1
|
Lichauco C, Foss EJ, Gatbonton-Schwager T, Athow NF, Lofts B, Acob R, Taylor E, Marquez JJ, Lao U, Miles S, Bedalov A. Sir2 and Fun30 regulate ribosomal DNA replication timing via MCM helicase positioning and nucleosome occupancy. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.21.586113. [PMID: 38585982 PMCID: PMC10996493 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
The association between late replication timing and low transcription rates in eukaryotic heterochromatin is well-known, yet the specific mechanisms underlying this link remain uncertain. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae , the histone deacetylase Sir2 is required for both transcriptional silencing and late replication at the repetitive ribosomal DNA arrays (rDNA). We have previously reported that in the absence of SIR2 , a derepressed RNA PolII repositions MCM replicative helicases from their loading site at the ribosomal origin, where they abut well-positioned, high-occupancy nucleosomes, to an adjacent region with lower nucleosome occupancy. By developing a method that can distinguish activation of closely spaced MCM complexes, here we show that the displaced MCMs at rDNA origins have increased firing propensity compared to the nondisplaced MCMs. Furthermore, we found that both, activation of the repositioned MCMs and low occupancy of the adjacent nucleosomes critically depend on the chromatin remodeling activity of FUN30 . Our study elucidates the mechanism by which Sir2 delays replication timing, and it demonstrates, for the first time, that activation of a specific replication origin in vivo relies on the nucleosome context shaped by a single chromatin remodeler.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu X, Kanemaki MT. Replication initiation sites and zones in the mammalian genome: Where are they located and how are they defined? DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 141:103713. [PMID: 38959715 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Eukaryotic DNA replication is a tightly controlled process that occurs in two main steps, i.e., licensing and firing, which take place in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle, respectively. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the budding yeast, replication origins contain consensus sequences that are recognized and bound by the licensing factor Orc1-6, which then recruits the replicative Mcm2-7 helicase. By contrast, mammalian initiation sites lack such consensus sequences, and the mammalian ORC does not exhibit sequence specificity. Studies performed over the past decades have identified replication initiation sites in the mammalian genome using sequencing-based assays, raising the question of whether replication initiation occurs at confined sites or in broad zones across the genome. Although recent reports have shown that the licensed MCMs in mammalian cells are broadly distributed, suggesting that ORC-dependent licensing may not determine the initiation sites/zones, they are predominantly located upstream of actively transcribed genes. This review compares the mechanism of replication initiation in yeast and mammalian cells, summarizes the sequencing-based technologies used for the identification of initiation sites/zones, and proposes a possible mechanism of initiation-site/zone selection in mammalian cells. Future directions and challenges in this field are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Zhu
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems (ROIS), Yata 1111, Shizuoka, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.
| | - Masato T Kanemaki
- Department of Chromosome Science, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems (ROIS), Yata 1111, Shizuoka, Mishima 411-8540, Japan; Graduate Institute for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Yata 1111, Shizuoka, Mishima 411-8540, Japan; Department of Biological Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reuter LM, Khadayate SP, Mossler A, Liebl K, Faull SV, Karimi MM, Speck C. MCM2-7 loading-dependent ORC release ensures genome-wide origin licensing. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7306. [PMID: 39181881 PMCID: PMC11344781 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51538-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Origin recognition complex (ORC)-dependent loading of the replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto replication origins in G1-phase forms the basis of replication fork establishment in S-phase. However, how ORC and MCM2-7 facilitate genome-wide DNA licensing is not fully understood. Mapping the molecular footprints of budding yeast ORC and MCM2-7 genome-wide, we discovered that MCM2-7 loading is associated with ORC release from origins and redistribution to non-origin sites. Our bioinformatic analysis revealed that origins are compact units, where a single MCM2-7 double hexamer blocks repetitive loading through steric ORC binding site occlusion. Analyses of A-elements and an improved B2-element consensus motif uncovered that DNA shape, DNA flexibility, and the correct, face-to-face spacing of the two DNA elements are hallmarks of ORC-binding and efficient helicase loading sites. Thus, our work identified fundamental principles for MCM2-7 helicase loading that explain how origin licensing is realised across the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Maximilian Reuter
- DNA Replication Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) gGmbH, Ackermannweg 4, Mainz, Germany.
