Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review

The adoption of point of care testing technologies for respiratory tract infections in primary care in Australia: Challenges and facilitators

Despite technological advances and readily available point of care test (POCT) devices with rapid turn-around results for respiratory tract infection (RTI) management, their adoption in primary care remains low. This paper summarises the challenges and facilitators of POCT implementation for RTIs in primary care settings in high-income countries. The review of 28 studies identified by systematic searches of electronic databases improves our understanding of the current state and will help guide the design and implementation of strategies to improve widespread POCT adoption. To effectively implement respiratory POCT in primary care, it is crucial to address several key challenges. These include ensuring the availability of resources to alleviate time pressures and costs, enhancing training, increasing quality control, improving device feasibility, and managing patient expectations. In doing so, diagnostic POCTs can contribute to an accurate, rapid, and evidence-based diagnosis of RTIs to reduce antimicrobial use and improve antimicrobial stewardship and patient outcomes.

'Shades of grey': a focus group study on diagnostic uncertainty among general practitioners using point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has long been a diagnostic tool in family medicine, although most Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) who use POCUS, scans infrequently. The broad scope of family medicine, the relatively low prevalence of illnesses and infrequent use of POCUS imply that GPs may experience diagnostic uncertainty regularly.

AIM

To explore how GPs perceived and managed diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A qualitative focus group study among Norwegian GPs using POCUS.

METHODS

Four focus group discussions were conducted. Total number of participants were 21. The interview guide was piloted, the focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and Systematic Text Condensation, a thematic cross-case analysis, was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Diagnostic uncertainty using POCUS was considered as aligning to the general clinical uncertainties in family medicine, but there were also POCUS-specific uncertainties in clinical decision-making. We generated six themes: emotional, cognitive, and ethical uncertainty using POCUS, communicating uncertainty to patients, interaction with specialists when using POCUS, and coping strategies of participants. POCUS results were the only results the participants sometimes withheld when communicating with other specialists. POCUS itself stimulated a renewed interest in family medicine. Scanning enough patients was the recommended coping strategy.

CONCLUSION

POCUS-using GPs experienced diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS that aligned with other diagnostic uncertainties they experienced in everyday practice. However, they did not treat the results like other findings, as the GPs at times withheld their POCUS findings when interacting with secondary care specialists. This requires further investigation.

Knowledge, attitude, practices, and perceived barriers to using point-of-care ultrasound by Asian primary care physicians - a mixed method study

BACKGROUND

Although research shows that point-of-care ultrasound is helpful in primary care, there is little research on point-of-care ultrasound use and the barriers to its use in Asia. This study estimated the prevalence of primary care physicians using point-of-care ultrasound in Hong Kong and assessed their perceived knowledge, attitude, practices, and barriers to using point-of-care ultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a mixed-method study: cross-sectional survey, followed by semi-structured interviews. Primary care physicians who were members of the Hong Kong College of Family Physicians and/or were clinical teachers affiliated with the Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care at the University of Hong Kong were invited to participate.

RESULTS

A total of 330 and 14 completed the survey and interviews, respectively. The prevalence of respondents using point-of-care ultrasound was 22.5%. Perceived knowledge was fair (mean score: 1.9 out of 4; SD: 0.6). The attitudes were mostly positive (mean score: 3.0 out of 4; SD: 0.5). Majority stated that barriers to using point-of-care ultrasound were related to training (90.9%), the competence of point-of-care ultrasound skills (90.2%), and clinical support (89.5%). Qualitative data identified that most participants found point-of-care ultrasound useful; however, participants felt that its use was limited by their competence of point-of-care ultrasound and by factors related to their clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a quarter of respondents are using point-of-care ultrasound with a majority having positive attitudes. They lack confidence in their skills as knowledge is poor but simultaneously find training and clinic support limited.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Post-acute and Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an emerging application of ultrasonography that is being integrated into patient care in many medical specialties. The post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) setting has opportunities to adopt POCUS as a diagnostic aid to improve patient outcomes. We aim (1) to describe the current use of POCUS in PALTC and (2) to examine how the use of POCUS can advance in PALTC settings.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

PALTC facilities and residents.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science databases were searched by a medical librarian for studies on the use of POCUS in PALTC. All studies underwent dual, independent review during 2 phases of screening. We included all study designs where POCUS was obtained and interpreted by a provider at the bedside.

RESULTS

Six studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the setting of COVID19 outbreaks in nursing homes and communities. The organ systems examined using POCUS were lung and vasculature. Lung ultrasound was shown to have variable diagnostic and prognostic utility in assessing lung injury secondary to COVID19. Ultrasound measurements of the vasculature were not useful for predicting hydration status.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Implementation of POCUS in PALTC is feasible, but current literature is limited to use in only 2 organ systems. These results suggest potential for expanding POCUS in PALTC. Further work is required to ascertain if POCUS use can improve patient outcomes in this health care setting.

Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography for thoracic and abdominal bacterial and parasitic diseases in ruminants: a comprehensive overview

This review article describes the roles of ultrasound in assessing thoracic and abdominal infectious diseases, mainly bacterial and parasitic ones that affect farm animals, including cattle, camels, sheep, and goats. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive imaging technique used to diagnose infectious diseases affecting the cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and hepatobiliary systems. In cases of thoracic and abdominal infections, ultrasound typically reveals abnormalities in echogenicity and echotexture, the presence of unusual artifacts, and mass formation exerting pressure on surrounding structures. Inflammatory and degenerative changes within the viscera can be identified ultrasonographically by comparing the echogenicity of affected areas with that of the surrounding normal parenchyma, such as in fascioliasis. Bacterial and parasitic infections often result in capsular mass lesions with anechoic contents, as observed in hydatid cysts and cysticercosis, or varying echogenic contents, as observed in liver abscesses. Effusions within the pericardium, pleura, and peritoneum are common ultrasonographic findings in infectious thoracic and abdominal diseases. However, these effusions' echogenicity does not always allow for clear differentiation between transudates and exudates. The routine use of ultrasonography in the evaluation of the chest and abdomen in affected or suspected ruminants is highly beneficial for detection, guiding therapeutic decisions, assessing prognosis, and aiding in the eradication of highly contagious diseases that cause significant economic losses.

Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.

DESIGN

A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020).

SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS

Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

Assessment of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Estimating Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Echocardiograms from Apical and Parasternal Long-Axis Views

This work aims to evaluate the performance of a new artificial intelligence tool (ExoAI) to compute the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in echocardiograms of the apical and parasternal long axis (PLAX) views. We retrospectively gathered echocardiograms from 441 individual patients (70% male, age: 67.3 ± 15.3, weight: 87.7 ± 25.4, BMI: 29.5 ± 7.4) and computed the ejection fraction in each echocardiogram using the ExoAI algorithm. We compared its performance against the ejection fraction from the clinical report. ExoAI achieved a root mean squared error of 7.58% in A2C, 7.45% in A4C, and 7.29% in PLAX, and correlations of 0.79, 0.75, and 0.89, respectively. As for the detection of low EF values (EF < 50%), ExoAI achieved an accuracy of 83% in A2C, 80% in A4C, and 91% in PLAX. Our results suggest that ExoAI effectively estimates the LVEF and it is an effective tool for estimating abnormal ejection fraction values (EF < 50%). Importantly, the PLAX view allows for the estimation of the ejection fraction when it is not feasible to acquire apical views (e.g., in ICU settings where it is not possible to move the patient to obtain an apical scan).

