1
|
Wang S, Raza SHA, Zhang K, Mei C, Alamoudi MO, Aloufi BH, Alshammari AM, Zan L. Selection signatures of Qinchuan cattle based on whole-genome sequences. Anim Biotechnol 2023; 34:1483-1491. [PMID: 35152846 DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2033252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Qinchuan cattle has gradually improved in body shape and growth rate in the long-term breeding process from the draft cattle to beef cattle. As the head of the five local yellow cattle in China, the Qinchuan cattle has been designated as a specialized beef cattle breed. We investigated the selection signatures using whole genome sequencing data in Qinchuan cattle. Based on Fst, we detected hundreds of candidate genes under selection across Qinchuan, Red Angus, and Japanese Black cattle. Through protein-protein interaction analysis and functional annotation of candidate genes, the results revealed that KMT2E, LTBP1 and NIPBL were related to brain size, body characteristics, and limb development, respectively, suggesting that these potential genes may affect the growth and development traits in Qinchuan cattle. ARIH2, DACT1 and DNM2, et al. are related to meat quality. Meanwhile, TBXA2R can be used as a gene associated with reproductive function, and USH2A affect coat color. This provided a glimpse into the formation of breeds and molecular genetic breeding. Our findings will promote genome-assisted breeding to improve animal production and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sihu Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | | | - Ke Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Chugang Mei
- College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Muna O Alamoudi
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bandar H Aloufi
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Linsen Zan
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
- National Beef Cattle Improvement Center, Yangling, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Della Coletta R, Fernandes SB, Monnahan PJ, Mikel MA, Bohn MO, Lipka AE, Hirsch CN. Importance of genetic architecture in marker selection decisions for genomic prediction. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2023; 136:220. [PMID: 37819415 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-023-04469-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE We demonstrate potential for improved multi-environment genomic prediction accuracy using structural variant markers. However, the degree of observed improvement is highly dependent on the genetic architecture of the trait. Breeders commonly use genetic markers to predict the performance of untested individuals as a way to improve the efficiency of breeding programs. These genomic prediction models have almost exclusively used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as their source of genetic information, even though other types of markers exist, such as structural variants (SVs). Given that SVs are associated with environmental adaptation and not all of them are in linkage disequilibrium to SNPs, SVs have the potential to bring additional information to multi-environment prediction models that are not captured by SNPs alone. Here, we evaluated different marker types (SNPs and/or SVs) on prediction accuracy across a range of genetic architectures for simulated traits across multiple environments. Our results show that SVs can improve prediction accuracy, but it is highly dependent on the genetic architecture of the trait and the relative gain in accuracy is minimal. When SVs are the only causative variant type, 70% of the time SV predictors outperform SNP predictors. However, the improvement in accuracy in these instances is only 1.5% on average. Further simulations with predictors in varying degrees of LD with causative variants of different types (e.g., SNPs, SVs, SNPs and SVs) showed that prediction accuracy increased as linkage disequilibrium between causative variants and predictors increased regardless of the marker type. This study demonstrates that knowing the genetic architecture of a trait in deciding what markers to use in large-scale genomic prediction modeling in a breeding program is more important than what types of markers to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Della Coletta
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Samuel B Fernandes
- Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences at University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA
| | - Patrick J Monnahan
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Mark A Mikel
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Martin O Bohn
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Alexander E Lipka
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Candice N Hirsch
