Immunohistochemical Expression of p16INK4a and bcl-2 According to HPV Type and to the Progression of Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

An Emerging Anti-p16 Antibody-BC42 Clone as an Alternative to the Current E6H4 for Use in the Female Genital Tract Pathological Diagnosis: Our Experience and a Review on p16ink4a Functional Significance, Role in Daily-Practice Diagnosis, Prognostic Potential, and Technical Pitfalls

Background: To date, useful diagnostic applications of p16 IHC have been documented in gynecological pathology both for HPV-related and non-HPV-related lesions. In the present article, we reported our experience with the novel anti-p16 INK4a antibody (clone BC42), whose expression was tested across all different gynecologic neoplasms; we also compared it to the traditional E6H4 clone. Moreover, we discussed and explored all the diagnostic applications of p16 IHC in gynecologic pathology. Methods: Consultation cases covering a 5-year period (2016–2020) regarding gynecological neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in which immunohistochemistry for p16, clone E6H4 was originally performed, were retrospectively retrieved from the files of our institution. Immunohistochemical staining for p16ink4a (BC42) [Biocare Medical group-Paceco USA; Bioptica Milan] and p16ink4a (E6H4) [Ventana Medical Systems-Arizona USA; Roche] was performed by using the Ventana automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). The immunostaining pattern was defined as negative, focal/patchy, or diffuse. Results: A total of 196 cases, represented by 36 high-grade SIL/CIN3 of the uterine cervix, 30 cervical adenocarcinomas, 22 cervical squamous cell carcinoma, 70 endometrial carcinomas, 25 high grade serous ovarian carcinomas, 6 uterine adenomatoid tumors, and 10 uterine leiomyosarcomas were included in this study. Results showed concordant staining quality of both clones on all tested neoplastic tissues. Conclusions: The novel anti-p16 antibody (BC42 clone) appeared as an alternative to the current E6H4 for use in gynecological neoplasms, offering similar levels of positivity and equally reliable staining results.

Prognostic value of p16-INK4A protein in women with negative or CIN1 histology result: a follow-up study

P16-INK4A overexpression has been proposed as a prognostic marker to manage the follow up of women with positive cytology and/or HPV test but without high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). This study measures the relative risk (RR) of CIN2+ of p16 positive versus negative in these women. All the women referred to colposcopy from October 2008 to September 2010 with negative or CIN1 colposcopy-guided biopsy were included in the study; women surgically treated or having a CIN2-3 were excluded. All baseline biopsies were dyed with hematoxylin and eosin and p16. Women were followed up according to screening protocols, with cytology or colposcopy at 6 or 12 months. CIN2/3 RRs and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were computed. Of 442 eligible women, 369 (83.5%) had at least one follow-up episode. At baseline, 113 (30.6%) were CIN1, 248 (67.2%) negative, and 8 (2.2%) inadequate histology; 293 (79.4%) were p16-negative, 64 (17.3%) p16 positive and 12 (3.2%) not valid. During follow up, we found ten CIN2 and three CIN3; of these, six were p16 positive (sensitivity 46%, 95% CI 19-75). The absolute risk among p16 positives was 9.4/100 compared to 1.7/100 of the p16 negatives (RR 5.5; 95% CI 1.7-17.4). The risk was also higher for CIN1 than for histologically negative women (RR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3-14.3). The RR for p16 in CIN1 did not change (RR 5.2; 95% CI 0.6-47.5). P16 overexpression is a good candidate for modulating follow-up intensity after a negative colposcopy but is limited by its low prospective sensitivity.

Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions

BACKGROUND

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL) are minor lesions of the cervical epithelium, detectable by cytological examination of cells collected from the surface of the cervix of a woman.Usually, women with ASCUS and LSIL do not have cervical (pre-) cancer, however a substantial proportion of them do have underlying high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN, grade 2 or 3) and so are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Therefore, accurate triage of women with ASCUS or LSIL is required to identify those who need further management.This review evaluates two ways to triage women with ASCUS or LSIL: repeating the cytological test, and DNA testing for high-risk types of the human papillomavirus (hrHPV) - the main causal factor of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES

Main objective To compare the accuracy of hrHPV testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay against that of repeat cytology for detection of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) in women with ASCUS or LSIL. For the HC2 assay, a positive result was defined as proposed by the manufacturer. For repeat cytology, different cut-offs were used to define positivity: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+), low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) or high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+).Secondary objective To assess the accuracy of the HC2 assay to detect CIN2+ or CIN3+ in women with ASCUS or LSIL in a larger group of reports of studies that applied hrHPV testing and the reference standard (coloscopy and biopsy), irrespective whether or not repeat cytology was done.

SEARCH METHODS

We made a comprehensive literature search that included the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (through PubMed), and EMBASE (last search 6 January 2011). Selected journals likely to contain relevant papers were handsearched from 1992 to 2010 (December). We also searched CERVIX, the bibliographic database of the Unit of Cancer Epidemiology at the Scientific Institute of Public Health (Brussels, Belgium) which contains more than 20,000 references on cervical cancer.More recent searches, up to December 2012, targeted reports on the accuracy of triage of ASCUS or LSIL with other HPV DNA assays, or HPV RNA assays and other molecular markers. These searches will be used for new Cochrane reviews as well as for updates of the current review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies eligible for inclusion in the review had to include: women presenting with a cervical cytology result of ASCUS or LSIL, who had undergone both HC2 testing and repeat cytology, or HC2 testing alone, and were subsequently subjected to reference standard verification with colposcopy and colposcopy-directed biopsies for histologic verification.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently extracted data from the selected studies, and obtained additional data from report authors.Two groups of meta-analyses were performed: group I concerned triage of women with ASCUS, group II concerned women with LSIL. The bivariate model (METADAS-macro in SAS) was used to assess the absolute accuracy of the triage tests in both groups as well as the differences in accuracy between the triage tests.

MAIN RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity of HC2 was significantly higher than that of repeat cytology at cut-off ASCUS+ to detect CIN2+ in both triage of ASCUS and LSIL (relative sensitivity of 1.27 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.39; P value < 0.0001) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.4; P value 0.007), respectively. In ASCUS triage, the pooled specificity of the triage methods did not differ significantly from each other (relative specificity: 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; P value 0.98)). However, the specificity of HC2 was substantially, and significantly, lower than that of repeat cytology in the triage of LSIL (relative specificity: 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.75) P value < 0.0001).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

HPV-triage with HC2 can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity, and similar specificity) than repeat cytology. When triaging women with LSIL, an HC2 test yields a significantly higher sensitivity, but a significantly lower specificity, compared to a repeat cytology. Therefore, practice recommendations for management of women with LSIL should be balanced, taking local circumstances into account.

Expression of BAG-1 and PARP-1 in precursor lesions and invasive cervical cancer associated with human papillomavirus (HPV)

Cervical cancer remains persistently the second most common malignancies among women worldwide, responsible for 500,000 new cases annually. Only in Brazil, the estimate is for 18,430 new cases in 2011. Several types of molecular markers have been studied in carcinogenesis including proteins associated with apoptosis such as BAG-1 and PARP-1. This study aims to demonstrate the expression of BAG-1 and PARP-1 in patients with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the uterine cervix and to verify a possible association with HPV infection. Fifty samples of LSILs, 50 samples of HSILs and 50 samples of invasive SCCs of the uterine cervix were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for BAG-1 and PARP-1 expression. PCR was performed to detect and type HPV DNA. BAG-1 expression levels were significantly different between LSILs and HSILs (p = 0,014) and between LSILs and SCCs (p = 0,014). In regards to PARP-1 expression, we found significant differences between the expression levels in HSILs and SCCs (p = 0,022). No association was found between BAG-1 expression and the presence of HPV. However, a significant association was found between PARP-1 expression and HPV positivity in the HSILs group (p = 0,021). In conclusion our research suggests that BAG-1 expression could contribute to the differentiation between LSIL and HSIL/SCC whereas PARP-1 could be useful to the differentiation between HSIL HPV-related and SCC. Further studies are needed to clarify the molecular aspects of the relationship between PARP-1 expression and HPV infection, with potential applications for cervical cancer prediction.

