Adaptive diversification and niche packing on rugged fitness landscapes.
J Theor Biol 2023;
562:111421. [PMID:
36754345 DOI:
10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111421]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Explaining the emergence of diversity and the coexistence of competing types has long been one of the main goals of ecological theory. Rugged fitness landscapes have often been used to explain diversity through the presence of local peaks, or adaptive zones, in the fitness landscape acting as available niches for different species. Alternatively, niche-packing and theories based on limiting similarity describe frequency-dependent selection leading to the organic differentiation of a continuous phenotype space into multiple coexisting types. By combining rugged carrying capacity landscapes with frequency-dependent selection, here we investigate the effects of ruggedness on adaptive diversification and stably maintained diversity. We show that while increased ruggedness often leads to a decreased opportunity for adaptive diversification, it is the shape of the global carrying capacity function, not the local ruggedness, that determines the diversity of the ESS and the total diversity a system can stably maintain.
Collapse