1
|
Aubrey-Basler K, Bursey K, Pike A, Penney C, Furlong B, Howells M, Al-Obaid H, Rourke J, Asghari S, Hall A. Interventions to improve primary healthcare in rural settings: A scoping review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305516. [PMID: 38990801 PMCID: PMC11239038 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residents of rural areas have poorer health status, less healthy behaviours and higher mortality than urban dwellers, issues which are commonly addressed in primary care. Strengthening primary care may be an important tool to improve the health status of rural populations. OBJECTIVE Synthesize and categorize studies that examine interventions to improve rural primary care. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Experimental or observational studies published between January 1, 1996 and December 2022 that include an historical or concurrent control comparison. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase. CHARTING METHODS We extracted and charted data by broad category (quality, access and efficiency), study design, country of origin, publication year, aim, health condition and type of intervention studied. We assigned multiple categories to a study where relevant. RESULTS 372 papers met our inclusion criteria, divided among quality (82%), access (20%) and efficiency (13%) categories. A majority of papers were completed in the USA (40%), Australia (15%), China (7%) or Canada (6%). 35 (9%) papers came from countries in Africa. The most common study design was an uncontrolled before-and-after comparison (32%) and only 24% of studies used randomized designs. The number of publications each year has increased markedly over the study period from 1-2/year in 1997-99 to a peak of 49 papers in 2017. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial inequity in health outcomes associated with rural living, very little attention is paid to rural primary care in the scientific literature. Very few studies of rural primary care use randomized designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Aubrey-Basler
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Division of Public Health and Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Krystal Bursey
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Andrea Pike
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Carla Penney
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Bradley Furlong
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Mark Howells
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Harith Al-Obaid
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - James Rourke
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Shabnam Asghari
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Division of Public Health and Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Amanda Hall
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Division of Public Health and Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrison J, Lind P, Sawleshwarkar S, Pasupathy D, Yapa HM. Rapid systematic review of interventions to improve antenatal screening rates for syphilis, hepatitis B, and HIV in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 166:3-26. [PMID: 38391190 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infectious diseases including syphilis, HIV, and hepatitis B are major contributors to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The World Health Organization has prioritized elimination of vertical transmission of these three diseases. OBJECTIVES To rapidly assess the impact of interventions designed to improve antenatal screening rates for syphilis, HIV, and hepatitis B in LMICs and to identify areas for future implementation research. SEARCH STRATEGY A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and EconLit, targeting articles published between January 1, 2013, and June 27, 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included quantitative interventional studies in English, involving pregnant adults (15 years or older) from LMICs. Exclusions were studies based in high-income countries, qualitative studies, or those investigating accuracy of diagnostic methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS From an initial 5549 potential studies, 27 were finalized for review after various screening stages. Data extraction covered aspects such as study design, intervention details, and outcomes. Findings were qualitatively synthesized within a systems thinking framework. MAIN RESULTS The interventions assessed varied in terms of geographic locations, health care system levels, and modalities. The review highlighted the effectiveness of interventions such as community health interventions, service quality improvements, and financial incentives. CONCLUSIONS The study underscores the potential of specific interventions in enhancing antenatal screening rates in LMICs. However, there is a discernible research gap concerning hepatitis B. The findings emphasize the importance of capacity building and health systems strengthening in public health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Harrison
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Lind
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Sawleshwarkar
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Pasupathy
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H M Yapa
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Endalamaw A, Khatri RB, Mengistu TS, Erku D, Wolka E, Zewdie A, Assefa Y. A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:487. [PMID: 38641786 PMCID: PMC11031995 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growing adoption of continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives in healthcare has generated a surge in research interest to gain a deeper understanding of CQI. However, comprehensive evidence regarding the diverse facets of CQI in healthcare has been limited. Our review sought to comprehensively grasp the conceptualization and principles of CQI, explore existing models and tools, analyze barriers and facilitators, and investigate its overall impacts. METHODS This qualitative scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We searched articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. In addition, we accessed articles from Google Scholar. We used mixed-method analysis, including qualitative content analysis and quantitative descriptive