Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV supports imprecise end joining independently of its catalytic activity

The biological principles and advanced applications of DSB repair in CRISPR-mediated yeast genome editing

To improve the performance of yeast cell factories for industrial production, extensive CRISPR-mediated genome editing systems have been applied by artificially creating double-strand breaks (DSBs) to introduce mutations with the assistance of intracellular DSB repair. Diverse strategies of DSB repair are required to meet various demands, including precise editing or random editing with customized gRNAs or a gRNA library. Although most yeasts remodeling techniques have shown rewarding performance in laboratory verification, industrial yeast strain manipulation relies only on very limited strategies. Here, we comprehensively reviewed the molecular mechanisms underlying recent industrial applications to provide new insights into DSB cleavage and repair pathways in both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other unconventional yeast species. The discussion of DSB repair covers the most frequently used homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) strategies to the less well-studied illegitimate recombination (IR) pathways, such as single-strand annealing (SSA) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Various CRISPR-based genome editing tools and corresponding gene editing efficiencies are described. Finally, we summarize recently developed CRISPR-based strategies that use optimized DSB repair for genome-scale editing, providing a direction for further development of yeast genome editing.

Holding it together: DNA end synapsis during non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are common lesions whose misrepair are drivers of oncogenic transformations. The non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway repairs the majority of these breaks in vertebrates by directly ligating DNA ends back together. Upon formation of a DSB, a multiprotein complex is assembled on DNA ends which tethers them together within a synaptic complex. Synapsis is a critical step of the NHEJ pathway as loss of synapsis can result in mispairing of DNA ends and chromosome translocations. As DNA ends are commonly incompatible for ligation, the NHEJ machinery must also process ends to enable rejoining. This review describes how recent progress in single-molecule approaches and cryo-EM have advanced our molecular understanding of DNA end synapsis during NHEJ and how synapsis is coordinated with end processing to determine the fidelity of repair.

The flexible and iterative steps within the NHEJ pathway

Cellular and biochemical studies of nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) have long established that nuclease and polymerase action are necessary for the repair of a very large fraction of naturally-arising double-strand breaks (DSBs). This conclusion is derived from NHEJ studies ranging from yeast to humans and all genetically-tractable model organisms. Biochemical models derived from recent real-time and structural studies have yet to incorporate physical space or timing for DNA end processing. In real-time single molecule FRET (smFRET) studies, our lab analyzed NHEJ synapsis of DNA ends in a defined biochemical system. We described a Flexible Synapsis (FS) state in which the DNA ends were in proximity via only Ku and XRCC4:DNA ligase 4 (X4L4), and in an orientation that would not yet permit ligation until base pairing between one or more nucleotides of microhomology (MH) occurred, thereby allowing an in-line Close Synapsis (CS) state. If no MH was achievable, then XLF was critical for ligation. Neither FS or CS required DNA-PKcs, unless Artemis activation was necessary to permit local resection and subsequent base pairing between the two DNA ends being joined. Here we conjecture on possible 3D configurations for this FS state, which would spatially accommodate the nuclease and polymerase processing steps in an iterative manner. The FS model permits repeated attempts at ligation of at least one strand at the DSB after each round of nuclease or polymerase action. In addition to activation of Artemis, other possible roles for DNA-PKcs are discussed.

Pol X DNA polymerases contribute to NHEJ flexibility

New work on DNA polymerase λ highlights its remarkable flexibility. This fits with the generally adaptable nature of the DNA-repair process in which this enzyme is involved — nonhomologous end-joining — which allows this mechanism to handle diverse types of broken DNA ends in order to restore the duplex structure, albeit with a loss of information at the join.

Catalytically inactive DNA ligase IV promotes DNA repair in living cells

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced by external genotoxic agents (ionizing radiation or genotoxins) or by internal processes (recombination intermediates in lymphocytes or by replication errors). The DNA ends induced by these genotoxic processes are often not ligatable, requiring potentially mutagenic end-processing to render ends compatible for ligation by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Using single molecule approaches, Loparo et al. propose that NHEJ fidelity can be maintained by restricting end-processing to a ligation competent short-range NHEJ complex that 'maximizes the fidelity of DNA repair'. These in vitro studies show that although this short-range NHEJ complex requires DNA ligase IV (Lig4), its catalytic activity is dispensable. Here using cellular models, we show that inactive Lig4 robustly promotes DNA repair in living cells. Compared to repair products from wild-type cells, those isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 show a somewhat increased fraction that utilize micro-homology (MH) at the joining site consistent with alternative end-joining (a-EJ). But unlike a-EJ in the absence of NHEJ, a large percentage of joints isolated from cells with inactive Lig4 occur with no MH - thus, clearly distinct from a-EJ. Finally, biochemical assays demonstrate that the inactive Lig4 complex promotes the activity of DNA ligase III (Lig3).

