith CH, Jones W, Oanh PT, Nguyen VC. The effectiveness of a Supported Self-management task-shifting intervention for adult depression in Vietnam communities: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:209. [PMID: 28476148 PMCID: PMC5418759 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1924-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Depressive disorders are one of the leading causes of disease and disability worldwide. In Vietnam, although epidemiological evidence suggests that depression rates are on par with global averages, services for depression are very limited. In a feasibility study that was implemented from 2013 to 2015, we found that a Supported Self-management (SSM) intervention showed promising results for adults with depression in the community in Vietnam. This paper describes the Mental Health in Adults and Children: Frugal Innovations (MAC-FI) trial protocol that will assess the effectiveness of the SSM intervention, delivered by primary care and social workers, to community-based populations of adults with depression in eight Vietnamese provinces. Methods/design The MAC-FI program will be assessed using a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial. Study participants are adults aged 18 years and over in eight provinces of Vietnam. Study participants will be screened at primary care centres and in the community by health and social workers using the Self-reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20). Patients scoring >7, indicating depression caseness, will be invited to participate in the study in either the SSM intervention group or the enhanced treatment as usual control group. Recruited participants will be further assessed using the World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS 2.0) and the Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener (CAGE) Questionnaire for alcohol misuse. Intervention-group participants will receive the SSM intervention, delivered with the support of a social worker or social collaborator, for a period of 2 months. Control- group participants will receive treatment as usual and a leaflet with information about depression. SRQ-20, WHODAS 2.0 and CAGE scores will be taken by blinded outcome assessors at baseline, after 1 month and after 2 months. The primary analysis method will be intention-to-treat. Discussion This study has the potential to add to the knowledge base about the effectiveness of a SSM intervention for adult depression that has been validated for the Vietnamese context. This trial will also contribute to the growing body of evidence about the effectiveness of low-cost, task-shifting interventions for use in low-resource settings, where specialist mental health services are often limited. Trial registration Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03001063. Registered on 20 December 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1924-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Murphy
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addictions, Simon Fraser University, Suite 2400, 515 W. Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada.
| | - Charles H Goldsmith
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall, Room 11300, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Wayne Jones
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addictions, Simon Fraser University, Suite 2400, 515 W. Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada
| | - Pham Thi Oanh
- Institute of Population, Health and Development, 18 Lane 132, Hoa Bang, Yen Hoa, Hanoi, 122667, Vietnam
| | - Vu Cong Nguyen
- Institute of Population, Health and Development, 18 Lane 132, Hoa Bang, Yen Hoa, Hanoi, 122667, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hammer NM, Egestad LK, Nielsen SG, Bjerre E, Johansen C, Egerod I, Pinto B, Midtgaard J. Feasibility and acceptability of active book clubs in cancer survivors - an explorative investigation. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:471-478. [PMID: 28094664 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1277036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the increasing number of people surviving cancer is promising, the long-term health effects warrant broad, innovative interventions. We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of a 24-week intervention called 'Active Book Club' comprising audio book listening, pedometer walking and supervised book club meetings. MATERIAL AND METHODS An exploratory and descriptive design was applied. Qualitative data included baseline and post-intervention focus group interviews as well as post-intervention individual interviews. The study also included data on retention, attendance, and adherence. Seventeen self-referred cancer survivors with various oncological and sociodemographic backgrounds were included. RESULTS Eight (47%) participants completed the entire intervention. Their median attendance at the book club meetings was eight [interquartile range (IQR) 6-9] of nine possible, and they reached the walking step goal in a median of 11 (IQR 7-12) of the first 12 weeks, and seven (IQR 1-10) of the last 12 weeks. The qualitative analysis revealed five themes including: Motivation and expectations (i.e. reasons for enrollment), Attentive listening (i.e. experiences of the audio book format), Affected by the story (i.e. experiences of the content of the books), Group involvement (i.e. experiences of the book club meetings) and Walking regularly (i.e. experiences of the walking program). Overall, findings revealed that while audio books may bring new meaning to physical activity and serve as a relief from own concerns, certain stories may affect some individuals negatively. The substantial dropout rate, however, suggested that modification is necessary and that patient involvement in choice of literature may be critical to enhance acceptability. CONCLUSION The 'Active Book Club' represents a novel psychosocial intervention potentially supporting physical activity adoption and mental health in cancer survivors. However, several issues related to feasibility and acceptability including choice of literature genre, format and supervision of book club meetings need to be considered before larger scale clinical trials are initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Maria Hammer
- The University Hospitals’ Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Kofoed Egestad
- Department of Oncology and Palliation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Susanne Grøn Nielsen
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Eik Bjerre
- The University Hospitals’ Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Oncology Department, Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Unit of Survivorship Research, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Egerod
- University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernardine Pinto
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Julie Midtgaard
- The University Hospitals’ Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beshai S, Wallace LM, Mcdougall KH, Waldmann K, Stea JN. Reduced Contact Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions for Adult Depression: A Review. THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2015; 150:252-79. [PMID: 26606161 DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1087376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression is a highly prevalent and debilitating mental health condition. Evidence suggests that there is a widening gap between the demand for and availability of effective treatments. As such, there is a vast need for the development and dissemination of accessible and affordable treatments for depression. In the past decade, there has been a proliferation of reduced client-therapist contact protocols for depression. In this article, the authors review and compare the efficacy of reduced contact cognitive-behavioral interventions for adult depression across two degrees of therapist-client contact (i.e., no therapist-client contact versus minimal therapist-client contact interventions). The authors also discuss the methodological and theoretical limitations of this research base. The present review suggests that a) reduced contact interventions for depression can be effective in remediating the symptoms of depression; b) the effect sizes of some reduced contact protocols may approximate those reported in traditional protocols involving significantly greater client-therapist contact; and c) protocols which employ some form of client-therapist contact, on average, generate higher effect sizes than those that are purely self-help in nature. A discussion of the theoretical and applied implications of such findings, as well as areas in need of further research, is provided.