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Track in an Academic Family Medicine Department

Introduction

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being employed in family medicine. Residency tracks can be an effective way to increase mastery in a specific subdiscipline for interested residents, but no studies exist on the implementation of a POCUS track in family medicine. We address this gap in the literature by assessing POCUS use by POCUS track residents compared to non-POCUS track residents and faculty in an academic family medicine department.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all POCUS scans completed in the first year after implementation of a family medicine residency POCUS track. Scans were analyzed by two reviewers. We compared scan volume and type between POCUS track residents, non-POCUS track residents, and faculty. A blinded quality analysis was performed on each group of scans.

Results

A total of 572 scans were completed on 536 patients over 1 year. POCUS track residents scanned significantly more than non-POCUS track residents (mean difference of 72.2, CI 59.1 to 85.4; P<.0001). The most common scan types across groups were musculoskeletal and soft tissue. POCUS track residents showed statistically improved scan quality in all scan types, while non-POCUS track residents showed statistical improvement only in soft tissue, shoulder, and abdominal aortic aneurysm scans.

Conclusions

This is the first longitudinal study of a novel academic family medicine residency POCUS track. Participation in a POCUS track can increase the number, variety, and quality of scans performed. Our curriculum can be a model for family medicine residency programs that wish to provide robust POCUS training.

Imaging Informatics Education in Clinical Informatics Programs: Perspective from Imaging and Clinical Informatics Professionals

BACKGROUND

 Imaging and Clinical Informatics are domains of biomedical informatics. Imaging Informatics topics are often not covered in depth in most Clinical Informatics fellowships. While dedicated Imaging Informatics fellowships exist, they may not have the same rigor as ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) accredited Clinical Informatics fellowships and they do not provide a direct path toward subspecialty board certification.

OBJECTIVES

 We compared published curricula and test content between Clinical and Imaging Informatics fellowship programs. We then highlighted differences between training programs and identified overlapping topics and opportunities for additional education for each type of trainee.

METHODS

 Published consensus curricula and topics were extracted for each specialty. Two informaticists compared topics as shared or not shared between specialties. Next, test content outlines were compared for each specialty exam, extracted, and classified as shared or not shared content. A Venn diagram was created to highlight areas unique to each specialty as well as areas of overlap.

RESULTS

 There were 139 Clinical Informatics topics compared with 97 Imaging Informatics topics. Of the 139 Clinical Informatics topics, 115 (83%) were covered in the Imaging Informatics curriculum. Of the 97 Imaging Informatics topics, 74 (76%) were covered in the Clinical Informatics curriculum. When using test content outline data, 170 out of 397 (43%) Imaging Informatics topics matched to 64 out of 139 (46%) Clinical Informatics topics. We describe examples of overlapping topics and those unique to each program to identify potential areas to expand.

CONCLUSION

 Imaging Informatics and Clinical Informatics fellowship programs have some overlap with areas unique to each. Our review may help guide those seeking informatics education and potential certification. As enterprise imaging evolves, these differences may become more important and create knowledge gaps, if not systematically evaluated.

The use of diagnostic ultrasound by primary care physicians in Switzerland - a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic ultrasound has become a bedside tool widely available to many primary care physicians (PCPs) in Europe. It is often used as point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in this setting. In Switzerland, certain POCUS examinations are listed as learning objectives in existing ultrasound training programs (we defined these examinations as swissPOCUS = sPOCUS). Ultrasound performed by PCPs can lead to faster diagnostic workup and reduce referral to secondary care units. However, adequate training is crucial to guarantee high quality. To guide the development of ultrasound training programs for PCPs, this study explores the use of ultrasound in primary care in Switzerland.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. We invited PCPs from the Swiss practice-based research network "Sentinella" to collect data on the first 5 daily ultrasounds they ordered or performed themselves. Participating PCPs collected data for 3 months - divided into 4 groups to account for seasonal differences.

RESULTS

Out of 188 PCPs invited, 81.9% provided data through an initial questionnaire. 46.8% provided data on 1616 ultrasounds. 56.5% of PCPs had access to ultrasound machines, while 29.8% had completed formal training. 77% of the reported ultrasounds were self-performed; 27% of the reported scans (35% of all self-performed scans) were performed by PCPs with incomplete or no formal training. The main areas of interest were the abdominal (57.9%) and the musculoskeletal (22%) region. 36.9% of reported examinations were sPOCUS exams. Among PCPs with access to US machines, the percentages of referred examinations were similar for sPOCUS (11.9%) and non-sPOCUS (11.3%) indications. However, some sPOCUS musculoskeletal ultrasounds were often referred (e.g. tendon/ligament/muscle injuries or cutaneous/subcutaneous tumour).

CONCLUSION

Most Swiss PCPs had access to ultrasound equipment and performed a majority of both sPOCUS and non-sPOCUS scans themselves, often without or with incomplete training. This reflects the fact that POCUS was only recently introduced in Switzerland. There is a need for easily accessible POCUS training programs aimed at PCPs in Switzerland. Training courses for PCPs should focus on abdominal and musculoskeletal ultrasound, because these were the most common sites for scans, and because some sPOCUS musculoskeletal examinations showed a particularly high percentage of referral.

Influencing Physical Therapist's Self-efficacy for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Through Blended Learning: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the growing interest for physical therapists to incorporate musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound comes a need to understand how to organize training to promote the transfer of training to clinical practice. A common training strategy blends asynchronous learning through online modules and virtual simulations with synchronous practice on live simulated participants. However, few physical therapists who attend MSK ultrasound continuing education courses integrate ultrasound into clinical practice. Self-efficacy is a significant predictor of training transfer effectiveness. This study describes to what degree and how a blended learning strategy influenced participants' self-efficacy for MSK ultrasound and transfer of training to clinical practice.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-one outpatient physical therapists with no previous MSK ultrasound training.

METHODS

Twenty-one participants assessed their self-efficacy using a 26-item self-efficacy questionnaire at 3 intervals: before asynchronous, before synchronous training, and before returning to clinical practice. Participants were interviewed within 1 week of training using a semi-structured interview guide. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA. Thematic analysis was used to examine participants' experiences, and "following the thread" was used to integrate findings.

RESULTS

Self-efficacy questionnaire mean scores increased significantly across the 3- time points ( F [2, 40] = 172.7, P < .001, η 2 = 0.896). Thematic analysis indicated that asynchronous activities scaffolded participants' knowledge, enhanced their self-efficacy, and prepared them for synchronous learning; however, it did not replicate the challenges of MSK ultrasound. Synchronous activities further improved self-efficacy and helped participants better calibrate their self-judgments of their abilities and readiness to integrate MSK ultrasound training into clinical practice. Despite individual-level improvements in self-efficacy, interviewees recognized their limitations and a need for longitudinal training in a clinical environment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

A blended learning approach positively affects participants' self-efficacy for MSK ultrasound; however, future training designs should provide learners with additional support during the transition phase.