Artificial chromosome technology and its potential application in plants

Plant genetic engineering and transgenic technology are powerful ways to study the function of genes and improve crop yield and quality in the past few years. However, only a few genes could be transformed by most available genetic engineering and transgenic technologies, so changes still need to be made to meet the demands for high throughput studies, such as investigating the whole genetic pathway of crop traits and avoiding undesirable genes simultaneously in the next generation. Plant artificial chromosome (PAC) technology provides a carrier which allows us to assemble multiple and specific genes to produce a variety of products by minichromosome. However, PAC technology also have limitations that may hinder its further development and application. In this review, we will introduce the current state of PACs technology from PACs formation, factors on PACs formation, problems and potential solutions of PACs and exogenous gene(s) integration.

The optimal strategy balancing risk and speed predicts DNA damage checkpoint override times

Checkpoints arrest biological processes allowing time for error correction. The phenomenon of checkpoint override (also known as checkpoint adaptation, slippage, or leakage), during cellular self-replication is biologically critical but currently lacks a quantitative, functional, or system-level understanding. To uncover fundamental laws governing error-correction systems, we derived a general theory of optimal checkpoint strategies, balancing the trade-off between risk and self-replication speed. Mathematically, the problem maps onto the optimization of an absorbing boundary for a random walk. We applied the theory to the DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) in budding yeast, an intensively researched model checkpoint. Using novel reporters for double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), we first quantified the probability distribution of DSB repair in time including rare events and, secondly, the survival probability after override. With these inputs, the optimal theory predicted remarkably accurately override times as a function of DSB numbers, which we measured precisely for the first time. Thus, a first-principles calculation revealed undiscovered patterns underlying highly noisy override processes. Our multi-DSB measurements revise well-known past results and show that override is more general than previously thought.

Modulating DNA Repair Pathways to Diversify Genomic Alterations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nuclease based genome editing systems have emerged as powerful tools to drive genomic alterations and enhance genome evolution via precise engineering in the various human and microbial cells. However, error-prone DNA repair has not been well studied previously to generate diverse genomic alterations and novel phenotypes. Here, we systematically investigated the potential interplay between DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and genome editing tools, and found that modulating the DSB end resection proteins could significantly improve mutational efficiency and diversity without exogenous DNA template in yeast. Deleting SAE2, EXO1, or FUN30, or overexpressing MRE11-H125N (nuclease-dead allele of MRE11), for DSB end resection markedly increased the efficiency of CRISPR/SpCas9 (more than 22-fold) and CRISPR/AsCpf1 (more than 30-fold)-induced mutagenesis. Deleting SAE2 or overexpressing MRE11-H125N substantially diversified CRISPR/SpCas9 or AsCpf1-induced mutation 2–3-fold at URA3 locus, and 3–5-fold at ADE2 locus. Thus, the error-prone DNA repair protein was employed to develop a novel mutagenic genome editing (mGE) strategy, which can increase the mutation numbers and effectively improve the ethanol/glycerol ratio of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through modulating the expression of FPS1 and GPD1. This study highlighted the feasibility of potentially reshaping the capability of genome editing by regulating the different DSB repair proteins and can thus expand the application of genome editing in diversifying gene expression and enhancing genome evolution.

IMPORTANCE Most of the published papers about nuclease-assisted genome editing focused on precision engineering in human cells. However, the topic of inducing mutagenesis via error-prone repair has often been ignored in yeast. In this study, we reported that perturbing DNA repair, especially modifications of the various DSB end resection-related proteins, could greatly improve the mutational efficiency and diversity, and thus functionally reshape the capability of the different genome editing tools without requiring an exogenous DNA template in yeast. Specifically, mutagenic genome editing (mGE) was developed based on CRISPR/AsCpf1 and MRE11-H125N overexpression, and used to generate promoters of different strengths more efficiently. Thus, this work provides a novel method to diversify gene expression and enhance genome evolution.