Collapse
|
7
|
Why has our recovery rate dropped? An audit examining waiting times, starting scores and length of treatment in relation to recovery within an IAPT service. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST 2015. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x15000148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) initiative was created to provide mental health services for those experiencing mild to moderate depression and anxiety. IAPT is commissioned on the basis that it achieves adequate performance on a number of ‘key performance indicators’, one of which is the proportion of clients who ‘move towards recovery’ following treatment. The impetus for the current evaluation was a significant reduction in the proportion of clients recovering within an IAPT service. Data for this clinical audit was obtained from IAPT electronic records (IAPTus). Three factors (waiting times, clinical contact and starting scores on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7) were examined and explored separately for each level of care (i.e. steps 2 and 3). These factors were analysed in relation to recovery and compared between periods of low and high recovery within the service. Results reveal that there was little change in the severity of clients’ starting scores between the periods of low and high recovery. Increased waiting time in the period of low recovery was not associated with recovery status. The amount of clinical contact was related to recovery at both time periods. Limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Twomey C, O'Reilly G, Byrne M. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract 2015; 32:3-15. [PMID: 25248976 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmu060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is increasingly being delivered in primary care, in a variety of delivery formats such as guided self-help CBT, telephone-based CBT, computerized CBT and standard, one-to-one CBT. However, the vast majority of research has focused on CBT in specialized services, and no previous meta-analysis has examined CBT's effectiveness across delivery formats in primary care. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of multi-modal CBT (i.e. CBT across delivery formats) for symptoms of anxiety and depression, in primary care. METHODS A meta-analysis of CBT-focused RCTs, for symptoms of anxiety or depression, in primary care. The authors searched four databases. To be included, RCTs had to be set in primary care or have primary care participants. RESULTS Twenty-nine RCTs were included in three separate meta-analyses. Results showed multi-modal CBT was more effective than no primary care treatment (d =0.59), and primary care treatment-as-usual (TAU) (d = 0.48) for anxiety and depression symptoms. Moreover, multi-modal CBT in addition to primary care TAU was shown to be more effective than primary care TAU for depression symptoms (no comparisons of this kind were available for anxiety) (d = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS The results from conducted meta-analyses indicate that multi-modal CBT is effective for anxiety and depression symptoms in primary care. Furthermore, based on CBT's economic viability, increasing the provision of CBT in primary care seems justified. Future research should examine if varying levels of qualification among primary care CBT practitioners impacts on the effectiveness of CBT in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conal Twomey
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gary O'Reilly
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Byrne
- Psychology Department, Health Service Executive Dublin Mid-Leinster, Offaly, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malhotra S, Chakrabarti S, Gupta A, Mehta A, Shah R, Kumar V, Sharma M. A self-guided relaxation module for telepsychiatric services: development, usefulness, and feasibility. Int J Psychiatry Med 2014; 46:325-37. [PMID: 24922985 DOI: 10.2190/pm.46.4.a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A modified form of the standard autogenic relaxation exercise was developed as part of a telepsychiatry project, which aims to deliver mental healthcare to remote areas through the net, and through the agency of non-specialists. This study describes the development and evaluation of a brief and simpler form of a relaxation technique, the Self-Guided Relaxation (SGR). METHOD SGR is a systematic technique to focus on muscle groups and feel the heaviness and relaxation through suggestions to induce relaxation in the body. The SGR was taught to 37 patients with different psychiatric disorders over two sessions a week apart. Measures of change used were scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and a visual analog scale. Its usefulness and feasibility was examined over a follow-up period of one month. Additionally a group of non-specialists was trained in SGR supplemented by audiovisual aids and printed instructions. These therapists rated the ease in learning and administering SGR in patients. RESULTS There was a consistent reduction in the HAM-A scores over the follow-up period among patients. Improvements were also noted in positive experiences, adherence, depth of relaxation achieved, perceived benefit, and patient satisfaction. Majority of the patients, relatives, and therapists reported that they could administer or practice SGR after having learned the technique in a single session lasting about 30 minutes. The use of audio-video aids and manual was helpful in making the process of learning easy. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary findings of usefulness, feasibility, and acceptance of the SGR were encouraging. These findings pave way for larger, randomized controlled study and for testing applicability of the SGR as a net-based psychological intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savita Malhotra
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Subho Chakrabarti
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Aarzoo Gupta
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Anurati Mehta
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Ruchita Shah
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Vineet Kumar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Minali Sharma