| | | | - Audrey Mossler
- DNA Replication Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Korbinian Liebl
- Department of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, and James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sarah V Faull
- DNA Replication Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammad M Karimi
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), London, United Kingdom
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Speck
- DNA Replication Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia J, Yu C. The Role of the MCM2-7 Helicase Subunit MCM2 in Epigenetic Inheritance. BIOLOGY 2024; 13:572. [PMID: 39194510 DOI: 10.3390/biology13080572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
Recycling histone proteins from parental chromatin, a process known as parental histone transfer, is an important component in chromosome replication and is essential for epigenetic inheritance. We review recent advances in our understanding of the recycling mechanism of parental histone H3-H4 tetramers (parH3:H4tet), emphasizing the pivotal role of the DNA replisome. In particular, we highlight the function of the MCM2-7 helicase subunit Mcm2 as a histone H3-H4 tetramer chaperone. Disruption of this histone chaperone's functions affects mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation and can lead to embryonic lethality in mice, underscoring the crucial role of the replisome in maintaining epigenomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Jia
- Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN 55912, USA
| | - Chuanhe Yu
- Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN 55912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foss EJ, Lichauco C, Gatbonton-Schwager T, Gonske SJ, Lofts B, Lao U, Bedalov A. Identification of 1600 replication origins in S. cerevisiae. eLife 2024; 12:RP88087. [PMID: 38315095 PMCID: PMC10945306 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
There are approximately 500 known origins of replication in the yeast genome, and the process by which DNA replication initiates at these locations is well understood. In particular, these sites are made competent to initiate replication by loading of the Mcm replicative helicase prior to the start of S phase; thus, 'a site that binds Mcm in G1' might be considered to provide an operational definition of a replication origin. By fusing a subunit of Mcm to micrococcal nuclease, we previously showed that known origins are typically bound by a single Mcm double hexamer, loaded adjacent to the ARS consensus sequence (ACS). Here, we extend this analysis from known origins to the entire genome, identifying candidate Mcm binding sites whose signal intensity varies over at least three orders of magnitude. Published data quantifying single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) during S phase revealed replication initiation among the most abundant 1600 of these sites, with replication activity decreasing with Mcm abundance and disappearing at the limit of detection of ssDNA. Three other hallmarks of replication origins were apparent among the most abundant 5500 sites. Specifically, these sites: (1) appeared in intergenic nucleosome-free regions flanked on one or both sides by well-positioned nucleosomes; (2) were flanked by ACSs; and (3) exhibited a pattern of GC skew characteristic of replication initiation. We conclude that, if sites at which Mcm double hexamers are loaded can function as replication origins, then DNA replication origins are at least threefold more abundant than previously assumed, and we suggest that replication may occasionally initiate in essentially every intergenic region. These results shed light on recent reports that as many as 15% of replication events initiate outside of known origins, and this broader distribution of replication origins suggest that S phase in yeast may be less distinct from that in humans than widely assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Foss
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Carmina Lichauco
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| | | | - Sara J Gonske
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Brandon Lofts
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Uyen Lao
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Antonio Bedalov
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer CenterSeattleUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gera T, Kumar DK, Yaakov G, Barkai N, Jonas F. ChEC-Seq: A Comprehensive Guide for Scalable and Cost-Efficient Genome-Wide Profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2846:263-283. [PMID: 39141241 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4071-5_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Chromatin endogenous cleavage coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChEC-seq) is a profiling method for protein-DNA interactions that can detect binding locations in vivo, does not require antibodies or fixation, and provides genome-wide coverage at near nucleotide resolution.The core of this method is an MNase fusion of the target protein, which allows it, when triggered by calcium exposure, to cut DNA at its binding sites and to generate small DNA fragments that can be readily separated from the rest of the genome and sequenced.Improvements since the original protocol have increased the ease, lowered the costs, and multiplied the throughput of this method to enable a scale and resolution of experiments not available with traditional methods such as ChIP-seq. This method describes each step from the initial creation and verification of the MNase-tagged yeast strains, over the ChEC MNase activation and small fragment purification procedure to the sequencing library preparation. It also briefly touches on the bioinformatic steps necessary to create meaningful genome-wide binding profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Gera
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | - Gilad Yaakov
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Naama Barkai
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Felix Jonas
