Visual performance after LASIK for a Q-optimized and a standard ablation algorithm

Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies examining the safety and efficacy of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treating myopia have yielded inconsistent results. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to clarify this issue METHODS:: Various databases were conducted up to November 21, 2018. All randomized controlled trials and cohorts that compared Q-value-guided LASIK with standard LASIK were selected. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlations. Additionally, different subgroup analyses and publication bias tests were performed. Data were extracted including the number of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, postoperative UCVA, preoperative and postoperative Q-value, postoperative refractive spherical equivalent (SE), the number of postoperative SE within ±0.5D, higher order aberration (HOA), coma-like aberration and spherical-like aberration.

RESULTS

A total of seventeen studies with 2640 patients and 3,358 eyes were included. It has been shown that postoperative Q-value (MD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.64, -0.21; P < .001), HOA (MD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.23, -0.06; P = .001), spherical-like aberration (MD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.06; P = .004) rather than postoperative UCVA (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.07; P = .012) were significantly better in the Q-value-guided LASIK than standard LASIK. However, the pooled results revealed that no significant differences were found between the 2 paired groups of postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.92; P = .763), preoperative Q-value (MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.02; P = .922), postoperative refractive SE (MD = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.25; P = .336), coma-like aberration (horizontal: MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.03; P = .966; vertical: MD = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.01; P = .263) and postoperative SE within ±0.5 D (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.48, 2.33; P = .886). Likewise, similar results were detected in some corresponding subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Q-value-guided LASIK is a safe, effective and predictable surgical option for treating myopia, especially showing superiority over standard LASIK in postoperative Q-value, HOA and spherical-like aberration. However, more detailed studies are required to confirm our conclusions in advanced researches.

Evaluation of visual evoked potential binocular summation after corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To explore whether visual evoked binocular summation is affected in eyes with refractive errors after refractive surgery.

METHODS

Twenty participants (6M, 14F) aged 20-35 years (mean 26.7 ± 4.4) were assessed through pattern-reversal visual evoked potential viewing with their every eye (first right eye and then left eye) and then with both eyes while wearing their best correction before undergoing surgery. Also, parameters of the P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential were evaluated after 3 months of refractive surgery in two different check sizes. Monocular and binocular amplitudes and latencies of P100 wave and binocular summation index were compared between before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Monocular visual evoked potentials elicited by two different high-contrast checkerboard-patterned stimuli were significantly reduced in P100 wave amplitude (P < 0.05) after refractive surgery. However, there was no difference between the pre- and post-refractive surgery in the mean value of monocular P100 latency (P > 0.05). Similar to monocular findings of P100 wave amplitude, on binocular viewing, the mean value of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential amplitude was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), and P100 wave latency was prolonged (P < 0.05) after refractive surgery in participants. Also, the mean postoperative binocular summation index value as compared to that in the preoperative was significantly lesser (P < 0.05) for the subject in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive surgery can degrade binocular visual performance throughout the change in visual evoked potential binocular summation. However, monocular function deteriorates less than binocular function after refractive surgery.

Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2

Our ability to detect faint images is better with two eyes than with one, but how great is this improvement? A meta-analysis of 65 studies published across more than 5 decades shows definitively that psychophysical binocular summation (the ratio of binocular to monocular contrast sensitivity) is significantly greater than the canonical value of √2. Several methodological factors were also found to affect summation estimates. Binocular summation was significantly affected by both the spatial and temporal frequency of the stimulus, and stimulus speed (the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency) systematically predicts summation levels, with slow speeds (high spatial and low temporal frequencies) producing the strongest summation. We furthermore show that empirical summation estimates are affected by the ratio of monocular sensitivities, which varies across individuals, and is abnormal in visual disorders such as amblyopia. A simple modeling framework is presented to interpret the results of summation experiments. In combination with the empirical results, this model suggests that there is no single value for binocular summation, but instead that summation ratios depend on methodological factors that influence the strength of a nonlinearity occurring early in the visual pathway, before binocular combination of signals. Best practice methodological guidelines are proposed for obtaining accurate estimates of neural summation in future studies, including those involving patient groups with impaired binocular vision. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the visual performance of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF-IOL).

SUBJECTS/METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, we enrolled 97 patients who underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with implantation of the Mini Well EDOF-IOL (SIFI, Italy). Patients underwent postoperatively the following examinations between 4 and 8 weeks after surgery: corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), reading speed with Radner's chart, distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and haloes quantitative assessment.

RESULTS

In the whole sample, the mean monocular CDVA and DCNVA were, respectively, 0.02 ± 0.07 logMAR and 0.38 ± 0.15 logRAD (logarithm of the reading acuity determination). In the 67 bilaterally implanted patients, binocular CDVA and DCNVA were better (0.00 ± 0.05 logMAR and 0.26 ± 0.13 logRAD) than the corresponding monocular values (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Ninety-two percent of patients bilaterally implanted reached a binocular reading speed >80 words per minute at a 0.5 logRAD print size (corresponding to the common book print size). The defocus curves showed that the EDOF-IOL provided increased depth of focus through 2.0 D of defocus, with the best performance at 1.0 and 1.5 D. Contrast sensitivity was within normal limits at all spatial frequencies. The mean visual disturbance index was 0.08 ± 0.12, suggesting low night visual disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

The new EDOF-IOL provided good visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near vision, with no loss of contrast sensitivity and low risk of night visual disturbances.

Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review

We analyze the role of bilateral symmetry in enhancing binocular visual ability in human eyes, and further explore how efficiently bilateral symmetry is preserved in different ocular surgical procedures. The inclusion criterion for this review was strict relevance to the clinical questions under research. Enantiomorphism has been reported in lower order aberrations, higher order aberrations and cone directionality. When contrast differs in the two eyes, binocular acuity is better than monocular acuity of the eye that receives higher contrast. Anisometropia has an uncommon occurrence in large populations. Anisometropia seen in infancy and childhood is transitory and of little consequence for the visual acuity. Binocular summation of contrast signals declines with age, independent of inter-ocular differences. The symmetric associations between the right and left eye could be explained by the symmetry in pupil offset and visual axis which is always nasal in both eyes. Binocular summation mitigates poor visual performance under low luminance conditions and strong inter-ocular disparity detrimentally affects binocular summation. Considerable symmetry of response exists in fellow eyes of patients undergoing myopic PRK and LASIK, however the method to determine whether or not symmetry is maintained consist of comparing individual terms in a variety of ad hoc ways both before and after the refractive surgery, ignoring the fact that retinal image quality for any individual is based on the sum of all terms. The analysis of bilateral symmetry should be related to the patients' binocular vision status. The role of aberrations in monocular and binocular vision needs further investigation.

Visual quality after monovision correction by laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed to achieve monovision in presbyopic patients.

SETTING

Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, Department of Optics, University of Granada, Granada, and Clínica Novovisión, Madrid, Spain.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz laser. The dominant eye was corrected for far vision and the nondominant eye for near vision by targeting -1.25 diopters of myopia. The F-CAT algorithm was programmed targeting a postsurgical corneal asphericity of -0.80 in the dominant eye and -1.00 in the nondominant eye. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, ocular aberrations, stereoacuity, the scattering index, and the visual-discrimination capacity were analyzed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 25 patients (50 eyes) with a mean age of 49.3 years ± 4.5 (SD). Postoperatively, more than 90% of patients had a binocular uncorrected distance and near visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR or better, although the contrast sensitivity function diminished, especially in the nondominant eye and with binocular vision. Stereoacuity was significantly worse in all patients (P<.001). The visual discrimination capacity declined in nondominant eyes and under binocular conditions (P<.005); no significant changes occurred in dominant eyes (P=.614). In all eyes, the mean objective scatter index value increased postoperatively, but not significantly (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Monovision correction by LASIK improved functional near vision in presbyopic patients. Although visual acuity was good for far vision, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity diminished significantly.

Optical quality and visual discrimination capacity after myopic LASIK with a standard and aspheric ablation profile

PURPOSE

To determine whether the eye's optical quality is correlated to the visual discrimination capacity of patients treated with LASIK using two different ablation algorithms.

METHODS

Visual discrimination was evaluated by the disturbance index under low illumination (Halo v1.0 software, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications) in two groups of patients who underwent LASIK with two different ablation algorithms using the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz laser (WaveLight AG). In the first group (standard group; 30 eyes), corneal ablations were performed with the standard algorithm (preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -3.20±1.70 diopters [D]). In the second group (Q-optimized group; 38 eyes; spherical equivalent refraction -3.40±1.90 D), the ablations were made with the Q-optimized (F-CAT) algorithm. Optical quality of the eye was calculated by the Strehl ratio measured with a double-pass device (OQAS, Visiometrics SL).

RESULTS

After LASIK, both the Strehl ratio as well as visual discrimination capacity diminished in both groups, although the changes were significantly greater in the standard group than in the Q-optimized group.

CONCLUSIONS

A high correlation was found between the Strehl ratio and the disturbance index in patients who underwent LASIK, regardless of the ablation algorithm applied. Optical and visual deterioration were greater after standard ablation.

Effect of pupil size on corneal aberrations before and after standard laser in situ keratomileusis, custom laser in situ keratomileusis, and corneal refractive therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of changing the pupil size on the corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations induced by different refractive treatments: standard laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), custom LASIK, and corneal refractive therapy.

DESIGN

Observational study.

METHODS

Eighty-one right eyes from patients with a mean age of 29.94 +/- 7.5 years, of which 50 were female (61.7%), were analyzed retrospectively at the Clínica Oftalmológica NovoVision, Madrid, Spain. Corneal videokeratographic data were used to obtain corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations for aperture diameters from 3 to 8 mm using the Vol-CT software (Sarver & Associates, Inc). Total root mean square (RMS) and RMS for third- to sixth-order Zernike polynomials as well as spherical-like, coma-like, secondary astigmatism, and spherical plus coma-like variables were calculated.

RESULTS

We verified an increase in the higher-order aberration total RMS after treatments of 0.014 +/- 0.025 microm, 0.019 +/- 0.027 microm, and 0.018 +/- 0.031 microm for standard LASIK, custom LASIK, and corneal refractive therapy, respectively, for 3-mm pupil diameter. For the 8-mm aperture diameter, changes in total RMS increased by a factor of 50 compared with the variation for the 3-mm diameter up to 0.744 +/- 0.731 microm, 0.493 +/- 0.794 microm, and 0.973 +/- 1.055 microm for standard LASIK, custom LASIK, and corneal refractive therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 techniques increase the wavefront aberrations of the cornea and change the relative contribution of coma-like and spherical-like aberrations. For a large aperture (> 5 mm), corneal refractive therapy induces more spherical-like aberrations than standard and custom LASIK. However, no clinically or statistically significant differences existed for narrower apertures. Standard and custom LASIK did not display statistically significant differences regarding higher-order aberrations.