1
|
Secret conversation opportunities facilitate minority influence in virtual groups: The influence on majority power, information processing, and decision quality. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
2
|
Rabinovich A, Morton TA. Things we (don’t) want to hear: Exploring responses to group-based feedback. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2015.1115214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
3
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanda Jetten
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia;
| | - Matthew J. Hornsey
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Esposo SR, Hornsey MJ, Spoor JR. Shooting the messenger: Outsiders critical of your group are rejected regardless of argument quality. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2013; 52:386-95. [DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2012] [Accepted: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R. Esposo
- The University of Queensland; St Lucia; Queensland; Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeffries CH, Hornsey MJ. Withholding negative feedback: Is it about protecting the self or protecting others? BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2012; 51:772-80. [DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02098.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
6
|
Cheng GHL, Fielding KS, Terry DJ. Responses of group members to procedural discrimination. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/1368430210390244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The current research examines how peripheral group members differ from prototypical group members in reacting to procedural discrimination (favoring self vs. favoring other procedures). Results of two experiments reveal that peripheral members react more negatively when the authority procedurally favors a prototypical member over them than when the authority favors them over a prototypical member. In contrast, reactions to procedural discrimination do not differ among prototypical members, and peripheral members paired with another peripheral member. The current research provides support for the literature on ingroup prototypicality, which argues that peripheral members are highly insecure about their inclusion in the group. It also furthers our insights into how group members’ responses to procedural experience are qualified by social identity concerns.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hiew DN, Hornsey MJ. Does time reduce resistance to out-group critics? An investigation of the persistence of the intergroup sensitivity effect over time. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2010; 49:569-81. [DOI: 10.1348/014466609x473938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
8
|
Hornsey MJ, Esposo S. Resistance to Group Criticism and Recommendations for Change: Lessons from the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS 2009. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00178.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Ariyanto A, Hornsey MJ, Gallois C. United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
10
|
Jetten J, Hornsey MJ, Spears R, Haslam SA, Cowell E. Rule transgressions in groups: The conditional nature of newcomers' willingness to confront deviance. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
11
|
Tekman HG, Hortaçsu N, Ok AB. Message content, group identification and the intergroup sensitivity effect: Responses to the message and recognition memory. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2008. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839x.2008.00268.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|