for quantitative findings to summarize findings and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to report the overall works. RESULTS A total of 87 articles, which covered 14 CQI models, were included in the review. While 19 tools were used for CQI models and initiatives, Plan-Do-Study/Check-Act cycle was the commonly employed model to understand the CQI implementation process. The main reported purposes of using CQI, as its positive impact, are to improve the structure of the health system (e.g., leadership, health workforce, health technology use, supplies, and costs), enhance healthcare delivery processes and outputs (e.g., care coordination and linkages, satisfaction, accessibility, continuity of care, safety, and efficiency), and improve treatment outcome (reduce morbidity and mortality). The implementation of CQI is not without challenges. There are cultural (i.e., resistance/reluctance to quality-focused culture and fear of blame or punishment), technical, structural (related to organizational structure, processes, and systems), and strategic (inadequate planning and inappropriate goals) related barriers that were commonly reported during the implementation of CQI. CONCLUSIONS Implementing CQI initiatives necessitates thoroughly comprehending key principles such as teamwork and timeline. To effectively address challenges, it's crucial to identify obstacles and implement optimal interventions proactively. Healthcare professionals and leaders need to be mentally equipped and cognizant of the significant role CQI initiatives play in achieving purposes for quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aklilu Endalamaw
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
| | - Resham B Khatri
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Health Social Science and Development Research Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Tesfaye Setegn Mengistu
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Daniel Erku
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Grifth University, Brisbane, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Grifth University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Eskinder Wolka
- International Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Zewdie
- International Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yibeltal Assefa
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iroz CB, Ramaswamy R, Bhutta ZA, Barach P. Quality improvement in public-private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:332. [PMID: 38481226 PMCID: PMC10935959 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10802-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public-private partnerships (PPP) are often how health improvement programs are implemented in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We therefore aimed to systematically review the literature about the aim and impacts of quality improvement (QI) approaches in PPP in LMICs. METHODS We searched SCOPUS and grey literature for studies published before March 2022. One reviewer screened abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. The study characteristics, setting, design, outcomes, and lessons learned were abstracted using a standard tool and reviewed in detail by a second author. RESULTS We identified 9,457 citations, of which 144 met the inclusion criteria and underwent full-text abstraction. We identified five key themes for successful QI projects in LMICs: 1) leadership support and alignment with overarching priorities, 2) local ownership and engagement of frontline teams, 3) shared authentic learning across teams, 4) resilience in managing external challenges, and 5) robust data and data visualization to track progress. We found great heterogeneity in QI tools, study designs, participants, and outcome measures. Most studies had diffuse aims and poor descriptions of the intervention components and their follow-up. Few papers formally reported on actual deployment of private-sector capital, and either provided insufficient information or did not follow the formal PPP model, which involves capital investment for a explicit return on investment. Few studies discussed the response to their findings and the organizational willingness to change. CONCLUSIONS Many of the same factors that impact the success of QI in healthcare in high-income countries are relevant for PPP in LMICs. Vague descriptions of the structure and financial arrangements of the PPPs, and the roles of public and private entities made it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about the impacts of the organizational governance on the outcomes of QI programs in LMICs. While we found many articles in the published literature on PPP-funded QI partnerships in LMICs, there is a dire need for research that more clearly describes the intervention details, implementation challenges, contextual factors, leadership and organizational structures. These details are needed to better align incentives to support the kinds of collaboration needed for guiding accountability in advancing global health. More ownership and power needs to be shifted to local leaders and researchers to improve research equity and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra B Iroz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Rohit Ramaswamy
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Global Health & Development, The Aga Khan University, South Central Asia, East Africa, UK
| | - Paul Barach