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Liu X, Wang C, Li Z, Jiang B, Zhang R, Tong L, Qu Y, He S, Chen H, Mao Y, Li Q, Pook T, Wu Y, Zan Y, Zhang H, Li L, Wen K, Chen Y. The pig pangenome provides insights into the roles of coding structural variations in genetic diversity and adaptation. Genome Res 2023; 33:1833-1847. [PMID: 37914227 PMCID: PMC10691484 DOI: 10.1101/gr.277638.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Structural variations have emerged as an important driving force for genome evolution and phenotypic variation in various organisms, yet their contributions to genetic diversity and adaptation in domesticated animals remain largely unknown. Here we constructed a pangenome based on 250 sequenced individuals from 32 pig breeds in Eurasia and systematically characterized coding sequence presence/absence variations (PAVs) within pigs. We identified 308.3-Mb nonreference sequences and 3438 novel genes absent from the current reference genome. Gene PAV analysis showed that 16.8% of the genes in the pangene catalog undergo PAV. A number of newly identified dispensable genes showed close associations with adaptation. For instance, several novel swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) genes discovered in nonreference sequences potentially participate in immune responses to productive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection. We delineated previously unidentified features of the pig mobilome that contained 490,480 transposable element insertion polymorphisms (TIPs) resulting from recent mobilization of 970 TE families, and investigated their population dynamics along with influences on population differentiation and gene expression. In addition, several candidate adaptive TE insertions were detected to be co-opted into genes responsible for responses to hypoxia, skeletal development, regulation of heart contraction, and neuronal cell development, likely contributing to local adaptation of Tibetan wild boars. These findings enhance our understanding on hidden layers of the genetic diversity in pigs and provide novel insights into the role of SVs in the evolutionary adaptation of mammals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengcao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China;
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Lu Tong
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Youping Qu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Sheng He
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Haifan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Yafei Mao
- Bio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China
| | - Qingnan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Torsten Pook
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen 6700 AH, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanjun Zan
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Lu Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Keying Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaosheng Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510006 Guangzhou, China;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ren D, Cai X, Lin Q, Ye H, Teng J, Li J, Ding X, Zhang Z. Impact of linkage disequilibrium heterogeneity along the genome on genomic prediction and heritability estimation. Genet Sel Evol 2022; 54:47. [PMID: 35761182 PMCID: PMC9235212 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00737-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, high-density SNP data contain abundant genetic variants and provide more information for the genetic evaluation of livestock, but it has been shown that they do not confer any advantage for genomic prediction and heritability estimation. One possible reason is the uneven distribution of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) along the genome, i.e., LD heterogeneity among regions. The aim of this study was to effectively use genome-wide SNP data for genomic prediction and heritability estimation by using models that control LD heterogeneity among regions. METHODS The LD-adjusted kinship (LDAK) and LD-stratified multicomponent (LDS) models were used to control LD heterogeneity among regions and were compared with the classical model that has no such control. Simulated and real traits of 2000 dairy cattle individuals with imputed high-density (770K) SNP data were used. Five types of phenotypes were simulated, which were controlled by very strongly, strongly, moderately, weakly and very weakly tagged causal variants, respectively. The performances of the models with high- and medium-density (50K) panels were compared to verify that the models that controlled LD heterogeneity among regions were more effective with high-density data. RESULTS Compared to the medium-density panel, the use of the high-density panel did not improve and even decreased prediction accuracies and heritability estimates from the classical model for both simulated and real traits. Compared to the classical model, LDS effectively improved the accuracy of genomic predictions and unbiasedness of heritability estimates, regardless of the genetic architecture of the trait. LDAK applies only to traits that are mainly controlled by weakly tagged causal variants, but is still less effective than LDS for this type of trait. Compared with the classical model, LDS improved prediction accuracy by about 13% for simulated phenotypes and by 0.3 to ~ 10.7% for real traits with the high-density panel, and by ~ 1% for simulated phenotypes and by - 0.1 to ~ 6.9% for real traits with the medium-density panel. CONCLUSIONS Grouping SNPs based on regional LD to construct the LD-stratified multicomponent model can effectively eliminate the adverse effects of LD heterogeneity among regions, and greatly improve the efficiency of high-density SNP data for genomic prediction and heritability estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duanyang Ren
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Xiaodian Cai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Haoqiang Ye
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Jinyan Teng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
| | - Xiangdong Ding
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
| |
Collapse
|