- School of Science, Constructor University, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee CSK, Weiβ M, Hamperl S. Where and when to start: Regulating DNA replication origin activity in eukaryotic genomes. Nucleus 2023; 14:2229642. [PMID: 37469113 PMCID: PMC10361152 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2229642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In eukaryotic genomes, hundreds to thousands of potential start sites of DNA replication named origins are dispersed across each of the linear chromosomes. During S-phase, only a subset of origins is selected in a stochastic manner to assemble bidirectional replication forks and initiate DNA synthesis. Despite substantial progress in our understanding of this complex process, a comprehensive 'identity code' that defines origins based on specific nucleotide sequences, DNA structural features, the local chromatin environment, or 3D genome architecture is still missing. In this article, we review the genetic and epigenetic features of replication origins in yeast and metazoan chromosomes and highlight recent insights into how this flexibility in origin usage contributes to nuclear organization, cell growth, differentiation, and genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare S K Lee
- Chromosome Dynamics and Genome Stability, Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Weiβ
- Chromosome Dynamics and Genome Stability, Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Hamperl
- Chromosome Dynamics and Genome Stability, Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Foss EJ, Lichauco C, Gatbonton-Schwager T, Gonske SJ, Lofts B, Lao U, Bedalov A. Identification of 1600 replication origins in S. cerevisiae. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.11.536402. [PMID: 38014147 PMCID: PMC10680564 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.11.536402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
There are approximately 500 known origins of replication in the yeast genome, and the process by which DNA replication initiates at these locations is well understood. In particular, these sites are made competent to initiate replication by loading of the Mcm replicative helicase prior to the start of S phase; thus, "a site to which MCM is bound in G1" might be considered to provide an operational definition of a replication origin. By fusing a subunit of Mcm to micrococcal nuclease, a technique referred to as "Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage", we previously showed that known origins are typically bound by a single Mcm double hexamer, loaded adjacent to the ARS consensus sequence (ACS). Here we extend this analysis from known origins to the entire genome, identifying candidate Mcm binding sites whose signal intensity varies over at least 3 orders of magnitude. Published data quantifying the production of ssDNA during S phase showed clear evidence of replication initiation among the most abundant 1600 of these sites, with replication activity decreasing in concert with Mcm abundance and disappearing at the limit of detection of ssDNA. Three other hallmarks of replication origins were apparent among the most abundant 5,500 sites. Specifically, these sites (1) appeared in intergenic nucleosome-free regions that were flanked on one or both sides by well-positioned nucleosomes; (2) were flanked by ACSs; and (3) exhibited a pattern of GC skew characteristic of replication initiation. Furthermore, the high resolution of this technique allowed us to demonstrate a strong bias for detecting Mcm double-hexamers downstream rather than upstream of the ACS, which is consistent with the directionality of Mcm loading by Orc that has been observed in vitro. We conclude that, if sites at which Mcm double-hexamers are loaded can function as replication origins, then DNA replication origins are at least 3-fold more abundant than previously assumed, and we suggest that replication may occasionally initiate in essentially every intergenic region. These results shed light on recent reports that as many as 15% of replication events initiate outside of known origins, and this broader distribution of replication origins suggest that S phase in yeast may be less distinct from that in humans than is widely assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Foss
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Carmina Lichauco
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | | | - Sara J Gonske
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Brandon Lofts
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Uyen Lao
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Antonio Bedalov
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miller CLW, Winston F. The conserved histone chaperone Spt6 is strongly required for DNA replication and genome stability. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112264. [PMID: 36924499 PMCID: PMC10106089 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Histone chaperones are an important class of proteins that regulate chromatin accessibility for DNA-templated processes. Spt6 is a conserved histone chaperone and key regulator of transcription and chromatin structure. However, its functions outside of these roles have been little explored. In this work, we demonstrate a requirement for S. cerevisiae Spt6 in DNA replication and, more broadly, as a regulator of genome stability. Depletion or mutation of Spt6 impairs DNA replication in vivo. Additionally, spt6 mutants are sensitive to DNA replication stress-inducing agents. Interestingly, this sensitivity is independent of the association of Spt6 with RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), suggesting that spt6 mutants have a transcription-independent impairment of DNA replication. Specifically, genomic studies reveal that spt6 mutants have decreased loading of the MCM replicative helicase at replication origins, suggesting that Spt6 promotes origin licensing. Our results identify Spt6 as a regulator of genome stability, at least in part through a role in DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine L W Miller
