Differential T cell response against BK virus regulatory and structural antigens: A viral dynamics modelling approach

The value and complexity of studying cellular immunity against BK Polyomavirus in kidney transplant recipients

BK Polyomavirus is of particular concern for kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppression. This problem is exacerbated by the high effectiveness of antirejection therapies, which also compromise the organism's ability to fight viral infections. The long-term risk is loss of graft function through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). The assessment of host immunity and its link to the control of viral infections is a major challenge. In terms of humoral immunity, researchers have highlighted the prognostic value of the pre-transplantation anti-BKPyV immunoglobulin G titer. However, humoral immunity alone does not guarantee viral clearance, and the correlation between the humoral response and the time course of the infection remains weak. In contrast, cellular immunity variables appear to be more closely associated with viral clearance, given that the cellular immune response to the kidney transplant is the main target of immunosuppressive treatments in recipients. However, the assessment of the cellular immune response to BK Polyomavirus is complex, and many details still need to be characterized. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about BKPyV cellular immunity, as well as the difficulties that may be encountered in studying it in kidney transplant recipient. This is an essential area of research for optimizing the management of transplant recipients and minimizing the risks associated with insidious BKPyV disease.

Intravenous immunoglobulins do not prove beneficial to reduce alloimmunity among kidney transplant recipients with BKV-associated nephropathy

Reduced immunosuppression during BKV-DNAemia has been associated with T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) may reduce alloimmunity. We studied 860 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) for the development of BKV-DNAuria and BKV-DNAemia (low-level <10 000 IE/ml, high-level >10 000 IE/ml). 52/131 KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia received IVIG. The HLA-related immunological risk was stratified by the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm. BKV-DNAuria only was observed in 86 KTRs (10.0%), low-level BKV-DNAemia in 180 KTRs (20.9%) and high-level BKV-DNAemia in 131 KTRs (15.2%). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly less TCMR compared to KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia (5.2% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001) and no BKV-replication (13.2%; P = 0.014), lowest rates of de novo DSA (21.3%), ABMR (9.2%) and flattest glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope (-0.8 ml/min). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly higher median (interquartile range) total PIRCHE if they developed TCMR [100.22 (72.6) vs. 69.52 (49.97); P = 0.020] or ABMR [128.86 (52.99) vs. 69.52 (49.96); P = 0.005]. Administration of IVIG did not shorten duration of BKV-DNAemia (P = 0.798) or reduce TCMR, de novo DSA and ABMR (P > 0.05). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed best protection against alloimmunity, with a high number of PIRCHE co-determining the remaining risk. The administration of IVIG, however, was not beneficial in reducing alloimmunity.

Sex-Associated Differences in Cytomegalovirus Prevention: Prophylactic Strategy is Potentially Associated With a Strong Kidney Function Impairment in Female Renal Transplant Patients

Post-transplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) syndrome can be prevented using the antiviral drug (val)ganciclovir. (Val)ganciclovir is typically administered following a prophylactic or a pre-emptive strategy. The prophylactic strategy entails early universal administration, the pre-emptive strategy, early treatment in case of infection. However, it is not clear which strategy is superior with respect to transplantation outcome; sex-specific effects of these prevention strategies are not known. We have retrospectively analyzed 540 patients from the multi-centre Harmony study along eight pre-defined visits: 308 were treated according to a prophylactic, 232 according to a pre-emptive strategy. As expected, we observed an association of prophylactic strategy with lower incidence of CMV syndrome, delayed onset and lower viral loads compared to the pre-emptive strategy. However, in female patients, the prophylactic strategy was associated with a strong impairment of glomerular filtration rate one year post-transplant (difference: -11.8 ± 4.3 ml min-1·1.73 m-2, p = 0.006). Additionally, we observed a tendency of higher incidence of acute rejection and severe BK virus reactivation in the prophylactic strategy group. While the prophylactic strategy was more effective for preventing CMV syndrome, our results suggest for the first time that the prophylactic strategy might lead to inferior transplantation outcomes in female patients, providing evidence for a strong association with sex. Further randomized controlled studies are necessary to confirm this potential negative effect.

Functional immune monitoring of BK Virus and donor-specific T-cell effector immune responses to guide treatment decision-making after kidney transplantation; an illustrative case report and literature review

Differential diagnosis between Polyoma virus associated-nephropathy (PVAN) and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) might be challenging, as respective treatment approaches are totally opposite. Here we report the illustrative case of a kidney transplant recipient with PVAN who developed a persistent acute TCMR after full abrogation of viral infection through immunosuppression modulation. By simultaneous functional immune monitoring of BKV and donor-specific T-cell responses using IFN-γELISPOT assay, we retrospectively demonstrated the predominant effector mechanisms responsible of allograft injury and thus, potential guidance for treatment decision-making. Furthermore, the evidence of an efficient T-cell alloimmunity abrogation accompanied by a sustained anti-viral response after sirolimus addition, promotes the potential benefit of converting patients to an mTOR-based immunosuppression in case of PVAN.

BK polyomavirus-specific antibody and T-cell responses in kidney transplantation: update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has emerged as a significant cause of premature graft failure after kidney transplantation. Without effective antiviral drugs, treatment is based on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. The paradigm of high-level viruria/decoy cells, BKPyV-DNAemia, and proven nephropathy permits early interventions. Here, we review recent findings about BKPyV-specific antibody and T-cell responses and their potential role in risk stratification, immune monitoring, and therapy.

