Neurocognitive trajectory and proteomic signature of inherited risk for Alzheimer's disease

Modeling genotype-protein interaction and correlation for Alzheimer's disease: a multi-omics imaging genetics study

Integrating and analyzing multiple omics data sets, including genomics, proteomics and radiomics, can significantly advance researchers' comprehensive understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current methodologies primarily focus on the main effects of genetic variation and protein, overlooking non-additive effects such as genotype-protein interaction (GPI) and correlation patterns in brain imaging genetics studies. Importantly, these non-additive effects could contribute to intermediate imaging phenotypes, finally leading to disease occurrence. In general, the interaction between genetic variations and proteins, and their correlations are two distinct biological effects, and thus disentangling the two effects for heritable imaging phenotypes is of great interest and need. Unfortunately, this issue has been largely unexploited. In this paper, to fill this gap, we propose $\textbf{M}$ulti-$\textbf{T}$ask $\textbf{G}$enotype-$\textbf{P}$rotein $\textbf{I}$nteraction and $\textbf{C}$orrelation disentangling method ($\textbf{MT-GPIC}$) to identify GPI and extract correlation patterns between them. To ensure stability and interpretability, we use novel and off-the-shelf penalties to identify meaningful genetic risk factors, as well as exploit the interconnectedness of different brain regions. Additionally, since computing GPI poses a high computational burden, we develop a fast optimization strategy for solving MT-GPIC, which is guaranteed to converge. Experimental results on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data set show that MT-GPIC achieves higher correlation coefficients and classification accuracy than state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, our approach could effectively identify interpretable phenotype-related GPI and correlation patterns in high-dimensional omics data sets. These findings not only enhance the diagnostic accuracy but also contribute valuable insights into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of AD.

What does heritability of Alzheimer's disease represent?

INTRODUCTION

Both late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and ageing have a strong genetic component. In each case, many associated variants have been discovered, but how much missing heritability remains to be discovered is debated. Variability in the estimation of SNP-based heritability could explain the differences in reported heritability.

METHODS

We compute heritability in five large independent cohorts (N = 7,396, 1,566, 803, 12,528 and 3,963) to determine whether a consensus for the AD heritability estimate can be reached. These cohorts vary by sample size, age of cases and controls and phenotype definition. We compute heritability a) for all SNPs, b) excluding APOE region, c) excluding both APOE and genome-wide association study hit regions, and d) SNPs overlapping a microglia gene-set.

RESULTS

SNP-based heritability of late onset Alzheimer's disease is between 38 and 66% when age and genetic disease architecture are correctly accounted for. The heritability estimates decrease by 12% [SD = 8%] on average when the APOE region is excluded and an additional 1% [SD = 3%] when genome-wide significant regions were removed. A microglia gene-set explains 69-84% of our estimates of SNP-based heritability using only 3% of total SNPs in all cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The heritability of neurodegenerative disorders cannot be represented as a single number, because it is dependent on the ages of cases and controls. Genome-wide association studies pick up a large proportion of total AD heritability when age and genetic architecture are correctly accounted for. Around 13% of SNP-based heritability can be explained by known genetic loci and the remaining heritability likely resides around microglial related genes.