Status and perception of point-of-care ultrasound education in Korean medical schools: A national cross-sectional study

As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used in clinical settings, ultrasound education is expanding into student curricula. We aimed to determine the status and awareness of POCUS education in Korean medical schools using a nationwide cross-sectional survey. In October 2021, a survey questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was distributed via e-mail to professors in the emergency medicine (EM) departments of Korean medical schools. The questionnaire encompassed 19 multiple-choice questions covering demographics, current education, perceptions, and barriers, and the final question was an open-ended inquiry seeking suggestions for POCUS education. All EM departments of the 40 medical schools responded, of which only 13 (33%) reported providing POCUS education. The implementation of POCUS education primarily occurred in the third and fourth years, with less than 4 hours of dedicated training time. Five schools offered a hands-on education. Among schools offering ultrasound education, POCUS training for trauma cases is the most common. Eight schools had designated professors responsible for POCUS education and only 2 possessed educational ultrasound devices. Of the respondents, 64% expressed the belief that POCUS education for medical students is necessary, whereas 36%, including those with neutral opinions, did not anticipate its importance. The identified barriers to POCUS education included faculty shortages (83%), infrastructure limitations (76%), training time constraints (74%), and a limited awareness of POCUS (29%). POCUS education in Korean medical schools was limited to a minority of EM departments (33%). To successfully implement POCUS education in medical curricula, it is crucial to clarify learning objectives, enhance faculty recognition, and improve the infrastructure. These findings provide valuable insights for advancing ultrasound training in medical schools to ensure the provision of high-quality POCUS education for future healthcare professionals.

The effect of focused lung ultrasonography on antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections in Danish general practice: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PLUS-FLUS)

BACKGROUND

The use of antibiotics is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance and is considered a major threat to global health. In Denmark, approximately 75% of antibiotic prescriptions are issued in general practice, with acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) being one of the most common indications. Adults who present to general practice with symptoms of acute LRTI often suffer from self-limiting viral infections. However, some patients have bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), a potential life-threatening infection, that requires immediate antibiotic treatment. Importantly, no single symptom or specific point-of-care test can be used to discriminate the various diagnoses, and diagnostic uncertainty often leads to (over)use of antibiotics. At present, general practitioners (GPs) lack tools to better identify those patients who will benefit from antibiotic treatment. The primary aim of the PLUS-FLUS trial is to determine whether adults who present with symptoms of an acute LRTI in general practice and who have FLUS performed in addition to usual care are treated less frequently with antibiotics than those who only receive usual care.

METHODS

Adults (≥ 18 years) presenting to general practice with acute cough (< 21 days) and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, where the GP suspects a bacterial CAP, will be invited to participate in this pragmatic randomized controlled trial. All participants will receive usual care. Subsequently, participants will be randomized to either the control group (usual care) or to an additional focused lung ultrasonography performed by the GP (+ FLUS). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at the index consultation (day 0). Secondary outcomes include comparisons of the clinical course for participants in groups.

DISCUSSION

We will examine whether adults who present with symptoms of acute LRTI in general practice, who have FLUS performed in addition to usual care, have antibiotics prescribed less frequently than those given usual care alone. It is highly important that a possible reduction in antibiotic prescriptions does not compromise patients' recovery or clinical course, which we will assess closely.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06210282. Registered on January 17, 2024.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Point of Care Ultrasound in Primary Care: Study Design and Protocol

The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians (FPs) in primary care (PC), in comparison with the findings in the medical record (MR) at 12 months of follow-up. This study is conducted entirely in PC healthcare centers in Spain. Abdominal ultrasound scans performed by FPs (selected on the basis of their ultrasound knowledge and experience) are compared with the findings, or not, in the patient's MR after a 12-month follow-up period. The study will involve 100 FPs in Spain and an estimated sample size of 1334 patients who are to undergo abdominal POCUS at the indication of their physician. The results of the abdominal POCUS will be collected and compared with the findings of the MR. This comparison will be performed by another physician of the research team, different from their FP after one year of follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal POCUS has been addressed in the hospital setting but not in PC. This lack of evidence can begin to be resolved with studies such as the one we present, designed for unselected populations such as those treated in PC and taking the patient's MR as the gold standard, which will allow us to make comparisons with the patient's clinical course.

Consensus on relevant point-of-care ultrasound skills in General Practice: a two-round French Delphi study

CONTEXT

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become an important tool in the clinical practice of many specialties, but its use and impact in General Practice in France remains to be explored.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to obtain a consensus among experienced French general practitioners on a list of relevant POCUS skills in General Practice in 4 anatomical regions.

METHOD

We used a two-round Delphi method to obtain a consensus. An initial list of skills was drawn by conducting a literature review. To rate each skill, we used a nine-point Likert scale. An interactive meeting between experts took place between Delphi rounds. POCUS experts in General Practice were defined as general practitioners with theoretical training in ultrasound who regularly perform ultrasound, who have performed ultrasound for more than five years and/or are involved in providing ultrasound training.

RESULTS

11 French general practitioners screened 83 skills in 4 anatomical regions: abdominal, urogenital, vascular, gynecology and obstetrics. An agreement was obtained for 36 POCUS skills as to their appropriateness in General Practice. There were 17 skills with a strong appropriate agreement (100% of "7-9" ratings) and 19 skills with a relative agreement (100% of "5-9" ratings).

CONCLUSION

These skills could serve as a basis for guidelines on the use and curriculum of POCUS in General Practice in France as well as in other countries with similar healthcare systems.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): Assessing patient satisfaction and socioemotional benefits in the hospital setting

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an imaging modality used to make expedient patient care decisions at bedside. Though its diagnostic utility has been extensively described, POCUS is not yet considered standard of care in inpatient settings. Data from emergency department settings suggest that POCUS may yield socioemotional benefits beyond its diagnostic utility; furthermore, elements of the POCUS experience are known to promote placebo effects. These elements likely contribute to a placebo-like "POCUS positive care effect" (PPCE) with socioemotional benefits for receptive patients. Our objective is to provide the first characterization of the PPCE and its facilitating factors in an inpatient setting. In this novel mixed-methods study, we recruited 30 adult patients admitted to internal medicine floors in an urban academic medical center, recorded observations during their routine POCUS encounters, and administered post-encounter surveys. We conducted complementary quantitative and qualitative analyses to define and assess the magnitude of the PPCE. We also aimed to identify factors associated with and facilitating receptiveness to the PPCE. The results indicated that POCUS improves patients' satisfaction with their hospital providers and care overall, as well as perceived care efficiency. Mutual engagement, strong therapeutic alliances, and interpreting POCUS images to provide reassurance are most closely associated with this PPCE. Patients who have lower anxiety levels, less severe illness, and received efficient care delivery during their hospitalizations are most receptive to the PPCE. We conclude that diagnostic POCUS has the potential to exert a positive care effect for hospitalized patients. This PPCE is associated with modifiable factors at the patient, provider, and environment levels. Together, our findings lay the groundwork for an optimized "therapeutic POCUS" that yields maximal socioemotional benefits for receptive patients.

Use of point-of-care ultrasound in rural British Columbia: Scale, training, and barriers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the scale and scope of use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in rural British Columbia (BC).

DESIGN

Online survey.

SETTING

Rural BC.

PARTICIPANTS

Physicians practising in rural BC communities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Practitioner demographic and practice characteristics, locations and frequency of POCUS use, POCUS education and training, and practitioner attitudes about and barriers to POCUS use.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven surveys were completed in fall 2021, corresponding to a response rate of 11.9% of all rural practitioners in BC. A total of 52.1% of respondents worked in communities with less than 10,000 people, while 24.9% had practices with relatively large proportions of Indigenous patients (more than 20% of the practice population). Respondents reported ease of access to local POCUS devices, with use highest in emergency departments (87.2%) followed by ambulatory care clinic (54.7%) and inpatient (50.3%) settings. Use of POCUS influenced clinical decision making in half the occasions in which it was employed, including a range of diagnostic and procedural applications. Barriers to use included lack of training, limited time to perform POCUS scans, and absence of image review or consultative support. Needed support for POCUS identified by respondents included real-time image acquisition advice and funding for both device acquisition and training. Recommendations for including POCUS training in undergraduate and residency education were strongly supported.

