Perceived flicker rate of suprathreshold stimuli: influences of spatial-frequency content and modulation amplitude

Flicker adaptation or superimposition raises the apparent spatial frequency of coarse test gratings

Independent channels respond to both the spatial and temporal characteristics of visual stimuli. Gratings <3 cycles per degree (cpd) are sensed by transient channels that prefer intermittent stimulation, while gratings >3 cpd are sensed by sustained channels that prefer steady stimulation. From this we predict that adaptation to a spatially uniform flickering field will selectively adapt the transient channels and raise the apparent spatial frequency of coarse sinusoidal gratings. Observers adapted to a spatially uniform field whose upper or lower half was steady and whose other half was flickering. They then adjusted the spatial frequency of a stationary test (matching) grating on the previously unmodulated half field until it matched the apparent spatial frequency of a grating falling on the previously flickering half field. The adapting field flickered at 8 Hz and the spatial frequency of the gratings was varied in octave steps from 0.25 to 16 cpd. As predicted, adapting to flicker raised the apparent spatial frequency of the test gratings. The aftereffect reached a peak of 11% between 0.5 and 1 cpd and disappeared above 4 cpd. We also observed that superimposed 10 Hz luminance flicker raised the apparent spatial frequency of 0.5 cpd test gratings. The effect was not seen with slower flicker or finer test gratings. Altogether, our study suggests that apparent spatial frequency is determined by the balance between transient and sustained channels and that an imbalance between the channels caused by flicker can alter spatial frequency perception.

Sensitivity to countermodulating gratings following spatiotemporal adaptation

Contrast sensitivities to countermodulating gratings were measured with a two-alternative temporal forced-choice procedure following adaptation to a static grating of the same spatial frequency, a homogeneous flickering field of the same temporal frequency, or a countermodulating grating of identical spatial and temporal frequencies. At high spatial frequencies, the temporal-frequency content of the adaptation was not critical, that is, a countermodulating adaptation grating was only slightly more effective at raising threshold than was a static adaptation grating. At low spatial frequencies, the sensitivity to countermodulating test gratings could not be reduced by either a high-contrast stimulus matching the test in the spatial domain only or by one matching the test in the temporal domain only. Adapting to a high-contrast stimulus matching the countermodulating test grating in both spatial- and temporal-frequency domains was effective at reducing test sensitivity for one observer but not for another.

Perceived flicker rate of suprathreshold stimuli: influences of spatial-frequency content and modulation amplitude

A number of experiments were conducted in which observers had to discriminate the apparent flicker rates of temporally modulated gratings and flickering homogeneous fields. When both intramodal- and cross-modal-matching procedures were used, apparent flicker rate was found to be consistently higher for countermodulating gratings than for homogeneous fields of the same temporal frequency. Also, the apparent flicker rate of countermodulating gratings tended to increase as spatial frequency increased. These effects are more pronounced at low rates of temporal modulation than at high rates and are not dependent on variations in the stimulus's apparent modulation amplitude.