Global and Local Manipulation of DNA Repair Mechanisms to Alter Site-Specific Gene Editing Outcomes in Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Monogenic disorders of the blood system have the potential to be treated by autologous stem cell transplantation of ex vivo genetically modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). The sgRNA/Cas9 system allows for precise modification of the genome at single nucleotide resolution. However, the system is reliant on endogenous cellular DNA repair mechanisms to mend a Cas9-induced double stranded break (DSB), either by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway or by the cell-cycle regulated homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway. Here, we describe a panel of ectopically expressed DNA repair factors and Cas9 variants assessed for their ability to promote gene correction by HDR or inhibit gene disruption by NHEJ at the HBB locus. Although transient global overexpression of DNA repair factors did not improve the frequency of gene correction in primary HSPCs, localization of factors to the DSB by fusion to the Cas9 protein did alter repair outcomes toward microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) repair, an HDR event. This strategy may be useful when predictable gene editing outcomes are imperative for therapeutic success.

A new assay capturing chromosome fusions shows a protection trade-off at telomeres and NHEJ vulnerability to low-density ionizing radiation

Chromosome fusions threaten genome integrity and promote cancer by engaging catastrophic mutational processes, namely chromosome breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and chromothripsis. Chromosome fusions are frequent in cells incurring telomere dysfunctions or those exposed to DNA breakage. Their occurrence and therefore their contribution to genome instability in unchallenged cells is unknown. To address this issue, we constructed a genetic assay able to capture and quantify rare chromosome fusions in budding yeast. This chromosome fusion capture (CFC) assay relies on the controlled inactivation of one centromere to rescue unstable dicentric chromosome fusions. It is sensitive enough to quantify the basal rate of end-to-end chromosome fusions occurring in wild-type cells. These fusions depend on canonical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Our results show that chromosome end protection results from a trade-off at telomeres between positive effectors (Rif2, Sir4, telomerase) and a negative effector partially antagonizing them (Rif1). The CFC assay also captures NHEJ-dependent chromosome fusions induced by ionizing radiation. It provides evidence for chromosomal rearrangements stemming from a single photon-matter interaction.

Mapping yeast mitotic 5' resection at base resolution reveals the sequence and positional dependence of nucleases in vivo

Resection of the 5′-terminated strand at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is the critical regulated step in the transition to homologous recombination. Recent studies have described a multi-step model of DSB resection where endonucleolytic cleavage mediated by Mre11 and Sae2 leads to further degradation mediated by redundant pathways catalyzed by Exo1 and Sgs1/Dna2. These models have not been well tested at mitotic DSBs in vivo because most methods used to monitor resection cannot precisely map early cleavage events. Here we report resection monitoring with high-throughput sequencing using molecular identifiers, allowing exact counting of cleaved 5′ ends at base resolution. Mutant strains, including exo1Δ, mre11-H125N and exo1Δ sgs1Δ, revealed a major Mre11-dependent cleavage position 60–70 bp from the DSB end whose exact position depended on local sequence. They further revealed an Exo1-dependent pause point approximately 200 bp from the DSB. Suppressing resection extension in exo1Δ sgs1Δ yeast exposed a footprint of regions where cleavage was restricted within 119 bp of the DSB. These results provide detailed in vivo views of prevailing models of DSB resection and extend them to show the combined influence of sequence specificity and access restrictions on Mre11 and Exo1 nucleases.

Development of a multi-locus CRISPR gene drive system in budding yeast

The discovery of CRISPR/Cas gene editing has allowed for major advances in many biomedical disciplines and basic research. One arrangement of this biotechnology, a nuclease-based gene drive, can rapidly deliver a genetic element through a given population and studies in fungi and metazoans have demonstrated the success of such a system. This methodology has the potential to control biological populations and contribute to eradication of insect-borne diseases, agricultural pests, and invasive species. However, there remain challenges in the design, optimization, and implementation of gene drives including concerns regarding biosafety, containment, and control/inhibition. Given the numerous gene drive arrangements possible, there is a growing need for more advanced designs. In this study, we use budding yeast to develop an artificial multi-locus gene drive system. Our minimal setup requires only a single copy of S. pyogenes Cas9 and three guide RNAs to propagate three gene drives. We demonstrate how this system could be used for targeted allele replacement of native genes and to suppress NHEJ repair systems by modifying DNA Ligase IV. A multi-locus gene drive configuration provides an expanded suite of options for complex attributes including pathway redundancy, combatting evolved resistance, and safeguards for control, inhibition, or reversal of drive action.