CONCLUSION

Use of POCUS in BC is expanding in frequency, scope, and scale in practices serving rural areas and in rural communities with large Indigenous populations, with practitioners reporting important improvements in clinical care as a result. Future research could help improve systemic support for POCUS use, guide needed curriculum changes in medical school and postgraduate training, and be used to inform continuing professional development needs.

Development of a hybrid point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for first year medical students in a rural medical education program: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The field of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has advanced in recent decades due to the benefits it holds for medical providers. However, aspiring POCUS practitioners require adequate training. Unfortunately, there remains a paucity of resources to deliver this training, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Despite these barriers, calls for POCUS training in undergraduate medical education are growing, and many medical schools now deliver some form of POCUS education. Our program lacked POCUS training; therefore, we developed and implemented a POCUS curriculum for our first-year medical students.

METHODS

We developed a POCUS curriculum for first year medical students in a rural medically underserved region of the United States. To evaluate our course, we measured learning outcomes, self-reported confidence in a variety of POCUS domains, and gathered feedback on the course with a multi-modal approach: an original written pre- and post-test, survey tool, and semi-structured interview protocol, respectively.

RESULTS

Student (n=24) knowledge of POCUS significantly increased (pre-test average score = 55%, post-test average score = 79%, P<0.0001), and the course was well received based on student survey and interview feedback. In addition, students reported increased confidence toward a variety of knowledge and proficiency domains in POCUS use and their future clinical education and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of consensus in POCUS education, existing literature describes many curricular designs across institutions. We leveraged a combination of student initiatives, online resources, remote collaborations, local volunteers, and faculty development to bring POCUS to our institution in a rural and medically underserved region. Moreover, we demonstrate positive learning and experiential outcomes that may translate to improved outcomes in students' clinical education and practice. Further research is needed to evaluate the psychomotor skills, broader learning outcomes, and clinical performance of students who take part in our POCUS course.

Economic review of point-of-care EEG

Aims: Point-of-care electroencephalogram (POC-EEG) is an acute care bedside screening tool for the identification of nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The objective of this narrative review is to describe the economic themes related to POC-EEG in the United States (US).Materials and methods: We examined peer-reviewed, published manuscripts on the economic findings of POC-EEG for bedside use in US hospitals, which included those found through targeted searches on PubMed and Google Scholar. Conference abstracts, gray literature offerings, frank advertisements, white papers, and studies conducted outside the US were excluded.Results: Twelve manuscripts were identified and reviewed; results were then grouped into four categories of economic evidence. First, POC-EEG usage was associated with clinical management amendments and antiseizure medication reductions. Second, POC-EEG was correlated with fewer unnecessary transfers to other facilities for monitoring and reduced hospital length of stay (LOS). Third, when identifying NCS or NCSE onsite, POC-EEG was associated with greater reimbursement in Medical Severity-Diagnosis Related Group coding. Fourth, POC-EEG may lower labor costs via decreasing after-hours requests to EEG technologists for conventional EEG (convEEG).Limitations: We conducted a narrative review, not a systematic review. The studies were observational and utilized one rapid circumferential headband system, which limited generalizability of the findings and indicated publication bias. Some sample sizes were small and hospital characteristics may not represent all US hospitals. POC-EEG studies in pediatric populations were also lacking. Ultimately, further research is justified.Conclusions: POC-EEG is a rapid screening tool for NCS and NCSE in critical care and emergency medicine with potential financial benefits through refining clinical management, reducing unnecessary patient transfers and hospital LOS, improving reimbursement, and mitigating burdens on healthcare staff and hospitals. Since POC-EEG has limitations (i.e. no video component and reduced montage), the studies asserted that it did not replace convEEG.

A Clinician's Guide to the Implementation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Outpatient Practice

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable clinical tool used at the patient bedside to rapidly assess a wide variety of symptoms and problems which would otherwise take hours or even days. Though it has become the standard of care in Emergency Medicine and is becoming so in hospital internal medicine, less uptake has been appreciated in the outpatient setting despite reported interest from clinicians practicing there. A number of common barriers have been cited to explain this gap in use, which usually include access to equipment, mentorship, and time. In this review we present a proposed framework for clinicians who have an interest in implementing POCUS in their outpatient practice which we hope can mitigate some of these barriers and provide a more streamlined pathway to their desired goals.

Seeing through the myths: Practical aspects of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound in nephrology

Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) is emerging as an invaluable tool for guiding patient care at the bedside, providing real-time diagnostic information to clinicians. Today, POCUS is recognized as the fifth pillar of bedside clinical examination, alongside inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. In spite of growing interest, the adoption of diagnostic POCUS in nephrology remains limited, and comprehensive training beyond kidney ultrasound is offered in only a few fellowship programs. Moreover, several misconceptions and barriers surround the integration of POCUS into day-to-day nephrology practice. These include myths about its scope, utility, impact on patient outcomes and legal implications. In this minireview, we address some of these issues to encourage wider and proper utilization of POCUS.

Past and Present of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS): A Narrative Review

This article aims to conduct a literature review to gain insight into point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). PoCUS is a rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and radiation-free imaging modality that can be used in stable and unstable patients. PoCUS can be performed parallel to physical examination, resuscitation, and stabilization; repeated exams in critical patients are essential for improving sensitivity. The review highlights how PoCUS, which was initially used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in trauma patients, has developed into a life-saving diagnostic tool that could be utilized by treating physicians during various stages of diagnosis, resuscitation, operation, and postoperative critical care when managing sick patients. The review also notes the barriers to the widespread uptake of PoCUS in general internal medicine and the recent commercial availability of "pocket" or handheld probes that have made PoCUS more readily available. This review concludes that adopting a focused binary decision-making approach can maximize PoCUS's value in many clinical settings, including emergency departments, intensive care units, and operation theatres. Overall, the review emphasizes the importance of awareness of common indications, limitations, and strengths of this evolving and promising technology to determine its future trajectory: Providing comprehensive PoCUS training within internal medicine curriculums and supporting trainers to do so.

Assessment of cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound objective structured clinical examinations in graduating anesthesiology residents across multiple residency programs

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To implement and assess a cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in a large cohort of graduating anesthesia residents.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospitals.

SUBJECTS

150 graduating anesthesia residents in their last nine months of training.

INTERVENTIONS

A standardized cardiopulmonary OSCE was administered to each resident.

MEASUREMENTS

The cardiac views evaluated were parasternal long axis (PLAX), apical 4 chamber (A4C), and parasternal short axis (PSAX). The pulmonary views evaluated were pleural effusion (PLE) and pneumothorax (PTX). In addition, a pre- and post-exam survey scored on a 5-point Likert scale was administered to each resident.

