Self-organization of a doubly asynchronous irregular network state for spikes and bursts

Beyond spiking networks: The computational advantages of dendritic amplification and input segregation

The brain can efficiently learn a wide range of tasks, motivating the search for biologically inspired learning rules for improving current artificial intelligence technology. Most biological models are composed of point neurons and cannot achieve state-of-the-art performance in machine learning. Recent works have proposed that input segregation (neurons receive sensory information and higher-order feedback in segregated compartments), and nonlinear dendritic computation would support error backpropagation in biological neurons. However, these approaches require propagating errors with a fine spatiotemporal structure to all the neurons, which is unlikely to be feasible in a biological network. To relax this assumption, we suggest that bursts and dendritic input segregation provide a natural support for target-based learning, which propagates targets rather than errors. A coincidence mechanism between the basal and the apical compartments allows for generating high-frequency bursts of spikes. This architecture supports a burst-dependent learning rule, based on the comparison between the target bursting activity triggered by the teaching signal and the one caused by the recurrent connections, providing support for target-based learning. We show that this framework can be used to efficiently solve spatiotemporal tasks, such as context-dependent store and recall of three-dimensional trajectories, and navigation tasks. Finally, we suggest that this neuronal architecture naturally allows for orchestrating "hierarchical imitation learning", enabling the decomposition of challenging long-horizon decision-making tasks into simpler subtasks. We show a possible implementation of this in a two-level network, where the high network produces the contextual signal for the low network.

Silences, spikes and bursts: Three-part knot of the neural code

When a neuron breaks silence, it can emit action potentials in a number of patterns. Some responses are so sudden and intense that electrophysiologists felt the need to single them out, labelling action potentials emitted at a particularly high frequency with a metonym - bursts. Is there more to bursts than a figure of speech? After all, sudden bouts of high-frequency firing are expected to occur whenever inputs surge. The burst coding hypothesis advances that the neural code has three syllables: silences, spikes and bursts. We review evidence supporting this ternary code in terms of devoted mechanisms for burst generation, synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. We also review the learning and attention theories for which such a triad is beneficial.