Ku DNA End-Binding Activity Promotes Repair Fidelity and Influences End-Processing During Nonhomologous End-Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The Ku heterodimer acts centrally in nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku, like mammalian Ku, binds and recruits NHEJ factors to DSB ends. Consequently, NHEJ is virtually absent in yeast Ku null (yku70∆ or yku80∆) strains. Previously, we unexpectedly observed imprecise NHEJ proficiency in a yeast Ku mutant with impaired DNA end-binding (DEB). However, how DEB impairment supported imprecise NHEJ was unknown. Here, we found imprecise NHEJ proficiency to be a feature of a panel of DEB-impaired Ku mutants and that DEB impairment resulted in a deficiency in precise NHEJ. These results suggest that DEB-impaired Ku specifically promotes error-prone NHEJ. Epistasis analysis showed that classical NHEJ factors, as well as novel and previously characterized NHEJ-specific residues of Ku, are required for the distinct error-prone repair in a Ku DEB mutant. However, sequencing of repair junctions revealed that imprecise repair in Ku DEB mutants was almost exclusively characterized by small deletions, in contrast to the majority of insertions that define imprecise repair in wild-type strains. Notably, while sequencing indicated a lack of Pol4-dependent insertions at the site of repair, Pol2 exonuclease activity, which mediates small deletions in NHEJ, contributed to imprecise NHEJ in a Ku DEB mutant. The deletions were smaller than in Ku-independent microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) and were neither promoted by Mre11 nuclease activity nor Sae2 Thus, the quality of Ku's engagement at the DNA end influences end-processing during NHEJ and DEB impairment unmasks a Ku-dependent error-prone pathway of end-joining distinct from MMEJ.

Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are dangerous sources of genome instability and must be repaired by the cell. Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) is an evolutionarily conserved pathway to repair DSBs by direct ligation of the ends, with no requirement for a homologous template. While NHEJ is the primary DSB repair pathway in mammalian cells, conservation of the core NHEJ factors throughout eukaryotes makes the pathway attractive for study in model organisms. The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been used extensively to develop a functional picture of NHEJ. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of NHEJ in S. cerevisiae. Topics include canonical end-joining, alternative end-joining, and pathway regulation. Particular attention will be paid to the NHEJ mechanism involving core factors, including Yku70/80, Dnl4, Lif1, and Nej1, as well as the various factors implicated in the processing of the broken ends. The relevance of chromatin dynamics to NHEJ will also be discussed. This review illustrates the use of S. cerevisiae as a powerful system to understand the principles of NHEJ, as well as in pioneering the direction of the field.

Overhang polarity of chromosomal double-strand breaks impacts kinetics and fidelity of yeast non-homologous end joining

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the main repair pathway for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cells with limited 5′ resection. To better understand how overhang polarity of chromosomal DSBs affects NHEJ, we made site-specific 5′-overhanging DSBs (5′ DSBs) in yeast using an optimized zinc finger nuclease at an efficiency that approached HO-induced 3′ DSB formation. When controlled for the extent of DSB formation, repair monitoring suggested that chromosomal 5′ DSBs were rejoined more efficiently than 3′ DSBs, consistent with a robust recruitment of NHEJ proteins to 5′ DSBs. Ligation-mediated qPCR revealed that Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 rapidly modified 5′ DSBs and facilitated protection of 3′ DSBs, likely through recognition of overhang polarity by the Mre11 nuclease. Next-generation sequencing revealed that NHEJ at 5′ DSBs had a higher mutation frequency, and validated the differential requirement of Pol4 polymerase at 3′ and 5′ DSBs. The end processing enzyme Tdp1 did not impact joining fidelity at chromosomal 5′ DSBs as in previous plasmid studies, although Tdp1 was recruited to only 5′ DSBs in a Ku-independent manner. These results suggest distinct DSB handling based on overhang polarity that impacts NHEJ kinetics and fidelity through differential recruitment and action of DSB modifying enzymes.