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mianda S, Todowede O, Schneider H. Service delivery interventions to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of quality improvement, implementation research and health system strengthening approaches. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1223. [PMID: 37940974 PMCID: PMC10634015 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10202-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review explores the characteristics of service delivery-related interventions to improve maternal and newborn health (MNH) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) over the last two decades, comparing three common framings of these interventions, namely, quality improvement (QI), implementation science/research (IS/IR), and health system strengthening (HSS). METHODS The review followed the staged scoping review methodology proposed by Levac et al. (2010). We developed and piloted a systematic search strategy, limited to English language peer-reviewed articles published on LMICs between 2000 and March 2022. Analysis was conducted in two-quantitative and qualitative-phases. In the quantitative phase, we counted the year of publication, country(-ies) of origin, and the presence of the terms 'quality improvement', 'health system strengthening' or 'implementation science'/ 'implementation research' in titles, abstracts and key words. From this analysis, a subset of papers referred to as 'archetypes' (terms appearing in two or more of titles, abstract and key words) was analysed qualitatively, to draw out key concepts/theories and underlying mechanisms of change associated with each approach. RESULTS The searches from different databases resulted in a total of 3,323 hits. After removal of duplicates and screening, a total of 231 relevant articles remained for data extraction. These were distributed across the globe; more than half (n = 134) were published since 2017. Fifty-five (55) articles representing archetypes of the approach (30 QI, 16 IS/IR, 9 HSS) were analysed qualitatively. As anticipated, we identified distinct patterns in each approach. QI archetypes tended towards defined process interventions (most typically, plan-do-study-act cycles); IS/IR archetypes reported a wide variety of interventions, but had in common evaluation methodologies and explanatory theories; and HSS archetypes adopted systemic perspectives. Despite their distinctiveness, there was also overlap and fluidity between approaches, with papers often referencing more than one approach. Recognising the complexity of improving MNH services, there was an increased orientation towards participatory, context-specific designs in all three approaches. CONCLUSIONS Programmes to improve MNH outcomes will benefit from a better appreciation of the distinctiveness and relatedness of different approaches to service delivery strengthening, how these have evolved and how they can be combined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Mianda
- School of Public Health & SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Olamide Todowede
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Schneider
- School of Public Health & SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Breton M, Gaboury I, Martin E, Green ME, Kiran T, Laberge M, Kaczorowski J, Ivers N, Deville-Stoetzel N, Bordeleau F, Beaulieu C, Descoteaux S. Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:97. [PMID: 37038126 PMCID: PMC10088119 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02048-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving access to primary health care is among top priorities for many countries. Advanced Access (AA) is one of the most recommended models to improve timely access to care. Over the past 15 years, the AA model has been implemented in Canada, but the implementation of AA varies substantially among providers and clinics. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) approaches can be used to promote organizational change like AA implementation. While CQI fosters the adoption of evidence-based practices, knowledge gaps remain, about the mechanisms by which QI happens and the sustainability of the results. The general aim of the study is to analyse the implementation and effects of CQI cohorts on AA for primary care clinics. Specific objectives are: 1) Analyse the process of implementing CQI cohorts to support PHC clinics in their improvement of AA. 2) Document and compare structural organisational changes and processes of care with respect to AA within study groups (intervention and control). 3) Assess the effectiveness of CQI cohorts on AA outcomes. 4) Appreciate the sustainability of the intervention for AA processes, organisational changes and outcomes. METHODS Cluster-controlled trial allowing for a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the proposed intervention 48 multidisciplinary primary care clinics will be recruited to participate. 24 Clinics from the intervention regions will receive the CQI intervention for 18 months including three activities carried out iteratively until the clinic's improvement objectives are achieved: 1) reflective sessions and problem priorisation; 2) plan-do-study-act cycles; and 3) group mentoring. Clinics located in the control regions will receive an audit-feedback report on access. Complementary qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the quintuple aim will be collected over a period of 36 months. RESULTS This research will contribute to filling the gap in the generalizability of CQI interventions and accelerate the spread of effective AA improvement strategies while strengthening local QI culture within clinics. This research will have a direct impact on patients' experiences of care. CONCLUSION This mixed-method approach offers a unique opportunity to contribute to the scientific literature on large-scale CQI cohorts to improve AA in primary care teams and to better understand the processes of CQI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials: NCT05715151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mylaine Breton
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Martin
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | | | - Tara Kiran
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Noah Ivers
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nadia Deville-Stoetzel
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Francois Bordeleau
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Christine Beaulieu
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Sarah Descoteaux
