Off-target piRNA gene silencing in Drosophila melanogaster rescued by a transposable element insertion

Rapid evolution of piRNA clusters in the Drosophila melanogaster ovary

The piRNA pathway is a highly conserved mechanism to repress transposable element (TE) activity in the animal germline via a specialized class of small RNAs called piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). piRNAs are produced from discrete genomic regions called piRNA clusters (piCs). Although the molecular processes by which piCs function are relatively well understood in Drosophila melanogaster, much less is known about the origin and evolution of piCs in this or any other species. To investigate piC origin and evolution, we use a population genomic approach to compare piC activity and sequence composition across eight geographically distant strains of D. melanogaster with high-quality long-read genome assemblies. We perform annotations of ovary piCs and genome-wide TE content in each strain. Our analysis uncovers extensive variation in piC activity across strains and signatures of rapid birth and death of piCs. Most TEs inferred to be recently active show an enrichment of insertions into old and large piCs, consistent with the previously proposed "trap" model of piC evolution. In contrast, a small subset of active LTR families is enriched for the formation of new piCs, suggesting that these TEs have higher proclivity to form piCs. Thus, our findings uncover processes leading to the origin of piCs. We propose that piC evolution begins with the emergence of piRNAs from individual insertions of a few select TE families prone to seed new piCs that subsequently expand by accretion of insertions from most other TE families during evolution to form larger "trap" clusters. Our study shows that TEs themselves are the major force driving the rapid evolution of piCs.

Experimentally evolving Drosophila erecta populations may fail to establish an effective piRNA-based host defense against invading P-elements

To prevent the spread of transposable elements (TEs), hosts have developed sophisticated defense mechanisms. In mammals and invertebrates, a major defense mechanism operates through PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). To investigate the establishment of the host defense, we introduced the P-element, one of the most widely studied eukaryotic transposons, into naive lines of Drosophila erecta We monitored the invasion in three replicates for more than 50 generations by sequencing the genomic DNA (using short and long reads), the small RNAs, and the transcriptome at regular intervals. A piRNA-based host defense was rapidly established in two replicates (R1, R4) but not in a third (R2), in which P-element copy numbers kept increasing for over 50 generations. We found that the ping-pong cycle could not be activated in R2, although the ping-pong cycle is fully functional against other TEs. Furthermore, R2 had both insertions in piRNA clusters and siRNAs, suggesting that neither of them is sufficient to trigger the host defense. Our work shows that control of an invading TE requires activation of the ping-pong cycle and that this activation is a stochastic event that may fail in some populations, leading to a proliferation of TEs that ultimately threaten the integrity of the host genome.

The curious case of the disappearing piRNAs

Small non-coding RNAs are key regulators of gene expression across eukaryotes. Piwi-interacting small RNAs (piRNAs) are a specific type of small non-coding RNAs, conserved across animals, which are best known as regulators of genome stability through their ability to target transposable elements for silencing. Despite the near ubiquitous presence of piRNAs in animal lineages, there are some examples where the piRNA pathway has been lost completely, most dramatically in nematodes where loss has occurred in at least four independent lineages. In this perspective I will provide an evaluation of the presence of piRNAs across animals, explaining how it is known that piRNAs are missing from certain organisms. I will then consider possible explanations for why the piRNA pathway might have been lost and evaluate the evidence in favor of each possible mechanism. While it is still impossible to provide definitive answers, these theories will prompt further investigations into why such a highly conserved pathway can nevertheless become dispensable in certain lineages. This article is categorized under: Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Biogenesis of Effector Small RNAs RNA Evolution and Genomics > RNA and Ribonucleoprotein Evolution.

The impact of paramutations on the invasion dynamics of transposable elements

According to the prevailing view, the trap model, the activity of invading transposable elements (TEs) is greatly reduced when a TE copy jumps into a piRNA cluster, which triggers the emergence of piRNAs that silence the TE. One crucial component in the host defence are paramutations. Mediated by maternally deposited piRNAs, paramutations convert TE insertions into piRNA producing loci, thereby transforming selfish TEs into agents of the host defence. Despite this significant effect, the impact of paramutations on the dynamics of TE invasions remains unknown. To address this issue, we performed extensive forward simulations of TE invasions with piRNA clusters and paramutations. We found that paramutations significantly affect TE dynamics, by accelerating the silencing of TE invasions, reducing the number of insertions accumulating during the invasions and mitigating the fitness cost of TEs. We also demonstrate that piRNA production induced by paramutations, an epigenetically inherited trait, may be positively selected. Finally, we show that paramutations may account for three important open problems with the trap model. Firstly, paramutated TE insertions may compensate for the insufficient number of insertions in piRNA clusters observed in previous studies. Secondly, paramutations may explain the discrepancy between the observed and the expected abundance of different TE families in Drosophila melanogaster. Thirdly, piRNA clusters may be crucial to trigger the host defence, but paramutations render the clusters dispensable once the defence has been established. This could account for the lack of TE activation when three major piRNA clusters were deleted in a previous study.

Rapid evolution of piRNA clusters in the Drosophila melanogaster ovary

Animal genomes are parasitized by a horde of transposable elements (TEs) whose mutagenic activity can have catastrophic consequences. The piRNA pathway is a conserved mechanism to repress TE activity in the germline via a specialized class of small RNAs associated with effector Piwi proteins called piwi-associated RNAs (piRNAs). piRNAs are produced from discrete genomic regions called piRNA clusters (piCs). While piCs are generally enriched for TE sequences and the molecular processes by which they are transcribed and regulated are relatively well understood in Drosophila melanogaster, much less is known about the origin and evolution of piCs in this or any other species. To investigate piC evolution, we use a population genomics approach to compare piC activity and sequence composition across 8 geographically distant strains of D. melanogaster with high quality long-read genome assemblies. We perform extensive annotations of ovary piCs and TE content in each strain and test predictions of two proposed models of piC evolution. The 'de novo' model posits that individual TE insertions can spontaneously attain the status of a small piC to generate piRNAs silencing the entire TE family. The 'trap' model envisions large and evolutionary stable genomic clusters where TEs tend to accumulate and serves as a long-term "memory" of ancient TE invasions and produce a great variety of piRNAs protecting against related TEs entering the genome. It remains unclear which model best describes the evolution of piCs. Our analysis uncovers extensive variation in piC activity across strains and signatures of rapid birth and death of piCs in natural populations. Most TE families inferred to be recently or currently active show an enrichment of strain-specific insertions into large piCs, consistent with the trap model. By contrast, only a small subset of active LTR retrotransposon families is enriched for the formation of strain-specific piCs, suggesting that these families have an inherent proclivity to form de novo piCs. Thus, our findings support aspects of both 'de novo' and 'trap' models of piC evolution. We propose that these two models represent two extreme stages along an evolutionary continuum, which begins with the emergence of piCs de novo from a few specific LTR retrotransposon insertions that subsequently expand by accretion of other TE insertions during evolution to form larger 'trap' clusters. Our study shows that piCs are evolutionarily labile and that TEs themselves are the major force driving the formation and evolution of piCs.