RECENT FINDING

Kidney transplant recipients having low or undetectable BKPyV-specific IgG immunoglobulin G (IgG) are higher risk for developing BKPyV-DNAemia if the donor has high BKPyV-specific IgG. This observation has been extended to neutralizing antibodies. Immunosuppression, impaired activation, proliferation, and exhaustion of BKPyV-specific T cells may increase the risk of developing BKPyV-DNAemia and nephropathy. Clearance of BKPyV-DNAemia was correlated with high CD8 T cell responses to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-types presenting BKPyV-encoded immunodominant 9mers. For clinical translation, these data need to be assessed in appropriately designed clinical studies, as outlined in recent guidelines on BKPyV in kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of BKPyV-specific immune responses in recipient and donor may help to stratify the risk of BKPyV-DNAemia, nephropathy, and graft loss. Future efforts need to evaluate clinical translation, vaccines, and immunotherapy to control BKPyV replication.

T-cell adoptive immunotherapy for BK nephropathy in renal transplantation

Introduction

BK virus (BKPyV) nephropathy occurs in 1%‐10% of kidney transplant recipients, with suboptimal therapeutic options.

Case

A 54‐year‐old woman received a transplant in March 2017. BKPyV was detected at 1.5 × 10² copies/mL within a month, necessitating halving of mycophenolate and addition of leflunomide. Allograft histology in December showed polyomavirus nephropathy treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and cessation of mycophenolate. In February 2018, cidofovir and ciprofloxacin were commenced. In April, tacrolimus was reduced while introducing everolimus. A second graft biopsy in August showed increasing polyoma virus infection and a subsequent biopsy in September for worsening renal function showed 30% of tubular reactivity for simian virus 40 (SV40). Allogeneic BKPyV‐reactive T cells were generated from the patient's daughter and infused over 10 sessions starting late September. The fourth allograft biopsy in November 2018 demonstrated involvement of BKPyV in 50% of tubules. Allograft function continued to decline, requiring hemodialysis from December 2018. Allograft nephrectomy after 6 months showed <1% SV40 in preserved tubules and 80% interstitial fibrosis.

Discussion

We conclude that the T‐cell adoptive immunotherapy reduced BKPyV load significantly despite extensive infection, but attendant fibrosis and tubular atrophy led to graft failure. Early intervention with T‐cell therapy may prove efficacious in BKPyV nephropathy.

A novel approach reveals that HLA class 1 single antigen bead-signatures provide a means of high-accuracy pre-transplant risk assessment of acute cellular rejection in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is associated with complications after kidney transplantation, such as graft dysfunction and graft loss. Early risk assessment is therefore critical for the improvement of transplantation outcomes. In this work, we retrospectively analyzed a pre-transplant HLA antigen bead assay data set that was acquired by the e:KID consortium as part of a systems medicine approach.

RESULTS

The data set included single antigen bead (SAB) reactivity profiles of 52 low-risk graft recipients (negative complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, PRA < 30%) who showed detectable pre-transplant anti-HLA 1 antibodies. To assess whether the reactivity profiles provide a means for ACR risk assessment, we established a novel approach which differs from standard approaches in two aspects: the use of quantitative continuous data and the use of a multiparameter classification method. Remarkably, it achieved significant prediction of the 38 graft recipients who experienced ACR with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (sensitivity = 76.5%, specificity = 88.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The resultant classifier achieved one of the highest prediction accuracies in the literature for pre-transplant risk assessment of ACR. Importantly, it can facilitate risk assessment in non-sensitized patients who lack donor-specific antibodies. As the classifier is based on continuous data and includes weak signals, our results emphasize that not only strong but also weak binding interactions of antibodies and HLA 1 antigens contain predictive information.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00724022 . Retrospectively registered July 2008.

Validated Models of Immune Response to Virus Infection

Viruses are a main cause of disease worldwide and many are without effective therapeutics or vaccines. A lack of understanding about how host responses work to control viral spread is one factor limiting effective management. How different immune components regulate infection dynamics is beginning to be better understood with the help of mathematical models. These models have been key in discriminating between hypotheses and in identifying rates of virus growth and clearance, dynamical control by different host factors and antivirals, and synergistic interactions during multi-pathogen infections. A recent focus in evaluating model predictions in the laboratory and clinic has illuminate the accuracy of models for a variety of viruses and highlighted the critical nature of theoretical approaches in virology. Here, I discuss recent model-driven exploration of host-pathogen interactions that have illustrated the importance of model validation in establishing the model's predictive capability and in defining new biology.

BKV, CMV, and EBV Interactions and their Effect on Graft Function One Year Post-Renal Transplantation: Results from a Large Multi-Centre Study

Background

BK virus (BKV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivations are common after kidney transplantation and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although CMV might be a risk factor for BKV and EBV, the effects of combined reactivations remain unknown. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the interaction and effects on graft function of these reactivations.

Methods

3715 serum samples from 540 kidney transplant recipients were analysed for viral load by qPCR. Measurements were performed throughout eight visits during the first post-transplantation year. Clinical characteristics, including graft function (GFR), were collected in parallel.

Findings

BKV had the highest prevalence and viral loads. BKV or CMV viral loads over 10,000 copies·mL⁻¹ led to significant GFR impairment. 57 patients had BKV-CMV combined reactivation, both reactivations were significantly associated (p = 0.005). Combined reactivation was associated with a significant GFR reduction one year post-transplantation of 11.7 mL·min⁻¹·1.73 m⁻² (p = 0.02) at relatively low thresholds (BKV > 1000 and CMV > 4000 copies·mL⁻¹). For EBV, a significant association was found with CMV reactivation (p = 0.02), but no GFR reduction was found. Long cold ischaemia times were a further risk factor for high CMV load.

Interpretation

BKV-CMV combined reactivation has a deep impact on renal function one year post-transplantation and therefore most likely on long-term allograft function, even at low viral loads. Frequent viral monitoring and subsequent interventions for low BKV and/or CMV viraemia levels and/or long cold ischaemia time are recommended.

Fund

Investigator Initiated Trial; financial support by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).