Improving musculoskeletal injury surveillance methods in Special Operation Forces: A Delphi consensus study

Musculoskeletal Injury in Australian Infantry Personnel: A Cross-sectional Study to Understand Prevention Priorities

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal injury patterns are under-investigated in the Royal Australian Infantry Corps. Subsequently, more evidence is needed to support injury prevention processes in this population. One difficulty in collecting injury information to monitor injury patterns within combat populations accurately is known injury concealment behaviors in such populations. This study aims to examine musculoskeletal injury epidemiology within Australian infantry battalions using a tailored approach to mitigate reporting avoidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study using an anonymous online survey captured musculoskeletal injury information directly from personnel serving within 2 Australian infantry battalions. The survey requested information on participants' injury frequency in the previous 12 months and the context of participants' most severe injury. Injury context was restricted to the most severe during the period to limit recall bias. The applied injury case definition encompassed all injuries that affected an individual's ability to perform in their role. A descriptive analysis of all data recorded across the 2 battalions was conducted. Subgroup statistical difference was assessed by examining the 95% CI overlap between groups. The Department of Defence and Veterans' Affairs Human Research Ethics Committee granted ethical approval for this study.

RESULTS

Overall, 166 individuals self-reported at least 1 injury in the past 12 months, representing a period prevalence of 55.5% (95% CI, 49.8-61.0%). No statistically significant prevalence differences existed between employment type, age, or sex. Approximately a quarter of injured participants were medically reclassified because of their injury, impacting their deployment fitness (n = 40, 24.4%). The following results relate to the most severe injury personnel experienced. Most injuries were service-related (n = 152, 91.6%). Field activities (n = 64, 39.3%) and physical training (n = 59, 36.2%) were the most common injury-related activities. Running was the most reported injury mechanism (n = 35, 21.7%), followed by pack marching (n = 29, 18.9%) and fall, slip, or trip (n = 18, 11.2%).

CONCLUSION

Musculoskeletal injuries are common in the Australian infantry and significantly burden the workforce. Physical training and field exercises are most associated with injury and represent opportunities for injury risk-mitigation strategies to support the overall deployability of personnel and the combat effectiveness of their battalions. Future research should more formally explore the injury risk factors related to these activities using more robust study designs to collect injury and exposure information more accurately and reliably. One study strength includes using military-specific international injury surveillance guidelines to inform the survey design, to collect the recommended injury information for effective surveillance, and to enable future research comparison. A second study strength was tailoring the survey to promote participatory engagement, providing a high completion rate. A challenge in conducting this research was coordinating participant recruitment and data collection during domestic operations. Such challenges reflect the reality of conducting research in the military.

Burden and risk factors for plantar fasciopathy in the military population from 2006 to 2015: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Ankle and foot injuries are highly prevalent in the US Armed Forces, incurring medical and personnel costs for the Department of Defense. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the burden and risk factors of plantar fasciopathy (PF) in the US Military.

METHODS

The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database identified all diagnosed PF cases in military service members from 2006 to 2015. A custom spreadsheet calculated incidence of PF and relative risk between sexes, military occupations and ranks. Relative risk of injury per demographic category (sex, age, service branch, rank and year) was also calculated.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PF from 2006 to 2015 was 12.85 per 1000 person-years, affecting 176 601 service members. 37 939 officers incurred PF at a rate of 17.65 per 1000 person-years (male 18.20 per 1000 person-years; female 14.80 per 1000 person-years). There were 116 122 enlisted personnel with PF that occurred at a rate of 12.22 per 1000 person-years (male 12.07 per 1000 person-years; female 13.22 per 1000 person-years). When compared with ground and naval gunfire officers, all officer specialties except for aviation and logistics had significantly higher risk of PF; aviation (relative risk (RR): 0.83, p<0.001) and logistics (RR: 0.94, p<0.001) had significantly lower risk. Regarding enlisted specialties, when compared with infantry, all occupations had significantly increased risk for PF except for Special Operations Forces (RR: 0.94, p=0.13). There were multiple associated factors identified with PF, including female sex, age >30, junior enlisted rank, a variety of military occupations and service in the Army.