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Fred Winston
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The human pre-replication complex is an open complex. Cell 2023; 186:98-111.e21. [PMID: 36608662 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, DNA replication initiation requires assembly and activation of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) 2-7 double hexamer (DH) to melt origin DNA strands. However, the mechanism for this initial melting is unknown. Here, we report a 2.59-Å cryo-electron microscopy structure of the human MCM-DH (hMCM-DH), also known as the pre-replication complex. In this structure, the hMCM-DH with a constricted central channel untwists and stretches the DNA strands such that almost a half turn of the bound duplex DNA is distorted with 1 base pair completely separated, generating an initial open structure (IOS) at the hexamer junction. Disturbing the IOS inhibits DH formation and replication initiation. Mapping of hMCM-DH footprints indicates that IOSs are distributed across the genome in large clusters aligning well with initiation zones designed for stochastic origin firing. This work unravels an intrinsic mechanism that couples DH formation with initial DNA melting to license replication initiation in human cells.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rhind N. DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance. Bioessays 2022; 44:e2200097. [PMID: 36125226 PMCID: PMC9783711 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202200097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The regulation of DNA replication is a fascinating biological problem both from a mechanistic angle-How is replication timing regulated?-and from an evolutionary one-Why is replication timing regulated? Recent work has provided significant insight into the first question. Detailed biochemical understanding of the mechanism and regulation of replication initiation has made possible robust hypotheses for how replication timing is regulated. Moreover, technical progress, including high-throughput, single-molecule mapping of replication initiation and single-cell assays of replication timing, has allowed for direct testing of these hypotheses in mammalian cells. This work has consolidated the conclusion that differential replication timing is a consequence of the varying probability of replication origin initiation. The second question is more difficult to directly address experimentally. Nonetheless, plausible hypotheses can be made and one-that replication timing contributes to the regulation of chromatin structure-has received new experimental support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Rhind
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rhind N. f = m* a: A Framework for Investigating the Regulation of Replication Timing. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:249. [PMID: 35205293 PMCID: PMC8872135 DOI: 10.3390/genes13020249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Stochastic models of replication timing posit that origin firing timing is regulated by origin firing probability, with early-firing origins having a high probability of firing and late-firing origins having a lower probability. However, they offer no insight into why one origin should have a higher firing probability than another. Here, a simple framework is suggested for how to approach the question by noting that the firing probability (f) must be the product of the stoichiometry of the MCM replicative helicase loaded at the origin (m) and the probability with which that MCM is activated (a). This framework emphasizes that mechanistic understanding of replication timing must focus on MCM loading and activation and can be simplified to the equation f = m*a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Rhind
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mei L, Kedziora KM, Song EA, Purvis JE, Cook J. The consequences of differential origin licensing dynamics in distinct chromatin environments. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:9601-9620. [PMID: 35079814 PMCID: PMC9508807 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic chromosomes contain regions of varying accessibility, yet DNA replication factors must access all regions. The first replication step is loading MCM complexes to license replication origins during the G1 cell cycle phase. It is not yet known how mammalian MCM complexes are adequately distributed to both accessible euchromatin regions and less accessible heterochromatin regions. To address this question, we combined time-lapse live-cell imaging with immunofluorescence imaging of single human cells to quantify the relative rates of MCM loading in euchromatin and heterochromatin throughout G1. We report here that MCM loading in euchromatin is faster than that in heterochromatin in early G1, but surprisingly, heterochromatin loading accelerates relative to euchromatin loading in middle and late G1. This differential acceleration allows both chromatin types to begin S phase with similar concentrations of loaded MCM. The different loading dynamics require ORCA-dependent differences in origin recognition complex distribution. A consequence of heterochromatin licensing dynamics is that cells experiencing a truncated G1 phase from premature cyclin E expression enter S phase with underlicensed heterochromatin, and DNA damage accumulates preferentially in heterochromatin in the subsequent S/G2 phase. Thus, G1 length is critical for sufficient MCM loading, particularly in heterochromatin, to ensure complete genome duplication and to maintain genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Mei
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Katarzyna M Kedziora
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Bioinformatics and Analytics Research Collaborative (BARC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Eun-Ah Song
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeremy E Purvis
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeanette Gowen Cook
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|