MAIN RESULTS

A4C view (mean 0.7 ± 0.3) scored a lower mean, compared to PSAX (mean 0.8 ± 0.3) and PLAX (mean 0.8 ± 0.4). Residents performed well on the PTX exam (mean 0.9 ± 0.3) but more poorly on the PLE exam (mean 0.6 ± 0.4). Structural identification across cardiac and pulmonary views were mostly high (means >0.7), but advanced interpretive skills and maneuvers had lower mean scores. Pre- and post- OSCE survey results were positive with almost all questions scoring >4 on the Likert scale.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that a cardiopulmonary POCUS OSCE can be successfully implemented across multiple anesthesia training programs. While most residents were able to perform basic ultrasound views and identify structures, advanced interpretive skills and maneuvers performed lower.

Functional Photoacoustic Imaging for Placental Monitoring: A Mini Review

The placenta, a highly vascularized interface between the mother and fetus, undergoes dramatic anatomical and functional changes during pregnancy. These changes occur both during healthy development and adverse pathologies of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia (PE). Abnormal placental development can lead to life-long health impacts on both the mother and child. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging, extensively developed for preclinical imaging applications in oncology and cardiovascular disease, uses optical energy to generate acoustic waves through thermoelastic expansion of light-absorbing chromophores within tissue. Recently, PA imaging has been used to study preclinical placental anatomy and function. If clinical translation of PA imaging of the placenta is achieved, the impact on maternal-fetal health could be expansive. This perspective highlights the recent progress in PA imaging for placental monitoring and discusses the progress needed for human clinical translation.

Nephrologist-Led Simulation-Based Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Workshop for Medical Students: Insights and Implications

Background

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is being increasingly recognized as an adjunct to physical examination. However, limited availability of trained faculty in specialties other than emergency medicine and lack of universal training standards remain key barriers to its widespread integration into undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. In this study, we sought to explore the effectiveness of a short simulation-based workshop for medical students teaching basic cardiac ultrasound led by a nephrologist.

Methods

Workshops were conducted for 2 different groups of 4th-year medical students with a total of 25 attendees. The workshop consisted of a 1-hour lecture followed by 15 minutes of cardiac anatomy simulation and a 2- to 2.5-hour hands-on session in the simulation laboratory. An anonymous precourse questionnaire comprising 10 questions assessing the interpretation of common grayscale ultrasound findings encountered in patients with undifferentiated hypotension was performed. After the workshop, a postcourse exam and survey were conducted, retesting the same concepts and seeking the students' feedback on the course.

Results

In total, 23 and 20 students answered the pre- and postcourse surveys, respectively. The mean total score on the pretest was 63.8% ± 13.6%, which significantly increased to 91.5% ± 10.5% on the posttest (P < .001). About 90% of the respondents strongly agreed that the cardiac anatomy simulation improved their understanding of the cardiac sonographic anatomy; 75% strongly agreed that the hands-on simulation enhanced their confidence in image acquisition and interpretation; and 70% said they would choose nephrology elective if POCUS training was integrated with it.

Conclusions

A nephrologist-led diagnostic POCUS workshop using simulation techniques is effective in improving the learners' knowledge, understanding of the sonographic cardiac anatomy, and confidence in image acquisition. Integration of POCUS training may increase medical student interest in nephrology elective rotations.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit

Objective

Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is a useful tool for managing critically ill patients in intensive care. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CCE examinations because of operator dependence. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of CCE examinations compared with cardiology-performed transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).

Design Setting and Subjects

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients in a medical ICU in a large academic medical center in the United States. We compared CCE examinations performed by a fellow and reviewed by a staff physician between May 5, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to TTE obtained within 24 hours of the CCE examination.

Intervention Measurements and Main Results

We developed a standardized process for documentation of all CCE examinations performed in the medical ICU. We assessed agreement (kappa statistic), sensitivity and specificity of CCE examination compared with TTE. Features included left ventricle (LV) systolic function, right ventricle (RV) size, RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, mitral insufficiency, tricuspid insufficiency, and aortic insufficiency. The study analyzed 504 pairs of CCE and TTE examinations. Kappa statistics for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction, pericardial effusion, and RV size ranged from 0.60 to 0.74. CCE showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction and pericardial effusion, with values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. The kappa statistic for detecting RV dilation was 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.85. In contrast, CCE examinations were nondiagnostic for mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency in 60-70% of cases, whereas TTE examinations were nondiagnostic in 20-30% of cases. Kappa statistics for mitral, tricuspid, and aortic insufficiency ranged from 0.32 to 0.42.

Conclusions

CCE is a reliable tool for assessing LV and RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, and RV size. However, CCE may be limited in its ability to detect mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency.

Differentiating pathologic parathyroid glands from thyroid nodules on neck ultrasound: the PARATH-US cross-sectional study

Background

Neck ultrasound (US) is a widely used and accessible operator-dependent technique that helps characterize thyroid nodules and pathologic parathyroid glands (PPGs). However, thyroid nodules may sometimes be confused with PPGs. PARATH-US study aims at identifying US characteristics to differentiate PPGs from thyroid nodules, as there is no study, at present, which directly compares the US features of these two common neoplasms.

Methods

PARATH-US is a single-center study that was conducted at a tertiary referral center, including consecutive lesions from patients undergoing neck US examination from 2016 to 2022.

Findings

176 PPGs (158 patients: serum calcium levels 2.91 [IQR 2.74-3.05] mmol/L, PTH levels 173 [112-296] ng/L) were compared to 232 size- and volume-matched thyroid nodules (204 age- and sex-matched patients). The morphologic patterns, echoic content and vascular status were all different between PPGs and thyroid neoplasms (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). The combined parameters maximally discriminated PPGs from thyroid nodules (OR, 7.6; 95% CI: 3.4, 17.1, p < 0.0001). When applying risk stratification systems developed for thyroid malignancies, 58-63% of PPGs were classified as high-risk lesions. Parathyroid adenomas had larger sizes and volumes than hyperplasias (p = 0.013 and p = 0.029). Serum calcium and PTH levels were significantly correlated with PPG size and volume (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

Interpretation

We demonstrate the presence of distinct US characteristics in PPGs, which help differentiate them from thyroid nodules. When mistaken for thyroid nodules, PPGs bear high-risk US features. When dealing with high-risk cervical lesions detected on US, a PPG should be suspected, and an assessment of calcium levels recommended to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures.

Funding

CYTO-TRAIN, C2022DOSRH053, funded by the French Regional Health Agency.

Building Consensus on the Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills Required for Effective Healthcare Service Delivery at District Hospitals in South Africa: A Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread availability of ultrasound machines in South African district hospitals, there are no guidelines on the competency in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use required by generalist doctors in this setting. This study aimed to define the required POCUS competencies by means of consensus via the Delphi method.

METHODS

An online Delphi process was initiated in June 2022, using the existing American Academy of Family Physicians' ultrasound curriculum (84 skillsets) as the starting questionnaire. Panelists were selected across the country, including two from district hospitals in each province and two from each academic family medicine department in South Africa (N = 36). In each iterative round, the participants were asked to identify which POCUS skillsets were essential, optional (region-specific), or non-essential for South African district hospitals. This process continued until consensus (>70% agreement) was achieved on all of the skillsets.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 81 of the 84 skillsets after 5 iterative rounds (96.4%), with 3 skillsets that could not achieve consensus (defined as <5% change over more than 2 consecutive rounds). The final consensus identified 38 essential, 28 optional, and 15 non-essential POCUS skillsets for the South African district hospital context.

CONCLUSIONS

The list of essential POCUS skillsets provided by this study highlights the predominance of obstetric- and trauma-based skillsets required for generalist healthcare workers in South African district hospitals. The findings will require priority setting and revalidation prior to their implementation across the country.