CONCLUSIONS

PF was common in the US military during the study period, with multiple salient risk factors identified. These findings highlight the need for prophylactic interventions for populations with the greatest risk.

Burden of Musculoskeletal Injuries in U.S. Active Duty Service Members: A 12-Year Study Spanning Fiscal Years 2010-2021

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) represent the most substantial and enduring threat to U.S. military readiness. Previous studies have focused on narrow surveillance periods, single branches of service, and used variable approaches for MSKI identification and classification. Therefore, the goals of this retrospective population study were to report the incidence, prevalence, and types of MSKIs sustained by active duty service members (ADSMs) across four Services in direct care (DC) and private sector care (PC) settings over fiscal years (FYs) 2010-2021, and to quantify and describe associated health care utilization and PC costs over the same period.

METHODS

This study included ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for Head/Neck, Upper Extremity (UE), Spine (upper back, middle back, lower back, pelvic), and Lower Extremity (LE) MSKIs in ADSMs, associated health care utilization, and PC costs were derived by querying electronic health records from DC, PC claims, and theater medical data from the Military Health System Data Repository. Patient episodes of care and associated PC costs related to MSKIs in DC and PC settings were classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays, body regions, and Services.

RESULTS

Over FY10-21, the most prevalent MSKIs were LE (24-29%) followed by Spine (17-20%), UE (14-16%), and Head/Neck (6-8%). Across FY10-21, soldiers were more likely to sustain LE MSKI than Airmen (risk ratio 1.12-1.30) and Marines demonstrated an increasing risk of LE MSKI prevalence and incidence (relative to Airmen) over the study period. The rise in prevalence of LE, Spine, UE, and Head/Neck MSKIs over FY10-21 was accompanied by increased health care utilization and reliance on PC care, especially same-day surgeries (SDS). PC reliance for SDS increased across body regions from FY10 to its peak in FY20 (Head/Neck: 22.7% to 49.7%, Spine: 37.1% to 57.0%, LE: 38.6% to 51.5%, UE: 40.4% to 53.5%). In FY21, the MHS incurred the highest PC costs for LE MSKIs ($132,242,289), followed by Spine ($98,738,863), UE ($92,118,071), and Head/Neck ($42,718,754).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first population study of MSKIs in ADSMs spanning the ICD-10 CM transition (FY15-16) that includes the four Services. Across Services, MSKIs in the U.S. military remain a prevalent and persistent problem. Consistent with prior research, the LE was the most common and costly body region affected by MSKIs. Service members with MSKIs demonstrated an increasing reliance on PC for MSKI care, particularly SDS, over the study period. Expanding future research efforts to include all Services to assess risk factors and patient outcomes for treatments across DC and PC settings is vital to mitigate the threat posed by MSKIs to the readiness of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries in United States Active Duty Service Members: Prevalence/Incidence, Health Care Utilization, and Cost Analysis Spanning Fiscal Years 2016-2021

INTRODUCTION

Lower Extremity musculoskeletal injuries (LE MSKIs) represent a significant portion of overuse injuries in active duty service members (ADSMs). However, variations in study methods and research gaps related to LE MSKIs have prevented Department of Defense (DoD) leaders from assessing the burden of these conditions. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence, prevalence, and types of LE MSKIs sustained by ADSMs across four branches of service and describe associated health care utilization and private sector costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study, including ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for LE MSKIs, associated health care utilization, and costs were obtained by querying electronic health records (EHR) from military treatment facilities (MTFs), private sector care (PC) claims, and theater medical data from the Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021 (FY16-21). Utilization associated with LE MSKIs in both the direct care (DC) and PC settings was classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays. PC costs related to LE MSKIs were captured for each year.