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doherty E, Wiggers J, Nathan N, Hall A, Wolfenden L, Tully B, Elliott EJ, Attia J, Dunlop AJ, Symonds I, Tsang TW, Reeves P, McFadyen T, Wynne O, Kingsland M. Iterative delivery of an implementation support package to increase and sustain the routine provision of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063486. [PMID: 35882461 PMCID: PMC9330336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy is not routinely delivered in maternity services. Although a number of implementation trials have reported significant increases in such care, the majority of women still did not receive all recommended care elements, and improvements dissipated over time. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an iteratively developed and delivered implementation support package in: (1) increasing the proportion of pregnant women who receive antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption and (2) sustaining the rate of care over time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A stepped-wedge cluster trial will be conducted as a second phase of a previous trial. All public maternity services within three sectors of a local health district in Australia will receive an implementation support package that was developed based on an assessment of outcomes and learnings following the initial trial. The package will consist of evidence-based strategies to support increases in care provision (remind clinicians; facilitation; conduct educational meetings) and sustainment (develop a formal implementation blueprint; purposely re-examine the implementation; conduct ongoing training). Measurement of outcomes will occur via surveys with women who attend antenatal appointments each week. Primary outcomes will be the proportion of women who report being asked about alcohol consumption at subsequent antenatal appointments; and receiving complete care (advice and referral) relative to alcohol risk at initial and subsequent antenatal appointments. Economic and process evaluation measures will also be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained through the Hunter New England (16/11/16/4.07, 16/10/19/5.15) and University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committees (H-2017-0032, H-2016-0422) and the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (1236/16). Trial findings will be disseminated to health service decision makers to inform the feasibility of conducting additional cycles to further improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption as well as at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000295741).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Nathan
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian John Dunlop
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tracey W Tsang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tameka McFadyen
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
- Thurru Indigenous Health Unit, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivia Wynne
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen S, Forster S, Yang J, Yu F, Jiao L, Gates J, Wang Z, Liu H, Chen Q, Geldsetzer P, Wu P, Wang C, McMahon S, Bärnighausen T, Adam M. Animated, video entertainment-education to improve vaccine confidence globally during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online randomized controlled experiment with 24,000 participants. Trials 2022; 23:161. [PMID: 35183238 PMCID: PMC8857749 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06067-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Science-driven storytelling and entertainment-education (E-E) media demonstrate potential for promoting improved attitudes and behavioral intent towards health-related practices. Months after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), emerging research highlights the essential role of interventions to improve public confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine. To improve vaccine confidence, we designed three short, animated videos employing three research-informed pedagogical strategies. These can be distributed globally through social media platforms, because of their wordless and culturally accessible design. However, the effectiveness of short, animated storytelling videos, deploying various pedagogic strategies, needs to be explored across different global regions. Methods/design The present study is a multi-site, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of (i) a storytelling-instructional-humor approach, (ii) a storytelling-analogy approach, (iii) a storytelling-emotion-focused approach, and (iv) no video. For our primary outcomes, we will measure vaccine hesitancy, and for secondary outcomes, we will measure behavioral intent to seek vaccination and hope. Using online platforms, we will recruit 12,000 participants (aged 18–59 years) from the USA and China, respectively, yielding a total sample size of 24,000. Discussion This trial uses innovative online technology, reliable randomization algorithms, validated survey instruments, and list experiments to establish the effectiveness of three short, animated videos employing various research-informed pedagogical strategies. Results will be used to scientifically support the broader distribution of these short, animated video as well as informing the design of future videos for rapid, global public health communication. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS #00023650. Date of registration: 2021/02/09. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06067-5.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hontelez JAC, Bulstra CA, Yakusik A, Lamontagne E, Bärnighausen TW, Atun R. Evidence-based policymaking when evidence is incomplete: The case of HIV programme integration. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003835. [PMID: 34752470 PMCID: PMC8577724 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Jan Hontelez and co-authors discuss the use of different types of evidence to inform HIV program integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan A. C. Hontelez
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline A. Bulstra
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Yakusik
- The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Erik Lamontagne
- The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland
- Aix-Marseille School of Economics, CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Les Milles, France
| | - Till W. Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), Mtubatuba, South Africa
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Rifat Atun