The presence of methylation of the p16INK4A gene and human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

Methylation is a chemical modification in which a methyl group (CH3) is added to the cytosine in the promoter region of the gene. It involves a very frequent epigenetic event that is found in many human cancers. Currently, there is no consensus on whether methylation of the p16 gene could be used as a biomarker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The authors studied the presence of methylation of the p16 gene and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, and a possible relationship between them in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. This case-control study analyzed 27 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion samples and 20 normal cytology samples. To detect p16 methylation, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used, and for HPV DNA detection the polymerase chain reaction was performed by using MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ consensus primers. The presence of methylation of the promoter region of the p16INK4a gene was detected in 55.6% of the samples from the case group, whereas it was detected only in 20% of the samples from the control group (P=0.005). HPV DNA was found in 66.7% of the samples from the case group, whereas only 15% from the control group (P=0.0001). The relationship between the presence of methylation of the p16 gene and HPV DNA did not prove statistically significant in the case group (P=0.67) or the control group (P=0.51). In conclusion, the presence of methylation of the p16 gene constituted an occurrence that was early but independent of the presence of HPV DNA.

Papillary squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix: human papillomavirus-dependent changes in cell cycle expression and cytologic features

Most human papillomavirus-associated squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix are flat; some have papillary architecture that shows a spectrum of differentiation from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. For this subset of lesions, there are few data relating human papillomavirus type to cytology and cell cycle activity. Here, we collected 24 cases of papillary squamous intraepithelial lesions with either low-risk (15 cases) or high-risk (9 cases) human papillomavirus infection. We described their morphology and performed immunohistochemical staining with cell cycle-related markers Ki-67, p53, pRb, and P16INK4a. The Ki-67 labeling index was significantly lower in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (P < .001). A cut point of less than 50% labeling index detected all but one low-risk group case. Degradation of p53 and pRb was less evident in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group (p53, P < .001; pRb, P = .006). P16INK4a produced an unexpectedly high positive rate of staining in the low-risk group (60%). However, a specific top-heavy distribution pattern was noted, with evident nuclear but faint cytoplasmic staining, whereas the high-risk group showed strong full-thickness nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. The detection of these lesions by smear examination was not reliable, given the wide expression pattern. Papillary structure was evident in none. We conclude that cell cycle-related markers are helpful in distinguishing low- and high-risk lesions. The strong p16INK4a staining in the low-risk group may imply that more cell cycle-controlling pressure is elicited in papillary lesions than in flat lesions. The distribution pattern of p16INK4a staining is important when making a diagnosis; cytology is not effective. Human papillomavirus type, histology, and cell cycle markers could clearly separate these lesions into either a low-risk or a high-risk group, properly designated low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in current management algorithms. Thus, the previously used terms papillary immature metaplasia and immature condyloma, although descriptive for low-risk group lesions, are confusing and should be discarded.

Value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of p16(INK4a) staining to classify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 according to its progression/regression risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 were prospectively recruited (n = 138). Simultaneous detection of high-risk human papillomaviruses and p16(INK4a) evaluation were performed. Follow-up was conducted every 6 months by cytology and colposcopy and annually by high-risk human papillomavirus testing, for at least 12 months (mean, 29.0). Progression was defined as a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3, regression as a negative cytology and high-risk human papillomaviruses, and persistence as a cytologic result of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or a positive test for high-risk human papillomaviruses.

