Effect of teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] on BMD when given to postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy

Factors associated with bone response to teriparatide in young postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the factors associated with changes in vertebral bone mineral density during teriparatide treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single centre, longitudinal study involving 145 osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide. Clinical evaluation, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements assessment and laboratory analyses were performed at baseline then after 12 and 18 months of treatment. Bone non-response to treatment was defined as no significant increase in BMD at 18 months as compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 145 women initially included, 109 completed the 18-month course of the treatment. 75% of them had a history of prior osteoporotic treatment. Baseline mean age was 60 ± 8 years. Mean baseline vertebral T-score was - 3.7 ± 0.7 and 83 (76%) women had suffered at least one vertebral fracture. At the end of treatment, 18 women (17%) were classified as non-responders. In the responder group (n = 91), vertebral BMD increased by 0.091 ± 0.04 g/cm2 (12.2 ± 5.3%). Clinical characteristics, baseline BMDs and the percentage of women previously treated with bisphosphonates as well as the duration of prior treatment did not significantly differ between the two groups of responders and non-responders. At baseline, non-responders had significant mean lower C-terminal fragment of type 1 collagen (CTX) values than responders (p < 0.01). Only baseline CTX values (r = 0.30 p < 0.01) were independently correlated to vertebral BMD changes during teriparatide treatment.

CONCLUSION

A minority of treated women had no vertebral densitometric gain after 18 months of teriparatide therapy. Low levels of baseline bone remodeling were the main factor associated with poor response to treatment.

Combination and sequential treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Introduction: Since postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic, potentially disabling condition requiring long-term treatment, the physician is expected to decide the optimal treatment strategy, e.g. how to use the available osteoanabolic and antiresorptive agents, sequentially or in combination, in the most effective and safe way, based on personalized patient care.Areas covered: Herein, the authors outline clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of various sequential treatment strategies. More specifically, they compare the efficacy of osteoanabolic agents when they precede or follow antiresorptive treatment, as well as the efficacy of antiresorptives following other antiresorptives. Finally, the authors quote and discuss available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the co-administration of osteoanabolics and antiresorptives in comparison with monotherapies.Expert opinion: Initiation with an osteoanabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive seems to be the optimal treatment sequence, at least in patients with severe osteoporosis. Osteoanabolic treatment following antiresorptives seems to lead in more modest responses in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. Combination therapy with teriparatide and denosumab or zoledronate has achieved higher BMD gains compared to each agent alone; however, due to the high cost, combination therapy is rarely compensated. On the contrary, the combination of teriparatide with alendronate results in smaller BMD increases than TPTD monotherapy.

Combination therapy with parathyroid hormone analogs and antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Combination therapy with parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs and antiresorptive agents may be more effective than monotherapy for the treatment of osteoporosis. This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for osteoporosis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 1, 2018, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration of at least 6 months on adults with osteoporosis treated with combination therapy versus monotherapy. Outcomes included fractures, bone mineral density (BMD) changes, and adverse events. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model, to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for fractures, and mean differences (MDs) for BMD changes. A total of 19 RCTs and 2177 patients were included. Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy had an advantage of 36% (RR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.98) regarding fracture risk reduction. It also appears to improve lumbar spine BMD by 4.06% (95%CI = 2.60-5.53) and total hip BMD by 1.89% (95%CI = 1.25-2.53). No RCT reported an increased risk of serious adverse events. Among patients with osteoporosis, combination therapy was superior to monotherapy regarding improvement of the lumbar spine and total hip BMD, without risk of serious adverse events. Combination therapy also had an advantage over monotherapy on fracture risk reduction. However, owing to the limited sample size, additional larger studies are required to confirm this benefit.