Antenatal ultrasound needs-analysis survey of Australian rural/remote healthcare clinicians: recommendations for improved service quality and access

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool in pregnancy, capable of identifying high-risk pregnancies and life-threatening conditions, allowing for appropriate management to prevent maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Women and babies from rural and remote Australia and low-resource areas worldwide experience poorer health outcomes and barriers to accessing antenatal care and imaging services. Healthcare clinicians working in these regions face significant challenges practising with limited resources and accessing training opportunities.

OBJECTIVE

To perform an exploratory needs-analysis survey investigating the availability, accessibility and use of antenatal ultrasound in rural Australia, exploring rural clinicians' interest in and access to ultrasound training opportunities.

METHODS

The survey tool for this cross-sectional study was designed and distributed as an anonymous online questionnaire targeting healthcare clinicians (doctors, nurses, midwives, clinic managers, Aboriginal healthcare workers) providing antenatal care in rural regions. Descriptive analysis was applied to quantitative data and thematic analysis was used to explore qualitative components.

RESULTS

A total of 114 valid survey responses were analysed. Overall, 39% (43/111) reported ultrasound was not used when providing antenatal care to patients at their clinic, stating 'Lack of ultrasound equipment (73%,29/40) and inaccessibility of training opportunities (47%,19/40) as the main reasons. For those with ultrasound (61%,68/111), estimating due date (89%,57/64) was the main use, and limited training/skills to operate the equipment (59%,38/64) and inaccessibility/distance of training opportunities (45%,29/64) were the most commonly reported barriers. Clinicians described a lack of childcare options (73%,74/102), long distances to reach ultrasound services (64%,65/102), appointment (59%,60/102) and transport availability/times (46%,47/102) as the main obstacles to patient access. Increased attendance, compliance with care directives, parental bonding and improved lifestyle choices were described by respondents as positive outcomes of antenatal ultrasound use.

CONCLUSIONS

Future efforts to combat inequitable service access must adopt a coordinated approach to meet the needs of pregnant women in low-resource settings. Providing portable ultrasound equipment, training in antenatal Point-of-Care ultrasound (PoCUS) with ongoing support/mentoring and accreditation of health professionals could strengthen rural workforce capacity. This, along with addressing the complex economic, environmental and socio-cultural barriers faced by patients, could improve service access and pregnancy outcomes in rural and remote communities.

Factors affecting point-of-care ultrasound implementation in general practice: a survey in Danish primary care clinics

OBJECTIVE

The implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in general practice varies, but it is unknown what determines this variation. The purpose of this study was to explore (1) the overall proportion of POCUS-users among general practitioners (GPs), (2) the current use of POCUS by GPs, (3) factors related to the implementation of POCUS in general practice and (4) GPs' concerns related to POCUS use in general practice.

DESIGN

An online survey was distributed in June 2019.

SETTING

General practice.

PARTICIPANTS

GPs working in office-based primary care clinics in Denmark.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The questionnaire was developed using mixed methods and included questions about participants' characteristics, past POCUS training and experience, capability, opportunity and motivation for using POCUS in the primary care setting. Results were summarised using descriptive statistics. Association between GPs' background characteristics and POCUS use was tested using logistics regression.

RESULTS

Responses were analysed from 1216 questionnaires corresponding to 36.4% of all GPs in Denmark. The majority (72.3%) of participants had previous POCUS experience, 14.7% had access to a POCUS device and 11.5% used POCUS. Several factors motivated participants to use POCUS. However, barriers existed such as lack of remuneration and high workload. Additionally, many GPs questioned their ability to scan with sufficient diagnostic accuracy and the impact of POCUS on the consultation. Of non-users, 28.7% believed they would be using POCUS in the future.

CONCLUSION

Although, the majority of GPs had past experience with POCUS and felt motivated to use it, few had implemented POCUS. Several factors influenced the GPs' capability, opportunity and motivation for using POCUS and several concerns were registered by non-users.

Use of point-of-care ultrasound in a low-resource setting to diagnose Achilles tendon rupture and avulsion fracture of the calcaneal bone

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming more prevalent in recent years for evaluating patients presenting with musculoskeletal injuries in the emergency department (ED). This imaging modality has been utilized to diagnose soft tissue and bony injuries accurately, obtain appropriate consultation, and perform timely interventional procedures in the ED.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 55-year-old man who presented to the ED with significant left ankle pain following a ground-level fall. His physical examination showed swelling and tenderness around the ankle. POCUS examination aided the rapid and accurate detection of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates that POCUS is a valuable diagnostic tool in evaluating patients with a suspected Achilles tendon rupture, especially in a resource-limited setting.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Unveils Life-Threatening Conditions: A Case Series Highlighting Its Vital Diagnostic Role

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool in healthcare, offering rapid and cost-effective evaluation of cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. This case series highlights the vital role of POCUS in diagnosing life-threatening conditions and emphasizes the need for adequate training in its use. The first case describes a patient with chest pain, where POCUS revealed findings suggestive of thoracic aortic dissection, leading to timely transfer and surgical repair. The second case involves a patient with altered mental status and hypoxia, where POCUS identified a right atrial thrombus leading to thrombectomy. The discussion explores the expanding applications of POCUS in various medical specialties, including critical care and trauma, and its potential to improve patient outcomes. While POCUS has shown great promise, it remains a user-dependent technology, necessitating comprehensive training and collaboration among healthcare professionals to ensure its effective and safe use.

Point-of-care ultrasound in geriatrics: a national survey of VA medical centers

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can aid geriatricians in caring for complex, older patients. Currently, there is limited literature on POCUS use by geriatricians. We conducted a national survey to assess current POCUS use, training desired, and barriers among Geriatrics and Extended Care ("geriatric") clinics at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of all VAMCs between August 2019 and March 2020 using a web-based survey sent to all VAMC Chiefs of Staff and Chiefs of geriatric clinics.

RESULTS

All Chiefs of Staff (n=130) completed the survey (100% response rate). Chiefs of geriatric clinics ("chiefs") at 76 VAMCs were surveyed and 52 completed the survey (68% response rate). Geriatric clinics were located throughout the United States, mostly at high-complexity, urban VAMCs. Only 15% of chiefs responded that there was some POCUS usage in their geriatric clinic, but more than 60% of chiefs would support the implementation of POCUS use. The most common POCUS applications used in geriatric clinics were the evaluation of the bladder and urinary obstruction. Barriers to POCUS use included a lack of trained providers (56%), ultrasound equipment (50%), and funding for training (35%). Additionally, chiefs reported time utilization, clinical indications, and low patient census as barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS has several potential applications for clinicians caring for geriatric patients. Though only 15% of geriatric clinics at VAMCs currently use POCUS, most geriatric chiefs would support implementing POCUS use as a diagnostic tool. The greatest barriers to POCUS implementation in geriatric clinics were a lack of training and ultrasound equipment. Addressing these barriers systematically can facilitate implementation of POCUS use into practice and permit assessment of the impact of POCUS on geriatric care in the future.

Rural family physician use of point-of-care ultrasonography: experiences of primary care providers in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

In British Columbia (BC), rural and remote areas lack proximal access to radiographic services. Poor access to radiographic services in rural settings presents a challenge to timely diagnosis and screening across many disease states and healthy pregnancies. As a solution to the lack of access to radiographic services in rural settings, the Rural Coordination Centre of BC (RCCbc) supported rural Family Physicians (FPs) wishing to use PoCUS through the Intelligent Network for PoCUS (IN PoCUS) program. This study evaluates FPs' experience and use of PoCUS in their clinical practice.

