Comparative effectiveness of adding delamanid to a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen comprised of three drugs likely to be effective

Effectiveness of a bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine "core" for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Rationale

Treatment outcomes may be compromised among patients with multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis with additional fluoroquinolone resistance. Evidence is needed to inform optimal treatment for these patients.

Objectives

We compared the effectiveness of longer individualized regimens comprised of bedaquiline for 5 to 8 months, linezolid, and clofazimine to those reinforced with at least 1 third-tier drug and/or longer duration of bedaquiline.

Methods

We emulated a target trial to compare the effectiveness of initiating and remaining on the core regimen to one of five regimens reinforced with (1) bedaquiline for ≥9 months, (2) bedaquiline for ≥9 months and delamanid, (3) imipenem, (4) a second-line injectable, or (5) delamanid and imipenem. We included patients in whom a fluoroquinolone was unlikely to be effective based on drug susceptibility testing and/or prior exposure. Our analysis consisted of cloning, censoring, and inverse-probability weighting to estimate the probability of successful treatment.

Measurements and Main Results

Adjusted probabilities of successful treatment were high across regimens, ranging from 0.75 (95%CI:0.61, 0.89) to 0.84 (95%CI:0.76, 0.91). We found no substantial evidence that any of the reinforced regimens improved effectiveness of the core regimen, with ratios of treatment success ranging from 1.01 for regimens reinforced with bedaquiline ≥9 months (95%CI:0.79, 1.28) and bedaquiline ≥9 months plus delamanid (95%CI:0.81, 1.31) to 1.11 for regimens reinforced by a second-line injectable (95%CI:0.92, 1.39) and delamanid and imipenem (95%CI:0.90, 1.41).

Conclusions

High treatment success underscores the effectiveness of regimens comprised of bedaquiline, linezolid, and clofazimine, highlighting the need for expanded access to these drugs.

The Safety and Efficacy of Prolonged Use of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Patients with Pulmonary Multi-Drug Resistant/Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Prospective, Cohort Study in China

Objective

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of prolonged bedaquiline (Bdq) treatment in patients with multi-drug/rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB).

Methods

This prospective cohort study was performed from August 2018 to August 2021. Patients diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively included. Patients were treated with individual regimens of 18-20 months containing Bdq for six months or a prolonged course of nine or 12 months according to treatment demands, and the efficacy and safety with a different course of Bdq-containing regimens were compared and evaluated.

Results

A total of 159 MDR/RR-TB patients were included in the study, including 96 cases with six months of Bdq, 50 cases with nine months of Bdq, and 13 patients with 12 months of Bdq. The treatment success rates were 89.6%, 90%, and 84.6% in Bdq at six months, nine months, and 12 months, respectively, which were not statistically different (P = 0.85). The main adverse events (AEs) were anemia, thrombocytopenia, and liver dysfunction in all patients, with no significant difference among the three groups. Patients who had fewer drugs chosen, disseminated lesions or lesions that were slowly absorbed, and severe cavities were the common reasons for prolonged use of Bdq.

Conclusion

Prolonged course use of Bdq from six months to 12 months clinically proved to be safe and efficient, and patients with severe or disseminated lesions had the chance to prolong the use of Bdq for more than six months to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.