Optimizing Sequential and Combined Anabolic and Antiresorptive Osteoporosis Therapy

As osteoporosis therapy options have expanded, and clinical guidelines have begun to embrace the concept of limited treatment courses and “drug holidays,” the choices that physicians must make when initiating, electing to continue, or switching therapies have become more complex. As a result, one of the fundamental issues that must be carefully considered is whether, when, and in what sequence anabolic therapies should be utilized. This review evaluates the current evidence supporting the optimal sequence for the use of anabolic and antiresorptive drugs and assesses the expanding number of clinical trials favoring the initial use of anabolic therapy followed by an antiresorptive agent. This review also explores the evidence suggesting that the effectiveness of anabolic medications are diminished when used in patients that have been previously treated with specific antiresorptive drugs for prolonged periods. Finally, the recent advances in designing combination antiresorptive/anabolic treatment approaches are detailed, with a focus on combined denosumab/teriparatide regimens, which appear to provide the most substantial and clinically relevant skeletal benefits to patients with established osteoporosis. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Combination therapy of anabolic and nonbisphosphonates antiresorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

According to the mechanisms of action, combination therapy of anabolic and antiresorptive agents may produce more effect for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, the combination therapy of anabolic agents and bisphosphonates reports no benefit and even reduced the anabolic effects of anabolic agents. This study aims to assess the effect of combination therapy of anabolic and nonbisphosphonates antiresorptive agents in adults with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1980 to November 1, 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with osteoporosis treated in combination therapy of anabolic and nonbisphosphonates antiresorptive agents compared with monotherapy of either agent alone. The primary outcome was the incidence of fractures. The secondary outcomes were the bone mineral density (BMD) changes at lumbar spine and total hip. Continuous outcomes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI), while dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. I statistic (I > 50% as a threshold indicates significant heterogeneity) was used to assess the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 10 trials with a total of 1042 patients were included. The pooled results showed that the combination therapy demonstrated a significant advantage over a monotherapy in the BMD improvement at the lumbar spine (SMD 1.18; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.72; I = 93%) and the total hip (SMD 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.29; I = 88%) and further reduce the fracture risk (RR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.21 to 0.94; I = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-to-moderate-quality evidence shows that the combination therapy of anabolic and nonbisphosphonates antiresorptive agents is superior to monotherapy in improving the BMD and reducing the fracture risk. However, further high methodological quality studies are needed to determine the antifracture efficacy, cost-effectiveness and safety of this strategy of combination therapy.

Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this review is to update evidence regarding the use of osteoporosis drugs in sequence or in combination to optimize increases in bone mass and strength.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simultaneous use of denosumab plus teriparatide produces larger increases in BMD than does monotherapy. The use of bisphosphonates or denosumab after teriparatide results in progressive gains in BMD. When switching from bisphosphonates and especially denosumab to teriparatide, an overlap of 6-12 months may prevent the transient loss of BMD in cortical sites. Phase 3 trials document fracture risk reduction with anabolic therapy for 12-18 months followed by an anti-remodeling drug. With the exception of adding teriparatide to ongoing denosumab therapy, there is little evidence to support the use of more than one osteoporosis drug at a time. In contrast, sequential therapy regimens of anabolic drugs followed by potent anti-remodeling agents will be the new standard for treating patients at imminent risk of fracture.

The effects of parathyroid hormone peptides on the peripheral skeleton of postmenopausal women. A systematic review

Given current developments in anabolic therapy for bone, we wished to document the effects of the only currently available anabolic therapy, parathyroid hormone (PTH) peptides, on the peripheral skeleton of postmenopausal women. We undertook a systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (final update 28th March 2016). Additional studies were identified through searches of bibliographies. Studies included those comparing PTH peptides with placebo, with anti-osteoporotic treatments and in combination therapies. Participants had to be postmenopausal women and outcomes included areal or volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and measurements of bone microarchitecture at peripheral sites, such as the forearm and tibia. Data were extracted independently and reviewed by EVM and LMM. Data on study design were also collected for methodological risk of bias assessment. The heterogeneity between studies, regarding the drug dose and duration, and the site measured, prevented grouped meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in areal BMD between PTH peptides and placebo at peripheral skeletal sites at 12months. A decrease in aBMD occurred with PTH(1-34) (larger dose) and PTH(1-84) treatment at 18months follow-up in comparison to the placebo arms. Anti-resorptives seemed to attenuate losses of aBMD at peripheral sites when compared to PTH peptides monotherapy, likely mediated by lower cortical porosity. Finally, PTH peptides combined with bisphosphonates or denosumab attenuated peripheral BMD losses in comparison to PTH peptide monotherapy, with evidence of increased BMD at ultradistal peripheral sites when PTH(1-34) was combined with denosumab or hormone replacement therapy. This summary should act as a reference point for the comparison of new anabolic therapies, specifically in comparison to PTH(1-34).

Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Analogs in Osteoporosis Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose is to review the efficacy and optimal use of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein analogs in osteoporosis treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The parathyroid hormone analog teriparatide, a potent stimulator of bone remodeling, increases hip and spine bone mineral density and reduces the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The parathyroid hormone-related protein analog, abaloparatide, also reduces fracture incidence but has pharmacological effects that differ from teriparatide, particularly in cortical bone. These analogs provide maximal benefit when their use is followed by a potent antiresorptive medication. Moreover, studies have shown that the combination of teriparatide and the RANK-ligand inhibitor, denosumab, increase bone density and estimated strength more than monotherapy and more than any currently available regimen. Parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related protein analogs, whether as monotherapy, in combination with antiresorptive agents or in sequence with antiresorptive agents, will likely play an expanding role in osteoporosis management.

Combined Pharmacologic Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Antiresorptive agents for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis include selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), bisphosphonates and denoumab. Teriparatide is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved anabolic agent. Synergistic effects of combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent have been proposed and studied. This article reviews the trial designs and the outcomes of combination therapies. Results of the combination therapy for teriparatide and bisphosphonates were mixed; while small increases of bone density were observed in the combination therapy of teriparatide and estrogen/SERM and that of teriparatide and denosumab. Those clinical studies were limited by small sample sizes and lack of fracture outcomes.

Use of combination therapy in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised trials

INTRODUCTION

The existing medications approved for treatment of primary osteoporosis can be divided into antiresorptive drugs and anabolic drugs. According to the mechanisms of action, the combined therapy may produce a synergistic effect on bone mineral density (BMD) compared with monotherapy, and thus improves the efficacy of fracture resistance. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacies of different combined methods for the treatment of primary osteoporosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases will be searched to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of combined therapy versus monotherapy for primary osteoporosis. The primary outcome will be the BMD changes at the lumbar spine and total hip, and the secondary outcome will be the risks of vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture. The efficacies of different combined methods will be compared via traditional pairwise meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because this is a protocol for a systematic review without including confidential personal data or data on interventions on patients. Our results will be published in a peer-review journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42016038569.

Antiresorptives and anabolic therapy in sequence or combination for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease which may require treatment for many years and requires not only individual management but often sequential or combination treatments. Monotherapy with antiresorptives is usually the first choice. Sometimes, it is necessary to modify this option for therapeutic failure or for the time of use and risk of side-effects. Due to their different mode of action, therapy with anabolic drugs has increased our options in the treatment of osteoporosis. Postmenopausal women and men with severe and progressive osteoporosis despite antiresorptive treatment ('therapeutic failure') should be evaluated for treatment with an anabolic option. Moreover, anabolic agents are indicated for 18-24 months in patients at high risk. Then, sequential antiresorptive therapy is recommended to maintain drug increases in bone mass and support secondary mineralization of the newly formed bone. Combination therapies of antiresorptives and anabolic agents have shown a significant increase in bone mineral density compared to monotherapies. However, none of the combinations have been studied for the prevention of fractures. Combination therapy may not be recommended because of the possible increase in cost.

Single and combined use of human parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-34) on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: evidence based on 9 RCTs

Background

Human parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-34) or teriparatide (TPTD) is an anabolic agent for osteoporosis. This recombinant protein stimulates positive bone formation balance and bone remodeling. However, when concomitantly used with antiresorptive (AR) agents, previous studies reported conflicting results in their potential additive and synergistic effects on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to integrate previous evidence to assess the effect of TPTD monotherapy and the additive effect of TPTD on AR agents in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Material/Methods

This meta-analysis identified 9 RCTs from databases. To assess the therapeutic effect on osteoporosis, the weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used to pool the percentage change of BMD along with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). BMD of 3 skeletal sites, including lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were assessed.

Results

TPTD alone could significantly improve BMD of all 3 skeletal sites compared with placebo, although the effect on the femoral neck was less conclusive. The additive effect of TPTD over hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and denosumab (DEN) agents is evident in all 3 skeletal sites. But TPTD plus Alendronate (ALN) did not demonstrate additive effect in total hip and femoral neck.