METHODS

This qualitative study conducted in-depth virtual interviews with 21 FPs across rural BC. The interview asked participants' motivation to participate in the RCCbc program, the type of training they received, their current use of PoCUS, their experience with the technology, and their experience interacting with specialists in regional centres. Thematic analysis of findings was undertaken.

RESULTS

This study used Rogers' framework on the five elements of diffusion of innovation to understand the factors that impede and enable the adoption of PoCUS in rural practice. Rural FPs in this study differentiated PoCUS from formal imaging done by specialists. The adoption of PoCUS was viewed as an extension of physical exams and was compatible with their values of providing generalist care. This study found that the use of PoCUS provided additional information that led to better clinical decision-making for triage and allowed FPs to determine the urgency for patient referral and transport to tertiary hospitals. FPs also reported an increase in job satisfaction with PoCUS use. Some barriers to using PoCUS included the time needed to be acquainted with the technology and learning how to integrate it into their clinical flow in a seamless manner.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated the importance of PoCUS in improving patient care and facilitating timely diagnosis and treatment. As the use of PoCUS among FPs is relatively new in Canada, larger infrastructure support such as improving billing structures, long-term subsidies, educational opportunities, and a quality improvement framework is needed to support the use of PoCUS among rural FPs.

Integration of ultrasound simulation to improve medical student knowledge and satisfaction on the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship

BACKGROUND

There has been increased use of ultrasound in contemporary medical education. Students tend to report a higher sense of satisfaction when ultrasound is incorporated into medical education, but little is known about whether its use leads to an improvement in medical knowledge acquisition independent of the ultrasound skill. In addition, there is no consensus among obstetrics and gynecology clerkships on the most effective way to incorporate ultrasound into the clerkship curriculum.

OBJECTIVE

This project described a method to integrate ultrasound simulation into an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship curriculum. Our hypothesis was that the incorporation of ultrasound simulation in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship curriculum will lead to an increase in standardized assessments of obstetrics and gynecology knowledge.

STUDY DESIGN

A prepost study at a single institution with multiple methods design was employed. Of note, 10 high-yield pathology topics commonly tested on the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics quizzes and National Board of Medical Examiners examinations were summarized into study sheets and associated with a representative ultrasound simulation module. All students were provided access to the summary sheets. Students with instruction in ultrasound simulation consisted of the postintervention group and were compared with students that did not have ultrasound simulation (preintervention group). Quiz and examination scores were compared between the groups. In addition, students who accessed the ultrasound simulator were given a survey at the end of their rotation to obtain qualitative information regarding satisfaction and the incorporation of ultrasound into the clerkship curriculum.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in quiz or examination scores between students who had access to the ultrasound simulation and those who did not. Most students found the integration of ultrasound simulation into the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship to be beneficial, to enhance their learning, to boost their confidence in ultrasound skills, and to be a potential substitute for clinical ultrasounds during the rotation.

CONCLUSION

Integration of ultrasound simulation into obstetrics and gynecology clerkships and medical school education is understudied but can be a valuable educational tool. The incorporation of ultrasound into the medical education system is a topic of current studies. This study found that integration was viewed favorably by students, although integration was not associated with an improvement in medical knowledge measured via quiz and examination performance. Our research provided students with a standardized ultrasound education experience, which improved student satisfaction with the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship but did not correlate to increased demonstrated medical knowledge and understanding of examinations. Moving forward, student participants provided various suggestions on how we can continue to enrich medical students' education with the implementation of ultrasound.

Single Image based Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging Using Residual Learning of Wavelet Features

The generation of super resolution ultrasound images from the low-resolution (LR) brightness mode (B-mode) images acquired by the portable point of care ultrasound systems has been of sufficient interest in the recent past. With the advancements in deep learning, there have been numerous attempts in this direction. However, all the approaches have been concentrated on employing the direct image as the input to the neural network. In this work, a stationary wavelet (SWT) decomposition is employed to extract the features from the input LR image which is passed through a modified residual network and the learned features are combined using the inverse SWT to reconstruct the high resolution (HR) image at a 4× scale factor. The proposed approach when compared to the state-of-the art approaches, results in an improved high resolution reconstruction.Clinical relevance- The proposed approach will enable the generation of high-resolution images from portable ultrasound systems, allowing for easier interpretation and faster diagnostics in primary care settings.

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of point-of-care lung ultrasonography in a tertiary centre in Benin: a qualitative study among general physicians and pneumologists

OBJECTIVES

Owing to its ease-of-use and excellent diagnostic performance for the assessment of respiratory symptoms, point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LUS) has emerged as an attractive skill in resource-low settings, where limited access to specialist care and inconsistent radiology services erode health equity.To narrow down the research to practice gap, this study aims to gain in-depth insights in the perceptions on POC-LUS and computer-assisted POC-LUS for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in a low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) of sub-Saharan Africa.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with three pneumologists and five general physicians in a tertiary centre for pneumology and tuberculosis in Benin, West Africa. The center hosts a prospective cohort study on the diagnostic performance of POC-LUS for LRTI. In this context, all participants started a POC-LUS training programme 6 months before the current study. Transcripts were coded by the interviewer, checked for intercoder reliability by an independent psychologist, compared and thematically summarised according to grounded theory methods.

RESULTS

Various barriers- and facilitators+ to POC-LUS implementation were identified related to four principal categories: (1) hospital setting (eg, lack of resources for device renewal or maintenance-, need for POC tests+), (2) physician's perceptions (eg, lack of opportunity to practice-, willingness to appropriate the technique+), (3) tool characteristics (eg, unclear lifespan-, expedited diagnosis+) and (4) patient's experience (no analogous image to keep-, reduction in costs+). Furthermore, all interviewees had positive attitudes towards computer-assisted POC-LUS.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear need for POC affordable lung imaging techniques in LMIC and physicians are willing to implement POC-LUS to optimise the diagnostic approach of LRTI with an affordable tool. Successful integration of POC-LUS into clinical routine will require adequate responses to local challenges related to the lack of available maintenance resources and limited opportunity to supervised practice for physicians.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Circulatory failure is classified into four types of shock (obstructive, cardiogenic, distributive, and hypovolemic) that must be distinguished as each requires a different treatment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used in clinical practice for acute conditions, and several diagnostic protocols using POCUS for shock have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in identifying the etiology of shock.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, European Union Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) until June 15, 2022. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for each type of shock. The study protocol was prospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (UMIN 000048025).

RESULTS

Of the 1553 studies identified, 36 studies were full-text reviewed, and 12 studies with 1132 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.91] and 0.98 [95% CI 0.92-0.99] for obstructive shock, 0.78 [95% CI 0.56-0.91] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.92-0.98] for cardiogenic shock, 0.90 [95% CI 0.84-0.94] and 0.92 [95% CI 0.88-0.95] for hypovolemic shock, and 0.79 [95% CI 0.71-0.85] and 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-0.98] for distributive shock, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each type of shock was approximately 0.95. The positive likelihood ratios for each type of shock were all greater than 10, especially 40 [95% CI 11-105] for obstructive shock. The negative likelihood ratio for each type of shock was approximately 0.2.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of the etiology for each type of shock using POCUS was characterized by high sensitivity and positive likelihood ratios, especially for obstructive shock.

