Real world external validation of metabolic gestational age assessment in Kenya

Post-natal gestational age assessment using targeted metabolites of neonatal heel prick and umbilical cord blood: A GARBH-Ini cohort study from North India

Background

Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) and identification of preterm birth (PTB) at delivery is essential to guide appropriate post-natal clinical care. Undoubtedly, dating ultrasound sonography (USG) is the gold standard to ascertain GA, but is not accessible to the majority of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in rural areas and small secondary care hospitals. Conventional methods of post-natal GA assessment are not reliable at delivery and are further compounded by a lack of trained personnel to conduct them. We aimed to develop a population-specific GA model using integrated clinical and biochemical variables measured at delivery.

Methods

We acquired metabolic profiles on paired neonatal heel prick (nHP) and umbilical cord blood (uCB) dried blood spot (DBS) samples (n = 1278). The master data set consists of 31 predictors from nHP and 24 from uCB after feature selection. These selected predictors including biochemical analytes, birth weight, and placental weight were considered for the development of population-specific GA estimation and birth outcome classification models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm.

Results

The nHP and uCB full model revealed root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-1.18) and of 1.26 (95% CI = 0.88-1.32) to estimate the GA as compared to actual GA, respectively. In addition, these models correctly estimated 87.9 to 92.5% of the infants within ±2 weeks of the actual GA. The classification models also performed as the best fit to discriminate the PTB from term birth (TB) infants with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.84-0.94) for nHP and an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.85-0.95) for uCB.

Conclusion

The biochemical analytes along with clinical variables in the nHP and uCB data sets provide higher accuracy in predicting GA. These models also performed as the best fit to identify PTB infants at delivery.

Overview of the Global and US Burden of Preterm Birth

Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children globally, yet its prevalence has been difficult to accurately estimate due to unreliable methods of gestational age dating, heterogeneity in counting, and insufficient data. The estimated global PTB rate in 2020 was 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 9.1, 11.2), which reflects no significant change from 2010, and 81% of prematurity-related deaths occurred in Africa and Asia. PTB prevalence in the United States in 2021 was 10.5%, yet with concerning racial disparities. Few effective solutions for prematurity prevention have been identified, highlighting the importance of further research.

Estimating Gestational Age and Prediction of Preterm Birth Using Metabolomics Biomarkers

Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children aged under 5 years globally, especially in low-resource settings. It remains a challenge in many low-income and middle-income countries to accurately measure the true burden of PTB due to limited availability of accurate measures of gestational age (GA), first trimester ultrasound dating being the gold standard. Metabolomics biomarkers are a promising area of research that could provide tools for both early identification of high-risk pregnancies and for the estimation of GA and preterm status of newborns postnatally.

Accuracy of prenatal and postnatal biomarkers for estimating gestational age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Knowledge of gestational age (GA) is key in clinical management of individual obstetric patients, and critical to be able to calculate rates of preterm birth and small for GA at a population level. Currently, the gold standard for pregnancy dating is measurement of the fetal crown rump length at 11-14 weeks of gestation. However, this is not possible for women first presenting in later pregnancy, or in settings where routine ultrasound is not available. A reliable, cheap and easy to measure GA-dependent biomarker would provide an important breakthrough in estimating the age of pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of prenatal and postnatal biomarkers for estimating gestational age (GA).

Methods

Systematic review prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020167727) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and other databases were searched from inception until September 2023 for cohort or cross-sectional studies that reported on the accuracy of prenatal and postnatal biomarkers for estimating GA. In addition, we searched Google Scholar and screened proceedings of relevant conferences and reference lists of identified studies and relevant reviews. There were no language or date restrictions. Pooled coefficients of correlation and root mean square error (RMSE, average deviation in weeks between the GA estimated by the biomarker and that estimated by the gold standard method) were calculated. The risk of bias in each included study was also assessed.

Findings

Thirty-nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 20 studies (2,050 women) assessed prenatal biomarkers (placental hormones, metabolomic profiles, proteomics, cell-free RNA transcripts, and exon-level gene expression), and 19 (1,738,652 newborns) assessed postnatal biomarkers (metabolomic profiles, DNA methylation profiles, and fetal haematological components). Among the prenatal biomarkers assessed, human chorionic gonadotrophin measured in maternal serum between 4 and 9 weeks of gestation showed the highest correlation with the reference standard GA, with a pooled coefficient of correlation of 0.88. Among the postnatal biomarkers assessed, metabolomic profiling from newborn blood spots provided the most accurate estimate of GA, with a pooled RMSE of 1.03 weeks across all GAs. It performed best for term infants with a slightly reduced accuracy for preterm or small for GA infants. The pooled RMSEs for metabolomic profiling and DNA methylation profile from cord blood samples were 1.57 and 1.60 weeks, respectively.

Interpretation

We identified no antenatal biomarkers that accurately predict GA over a wide window of pregnancy. Postnatally, metabolomic profiling from newborn blood spot provides an accurate estimate of GA, however, as this is known only after birth it is not useful to guide antenatal care. Further prenatal studies are needed to identify biomarkers that can be used in isolation, as part of a biomarker panel, or in combination with other clinical methods to narrow prediction intervals of GA estimation.

Funding

The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-000368). ATP is supported by the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre with funding from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR, the Department of Health, or the Department of Biotechnology. The funders of this study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, in writing the paper or the decision to submit for publication.