Conclusions

TPTD alone could significantly improve BMD of lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. BMD outcomes of concomitant use of TPTD and AR agents are site-dependent and vary depending on the specific AR agent used and the timing of AR therapy initiation.

Anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis: combination and sequential approaches

In the recent Bone Key Reports review, it was noted that combinations of anabolic and antiresorptive agents have potential to improve bone density and bone strength more than either agent as monotherapy. Small clinical trials have been performed evaluating combinations of PTH1-34 (TPTD) or PTH1-84 (PTH) with a variety of antiresorptives including hormone/estrogen therapy, raloxifene, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid, and denosumab. Most of the studies evaluate dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry outcomes, and a few trials report volumetric mineral density (BMD) by quantitative computed tomography, followed by finite element modeling to calculate bone strength. None of the studies has been powered to assess differences in fracture incidence between combination therapy and monotherapy. BMD outcomes vary based on the timing of introduction of the anabolic agent (before, during, or after antiresorptive treatment), as well as the specific anabolic and antiresorptive used. Furthermore, effects of combination therapies are site-dependent. The most consistent effect of combining antiresorptive agents with PTH or TPTD is a superior hip BMD outcome compared with TPTD/PTH alone. This is most evident when TPTD/PTH is combined with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. In contrast to findings in the hip, in the majority of studies, there is no benefit to spine BMD with combination therapy vs monotherapy. The 2 exceptions to this are when TPTD is combined with denosumab and when TPTD is given as monotherapy first for 9 months, followed by the addition of alendronate (with continuation administration of TPTD). Based on what we now know, in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates who suffer hip fractures or who have very low or declining hip BMD, strong consideration should be given to starting TPTD and continuing a potent antiresorptive agent (possibly switching to zoledronic acid or denosumab) to improve hip BMD and strength quickly. Furthermore, in treatment naïve individuals with very severe osteoporosis, such as those with spine and hip fractures, combination therapy with TPTD and denosumab or TPTD followed by combination treatment with a potent bisphosphonate or denosumab should be considered to maximize early increases in BMD throughout the skeleton (Cosman BoneKEy Rep 3, 2014).

Biological agents in management of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease associated with an imbalance between formation and resorption, leading to net loss of bone mass, loss of bone microarchitecture, and development of fractures. Bone resorption is primarily due to an activation of osteoclastogenesis and an increase in receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) expression, a cytokine involved in the final pathway of the osteoclast cycle.Recent studies of genetic diseases led to the discovery of the wingless-type (Wnt) signaling pathway that plays a major role in bone formation. Further work showed that sclerostin produced by osteocytes and the Dickkopf (DKK1) protein secreted in bone were negative regulators of the Wnt signaling bone formation pathway that act directly by binding to the co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6 of WnT and thereby inhibiting the anabolic Wnt pathway. This understanding of the bone remodeling led to the discovery of new biological drugs that target these pathways and have been evaluated in clinical trials.The current article discusses the role of these newer "biological" agents in management of osteoporosis. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds RANKL, blocks the binding of RANK to its ligand markedly reducing bone resorption, increases bone density, and reduces fractures and is approved for osteoporosis. Parathyroid hormone PTH 1-34 (teriparatide) stimulates bone formation through inhibition of sclerostin, DKK1, and frizzled protein; increases BMD; improves microarchitecture; and decreases fractures and is approved for osteoporosis. The anti-sclerostin antibodies (romosozumab, blosozumab) increase bone mass by neutralizing the negative effects of sclerostin on the Wnt signaling pathway. These biologics are being evaluated now in a clinical trial and early data looks promising. Cathepsin K is a proteolytic enzyme that degrades bone matrix and inhibitors such as odanacatib show increasing bone density and perhaps decreased fractures. The potential power of combining these newer antiresorptives with the newer anabolic agents could theoretically increase bone mass rapidly to normal within 1 year and reduce fractures. These newer treatments are revolutionizing the management of osteoporosis.

