Peripheral vision and hazard detection with average phakic and pseudophakic optical errors

Impact of Peripheral Refractive Errors in Mobility Performance

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional effects of peripheral refractive errors on mobility performance through a stair negotiation task.

Methods

Twenty-one young, normal sighted subjects navigated through an obstacle with steps, wearing spectacles that altered only their peripheral refraction. Lenses were used to induce positive defocus (+2 diopters [D] and +4 D), negative defocus (-2 D and -4 D), or astigmatism (+1.75 D and -3.75 D, axis 45 degrees) in the periphery. Feet trajectories were analyzed, and several gait assessment parameters were obtained. Statistical tests were conducted to determine significant performance differences between the lenses. Peripheral refraction in each subject was measured using a scanning Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor to assess the impact of intrinsic peripheral refraction on the experiment.

Results

Statistically significant differences in performance appeared when peripheral errors were superimposed. Crossing time with respect to plano lenses increased by 6.2%, 7.6%, 19.2%, and 29.6% for the -2 D, +2 D, -4 D, and +4 D lenses, respectively (P < 0.05 in the last 3 cases). Subjects exhibited slower walking speeds, increased step count, and adopted precautionary measures. High-power positive defocus lenses had the biggest impact on performance, and differences were observed in distance to steps between induced positive and negative defocus.

Conclusions

In this laboratory-based study without an adaptation period, peripheral refractive errors affected stair negotiation, causing cautious behavior in subjects. Performance differences among types of peripheral defocus may result from magnification effects and intrinsic peripheral refraction. These results highlight the importance of understanding the effects of induced peripheral errors by myopia control and intraocular lenses.

Peripheral defocus of monofocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To quantify the angular dependence of monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) power.

SETTING

Ophthalmic Biophysics Laboratory, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

DESIGN

Laboratory study.

METHODS

Experiments were performed on IOLs from 2 different manufacturers (APPALENS 207, Appasamy Associates and SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). IOL powers ranged from 17 to 25 diopters (D). The IOLs were mounted in a fluid-filled chamber, and the on-axis and off-axis powers were measured using a laser ray tracing system over the central 3 mm zone with delivery angles ranging from -30 to +30 degrees in 5-degree increments. The position of the best focus was calculated for each IOL at each angle. The angular dependence of IOL power was compared with theoretical predictions.

RESULTS

Peripheral defocus increased significantly with increasing incidence angle and power. The peripheral defocus at ±30 degrees increased from 5.8 to 8.5 D when the power increased from 17.5 to 24.5 D for APPALENS 207 and from 4.9 to 7.4 D when the power increased from 17 to 25 D for SN60WF. The mean difference between the measured and theoretical tangential power at ±30 degrees was 0.50 ± 0.16 D for the APPALENS 207 and -0.40 ± 0.10 D for the SN60WF, independent of IOL power.

CONCLUSIONS

IOLs introduce a significant amount of peripheral defocus which varies significantly with IOL power and design. Given that peripheral defocus is related to lens power, replacement of the crystalline lens (approximately 24 D) with an IOL will produce a significant difference in peripheral defocus profile after surgery.

Widefield wavefront sensor for multidirectional peripheral retinal scanning

The quantitative evaluation of peripheral ocular optics is essential in both myopia research and the investigation of visual performance in people with normal and compromised central vision. We have developed a widefield scanning wavefront sensor (WSWS) capable of multidirectional scanning while maintaining natural central fixation at the primary gaze. This Shack-Hartmann-based WSWS scans along any retinal meridian by using a unique scanning method that involves the concurrent operation of a motorized rotary stage (horizontal scan) and a goniometer (vertical scan). To showcase the capability of the WSWS, we tested scanning along four meridians including a 60° horizontal, 36° vertical, and two 36° diagonal scans, each completed within a time frame of 5 seconds.

Central and peripheral refraction measured by a novel double-pass instrument

A novel double-pass instrument and its data analysis method for the measurement of central and peripheral refraction is presented and validated in a group of healthy subjects. The instrument acquires in-vivo, non-cycloplegic, double-pass, through-focus images of the eye's central and peripheral point-spread function (PSF) using an infrared laser source, a tunable lens and a CMOS camera. The through-focus images were analyzed to determine defocus and astigmatism at 0° and 30° visual field. These values were compared to those obtained with a lab-based Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. The two instruments provided data showing good correlation at both eccentricities, particularly in the estimation of defocus.