RESULTS

In FY21, LE MSKIs occurred in 25.3% of ADSMs (n = 378,615). A higher proportion of females sustained an LE MSKI (33.3%), compared to males (23.7%). From FY16-21, the Army had the highest annual prevalence of LE MSKIs (30.9-35.5%), followed by the Air Force (23.8-31.0%), Marine Corps (23.4-27.0%), and Navy (17.2-19.8%). Incidence rate patterns were similar, with the Army sustaining LE MSKIs at 320 to 377 injuries per 1,000 person-years, followed by the Air Force (241-318), Marines (255-288), and Navy (173-203). Overuse/non-specific MSKIs of the knee were the most common injury type and body region affected, respectively. There were 10,675,543 DC and 1,875,307 PC outpatient encounters from FY16-21 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of LE MSKI. The Air Force was most reliant on PC, with 21.5 to 36.8% of LE MSKI-related encounters occurring outside MTFs during FY16-21. Over $99 million was paid by TRICARE on LE MSKI in FY21 alone with Same Day Surgeries accounting for almost half ($48 million) of this total.

CONCLUSIONS

Among U.S. ADSMs, LE MSKIs remain highly prevalent and costly. We observed disparities across the Services in the prevalence and incidence of LE MSKIs, and their respective reliance on the private sector for management of these conditions. Findings from this work may support military leaders and MSKI researchers who seek to reduce the impact of LE MSKIs on the readiness and overall health of the U.S. Military.

Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries in United States Active Duty Service Members: Prevalence/Incidence, Health Care Utilization, and Cost Analysis Spanning Fiscal Years 2016-2021

INTRODUCTION

Upper Extremity musculoskeletal injuries (UE MSKIs) represent a major threat to the overall health and readiness of U.S. active duty service members (U.S. ADSMs). However, a lack of prior research and inconsistent study and surveillance methodology has limited Department of Defense (DoD) leaders from assessing and addressing the burden of these conditions. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence, prevalence, and types of UE MSKIs sustained by ADSMs across four branches of service and describe associated health care utilization and private sector costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study, including ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for UE MSKIs, associated health care utilization, and private sector costs were obtained by querying electronic health records from military treatment facilities (MTF), private sector care (PC) claims, and theater medical data from the Military Health System Data Repository from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021 (Fiscal Years [FYs] 16-21). Utilization associated with UE MSKIs in both the direct care (DC) and PC settings was classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays. PC costs related to UE MSKIs were captured for each year.

RESULTS

In FY21, UE MSKIs occurred in 15.0% of ADSMs (n = 224,842). From FY16-21, the Army had the highest annual prevalence of UE MSKIs (16.7-18.8%), followed by the Air Force (15.2-17.6%), Marine Corps (13.2-14.7%), and Navy (11.1-12.6%). Incidence rate patterns were similar, with the Army sustaining UE MSKIs at 172 to 199 injuries per 1,000 person-years, followed by the Air Force (150-181), Marines (140-157), and Navy (113-130). Overuse/non-specific MSKIs of the shoulder were the most common UE injury type and body region affected, respectively. There were 5,641,191 DC and 1,290,153 PC outpatient encounters from FY16-21 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of UE MSKI. The Air Force was most reliant on PC, with 31.5% of their UE MSKI-related encounters occurring outside MTFs during FY16-21.

CONCLUSIONS

Among U.S. ADSMs, UE MSKIs are both highly prevalent and financially burdensome. We observed variation across the Services in the prevalence and incidence of UE MSKIs, and their respective reliance on the private sector for management of these conditions. Findings from this work may support military leaders and MSKI researchers who seek to reduce the impact of UE MSKIs on the readiness and overall health of the U.S. Military.