Combination therapy for osteoporosis: a reappraisal

Combinations of anabolic and antiresorptive agents have potential to improve bone density and bone strength more than either agent alone. A large number of relatively small clinical trials have been performed evaluating combinations of PTH1-34 or PTH1-84 with a variety of antiresorptives, including hormone/estrogen therapy, raloxifene, alendronate (Aln), risedronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid and denosumab (Dmab). Most of the studies evaluate dual-X-ray densitometry outcomes, with a few trials reporting volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) by quantitative computed tomography followed by finite element modeling of bone strength. None of the studies has been powered to assess differences in fracture incidence between combination therapy and monotherapy. BMD outcomes vary depending on the timing of introduction of the anabolic agent (before, during or after antiresorptive treatment), as well as according to the specific anabolic and antiresorptive used. Furthermore, effects of combination therapies are site dependent. The most consistent effect of combining antiresorptive agents with parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a superior hip BMD outcome compared with PTH alone. This is most evident when PTH is combined with a bisphosphonate or Dmab. In contrast to findings in the hip, in the majority of studies there is no benefit to spine BMD with combination therapy when compared with monotherapy. The two exceptions to this are when PTH is combined with Dmab and when PTH is given as monotherapy first for 9 months followed by the addition of Aln and continuation of PTH as combination treatment. On the basis of what we now know, in patients on bisphosphonates who suffer hip fractures or who have very low hip BMD, strong consideration should be given to starting teriparatide and continuing a bisphosphonate (possibly switching to zoledronic acid or even Dmab) to maximize hip BMD and strength. Furthermore, in treatment-naive individuals with very severe osteoporosis, such as those with spine and hip fractures, combination therapy with PTH and Dmab or PTH followed by combination treatment with a potent bisphosphonate or Dmab should be considered to maximize early increases in BMD.

Antiresorptives overlapping ongoing teriparatide treatment result in additional increases in bone mineral density

During teriparatide (TPTD) treatment, high levels of bone formation are accompanied by an increase in bone resorption. The aim of this work was to test if coadministration of raloxifene (RAL) or alendronate (ALN) following 9 months of ongoing TPTD therapy would reopen the anabolic window, thereby exerting additional benefit on bone mineral density (BMD). Postmenopausal women (n = 125) with severe osteoporosis on TPTD treatment for 9 months were randomized into three open-label groups for a further 9 months: ALN (70 mg/week) in addition to TPTD; RAL (60 mg/d) in addition to TPTD; or no medication in addition to TPTD. Amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) and cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX), and areal and volumetric BMD at the lumbar spine and hip were assessed. During the combination period, P1NP concentrations did not change on TPTD monotherapy (693% ± 371%, p < 0.0001) and decreased in the ALN (360% ± 153%, p < 0.0001) and RAL (482% ± 243%, p < 0.0001) combination groups; whereas CTX did not change on TPTD monotherapy (283% ± 215%, p < 0.0001), decreased to the starting level in the ALN combination group (17% ± 72%, p = 0.39), and remained elevated in the RAL combination group (179% ± 341%, p < 0.0001). The increase in lumbar spine BMD was 5% ± 6.3% in the ALN and 6% ± 5.2% in the RAL combination groups compared with 2.8% ± 9.3% in the TPTD monotherapy group (p = 0.085 and p = 0.033, respectively). The increase of trabecular lumbar spine BMD for both the ALN and RAL combination groups was superior to TPTD monotherapy. Total hip BMD changes were 4% ± 5.3% for the ALN combination group and 1.4% ± 5.1% for the TPTD monotherapy (p = 0.032), and 1.4% ± 3.4% (p = 0.02) for the RAL combination group. With the exception of no differences in the trabecular compartment of femoral neck, volumetric BMD changes in the ALN combination group for all other comparisons were significantly superior to the two other groups. Our data suggest that ALN when added to TPTD 9 months after initiation of TPTD monotherapy results in a more robust increase in BMD, probably due to a reopening of the anabolic window. The clinical relevance of the BMD increase is unknown.

Anabolic therapies for osteoporosis

As the first FDA-approved anabolic agent for osteoporosis, teriparatide has proven effective for people at highest risk of fracture, despite limitations of expense, route of delivery, and length of treatment. Available data show that combination therapy with teriparatide and antiresorptive agents does not offer a therapeutic advantage. However, treatment with an antiresorptive agent after teriparatide discontinuation is essential to prevent the ensuing bone loss. Although pretreatment with bisphosphonates may somewhat attenuate the anabolic effect of teriparatide, significant gains in bone mineral density are still achieved and prior bisphosphonate use should not dissuade clinicians from using teriparatide in select patients.

Effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density and fracture in postmenopausal osteoporosis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

To determine the efficacy of teriparatide supplementation for improving bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis and if effects vary with factors. We identified eight randomised controlled trials (n = 2388) using electronic databases, supplemented by a hand-search of the reference lists. All trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of daily subcutaneous teriparatide injection in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The main outcomes were fracture risk and percentage change of BMD from baseline. Data were pooled by employing a random-effect model. In trials that reported BMD as an outcome, treatment was associated with an increase of bone mass of 8.14% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.72-9.55%; eight trials, n = 2206] in spine and 2.48% (95% CI: 1.67-3.29%; seven trials, n = 1303) at the hip. In trials that reported fracture as an outcome, treatment was associated with a 70% risk reduction in vertebral fractures (risk ratio 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21-0.44; three trials, n = 1452) and 38% risk reduction in non-vertebral fractures (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.87; three trials, n = 1842). The PTH treatment with total calcium intake more than 1500 mg was related to a significant increase in BMD gains at total hip (1.40% vs. 3.72%; p = 0.004). However, long-term duration did not appear to contribute to differences in responsiveness to teriparatide. Evidence supports the use of teriparatide in treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who are at risk for fracture. Further studies directly comparing concurrent therapy and calcium supplement with long-term duration are warranted.

[2011 Up-date of the consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on osteoporosis]

OBJECTIVE

Due to increasing improvement in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis and the development of new tools and drugs, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and other health professionals involved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on a systematic review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and available clinical guidelines was used.

RESULTS

We have produced recommendations on diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis. These recommendations include the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, premenopausal and male osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the SER recommendations related to the biologic therapy risk management.

Teriparatide: Its Use in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

The prevalence of osteoporosis is likely to rise with the increase in life expectancy of an ageing population. Current first line therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis are predominantly anti-resorptive. Teriparatide is a first in class, anabolic agent with a unique mechanism that results in increased bone formation. Daily subcutaneous injection for 6–24 months was effective in reducing vertebral and non-vertebral fracture rates, in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and in increasing bone formation rates in postmenopausal osteoporosis, with effects persisting following treatment cessation. Similar benefits on bone mass and bone formation were seen in men with osteoporosis and glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. Beneficial effects on bone mass have been demonstrated in treatment naive subjects treated with teriparatide alone, sequentially with anti-resorptive therapy and concomitantly with some, but not all, anti-resorptive treatments due to an early blunting of the anabolic effect. Teriparatide is generally well tolerated. However, the high treatment cost and inconvenient mode of administration has limited it's use to patients with osteoporosis who have experienced an unsatisfactory response, who are intolerant to other osteoporosis therapies, or to patients at very high risk of fracture. Teriparatide treatment is currently restricted to a total lifetime treatment dose of 18 months of daily subcutaneous therapy due to concerns from animal studies suggesting an increased risk of osteosarcoma. More safety data may permit a longer duration of treatment in the future but will necessitate prolonged human studies. Teriparatide may serve a more prominent role in the treatment of older patients who continue to fracture despite low bone turnover or sustain side effects with anti-resorptive therapy.

Back pain during different sequential treatment regimens of teriparatide: results from EUROFORS

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in back pain in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis who received teriparatide for 24 months or switched at 12 months to raloxifene or no active treatment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective, controlled, randomised, open-label, 2-year study enrolled 868 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and a recent fragility fracture. After 12 months of teriparatide (20 microg/day), 507 patients were randomised to further teriparatide (n = 305), raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 100), or no active treatment (n = 102) for another 12 months (substudy 1); in substudy 2, 199 patients continued teriparatide. All received calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Back pain was self-assessed by patients using a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm). Changes in back pain were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

During year 1, back pain decreased from a mean (SD) of 48.9 mm (24.0) at baseline by 11.5 mm (p < 0.001) in the total study population. In substudy 1, mean change in back pain from month 12 (randomisation) to 24 months was -2.2, -4.4 and +0.7 mm in the teriparatide (p = 0.076), raloxifene (p = 0.041), and no active treatment groups (p = 0.751). There were no between-group differences from randomization to 18 or 24 months. In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with low baseline back pain (VAS < 30 mm), mean change from randomisation to endpoint was significant for teriparatide (-3.9 mm, p = 0.006) and raloxifene (-6.3 mm, p = 0.018) groups. Subgroup analyses of 503 patients who received teriparatide for up to 2 years showed that patients with a recent vertebral fracture had a greater decrease in back pain than those without (p < 0.05). Those with and without mild back pain (>or=30 mm), and those with and without severe back pain (>or=60 mm) at baseline all had a statistically significant reduction in back pain after 24 months (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide treatment is associated with significant reductions in back pain regardless of the presence of recent vertebral fracture. These results need to be considered with caution due to the open-label design of the study.

Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, and total body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69).

RESULTS

DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker).

CONCLUSION

Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.

Effects of teriparatide retreatment in osteoporotic men and women

CONTEXT

The stimulatory effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover is initially exuberant, but then diminishes.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine whether retreating with teriparatide after a drug-free period can restore the initial exuberant response to teriparatide.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a planned extension of a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Subjects previously participated in a 30-month randomized trial comparing the effects of alendronate (group 1), teriparatide (group 2), or both (group 3) on BMD and bone turnover in men and women with low BMD (phase 1). Subjects who completed phase 1 on their assigned therapy entered phase 2 (months 30-42), during which teriparatide was stopped in groups 2 and 3. Teriparatide was administered to all subjects during months 42 to 54 (phase 3).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We compared changes in BMD and markers of bone turnover (serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide) between phase 1 and 3 in subjects receiving teriparatide alone.

RESULTS

Posterior-anterior and lateral spine BMD increased 12.5 +/- 1.5 and 16.9 +/- 1.7%, respectively, during the first 12 months of teriparatide administration and 5.2 +/- 0.8 and 6.2 +/- 1.8%, respectively, during teriparatide retreatment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Increases in osteocalcin (P < 0.001), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P < 0.001), and N-telopeptide (P < 0.001) were greater during the first period of teriparatide administration.

CONCLUSION

The response to teriparatide is attenuated when readministered after a 12-month hiatus.

Parathyroid hormone treatment for osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has recently been a dramatic expansion of clinical investigation of parathyroid hormone (PTH). There are no other anabolic agents on the horizon at the current time but clearly there are a large number of questions that remain about this powerful agent for osteoporosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present study reviews clinical trials using PTH alone and in combination and sequence with antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal women and briefly overviews trials in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men. PTH will be referred to as teriparatide when it is the recombinant human PTH(1-34) fragment produced by Lilly (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) or the human PTH(1-34) produced by biochemical synthetic methods (Bachem, California, USA); and PTH(1-84) as the intact human recombinant molecule developed by NPS Pharmaceuticals (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA). PTH without other designation denotes either of the compounds.

SUMMARY

Because PTH improves microarchitecture, macroarchitecture and mass of bone, it might produce better long-term protection against fracture, when given first and followed by antiresorptive therapy, compared with antiresorptive agents alone. Results of studies on combination therapy must distinguish previously untreated vs. previously treated individuals. PTH should be considered in women with persistent osteoporosis on established bisphosphonates or raloxifene, in which adding PTH might produce better results than switching to PTH. There are still many unanswered questions concerning PTH therapy, one of the most important being the optimal regimen.

Combination therapy for treatment of osteoporosis: A review

Combination therapy for osteoporosis has been tested in small trials of short duration with various combinations. Pertinent human and animal randomized clinical trial data were identified through Medline and reviewed with a focus on the risks and benefits of different types of combination therapies. Improvements in bone density were found in some, but not all, combinations. There are no large trials of adequate length or numbers to determine fracture efficacy. Consider combination therapy if monotherapy is unsuccessful, if there is an added nonskeletal benefit to the proposed combination or as sequential treatment with an anabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive agent. Although combination therapy, in general, has limitations based on cost, concern about potential oversuppression of bone, and lack of long-term safety and fracture efficacy, selected patients may benefit.

Occurrence of hypercalciuria in patients with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide

CONTEXT

Teriparatide (TPTD) [recombinant human PTH(1-34)] given sc once daily transiently increases serum calcium concentrations at 4-6 h after dosing, but its effects on urinary calcium excretion are less well studied.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate urinary calcium excretion, a prespecified safety endpoint, for up to 12 months of TPTD treatment.