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and, Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mayo-Wilson E, Montgomery P. Media-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and behavioural therapy (self-help) for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD005330. [PMID: 24018460 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005330.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problems. They are chronic and unremitting. Effective treatments are available, but access to services is limited. Media-delivered behavioural and cognitive behavioural interventions (self-help) aim to deliver treatment with less input from professionals compared with traditional therapies. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of media-delivered behavioural and cognitive behavioural therapies for anxiety disorders in adults. SEARCH METHODS Published and unpublished studies were considered without restriction by language or date. The Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialized Register (CCDANCTR) was searched all years to 1 January 2013. The CCDANCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). Complementary searches were carried out on Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to 23 February 2013) and PsycINFO (1987 to February, Week 2, 2013), together with International trial registries (the trials portal of the World Health Organization (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov). Reference lists from previous meta-analyses and reports of randomised controlled trials were checked, and authors were contacted for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of media-delivered behavioural or cognitive behavioural therapy in adults with anxiety disorders (other than post-traumatic stress disorder) compared with no intervention (including attention/relaxation controls) or compared with face-to-face therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Both review authors independently screened titles and abstracts. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted in duplicate. Outcomes were combined using random-effects models, and tests for heterogeneity and for small study bias were conducted. We examined subgroup differences by type of disorder, type of intervention provided, type of media, and recruitment methods used. MAIN RESULTS One hundred and one studies with 8403 participants were included; 92 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. These trials compared several types of media-delivered interventions (with varying levels of support) with no treatment and with face-to-face interventions. Inconsistency and risk of bias reduced our confidence in the overall results. For the primary outcome of symptoms of anxiety, moderate-quality evidence showed medium effects compared with no intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.80; 72 studies, 4537 participants), and low-quality evidence of small effects favoured face-to-face therapy (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.09; 24 studies, 1360 participants). The intervention was associated with greater response than was seen with no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.81 to 3.03; 21 studies, 1547 participants) and was not significantly inferior to face-to-face therapy in these studies (RR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.56 to 1.09; 10 studies, 575 participants), but the latter comparison included versions of therapies that were not as comprehensive as those provided in routine clinical practice. Evidence suggested benefit for secondary outcome measures (depression, mental-health related disability, quality of life and dropout), but this evidence was of low to moderate quality. Evidence regarding harm was lacking. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Self-help may be useful for people who are not able or are not willing to use other services for people with anxiety disorders; for people who can access it, face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy is probably clinically superior. Economic analyses were beyond the scope of this review.Important heterogeneity was noted across trials. Recent interventions for specific problems that incorporate clinician support may be more effective than transdiagnostic interventions (i.e. interventions for multiple disorders) provided with no guidance, but these issues are confounded in the available trials.Although many small trials have been conducted, the generalisability of their findings is limited. Most interventions tested are not available to consumers. Self-help has been recommended as the first step in the treatment of some anxiety disorders, but the short-term and long-term effectiveness of media-delivered interventions has not been established. Large, pragmatic trials are needed to evaluate and to maximise the benefits of self-help interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK, WC1E 7HB
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bilsker D, Goldner EM, Anderson E. Supported self-management: a simple, effective way to improve depression care. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2012; 57:203-9. [PMID: 22480584 DOI: 10.1177/070674371205700402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To introduce supported self-management (SSM) for depression, examine it through the use of a quality assessment framework, and show its potential for enhancing the Canadian health care system. METHOD SSM is examined in terms of quality criteria: relevance, effectiveness, appropriateness, efficiency, safety, acceptability, and sustainability. Critical research is highlighted, and a case study is presented to illustrate the use of SSM with depressed patients. RESULTS SSM is defined by access to a self-management guide (workbook or website) plus encouragement and coaching by health care provider, family member, or other supporter. It has high relevance to depression care in Canada, high cost-effectiveness, high appropriateness for most people with depression, and high safety. Acceptability of this intervention is more problematic: many providers remain doubtful of its acceptability to their poorly motivated patients. Sustainability of SSM as a component of mental health care will require ongoing knowledge exchange among policy-makers, health care providers, and researchers. CONCLUSION The introduction of SSM represents a unique opportunity to enhance the delivery of depression care in Canada. Actively engaging the distressed individual in changing depressive patterns can improve outcomes without mobilizing substantial new resources. Over time, we will learn more about making SSM compatible with constraints on provider time, increasing access to self-management tools, and evaluating the benefit to everyday clinical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Bilsker
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|