A saturated reaction in repressor synthesis creates a daytime dead zone in circadian clocks

Background compensation revisited: Conserved phase response curves in frequency controlled homeostats with coherent feedback

Background compensation is the ability of a controlled variable to respond to an applied perturbation in an unchanged manner and independent of different but constant background signals which act in parallel to the perturbation. Background compensation occurs by 'coherent feedback' mechanisms where additional control variables feed directly back to the controlled variable. This paper extends a previous study on background compensation to include phase responses in frequency controlled coherent feedback oscillators. While the frequency resetting amplitude in coherent feedback oscillators is found to be dependent on the inflow/outflow perturbation of the controlled variable and thereby become phase dependent, the frequency resetting itself and the corresponding phase response curves are found to be background compensated. It is speculated that this type of background compensation may be an additional way how ambient noise can be 'ignored' by organisms.

A circadian clock regulates the blood-brain barrier across phylogeny

As the central regulatory system of an organism, the brain is responsible for overseeing a wide variety of physiological processes essential for an organism's survival. To maintain the environment necessary for neurons to function, the brain requires highly selective uptake and elimination of specific molecules through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). As an organism's activities vary throughout the day, how does the BBB adapt to meet the changing needs of the brain? A mechanism is through temporal regulation of BBB permeability via its circadian clock, which will be the focal point of this chapter. To comprehend the circadian clock's role within the BBB, we will first examine the anatomy of the BBB and the transport mechanisms enabling it to fulfill its role as a restrictive barrier. Next, we will define the circadian clock, and the discussion will encompass an introduction to circadian rhythms, the Transcription-Translation Feedback Loop (TTFL) as the mechanistic basis of circadian timekeeping, and the organization of tissue clocks found in organisms. Then, we will cover the role of the circadian rhythms in regulating the cellular mechanisms and functions of the BBB. We discuss the implications of this regulation in influencing sleep behavior, the progression of neurodegenerative diseases, and finally drug delivery for treatment of neurological diseases.

Combined multiple transcriptional repression mechanisms generate ultrasensitivity and oscillations

Transcriptional repression can occur via various mechanisms, such as blocking, sequestration and displacement. For instance, the repressors can hold the activators to prevent binding with DNA or can bind to the DNA-bound activators to block their transcriptional activity. Although the transcription can be completely suppressed with a single mechanism, multiple repression mechanisms are used together to inhibit transcriptional activators in many systems, such as circadian clocks and NF-κB oscillators. This raises the question of what advantages arise if seemingly redundant repression mechanisms are combined. Here, by deriving equations describing the multiple repression mechanisms, we find that their combination can synergistically generate a sharply ultrasensitive transcription response and thus strong oscillations. This rationalizes why the multiple repression mechanisms are used together in various biological oscillators. The critical role of such combined transcriptional repression for strong oscillations is further supported by our analysis of formerly identified mutations disrupting the transcriptional repression of the mammalian circadian clock. The hitherto unrecognized source of the ultrasensitivity, the combined transcriptional repressions, can lead to robust synthetic oscillators with a previously unachievable simple design.

Dead zones and phase reduction of coupled oscillators

A dead zone in the interaction between two dynamical systems is a region of their joint phase space where one system is insensitive to the changes in the other. These can arise in a number of contexts, and their presence in phase interaction functions has interesting dynamical consequences for the emergent dynamics. In this paper, we consider dead zones in the interaction of general coupled dynamical systems. For weakly coupled limit cycle oscillators, we investigate criteria that give rise to dead zones in the phase interaction functions. We give applications to coupled multiscale oscillators where coupling on only one branch of a relaxation oscillation can lead to the appearance of dead zones in a phase description of their interaction.

Complementary phase responses via functional differentiation of dual negative feedback loops

Multiple feedback loops are often found in gene regulations for various cellular functions. In mammalian circadian clocks, oscillations of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) expression are caused by interacting negative feedback loops (NFLs) whose protein products with similar molecular functions repress each other. However, Per1 expression peaks earlier than Per2 in the pacemaker tissue, raising the question of whether the peak time difference reflects their different dynamical functions. Here, we address this question by analyzing phase responses of the circadian clock caused by light-induced transcription of both Per1 and Per2 mRNAs. Through mathematical analyses of dual NFLs, we show that phase advance is mainly driven by light inputs to the repressor with an earlier expression peak as Per1, whereas phase delay is driven by the other repressor with a later peak as Per2. Due to the complementary contributions to phase responses, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates between Per1 and Per2 determines the magnitude and direction of phase shifts at each time of day. Specifically, stronger Per1 light induction than Per2 results in a phase response curve (PRC) with a larger phase advance zone than delay zone as observed in rats and hamsters, whereas stronger Per2 induction causes a larger delay zone as observed in mice. Furthermore, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates required for entrainment is determined by the relation between the circadian and light-dark periods. Namely, if the autonomous period of a circadian clock is longer than the light-dark period, a larger light-induced transcription rate of Per1 than Per2 is required for entrainment, and vice versa. In short, the time difference between Per1 and Per2 expression peaks can differentiate their dynamical functions. The resultant complementary contributions to phase responses can determine entrainability of the circadian clock to the light-dark cycle.

Amplitude Effects Allow Short Jet Lags and Large Seasonal Phase Shifts in Minimal Clock Models

Mathematical models of varying complexity have helped shed light on different aspects of circadian clock function. In this work, we question whether minimal clock models (Goodwin models) are sufficient to reproduce essential phenotypes of the clock: a small phase response curve (PRC), fast jet lag, and seasonal phase shifts. Instead of building a single best model, we take an approach where we study the properties of a set of models satisfying certain constraints; here, a 1h-pulse PRC with a range of 3h and clock periods between 22h and 26h is designed. Surprisingly, almost all these randomly parameterized models showed a 4h change in phase of entrainment between long and short days and jet lag durations of three to seven days in advance and delay. Moreover, intrinsic clock period influenced jet lag duration and entrainment amplitude and phase. Fast jet lag was realized in this model by means of an interesting amplitude effect: the association between clock amplitude and clock period termed "twist." This twist allows amplitude changes to speed up and slow down clocks enabling faster shifts. These findings were robust to the addition of positive feedback to the model. In summary, the known design principles of rhythm generation - negative feedback, long delay, and switch-like inhibition (we review these in detail) - are sufficient to reproduce the essential clock phenotypes. Furthermore, amplitudes play a role in determining clock properties and must be always considered, although they are difficult to measure.

State-dependent effective interactions in oscillator networks through coupling functions with dead zones

The dynamics of networks of interacting dynamical systems depend on the nature of the coupling between individual units. We explore networks of oscillatory units with coupling functions that have 'dead zones', that is the coupling functions are zero on sets with interior. For such networks, it is convenient to look at the effective interactions between units rather than the (fixed) structural connectivity to understand the network dynamics. For example, oscillators may effectively decouple in particular phase configurations. Along trajectories, the effective interactions are not necessarily static, but the effective coupling may evolve in time. Here, we formalize the concepts of dead zones and effective interactions. We elucidate how the coupling function shapes the possible effective interaction schemes and how they evolve in time. This article is part of the theme issue 'Coupling functions: dynamical interaction mechanisms in the physical, biological and social sciences'.