RESULTS

Progression was observed in 14 women (10.1%), 66 (47.6%) regressed, and 58 (42.0%) had a persistent disease. p16(INK4a) was positive in 77 (55.8%) initial biopsy specimens. Progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 was identified in 14 of 77 (18.2%) women with positive and none of 61 (0.00%) women with negative p16(INK4a) immunostaining (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

p16(INK4a) negative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 lesions rarely progress and may benefit from a less intensive follow-up.

p16 INK4a immunostaining identifies occult CIN lesions in HPV-positive women

To evaluate whether p16 staining could help to recognize underestimated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) with negative biopsy. Out of 1,259 women undergoing a histologic study and a simultaneous HR-HPV detection using the Hybrid Capture 2 test, we selected all patients testing positive for HR-HPV and having a negative biopsy (n=139), as well as all women testing negative for HR-HPV with a biopsy of either CIN 1 (26 cases) or CIN 2 to 3 (11 cases). Of the remaining 1,083 women, we randomly selected for the purpose of controls, 50 cases negative for HR-HPV with negative biopsy and 100 cases positive for HR-HPV and with biopsy of CIN (50 CIN 1, 50 CIN 2-3). In all cases, immunohistochemical staining for p16 and a second evaluation of the initial biopsy was carried out. Thirty-four out of 139 biopsies (24.5%) testing positive for HR-HPV but having a negative biopsy were positive for p16. Thirty of these cases (21.6%) were classified as harboring a CIN (11 CIN 1, 19 CIN 2/3) after reevaluation. Both the number of cases reclassified as CIN of any grade, or as CIN 2/3, were significantly higher for cases with HR-HPV load above 100 relative light unit (P<0.005). Particular attention should be paid to biopsies from patients having positive Hybrid Capture 2. The risk of harboring undetected CIN of any type or CIN 2/3 is significantly higher for patients with high HR-HPV load. Immunostaining with p16 should be considered as a highly desirable addition to the histologic evaluation of cervical biopsy specimens in HR-HPV-positive women.

p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

P16(INK4a) is a biomarker for transforming HPV infections that could act as an adjunct to current cytological and histological assessment of cervical smears and biopsies, allowing the identification of those women with ambiguous results that require referral to colposcopy and potentially treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of all studies that evaluated the use of p16(INK4a) in cytological or histological specimens from the uterine cervix. We also estimated the mean proportion of samples that were positive for p16(INK4a) in cytology and histology, stratified by the grade of the lesion.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies were included. The proportion of cervical smears overexpressing p16(INK4a) increased with the severity of cytological abnormality. Among normal smears, only 12% (95% CI: 7-17%) were positive for the biomarker compared to 45% of ASCUS and LSIL (95% CI: 35-54% and 37-57%, respectively) and 89% of HSIL smears (95% CI: 84-95%). Similarly, in histology only 2% of normal biopsies (95% CI: 0.4-30%) and 38% of CIN1 (95% CI: 23-53%) showed diffuse staining for p16(INK4a) compared to 68% of CIN2 (95% CI: 44-92%) and 82% of CIN3 (95% CI: 72-92%).

CONCLUSION

Although there is good evidence that p16(INK4a) immunostaining correlates with the severity of cytological/histological abnormalities, the reproducibility is limited due to insufficiently standardized interpretation of the immunostaining. Therefore, a consensus needs to be reached regarding the evaluation of p16(INK4a) staining and the biomarker needs to be assessed in various clinical settings addressing specific clinical questions.

Classical and non-classical HLA molecules and p16(INK4a) expression in precursors lesions and invasive cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Viruses and tumour cells may regulate the expression of HLA molecules on the cell surface to escape immune system surveillance. Absence of classical HLA class I molecules may impair the action of specific cytotoxic cells, whereas non-classical HLA class I molecules may regulate innate and adaptive immune cells. We assess here the possible associations between classical/non-classical class I HLA and p16(INK4a) molecule expression in cervical biopsies of women infected with HPV, stratified according to grade of the lesion and HPV type.