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bulstra CA, Hontelez JAC, Otto M, Stepanova A, Lamontagne E, Yakusik A, El-Sadr WM, Apollo T, Rabkin M, Atun R, Bärnighausen T. Integrating HIV services and other health services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003836. [PMID: 34752477 PMCID: PMC8577772 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integration of HIV services with other health services has been proposed as an important strategy to boost the sustainability of the global HIV response. We conducted a systematic and comprehensive synthesis of the existing scientific evidence on the impact of service integration on the HIV care cascade, health outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND FINDINGS We reviewed the global quantitative empirical evidence on integration published between 1 January 2010 and 10 September 2021. We included experimental and observational studies that featured both an integration intervention and a comparator in our review. Of the 7,118 unique peer-reviewed English-language studies that our search algorithm identified, 114 met all of our selection criteria for data extraction. Most of the studies (90) were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, primarily in East Africa (55) and Southern Africa (24). The most common forms of integration were (i) HIV testing and counselling added to non-HIV services and (ii) non-HIV services added to antiretroviral therapy (ART). The most commonly integrated non-HIV services were maternal and child healthcare, tuberculosis testing and treatment, primary healthcare, family planning, and sexual and reproductive health services. Values for HIV care cascade outcomes tended to be better in integrated services: uptake of HIV testing and counselling (pooled risk ratio [RR] across 37 studies: 1.67 [95% CI 1.41-1.99], p < 0.001), ART initiation coverage (pooled RR across 19 studies: 1.42 [95% CI 1.16-1.75], p = 0.002), time until ART initiation (pooled RR across 5 studies: 0.45 [95% CI 0.20-1.00], p = 0.050), retention in HIV care (pooled RR across 19 studies: 1.68 [95% CI 1.05-2.69], p = 0.031), and viral suppression (pooled RR across 9 studies: 1.19 [95% CI 1.03-1.37], p = 0.025). Also, treatment success for non-HIV-related diseases and conditions and the uptake of non-HIV services were commonly higher in integrated services. We did not find any significant differences for the following outcomes in our meta-analyses: HIV testing yield, ART adherence, HIV-free survival among infants, and HIV and non-HIV mortality. We could not conduct meta-analyses for several outcomes (HIV infections averted, costs, and cost-effectiveness), because our systematic review did not identify sufficient poolable studies. Study limitations included possible publication bias of studies with significant or favourable findings and comparatively weak evidence from some world regions and on integration of services for key populations in the HIV response. CONCLUSIONS Integration of HIV services and other health services tends to improve health and health systems outcomes. Despite some scientific limitations, the global evidence shows that service integration can be a valuable strategy to boost the sustainability of the HIV response and contribute to the goal of 'ending AIDS by 2030', while simultaneously supporting progress towards universal health coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A. Bulstra
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Jan A. C. Hontelez
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Moritz Otto
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Stepanova
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erik Lamontagne
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
- Aix-Marseille School of Economics, CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Les Milles, France
| | - Anna Yakusik
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Wafaa M. El-Sadr
- ICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Miriam Rabkin
- ICAP, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Rifat Atun
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chappell E, Thorne C, Collins IJ, Baisley K, Yapa HM, Gareta D, Bärnighausen T, Herbst K, Judd A. It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: The pitfalls of using routine data to measure early infant HIV diagnosis in HIV-exposed infants. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257496. [PMID: 34591881 PMCID: PMC8483382 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early infant HIV diagnosis (EID) is critical to ensuring timely diagnosis of HIV-exposed infants, and treatment in those found to be infected. However estimates of coverage vary considerably, depending on data sources used. We used 4 methods to estimate coverage among a historical cohort of HIV-exposed infants in rural South Africa, between 2010-2016. METHODS We estimated the proportion of infants ever tested (methods 1-3) and tested by 7 weeks of age (1-4) as follows: (1) infants born to women identified as HIV-positive in demographic surveillance were linked to those with ≥1 EID result in routine laboratory surveillance; (2) the number of infants with ≥1 EID result in laboratory surveillance divided by the estimated number of HIV-exposed infants, calculated as total live births multiplied by antenatal HIV seroprevalence; (3) the number of infants with ≥1 EID result in routine laboratory surveillance, divided by the number of HIV-exposed infants as estimated by the district health service; (4) from documentation in infants' Road-to-Health-booklets. RESULTS The proportion ever tested was 43%, 88% and 138% for methods 1-3, and by 7 weeks of age was 25%, 49%, 86% and 46% for methods 1-4 respectively. CONCLUSIONS The four methods, applied to a range of routine data sources, resulted in estimates varying considerably, and the true coverage of EID remains unclear. Our findings highlight the importance of developing unique patient identifiers, improving training of healthcare providers using reporting systems, and ensuring the accuracy of healthcare records, to ensure the best possible health outcomes for HIV-exposed infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Thorne
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kathy Baisley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - H. Manisha Yapa
- Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- The Kirby Institute University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dickman Gareta
- Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute for Global Health UCL, Mortimer Market Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kobus Herbst
- Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- DSI-MRC South African Population Research Infrastructure Network (SAPRIN), Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Ali Judd
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|