Golden angle based scanning for robust corneal topography with OCT

Effect of fixational eye movements in corneal topography measurements with optical coherence tomography

There is an increasing interest in applying optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify the topography of ocular structures. However, in its most usual configuration, OCT data is acquired sequentially while a beam is scanned through the region of interest, and the presence of fixational eye movements can affect the accuracy of the technique. Several scan patterns and motion correction algorithms have been proposed to minimize this effect, but there is no consensus on the ideal parameters to obtain a correct topography. We have acquired corneal OCT images with raster and radial patterns, and modeled the data acquisition in the presence of eye movements. The simulations replicate the experimental variability in shape (radius of curvature and Zernike polynomials), corneal power, astigmatism, and calculated wavefront aberrations. The variability of the Zernike modes is highly dependent on the scan pattern, with higher variability in the direction of the slow scan axis. The model can be a useful tool to design motion correction algorithms and to determine the variability with different scan patterns.

Eye motion correction algorithm for OCT-based corneal topography

With its sequential image acquisition, OCT-based corneal topography is often susceptible to measurement errors due to eye motion. We have developed a novel algorithm to detect eye motion and minimize its impact on OCT topography maps. We applied the eye motion correction algorithm to corneal topographic scans acquired using a 70 kHz spectral-domain OCT device. OCT corneal topographic measurements were compared to those from a rotating Scheimpflug camera topographer. The motion correction algorithm provided a 2-4 fold improvement in the repeatability of OCT topography and its agreement with the standard Scheimpflug topographer. The repeatability of OCT Zernike-based corneal mean power, cardinal astigmatism, and oblique astigmatism after motion detection was 0.14 D, 0.28 D, and 0.24 D, respectively. The average differences between the two devices were 0.19 D for simulated keratometry-based corneal mean power, 0.23 D for cardinal astigmatism, and 0.25 D for oblique astigmatism. Our eye motion detection method can be applied to any OCT device, and it therefore represents a powerful tool for improving OCT topography.