STUDY DESIGN

Cervical biopsies (N=74) presenting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) (n=31), CIN2-3 (n=19), and invasive cancer (n=14) were evaluated alongside 10 normal cervical specimens.

RESULTS

HLA-A/B/C/G staining was observed in the early stages of HPV infection. A significant association was detected between HLA-A/B/C staining and HPV16/18 infection (OR=0.12, 95%CI: 0.0163-0.7899; p=0.04). HLA-E expression increased with the progression of the lesion (chi(2)-test for trend=4.01; p=0.05), and a significant association was found between HLA-E staining and HPV16/18 infection (OR=11.25, 95%CI: 2.324-54.465; p=0.003). Irrespective of the grade of the lesion, HLA-A/B/C staining and p16(INK4a) presented a good concordance (Kappa: 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-E overexpression seemed to be associated with invasive cancer and HPV16/18 infection.

The utility of p16(Ink4a) in discriminating between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 and nonneoplastic equivocal lesions of the cervix

CONTEXT

The protein p16(Ink4a) is overexpressed in cervical lesions associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes 16 and 18, but not in low-risk HPV subtypes 6 and 11 or non-HPV-associated cervical lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether p16(Ink4a) expression in equivocal cervical lesions helps distinguish atypical non-HPV changes from HPV-related changes.

DESIGN

One hundred ninety-one cervical lesions, including 81 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1, 52 squamous metaplasia, 33 cellular features suggestive of HPV-related change, 9 reserve cell hyperplasia, 4 microglandular hyperplasia, and 12 inflammatory cervicitis, were randomly selected from archival cervical biopsy specimens. All 191 samples were studied with p16(Ink4a) (JC8 monoclonal antibody). Reactivity for p16(Ink4a) was scored on a 3-tier system as follows: negative, 0% to 5% cells reactive; focal/scattered positive, greater than 5% and less than or equal to 80% cells reactive; diffuse positive, greater than 80% cells reactive. Reactivity was based on normal/reactive cervical specimens where anti-p16 antibody was negative/weakly expressed in non-cervical epithelial cells. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 lesions not reactive for p16(Ink4a) were investigated for the presence of high-risk HPV by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

No p16(Ink4a) reactivity was detected in the cervical lesions associated with atypical non-HPV change. Eleven of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 lesions showed focal/scattered reactivity expression for p16(Ink4a), and 19 of the CIN 1 lesions had diffuse reactivity. Fifty of 51 of the CIN 1 lesions negative for p16(Ink4a) were real-time polymerase chain reaction negative for the presence of high-risk HPV; 1 was real-time polymerase chain reaction positive for high-risk HPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the routine use of p16(Ink4a) immunohistochemical evaluation of cervical biopsy specimens for better discrimination of non-HPV-associated lesions from HPV-related lesions.

Expression of p16 in conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia does not correlate with HPV-infection

The aim of our study was to identify the frequency of expression of p16(INK4a) (CDKN2A) and HPV (human papilloma virus) in different grades of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).Twelve specimens including CIN I (2), II (3), III (5), and CIN with beginning invasion (2), as well as 15 control specimens, were stained with antibodies against p16(INK4a) and MIB1. The presence of HPV was examined by PCR.p16 as well as MIB1 were significantly elevated in CIN compared to control specimens (p<0.01) without correlation with the differentiation grade. Only two cases with CIN grade 3 contained HPV 16.As few control specimens also showed increased p16(INK4a) expression, p16(INK4a) seems not to be a very reliable marker for the exact determination of CIN. It could serve as an additional diagnostic tool besides the morphological characterization. Our study suggested that p16(INK4a) elevation is not associated with HPV infection.