Capturing and Categorizing the Burden of Musculoskeletal Injuries in U.S. Active Duty Service Members: A Comprehensive Methodology

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) represent the most common, costly, and impactful medical conditions affecting active duty service members (ADSMs) of the United States Armed Forces. Inconsistent, variable MSKI surveillance methods and often incompletely described criteria for cohort selection, injuries, incidence, and prevalence have limited efforts to observe longitudinal trends, identify gaps in care, or highlight specific military branches or sites that could benefit from enhanced MSKI intervention protocols. The purpose of this manuscript is to present a comprehensive, well-documented, and reproducible framework for capturing and categorizing MSKI burden, healthcare utilization, and private sector costs for ADSMs across a 12-year period spanning the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification transition.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study, including ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for Upper Extremity, Lower Extremity, Spine, and Head/Neck MSKIs, associated health care utilization, and private sector costs were obtained by querying electronic health records from military treatment facilities, private sector care (PC) claims, and theater medical data from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2021 (Fiscal Years 10-21), using the Military Health System Data Repository. Utilization associated with MSKIs per body region in the direct care and PC settings was classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays. PC MSKI-associated costs were captured per year and categorized by service, body region, and setting.

CONCLUSIONS

MSKI surveillance research in ADSMs has been impacted by variable, often incompletely described methods. While our approach is not without limitations, our aim was to present a well-documented, reproducible methodology for MSKI investigation in military personnel. By presenting a comprehensive blueprint for capturing and categorizing MSKI care in U.S. service members, our goal is for this methodology to enhance the efforts of researchers, public health officials, and Military Health System leaders to combat MSKIs, the primary medical threat to military readiness.

Musculoskeletal Spine Injuries in U.S. Active Duty Service Members: Prevalence/Incidence, Healthcare Utilization, and Cost Analysis Spanning Fiscal Years 2016-2021

BACKGROUND

Low back pain and musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) of the Spine are the most common reason for U.S. active duty service members (ADSMs) to seek medical care. The purposes of this descriptive study were to report the prevalence/incidence, health care utilization, and health care costs attributable to Spine (thoracic, lumbar, sacral, and pelvic) MSKIs across the four major branches of service from Fiscal Years (FY) 2016 to 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study, including ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for Spine MSKIs, associated health care utilization, and costs were obtained by querying electronic health records (EHRs) from military treatment facilities, private sector care (PC) claims, and theater medical data from the Military Health System Data Repository from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021 (FY16-21). Utilization associated with Spine MSKIs in both the direct care (DC) and PC settings was classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays. PC costs related to Spine MSKIs were captured per year.

RESULTS

In FY21, 269,301 ADSMs sought care for Spine MSKI, representing 18.0% of the U.S. Armed Forces. The prevalence of Spine MSKIs ranged from 17.4 to 19.5% during FY16-21, with the highest annual prevalence among the Army (20.7-22.9%) and Air Force (19.0-22.6%). Across the study period, Soldiers had the highest share (47.8-50.4%) of DC outpatient encounters for Spine MSKI (primary or secondary diagnosis). The Air Force relied most heavily on PC for outpatient Spine MSKI care across the study period, where in FY21 Airmen accounted for 36.5% of the outpatient PC Spine MSKI encounters totaling $21,140,935 in PC costs. In FY21, total PC costs for Spine MSKI totaled $99,317,832.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective, descriptive study establishes prevalence/incidence, health care utilization, and PC costs for Spine MSKIs across the Services from FY16-21 and highlights the burden of Spine MSKIs among the U.S. Armed Forces, with costs amounting to over $99 million in PC reliance in FY21 alone.

Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) Version 15

BACKGROUND

Sports medicine (injury and illnesses) requires distinct coding systems because the International Classification of Diseases is insufficient for sports medicine coding. The Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) is one of two sports medicine coding systems recommended by the International Olympic Committee. Regular updates of coding systems are required.

METHODS

For Version 15, updates for mental health conditions in athletes, sports cardiology, concussion sub-types, infectious diseases, and skin and eye conditions were considered particularly important.

RESULTS

Recommended codes were added from a recent International Olympic Committee consensus statement on mental health conditions in athletes. Two landmark sports cardiology papers were used to update a more comprehensive list of sports cardiology codes. Rugby union protocols on head injury assessment were used to create additional concussion codes.

