Contrast-dependent red-green hue shift

Low luminance contrast's effect on the color appearance of S-cone patterns

There is a surprisingly strong effect on color appearance when low levels of luminance contrast are added to visual targets in which only S-cones are modulated. This phenomenon can be studied with checkerboard patterns composed of alternating S-cone-modulated checks and gray checks. + S checks look purple when surrounded by slightly brighter gray checks but look highly desaturated (lavender, almost white) when surrounded by darker gray checks. -S checks change in hue with luminance contrast; they look yellow when surrounded by darker gray checks but are greener when surrounded by lighter checks. Psychophysical paired comparisons confirm these perceptions. Furthermore, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded from human posterior cortex indicate that signals evoked by low luminance contrast interact nonlinearly with S-cone-evoked signals in early cortical color processing. Our new psychophysics and electrophysiology results prove that human perception of color appearance is not based on neural computations within a separate, isolated color system. Rather, signals evoked by color contrast and luminance contrast interact to produce the colors we see.

Melanopsin-driven surround induction on the red/green balance of yellow

To test the potential role of melanopsin-dependent ipRGCs in surround induction effects, we used a four-channel projector apparatus to hold the cone activity in a surround constant while varying the amount of melanopsin activity between two levels: low (baseline) and high (136% of the baseline). Rods were partially controlled by having the subjects complete conditions after either adapting to a bright field or darkness. The subjects adjusted the red/green balance of a 2.5° central target that varied in its ratio of L and M cones, but was equiluminant with the surround, to a perceptual null point (neither reddish nor greenish). When the surround melanopsin activity was higher, the subjects set their yellow balances at significantly higher L/(L+M) ratios, suggesting the high melanopsin surround was inducing greenishness into the central yellow stimulus. This is consistent with surround brightness effects that show the induction of greenishness into a central yellow test by high luminance surrounds. This potentially provides further evidence for a general role of melanopsin activity in brightness perception.

Relative contributions of melanopsin to brightness discrimination when hue and luminance also vary

A large number of studies have shown the effect of melanopsin-dependent retinal ganglion cells on humans performing brightness discrimination tasks. These studies often utilized targets that only differ in their melanopsin activation levels, and not in their luminance or hue, which are both factors that make large contributions to brightness discrimination. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative contribution of melanopsin activation to brightness discrimination when luminance and hue are also varying in addition to melanopsin activation. Using an apparatus consisting of three separate high luminance projectors, we were able to manipulate melanopsin-isolating stimulation, and L-, M-, and S-cone stimulation separately, thus allowing us to vary stimuli in their melanopsin activation, luminance, and hue category independently. We constructed three sets of target stimuli with three different levels of melanopsin activation (100%, 131%, and 167% relative melanopsin excitation) and five levels of luminance. We then had subjects do a two-alternative forced choice task where they compared the previously described target stimuli set to a set of four comparison stimuli that varied in their hue category but had identical luminances. We found that in our stimuli set the overall contribution of melanopsin activity to brightness discrimination was small (an average of 6% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus) when luminance and hue also varied. However, a significant interaction showed that when the comparison was between stimuli differing only in melanopsin stimulation (with luminance and hue unchanged) the contribution of melanopsin to brightness judgments was about 3 times larger (an average of 18% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus). This suggests that although luminance and hue have large effects on brightness discrimination such that the melanopsin contribution can become hard to detect, when there are minimal cone-dependent signals available, melanopsin can make a large contribution to brightness discrimination.