Senescence and apoptosis in carcinogenesis of cervical squamous carcinoma

Senescence and apoptosis are two key mechanisms that protect against cancer development. Many cell cycle regulators, such as p14(ARF), p15(INK4b) and p16(INK4a), are important in G1 cell cycle arrest and oncogene-induced senescence. The bcl-2 protein is one of the key components that control apoptosis, while the p53 protein plays key roles in both mechanisms. The genes of these key regulator proteins are often mutated or deleted in various malignancies. It is unknown how senescence and apoptosis are regulated in one of the most common tumors of the female genital tract, cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In this study the, expression of senescence, apoptosis and proliferation markers in normal cervical epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and SCC are characterized via immunohistochemical staining for p14(ARF), p15(INK4b), p16(INK4a), bcl-2, p53 and Ki-67 in tissue microarray blocks containing 20 samples each of normal cervix, moderate-to-severe cervical dysplasia (CIN II-III) and invasive SCC. Samples are derived from 60 total cases of cervical biopsies and cervical conizations. Results showed that the proliferation marker, Ki-67, is markedly increased, and the senescence markers, p15(INK4b), p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) are overexpressed in both dysplasia and carcinoma. P53 immunostain is negative in all normal cervical tissue, and positive in dysplasia and carcinoma. Although the expression of bcl-2 is increased in dysplasia, this marker is negative in approximately half of SCC cases. These results suggest that some senescence pathways are activated and are still maintained in cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. However proliferation is increased and carcinogenesis is not thwarted, leading to eventual development of cervical cancer. Other mechanisms, such as those that account for the apparent overexpression of p53 and paradoxical loss of bcl-2 expression in some SCC cases, as well as additional senescence and apoptotic pathways, may play key roles carcinogenesis of cervical SCC.

Estimation of prognoses for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 by p16INK4a immunoexpression and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization signal types

The present study used immunohistochemical staining and in situ hybridization (ISH) to examine whether progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 2 (CIN 2) can be predicted by p16INK4a immunoexpression and high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) ISH signal types. We studied 52 cases histologically diagnosed with CIN 2: dysplasia regressed in 28 cases; 13 cases progressed to CIN 3; and CIN 2 persisted in 11 cases. Expression of p16INK4a and high-risk HPV signal both related to grade of CIN. Stronger p16INK4a immunoexpression and a higher frequency of expression of a punctate nuclear signal were observed in CIN 2 lesions before progression compared with those before regression. CIN 2 cases in which moderate to strong immunoexpression of p16INK4a and a punctate signal were observed simultaneously progressed to CIN 3 in 10 (91%) of 11 cases. CIN 2 cases with moderate to strong immunoexpression of p16INK4a and a high-risk HPV punctate signal should be treated because of the great risk of progression.

High-grade ovarian serous carcinoma exhibits significantly higher p16 expression than low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour

AIMS

A dualistic pathway of ovarian serous carcinogenesis is now well established whereby high-grade serous carcinoma and low-grade serous carcinoma represent two distinct tumour types with a different underlying pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to compare expression of p16 INK4A (p16) in these two tumour types. We also included cases of serous borderline tumour, since these are considered to represent a precursor lesion of low-grade serous carcinoma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cases of serous borderline tumour (n = 18), low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (n = 22) and high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (n = 24) were stained with a monoclonal antibody against p16. Cases were scored both with respect to intensity of immunoreactivity (weak, 1+; moderate, 2+; or strong, 3+) and distribution (0, negative or occasional positive cells; 1+, < 10% cells positive; 2+, 10-25% cells positive; 3+, 26-50% cells positive; 4+, 51-75% cells positive; or 5+, 76-100% cells positive). An immunohistochemical composite score was also calculated (0-15) by multiplying the intensity and distribution scores. There was a statistically significant difference in p16 immunoreactivity with respect to intensity, distribution and composite score between high-grade serous carcinoma and each of the other two groups, with the high-grade neoplasms exhibiting stronger and more diffuse positivity. Most high-grade serous carcinomas exhibited positivity of close to 100% of tumour cells. There was no significant difference in p16 expression between the borderline tumours and low-grade serous carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased expression of p16 in high-grade serous carcinoma compared with low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour is in keeping with a different underlying pathogenesis. p16 may be implicated in the development of high-grade serous neoplasia within the ovary and elsewhere within the female genital tract.

