Public health in a managed care environment

Does Advanced Community/Public Health Nursing Practice Have a Future?

Societal trends and predicted needs of the health care system indicate that there will be increasing demands for health care professionals who can effectively manage the health needs of populations and communities. Nurses who have master's degrees in community/public health nursing have the educational background to provide this expertise. Although the Association of Community Health Nursing Educators and many nursing leaders maintain that these nurses are advanced practice nurses, most leading nursing organizations and state nurse practice acts do not include population and community health management skills in their definitions of advanced practice nursing. These exclusions have produced a serious status problem for master's programs in community/public health nursing. This article examines issues affecting the current and future status of master's-level community/public health nursing. Solutions are suggested for ensuring the viability of this specialty area.

The practice of nurse-midwifery in the era of managed care: reports from the field

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to describe the reports of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) about how changes in the financing and organization of health care in the late 1990s influenced their ability to serve vulnerable populations and provide a woman-centered, prevention-oriented midwifery model of care.

METHODS

A 13-page survey was mailed to all CNMs ever certified by the American College of Nurse-Midwives (N = 6365) in July 1998. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions. A total of 2405 CNMs responded: of these, 2089 were in clinical practice during the study period (1997-98) and 82% of the 2089 (N = 1704) wrote responses to the open-ended questions and were included in the qualitative database. We present responses to the closed-ended questions about seven domains of practice and elaborate on three major themes identified through content analysis of the qualitative data.

RESULTS

The majority (57%) reported that the changes in the larger health care environment had influenced their practices during 1997-98. The effects most frequently reported were 1) increased client loads (31%); 2) altered style of practice (30%): 3) inability to serve the same populations; (20%); 4) decreased client loads (20%); and 5) increased administrative duties (17%). Three major themes were identified and elaborated upon in the qualitative data: 1) challenges to the style of midwifery practice related to the managed care environment; 2) the loss of socially and economically at-risk women from CNMs' client base; and 3) barriers to high quality and comprehensive services for women.

CONCLUSIONS

During the late 1990s as managed care was expanding and health systems were merging, a significant number of CNMs in the field described threats to their ability to sustain economically viable practices and a style of care consistent with the woman-centered, prevention-oriented midwifery model.

Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. A model for overcoming barriers between managed care and public health. The IOM Workshop on the Role of Health Plans in STD Prevention

CONTEXT

The growth of managed care has spurred re-evaluation of the roles and responsibilities of public health agencies and private health plans for providing public health services. Although rates of curable sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States are the highest in the developed world, many clinicians and managed care organizations are not systematically providing high-quality, comprehensive STD-related services to their patients and the community.

OBJECTIVE

To examine issues around managed care and STD prevention as a model for overcoming barriers that impede managed care organizations from providing comprehensive public health services and collaborating with health agencies.

SETTING

Two-day invitational workshop.

PARTICIPANTS

Representatives from 18 health plans, 10 public health agencies, 6 academic institutions, 1 purchasing coalition, and 5 other health organizations.

RESULTS

Major obstacles include: turnover and heterogeneity in the health care system; deficiencies in clinical knowledge and skills; differences in organizational culture and language; low priority of STDs; inadequate public health surveillance data and performance measures; confidentiality concerns; and lack of coverage for sex partners.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential approaches for addressing these barriers include: requiring that STD-related services be covered by Medicaid managed care programs; implementing performance measures; requiring collaborative activities; promoting education of and outreach to stakeholders; funding of pilot projects; and researching the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of STD-related services for various populations.

Managed care and public health departments: who is responsible for the health of the population?

This review examines changes over the past decade in the delivery of health care in the United States, specifically the move toward managed care and capitation. Over 77 million Americans are now enrolled in health maintenance organizations, and the health care delivery system is reorganizing into large group practices and integrated health systems. Examined here are the implications of this shift on the interaction between managed care and public health agencies. How will a population-based system of health care be achieved in light of managed care organizations' responsibility only for their enrolled population, in contrast to the responsibility of the public health service for the entire population? Where does the responsibility of MCOs end and that of public health begin? Should certain public health functions be absorbed by managed care organizations? What are the prospects for partnership between these two systems?