Yeast DNA ligase IV mutations reveal a nonhomologous end joining function of BRCT1 distinct from XRCC4/Lif1 binding

LIG4/Dnl4 is the DNA ligase that (re)joins DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), an activity supported by binding of its tandem BRCT domains to the ligase accessory protein XRCC4/Lif1. We screened a panel of 88 distinct ligase mutants to explore the structure–function relationships of the yeast Dnl4 BRCT domains and inter-BRCT linker in NHEJ. Screen results suggested two distinct classes of BRCT mutations with differential effects on Lif1 interaction as compared to NHEJ completion. Validated constructs confirmed that D800K and GG(868:869)AA mutations, which target the Lif1 binding interface, showed a severely defective Dnl4–Lif1 interaction but a less consistent and often small decrease in NHEJ activity in some assays, as well as nearly normal levels of Dnl4 accumulation at DSBs. In contrast, mutants K742A and KTT(742:744)ATA, which target the β3-α2 region of the first BRCT domain, substantially decreased NHEJ function commensurate with a large defect in Dnl4 recruitment to DSBs, despite a comparatively greater preservation of the Lif1 interaction. Together, these separation-of-function mutants indicate that Dnl4 BRCT1 supports DSB recruitment and NHEJ in a manner distinct from Lif1 binding and reveal a complexity of Dnl4 BRCT domain functions in support of stable DSB association.

How do telomeres and NHEJ coexist?

The telomeres of eukaryotes are stable open double-strand ends that coexist with nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), the repair pathway that directly ligates DNA ends generated by double-strand breaks. Since a single end-joining event between 2 telomeres generates a circular chromosome or an unstable dicentric chromosome, NHEJ must be prevented from acting on telomeres. Multiple mechanisms mediated by telomere factors act in synergy to achieve this inhibition.

The fidelity of the ligation step determines how ends are resolved during nonhomologous end joining

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) can effectively resolve chromosome breaks despite diverse end structures, but it is unclear how the steps employed for resolution are determined. We sought to address this question by analyzing cellular NHEJ of ends with systematically mispaired and damaged termini. We show NHEJ is uniquely proficient at bypassing subtle terminal mispairs and radiomimetic damage by direct ligation. Nevertheless, bypass ability varies widely, with increases in mispair severity gradually reducing bypass products from 85% to 6%. End-processing by nucleases and polymerases is increased to compensate, though paths with the fewest number of steps to generate a substrate suitable for ligation are favored. Thus, both the frequency and nature of end processing are tailored to meet the needs of the ligation step. We propose a model where the ligase organizes all steps during NHEJ within the stable paired-end complex to limit end processing and associated errors.

DNA ligase C1 mediates the LigD-independent nonhomologous end-joining pathway of Mycobacterium smegmatis

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a recently described bacterial DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway that has been best characterized for mycobacteria. NHEJ can religate transformed linear plasmids, repair ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs in nonreplicating cells, and seal I-SceI-induced chromosomal DSBs. The core components of the mycobacterial NHEJ machinery are the DNA end binding protein Ku and the polyfunctional DNA ligase LigD. LigD has three autonomous enzymatic modules: ATP-dependent DNA ligase (LIG), DNA/RNA polymerase (POL), and 3' phosphoesterase (PE). Although genetic ablation of ku or ligD abolishes NHEJ and sensitizes nonreplicating cells to ionizing radiation, selective ablation of the ligase activity of LigD in vivo only mildly impairs NHEJ of linearized plasmids, indicating that an additional DNA ligase can support NHEJ. Additionally, the in vivo role of the POL and PE domains in NHEJ is unclear. Here we define a LigD ligase-independent NHEJ pathway in Mycobacterium smegmatis that requires the ATP-dependent DNA ligase LigC1 and the POL domain of LigD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis LigC can also support this backup NHEJ pathway. We also demonstrate that, although dispensable for efficient plasmid NHEJ, the activities of the POL and PE domains are required for repair of IR-induced DSBs in nonreplicating cells. These findings define the genetic requirements for a LigD-independent NHEJ pathway in mycobacteria and demonstrate that all enzymatic functions of the LigD protein participate in NHEJ in vivo.

Non-homologous end joining often uses microhomology: implications for alternative end joining

Artemis and PALF (also called APLF) appear to be among the primary nucleases involved in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and responsible for most nucleolytic end processing in NHEJ. About 60% of NHEJ events show an alignment of the DNA ends that use 1 or 2bp of microhomology (MH) between the two DNA termini. Thus, MH is a common feature of NHEJ. For most naturally occurring human chromosomal deletions (e.g., after oxidative damage or radiation) and translocations, such as those seen in human neoplasms and as well as inherited chromosomal structural variations, MH usage occurs at a frequency that is typical of NHEJ, and does not suggest major involvement of alternative pathways that require more extensive MH. Though we mainly focus on human NHEJ at double-strand breaks, comparison on these points to other eukaryotes, primarily S. cerevisiae, is informative.