Efficiency of immunohistochemical p16 expression and HPV typing in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion grading and review of the p16 literature

Diagnosing and grading cervical cancer precursors is challenging. This study investigates the presence of HPV infection, the expression of p16, and any correlation between these two findings. H&E-stained slides of cervical loop excision materials diagnosed as LSIL and HSIL were reviewed. An immunohistochemical panel consisting of p16 as well as of all HPV types and HR-HPV types was applied. Staining of p16 was evaluated according to distribution extent and degree of intensity. All HSIL cases and 80% of LSIL cases were positive for p16. In HSIL cases, the staining distribution was as follows: 50% full thickness, 45% basal, and 5% rare. The staining intensity for the same cases was strong in 70%, variable in 20%, and weak in 10% accordingly. In LSIL cases, staining distribution was basal in 58.3% and rare in 41.7%. None of the LSIL cases showed full thickness of p16 positivity. The staining intensity of the same cases was strong in 25%, variable in 16.7%, and weak in 58.3%. Of all cases, 48.6% were positive for screening kit (all HPV types), and 31.4% of all cases were positive for HR-HPV. The distribution of this positivity was 35% for HSIL and 26.6% for LSIL cases. The total HPV-type positivity rate was 48.6%, the distribution being 50% for HSIL and 46.6% for LSIL cases. p16 is a highly sensitive marker for cervical epithelial dysplasia. Strong and full thickness staining of p16 in the cervix epithelium is highly supportive of HSIL, while weak and basal/rare staining favors LSIL. All HPV-positive cases were also p16-positive, but no statistically significant relationship between HPV infection positivity and the intensity and distribution of p16 was found. HPV is not helpful in the grading of SIL, as an unignorable rate of HR-HPV positivity (26.6%) was detected in LSIL group.

Usefulness of combining testing for p16 protein and human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical carcinoma screening

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of the combination of p16 and HPV detection in the screening for cervical cancer.

METHODS

186 patients with previous abnormal cervical lesion were studied. After colposcopic examination, two conventional Pap slides were prepared: the first was Papanicolaou-stained and examined by cytologist; the second was immunocytochemically stained for p16. Cervical cells were collected by brush using for HPV detection by Hybrid Capture II. Biopsy of any colposcopically abnormal lesions was performed.

RESULTS

The 186 cervical samples were classified cytologically as normal (148), ASCUS (13), low-grade (11), high-grade (12) dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma (2). P16 and HPV were found in all high-grade dysplasia and SCC, and in 64% and 27% of low-grade dysplasia, 62% and 0% of ASCUS and 7.4% and 3.4% of normal, respectively. 18 of p16-positive cases (11%) were HPV-negative, 14 of them in the ASCUS and normal group. Compared to histological results, all of the p16-positive cases of squamous metaplasia, CIN II/III and SCC were HR-HPV-positive. Therefore, the cases that were positive for both with normal cytology (5 cases) or low-grade dysplasia (3 cases) may comprise a high-risk group for neoplastic change.

CONCLUSION

The combination of p16 and HPV detection may be useful in cervical cancer screening to identify high-risk patients requiring early and proper management.

p16INK4a immunoexpression: surrogate marker of high-risk HPV and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

p16INK4a has emerged as a valuable surrogate marker for high-risk human papillomavirus infection and shows increased immunoexpression with worsening grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Numerous studies have emerged in recent years supporting its role in the detection of high-grade dysplasia and have lead to the use of p16INK4a immunohistochemistry in many laboratories. However, only a few studies have examined the possible predictive or prognostic value of p16INK4a in CIN or cervical cancer. This review addresses some of the practical issues in the application of p16INK4a in everyday practice, with an emphasis on integrating the extensive data that have emerged in the literature on p16INK4a immunoreactivity in CIN. The potential role of p16INK4a immunohistochemistry in the prediction of CIN progression is also discussed.

Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4a) is predictive of HR-HPV infection in cervical low-grade lesions

The p16(INK4a) is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that decelerates the cell cycle by inactivating the cyclin-dependent kinases involved in the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (RB). Expression of E6 and E7 oncogenes of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV), affecting the RB-p16 pathway, leads to p16 upregulation. Although it is widely reported that p16 is overexpressed in a high percentage of preneoplastic lesions and in almost all carcinomas of the uterine cervix, protein upregulation and its correlation with HPV infection in low-grade lesions is still being debated. In this study, we investigated in parallel, p16 expression and HPV infection in 100 cervical biopsies (17 normal tissues, 54 CIN1, 10 CIN2, 11 CIN3, eight invasive squamous cancers). Results obtained demonstrated that none of the 17 normal cervical tissues, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, presented p16 positivity whereas, starting from CIN1 (31%) to CIN2 (90%), CIN3 (100%) and carcinomas (100%), a constant and significant increase of protein overexpression (P<0.0001) was observed. In addition, p16 overexpression consistently showed elevated sensitivity (84%) and specificity (98%) in detecting HR-HPV infection with a high positive predictive value (97%) and negative predictive value (86%). Of interest, 93% of the p16-positive CIN1 were also HR-HPV infected. Our findings confirmed that p16 overexpression is associated to high-grade precancerous lesions and cervical carcinomas, and further demonstrated that immunohistochemical evaluation of p16 may be a useful biomarker in identifying HR-HPV-infected low-grade lesions.

p16 expression in the female genital tract and its value in diagnosis

p16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor that is expressed in a limited range of normal tissues and tumors. In recent years, immunohistochemistry with p16 antibodies has been used as a diagnostic aid in various scenarios in gynecologic pathology. Diffuse (as opposed to focal) positivity with p16 in the cervix can be regarded as a surrogate marker of the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). In cervical squamous lesions, p16 is positive in most high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in some cases of low-grade CIN, usually those associated with high-risk HPV. p16 may be useful to identify small focal high-grade CIN lesions, to distinguish some cases of CIN involving immature metaplastic squamous epithelium from immature metaplastic squamous epithelium not involved by CIN and to distinguish high-grade CIN from benign mimics. Most cervical carcinomas of squamous, glandular, and small cell type are p16-positive. In cervical glandular lesions, p16 is useful, as part of a panel, in the distinction between adenocarcinoma in situ (diffusely positive) and benign mimics, including tuboendometrial metaplasia and endometriosis, which are usually p16-negative or focally positive. p16 may be used, in combination with other markers, to distinguish between a cervical adenocarcinoma (diffuse positivity) and an endometrioid-type endometrial adenocarcinoma (negative or focally positive). Some uterine serous carcinomas are diffusely positive. In the vulva, p16 is positive in HPV-associated vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) but negative in VIN not associated with HPV. Similarly, HPV-associated invasive squamous carcinomas are p16-positive, whereas the more common non-HPV-associated neoplasms are largely negative or focally positive. In the uterus, p16 positivity is more common and widespread in leiomyosarcomas than leiomyomas, and this may be a useful aid to diagnosis, although problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms have not been extensively studied. Metastatic cervical adenocarcinomas in the ovary are usually diffusely p16-positive, and because these may closely mimic a primary ovarian endometrioid or mucinous adenocarcinoma, this may be a valuable diagnostic aid, although p16 expression in primary ovarian adenocarcinomas of these morphologic subtypes has not been widely investigated. Some ovarian serous carcinomas, similar to their uterine counterparts, are p16-positive.