Orthogonally-polarized excitation for improved two-photon and second-harmonic-generation microscopy, applied to neurotransmitter imaging with GPCR-based sensors

Optical constraints on two-photon voltage imaging

Significance

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) are a valuable tool for studying neural circuits in vivo, but the relative merits and limitations of one-photon (1P) versus two-photon (2P) voltage imaging are not well characterized.

Aim

We consider the optical and biophysical constraints particular to 1P and 2P voltage imaging and compare the imaging properties of commonly used GEVIs under 1P and 2P excitation.

Approach

We measure the brightness and voltage sensitivity of voltage indicators from commonly used classes under 1P and 2P illumination. We also measure the decrease in fluorescence as a function of depth in the mouse brain. We develop a simple model of the number of measurable cells as a function of reporter properties, imaging parameters, and desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We then discuss how the performance of voltage imaging would be affected by sensor improvements and by recently introduced advanced imaging modalities.

Results

Compared with 1P excitation, 2P excitation requires ∼ 10 4 -fold more illumination power per cell to produce similar photon count rates. For voltage imaging with JEDI-2P in the mouse cortex with a target SNR of 10 (spike height to baseline shot noise), a measurement bandwidth of 1 kHz, a thermally limited laser power of 200 mW, and an imaging depth of > 300    μ m , 2P voltage imaging using an 80-MHz source can record from no more than ∼ 12 neurons simultaneously.

Conclusions

Due to the stringent photon-count requirements of voltage imaging and the modest voltage sensitivity of existing reporters, 2P voltage imaging in vivo faces a stringent tradeoff between shot noise and tissue photodamage. 2P imaging of hundreds of neurons with high SNR at a depth of > 300    μ m will require either major improvements in 2P GEVIs or qualitatively new approaches to imaging.

Optical constraints on two-photon voltage imaging

Significance

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) are a valuable tool for studying neural circuits in vivo, but the relative merits and limitations of one-photon (1P) vs. two-photon (2P) voltage imaging are not well characterized.

Aim

We consider the optical and biophysical constraints particular to 1P and 2P voltage imaging and compare the imaging properties of commonly used GEVIs under 1P and 2P excitation.

Approach

We measure brightness and voltage sensitivity of voltage indicators from commonly used classes under 1P and 2P illumination. We also measure the decrease in fluorescence as a function of depth in mouse brain. We develop a simple model of the number of measurable cells as a function of reporter properties, imaging parameters, and desired signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We then discuss how the performance of voltage imaging would be affected by sensor improvements and by recently introduced advanced imaging modalities.

Results

Compared to 1P excitation, 2P excitation requires ~104-fold more illumination power per cell to produce similar photon count rates. For voltage imaging with JEDI-2P in mouse cortex with a target SNR of 10 (spike height:baseline shot noise), a measurement bandwidth of 1 kHz, a thermally limited laser power of 200 mW, and an imaging depth of > 300 μm, 2P voltage imaging using an 80 MHz source can record from no more 12 cells simultaneously.

Conclusions

Due to the stringent photon-count requirements of voltage imaging and the modest voltage sensitivity of existing reporters, 2P voltage imaging in vivo faces a stringent tradeoff between shot noise and tissue photodamage. 2P imaging of hundreds of neurons with high SNR at depth > 300 μm will require either major improvements in 2P GEVIs or qualitatively new approaches to imaging.

Microscopy and spectroscopy approaches to study GPCR structure and function

The GPCR signalling cascade is a key pathway responsible for the signal transduction of a multitude of physical and chemical stimuli, including light, odorants, neurotransmitters and hormones. Understanding the structural and functional properties of the GPCR cascade requires direct observation of signalling processes in high spatial and temporal resolution, with minimal perturbation to endogenous systems. Optical microscopy and spectroscopy techniques are uniquely suited to this purpose because they excel at multiple spatial and temporal scales and can be used in living objects. Here, we review recent developments in microscopy and spectroscopy technologies which enable new insights into GPCR signalling. We focus on advanced techniques with high spatial and temporal resolution, single-molecule methods, labelling strategies and approaches suitable for endogenous systems and large living objects. This review aims to assist researchers in choosing appropriate microscopy and spectroscopy approaches for a variety of applications in the study of cellular signalling.