CONCLUSION

It is planned that OSIICS Version 15 will be translated into multiple new languages in a timely fashion to facilitate international accessibility. The large number of recently published sport-specific and discipline-specific consensus statements on athlete surveillance warrant regular updating of OSIICS.

Introducing a new method to record injuries during military training: a prospective study among 296 young Norwegian conscripts

INTRODUCTION

Most epidemiological studies in the field of military medicine have been based on data from medical records and registries. The aims of this study were to test a self-reporting injury surveillance system commonly used in sports medicine in a military setting, and to describe the injury pattern among Norwegian army conscripts during a period of military training.

METHOD

A total of 296 conscripts in His Majesty the King's Guard were asked to report all injuries each week for 12 weeks, using a modification of the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Questionnaire on Health Problems (OSTRC-H2). We recorded all injuries irrespective of their need for medical attention or consequences for military participation. In addition, we retrieved data on injuries recorded by military physicians in the medical record from the Norwegian Armed Forces Health Register.

RESULTS

The mean weekly response rate was 74%. A total of 357 injuries were recorded, of which 82% were only captured through the OSTRC-H2 and 3% only in the medical records. The average weekly prevalence of injury was 28% (95% CI: 25% to 31%), and 10% (95% CI: 8% to 12%) experienced injuries with a substantial negative impact on training and performance. The greatest injury burden was caused by lower limb injuries, with knee and foot injuries as the predominant injury locations.

CONCLUSION

The OSTRC-H2 is suitable for use in a military setting and records substantially more injuries than the standard medical record. The prevalence of injuries among conscripts is high and comparable with many elite sports.

Musculoskeletal Complaint Epidemiology in Australian Special Operation Forces Trainees

INTRODUCTION

Elite military trainees are burdened by high numbers of musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and are a priority military population for injury prevention. This research aims to describe the MSK complaint epidemiology of trainees undertaking special forces (SF) training in the Australian Defence Force (ADF). One barrier to accurate injury surveillance in military populations is that traditional surveillance methods rely on personnel engaging with the military healthcare system to collect injury data. This approach is likely to underestimate the injury burden as it is known that many military personnel, particularly trainees, avoid reporting their injuries because of various motives. Subsequently, the insights from surveillance systems may underestimate the injury burden and limit the ability to inform prevention requirements. This research aims to actively seek MSK complaint information directly from trainees in a sensitive manner to mediate injury-reporting behaviors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive epidemiology study included two consecutive cohorts of ADF SF trainees from 2019 to 2021. Musculoskeletal data items and their respective recording methods were based on international sports injury surveillance guidelines and adapted to a military context. Our case definition encompassed all injuries or physical discomforts as recordable cases. A unit-embedded physiotherapist retrospectively collected MSK complaint data from selection courses and collected prospective data over the training continuum. Data collection processes were external to the military health care system to mediate reporting avoidance and encourage injury reporting. Injury proportions, complaint incidence rates, and incidence rate ratios were calculated and compared between training courses and cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 334 MSK complaints were reported by 103 trainees (90.4%), with a complaint incidence rate of 58.9 per 1,000 training weeks (95% CI, 53.0-65.5). Of these MSK complaints, 6.4% (n = 22) resulted in time loss from work. The lumbar spine (20.6%, n = 71) and the knee (18.9%, n = 65) were the most frequently affected body parts. Most of the MSK complaints were reported during selection courses (41.9%), followed by field survival and team tactics (23.0%) and urban operations courses (21.9%). Physical training accounted for 16.5% of complaints. Fast-roping training was associated with more severe MSK complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Musculoskeletal complaints are highly prevalent in ADF SF trainees. Complaints are more frequently reported in selection and qualification training courses than in physical training. These activities are priorities for focused research to understand injury circumstances in ADF elite training programs to inform injury prevention strategies. A strength of our study is the data collection methods which have provided greater MSK complaint information than past research; however, much work remains in conducting consistent and accurate surveillance. Another strength is the use of an embedded physiotherapist to overcome injury-reporting avoidance. Embedded health professionals are recommended as continued practice for ongoing surveillance and early intervention.

Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injury in military recruits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Injuries are a common occurrence in military recruit training, however due to differences in the capture of training exposure, injury incidence rates are rarely reported. Our aim was to determine the musculoskeletal injury epidemiology of military recruits, including a standardised injury incidence rate.

METHODS

Epidemiological systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five online databases were searched from database inception to 5th May 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies that reported data on musculoskeletal injuries sustained by military recruits after the year 2000 were included. We reported on the frequency, prevalence and injury incidence rate. Incidence rate per 1000 training days (Exact 95% CI) was calculated using meta-analysis to allow comparisons between studies. Observed heterogeneity (e.g., training duration) precluded pooling of results across countries. The Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Assessment Checklist for Prevalence Studies assessed study quality.

RESULTS

This review identified 41 studies comprising 451,782 recruits. Most studies (n = 26; 63%) reported the number of injured recruits, and the majority of studies (n = 27; 66%) reported the number of injuries to recruits. The prevalence of recruits with medical attention injuries or time-loss injuries was 22.8% and 31.4%, respectively. Meta-analysis revealed the injury incidence rate for recruits with a medical attention injury may be as high as 19.52 injuries per 1000 training days; and time-loss injury may be as high as 3.97 injuries per 1000 training days. Longer recruit training programs were associated with a reduced injury incidence rate (p = 0.003). The overall certainty of the evidence was low per a modified GRADE approach.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review with meta-analysis highlights a high musculoskeletal injury prevalence and injury incidence rate within military recruits undergoing basic training with minimal improvement observed over the past 20 years. Longer training program, which may decrease the degree of overload experienced by recruit, may reduce injury incidence rates. Unfortunately, reporting standards and reporting consistency remain a barrier to generalisability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42021251080).

A Validated Injury Surveillance and Monitoring Tool for Fast Jet Aircrew: Translating Sports Medicine Paradigms to a Military Population

BACKGROUND

Military populations, including fast jet aircrew (FJA - aka fighter aircrew/pilots), commonly suffer from musculoskeletal complaints, which reduce performance and operational capability. Valid surveillance tools and agreed recordable injury definitions are lacking. Our objective was to develop and then evaluate the validity of a musculoskeletal complaints surveillance and monitoring tool for FJA.

METHODS

A Delphi study with international experts sought consensus on recordable injury definitions and important content for use in a surveillance and monitoring tool for FJA. Using these results and feedback from end-users (FJA), the University of Canberra Fast Jet Aircrew Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (UC-FJAMQ) was developed. Following its use with 306 Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) FJA over 4 × five-month reporting periods, validity of the UC-FJAMQ was evaluated via multi-level factor analysis (MFA) and compared with routine methods of injury surveillance.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for: eight words/descriptors for defining a musculoskeletal complaint; six definitions of recordable injury; and 14 domains important for determining overall severity. The UC-FJAMQ was developed and refined. MFA identified three distinct dimensions within the 11 items used to determine severity: operational capability, symptoms, and care-seeking. MFA further highlighted that symptom severity and seeking medical attention were poor indicators of the impact musculoskeletal complaints have upon operational capability. One hundred and fifty-two episodes of time loss were identified, with the UC-FJAMQ identifying 79% of these, while routine methods identified 49%. Despite modest weekly reporting rates (61%), the UC-FJAMQ outperformed routine surveillance methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The UC-FJAMQ was developed to specifically address the complexities of injury surveillance with FJA, which are similar to those noted in other military and sporting populations. The results demonstrated the UC-FJAMQ to be sensitive and valid within a large group of FJA over 4 × five-month reporting periods. Adoption of consistent, sensitive, and valid surveillance methods will strengthen the FJA injury prevention literature, ultimately enhancing their health, performance, and operational capability.