Barriers and Facilitators to Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use in Rural Australia

This study explores the barriers and facilitators to point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and adoption in rural healthcare since POCUS is a useful resource for rural clinicians to overcome the challenges associated with limited on-site clinical support, such as limited diagnostic imaging services and infrastructure. A qualitative descriptive study was employed, interviews with ten rural clinicians were conducted, and the data were analysed using the Walt and Gilson health policy framework to guide interpretation. Barriers include a lack of standardised training requirements, the cost of the devices and challenges recouping the costs of purchase and training, difficulty with the maintenance of skills, and a lack of an effective method to achieve quality assurance. Coupling POCUS with telemedicine could address the issues of the maintenance of skills and quality assurance to facilitate increased POCUS use, leading to positive patient safety and social and economic implications.

Development and Implementation of a Semi-Automated Workflow for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Billing and Documentation Within an Electronic Health Record

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. With its many advantages, including ease of use, real-time multisystem assessment, affordability, availability, and accuracy, it has been adopted by all medical specialties. Despite its advantages, the lack of standard workflow and automated billing solutions makes it difficult to launch a comprehensive POCUS program. In this work, we describe how we created and implemented an efficient standardized EHR-based workflow for POCUS that has been used across multiple division and settings within our organization.

A survey of barriers and facilitators to ultrasound use in low- and middle-income countries

Point-of-care ultrasound has the potential to help inform assessment, diagnosis, and management of illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). To better understand current ultrasound use, barriers and facilitators to use, and perceptions and practices in LMIC, we conducted an anonymous online global survey targeting healthcare providers training and using ultrasound in LMIC. A total of 241 respondents representing 62 countries participated and most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals in LMIC. Most had received ultrasound training (78%), reported expertise (65%) and confidence (90%) in ultrasound use, and had access to ultrasound (88%), utilizing ultrasound most commonly for procedures and for evaluations of lungs, heart, and trauma. Access to an ultrasound machine was reported as both the top barrier (17%) and top facilitator (53%); other common barriers included access to education and training, cost, and competition for use and other common facilitators included access to a probe, gel, and electricity, and acceptance by healthcare providers, administrators, and patients. Most (80%) noted ultrasound access was important and 96% agreed that ultrasound improves quality of care and patient outcomes. Improving access to low-cost ultrasound equipment is critical to increasing ultrasound use among those who are trained.

Open-Source Ultrasound Trainer for Healthcare Professionals: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial

INTRODUCTION

This technical report describes the development of a high-fidelity, open-source ultrasound trainer and showcases its abilities through a proof-of-concept, pilot randomized control trial. The open-source ultrasound trainer (OSUT) aims to enhance anatomical visualization during ultrasound education. The OSUT can attach to any ultrasound transducer, uses minimal hardware, and is able to be used during live patient ultrasound examinations.

METHODS

After viewing a standardized training video lecture, 24 incoming first-year medical students with no prior ultrasound experience were randomized into a control group given an ultrasound system or an intervention group given the OSUT in addition to an ultrasound system. Both groups were tasked with localizing the thyroid, abdominal aorta, and right kidney on a patient. Performance outcomes were structure localization time, ultrasound image accuracy, and preactivity and postactivity participant confidence.

RESULTS

The OSUT decreased right kidney localization time (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.001), increased sonographer right kidney accuracy ratings (Mann-Whitney U , U = 10.5, P < 0.05), and increased confidence in structure identification (Mann-Whitney U , U = 37, P = 0.045) and overall ultrasound ability (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.007). There was no significant change in localization time, accuracy ratings, or participant confidence for locating the thyroid and abdominal aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-fidelity, open-source ultrasound trainer was developed to aid healthcare professionals in learning diagnostic ultrasound. The study demonstrated the potential beneficial effects of the OSUT in localizing the right kidney, showcasing its adaptability and accessibility for ultrasound education for certain anatomical structures.

Practitioners' views on community implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the UK: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Implementing Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in community practice could help to decide upon and prioritise initial treatment, procedures and appropriate specialist referral or conveyance to hospital. A recent literature review suggests that image quality, portability and cost of ultrasound devices are all improving with widening indications for community POCUS, but evidence about community POCUS use is needed in the UK. We aimed to explore views of clinical practitioners, actively using ultrasound, on their experiences of using POCUS and potential facilitators and barriers to its wider implementation in community settings in the UK.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative interview study with practitioners from community and secondary care settings actively using POCUS in practice. A convenience sample of eligible participants from different clinical specialties and settings was recruited using social media adverts, through websites of relevant research groups and snowball sampling. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted online using Microsoft Teams. These were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a Framework approach supported by NVivo 12.

RESULTS

We interviewed 16 practitioners aged between 40 and 62 years from different professional backgrounds, including paramedics, emergency physicians, general practitioners, and allied health professionals. Participants identified key considerations and facilitators for wider implementation of POCUS in community settings in the UK: resource requirements for deployment and support of working devices; sufficient time and a skilled workforce; attention to training, education and support needs; ensuring proper governance, guidelines and quality assurance; workforce considerations; enabling ease of use in assisting decision making with consideration of unintended consequences; and more robust evidence to support perceptions of improved patient outcomes and experience.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS could be useful for improving patient journey and health outcomes in community care, but this requires further research to evaluate outcomes. The facilitators identified could help make community POCUS a reality.

Implementation of Point‑of‑Care ultrasound examination in general practice

Point-of-Care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a method defined as a targeted ultrasound examination of patients with acute symptoms or syndromes that can be diagnosed by a healthcare worker at a site. The aim is to answer a specific diagnostic or therapeutic question or to ease the therapeutic procedure. Recently in Europe, there has been an increase in implementing POCUS in many medical fields including primary health care. The Czech Society of General Practice (SVL ČLS JEP) has for several years been watching the use of POCUS in primary care in many European countries. In August 2020, the committee of the Czech Society of General Practice charged the Working Group for ultrasound in primary care to start a project POCUS iGP - POCUS Implementation in General Practice aiming for the implementation of POCUS into daily practice in general medicine. An ultrasound device is required, as well as setting up the education and training courses with follow up courses and a consensual curriculum of skills, securing quality control mechanisms, proving with scientific evidence the reliability of POCUS when provided by GPs and setting up the final rules of competency and payment for performance. The current international trend of patient centred care in primary health settings and increasing competencies of GPs emphasises a need to implement new point of care diagnostic methods. One of which is point of care ultrasonography. Scientific outcomes and published data from primary care and other fields of medicine show that even doctors who do not work in radiology departments are after a relatively short course able to independently provide POCUS examinations with high reliability. Establishment of the Czech Multidisciplinary Task Force Group for standards, education and research in Pointof- Care ultrasound support development of the POCUS implementation.

Use of point-of-care ultrasound by internists to rapidly diagnose acute decompensated heart failure

Dyspnea is a common presenting complaint seen by hospitalists. The differential is broad, including life-threatening and less urgent etiologies. We report a 43-year-old male presenting to an inpatient medicine service with dyspnea in the setting of asthma, tobacco and occupational exposures, and no prior cardiac history. Use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) immediately confirmed diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, allowing prompt decision making and care. Use of POCUS is widespread among emergency physicians and intensivists; however, use among medical students, internal medicine residents, and hospitalists remains variable. Increased use of POCUS by hospitalists may increase speed and accuracy of diagnosis.