Inverted meniscus intraocular lens as a better optical surrogate of the crystalline lens

Current intraocular lenses (IOLs) are designed to substitute the cataractous crystalline lens, optimizing focus at the fovea. However, the common biconvex design overlooks off-axis performance, leading to a reduced optical quality in the periphery of the retina in pseudophakic patients compared to the normal phakic eye. In this work, we designed an IOL to provide better peripheral optical quality, closer in that respect to the natural lens, using ray-tracing simulations in eye models. The resulting design was a concave-convex inverted meniscus IOL with aspheric surfaces. The curvature radius of the posterior surface was smaller than that of the anterior surface by a factor that depended on the IOL power. The lenses were manufactured and evaluated in a custom-built artificial eye. Images of a point source and of extended targets were directly recorded at various field angles with both standard and the new IOLs. This type of IOL produces superior image quality in the whole visual field, being a better surrogate for the crystalline lens than the commonly used thin biconvex intraocular lenses.

Effect of Correcting Peripheral Refractive Errors on Retinal Sensitivity in Younger and Older Healthy Adults

SIGNIFICANCE

Retinal sensitivity decreases with age and age-related eye diseases. Peripheral retinal sensitivity may also be compromised if the refractive correction is not optimized for peripheral vision.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the impact of using a peripheral refractive correction on perimetric thresholds and the influence of age and spherical equivalent on this impact.

METHODS

We measured, in 10 younger (20 to 30 years) and 10 older (58 to 72 years) healthy subjects, perimetric thresholds for Goldmann size III stimulus in several test locations along the horizontal meridian of the visual field (eccentricity, 0, ±10, and ±25°), with default central refractive correction and with peripheral refractive corrections as measured with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. We used analysis of variance to determine the effect of age and spherical equivalent (between-subject variables) and eccentricity and correction method (central vs. eccentricity specific; within-subject variables) on retinal sensitivity.

RESULTS

Retinal sensitivity was higher if the eyes were optimally corrected for the concerning test location (P = .008), and the effect of this peripheral correction differed between the younger and older subjects (interaction term between group and correction method: P = .02), primarily because of more myopia in the younger group (P = .003). The average improvement by applying peripheral corrections was 1.4 dB in the older subjects and 0.3 dB in the younger subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral optical correction has a variable impact on retinal sensitivity, and therefore, assessment of retinal sensitivity may be more accurate if peripheral defocus and astigmatism are corrected.

Adaptive optics visual simulators: a review of recent optical designs and applications [Invited]

In their pioneering work demonstrating measurement and full correction of the eye's optical aberrations, Liang, Williams and Miller, [JOSA A14, 2884 (1997)10.1364/JOSAA.14.002884] showed improvement in visual performance using adaptive optics (AO). Since then, AO visual simulators have been developed to explore the spatial limits to human vision and as platforms to test non-invasively optical corrections for presbyopia, myopia, or corneal irregularities. These applications have allowed new psychophysics bypassing the optics of the eye, ranging from studying the impact of the interactions of monochromatic and chromatic aberrations on vision to neural adaptation. Other applications address new paradigms of lens designs and corrections of ocular errors. The current paper describes a series of AO visual simulators developed in laboratories around the world, key applications, and current trends and challenges. As the field moves into its second quarter century, new available technologies and a solid reception by the clinical community promise a vigorous and expanding use of AO simulation in years to come.

Effect of peripheral refractive errors on driving performance

The effect of peripheral refractive errors on driving while performing secondary tasks at 40° of eccentricity was studied in thirty-one young drivers. They drove a driving simulator under 7 different induced peripheral refractive errors (baseline (0D), spherical lenses of +/- 2D, +/- 4D and cylindrical lenses of +2D and +4D). Peripheral visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were also evaluated at 40°. Driving performance was significantly impaired by the addition of myopic defocus (4D) and astigmatism (4D). Worse driving significantly correlated with worse contrast sensitivity for the route in general, but also with worse visual acuity when participants interacted with the secondary task. Induced peripheral refractive errors may negatively impact driving when performing secondary tasks.