DESIGN

This study included two prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2074 participants with osteoporosis or low bone mass (study 1, 1637 postmenopausal women; study 2, 437 men) were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were given calcium (1000 mg/d) and vitamin D (400-1200 IU/d) supplements, and were randomized to placebo, TPTD 20 mug/d, or TPTD 40 mug/d.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Urinary calcium excretion was measured in 24-h collections at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

In each study, baseline urinary calcium excretion was similar among groups. All groups had significantly increased urinary calcium excretion, compared with baseline, at most post-baseline time points. Post-baseline urinary calcium excretion was increased in the TPTD 20 microg/d group by up to 32 mg/d compared with placebo at the same time point (P < 0.05) in study 1. A total of seven participants (0.3%), of which three and four were in the placebo and TPTD groups, respectively, discontinued study drug due to repeated hypercalciuria (>300 mg/d).

CONCLUSION

Urinary calcium excretion was increased with TPTD treatment for up to 12 months, compared with placebo and baseline values, but the magnitude of these changes is unlikely to be clinically relevant or warrant urinary calcium monitoring for most patients.

Weaning triggers a decrease in receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand expression, widespread osteoclast apoptosis, and rapid recovery of bone mass after lactation in mice

A significant portion of milk calcium comes from the mother's skeleton, and lactation is characterized by rapid bone loss. The most remarkable aspect of this bone loss is its complete reversibility, and the time after weaning is the most rapid period of skeletal anabolism in adults. Despite this, little is known of the mechanisms by which the skeleton repairs itself after lactation. We examined changes in bone and calcium metabolism defining the transition from bone loss to bone recovery at weaning in mice. Bone mass decreases during lactation and recovers rapidly after weaning. Lactation causes changes in bone microarchitecture, including thinning and perforation of trabecular plates that are quickly repaired after weaning. Weaning causes a rapid decline in urinary C-telopeptide levels and stimulates an increase in circulating levels of osteocalcin. Bone histomorphometry documented a significant reduction in the numbers of osteoclasts on d 3 after weaning caused by a coordinated wave of osteoclast apoptosis beginning 48 h after pup removal. In contrast, osteoblast numbers and bone formation rates, which are elevated during lactation, remain so 3 d after weaning. The cessation of lactation stimulates an increase in circulating calcium levels and a reciprocal decrease in PTH levels. Finally, weaning is associated with a decrease in levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand mRNA in bone. In conclusion, during lactation, bone turnover is elevated, and bone loss is rapid. Weaning causes selective apoptosis of osteoclasts halting bone resorption. The sudden shift in bone turnover favoring bone formation subsequently contributes to the rapid recovery of bone mass.

Osteoporosis: differences and similarities in male and female patients

Osteoporosis is associated with decreased bone strength as a consequence of decreased bone density and altered quality. It is a result of a disruption of balance between bone breakdown and bone formation, caused by increased bone resorption by osteoclasts or without appropriate screening, one's first awareness of the disease is a fracture. It results in increased mortality and significant morbidity. In the last decade, great strides have been made in defining the diagnosis and establishing effective modes of treatment for this disorder. Our current state of knowledge indicates that although this disease affects both sexes, there are clear differences that have clinical importance.

Reduction in the risk of developing back pain persists at least 30 months after discontinuation of teriparatide treatment: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] reduces fracture risk, and in a published meta-analysis of clinical trials, teriparatide-treated patients had reduced incidence of back pain relative to placebo or to antiresorptive drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate back pain in teriparatide-treated versus comparator-treated patients during an interval including controlled clinical trials plus 30 months of additional follow-up.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of four completed randomized, double-blinded trials of teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] versus comparator was performed. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the heterogeneity of results and to estimate the relative risk of back pain.

RESULTS

Patients in the pooled teriparatide group had reduced risk for any back pain [relative risk, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.87)], moderate or severe back pain [0.72 (0.58-0.89)], and severe back pain [0.39 (0.25-0.61)] compared with pooled controls, from initiation of the study drug through the end of follow-up. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust to the removal of each individual trial from the meta-analysis. Separate meta-analyses comparing teriparatide versus placebo or antiresorptive drugs gave similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide-treated patients had a reduced incidence of back pain versus those receiving a comparator during an observation encompassing clinical trials plus 30 months of posttreatment observation.