The organization, weaknesses, and challenges of the control of thalidomide in Brazil: A review

Promoting safe and appropriate use of miltefosine to treat tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION

Miltefosine is a new drug that was recently approved for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) by the Brazilian health system. It has a teratogenic potential and requires follow-up of patients undergoing treatment. Improving compliance with best practices is essential to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this drug.

OBJECTIVE

This project aimed to implement best practices for the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine in the treatment of TL in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

METHODS

This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Five best practice criteria were established based on the best available evidence. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practice against best practice. Barriers to best practice were then identified and a follow-up audit was conducted to evaluate changes after the implementation of improvement strategies. Two sites were analyzed: a leishmaniasis reference service in Belo Horizonte, the capital of Minas Gerais, and 28 regional offices.

RESULTS

The baseline audit evaluated data from 197 miltefosine requests distributed across 13 regional sites. All requests from the reference service were compliant (100%). This is in contrast to the 60% compliance rate at the regional offices. The improvement strategies included intensifying direct communication with the regional health professionals, which increased the average compliance rate to 79.5%, 6 months after the interventions were introduced.

CONCLUSION

This best practice implementation project effectively increased the compliance rate for the audited procedures. Communication from the reference site with the regional health professionals successfully increased compliance with best practices and promoted the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine. These strategies should analyzed and applied to improve other programs.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A184.

The dark side of drug repurposing. From clinical trial challenges to antimicrobial resistance: analysis based on three major fields

Drug repurposing is a strategic endeavor that entails the identification of novel therapeutic applications for pharmaceuticals that are already available in the market. Despite the advantageous nature of implementing this particular strategy owing to its cost-effectiveness and efficiency in reducing the time required for the drug discovery process, it is essential to bear in mind that there are various factors that must be meticulously considered and taken into account. Up to this point, there has been a noticeable absence of comprehensive analyses that shed light on the limitations of repurposing drugs. The primary aim of this review is to conduct a thorough illustration of the various challenges that arise when contemplating drug repurposing from a clinical perspective in three major fields-cardiovascular, cancer, and diabetes-and to further underscore the potential risks associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) when employing repurposed antibiotics for the treatment of noninfectious and infectious diseases. The process of developing repurposed medications necessitates the application of creativity and innovation in designing the development program, as the body of evidence may differ for each specific case. In order to effectively repurpose drugs, it is crucial to consider the clinical implications and potential drawbacks that may arise during this process. By comprehensively analyzing these challenges, we can attain a deeper comprehension of the intricacies involved in drug repurposing, which will ultimately lead to the development of more efficacious and safe therapeutic approaches.

Practical Considerations for the Implementation and Monitoring of Risk Minimisation Measures for High-Risk Teratogenic Medicines

There is considerable societal interest in making medicines more affordable. A critical factor often inadequately considered early in the process of adding drugs to a company's product portfolio is that some products may require additional monitoring and complex, demanding and expensive additional risk minimisation measures (aRMMs). These aRMMs may have a sizeable impact on a company's commitment to that medicinal product throughout the product's entire life cycle. The teratogenic phthalimides were selected as an example of medicines that are recently being genericised and require a substantial commitment in terms of additional monitoring and aRMMs, most notably in the form of pregnancy prevention programmes (PPPs) with controlled distribution systems (CDSs). Implementing PPPs with CDSs is complex and demanding and encompasses all routine activities, aRMMs, local/regional Health Authority (HA) requirements, and commercialisation strategies. Considerations have been summarised that can support decision-making during due diligence processes, implementation and monitoring. Proactive, effective pharmacovigilance requires innovative, sustainable and flexible solutions to maintain high standards across the board. In particular, generic marketing authorisation holders operate with limited resources and may benefit appreciably from the following proposed suggestions and solutions such as early planning and preparation, knowledge-sharing, utilisation of new technologies and implementation of measures beyond HA-mandated requirements.

Implementation of a Pregnancy Prevention Programme (PPP) with a Controlled Distribution System (CDS) for the Generic Teratogenic Phthalimides Thalidomide, Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide

Thalidomide (α-phthalimidoglutaride) was marketed in the 1950s and early 1960s; it was promoted as a sedative-hypnotic agent with minimal hangover. It was available in some countries as an over-the-counter medicine. Publications reporting profound teratogenic effects with thalidomide brought about major revisions to the monitoring of the safety of medicines. As a consequence of previously unrecognised teratogenic effects, it has been estimated that over 12,000 children were born with a range of defects and disabilities, including severe congenital anomalies. Notably, it has been hypothesised that around 40% of babies with thalidomide-induced malformations born during the 1950s and 1960s died in the neonatal period. The commonest causes of death were atresia of the small bowel, cardiac or renal malformations. Nevertheless, phocomelia (as a typical manifestation of thalidomide´s teratogenic effects) has been reported once again after thalidomide was approved for use in areas where leprosy is endemic. As a result, thalidomide embryopathy remains an important topic in countries such as Brazil. Nowadays thalidomide is approved around the world for the treatment of a wide range of conditions, including leprosy, Crohn's disease, multiple myeloma, and certain malignant solid tumours. Second-generation immunmodulatory drugs including lenalidomide and pomalidomide have received approval for use in the management of various forms of neoplastic disease. Based on clinical experience with thalidomide and its derivatives, learnings have been transferred to further research on a subset of substituted phthalimides each of which has a high risk of causing teratogenic effects. This group of phthalimides is classified within regulatory science as human teratogens. In order to gain approval, a Pregnancy Prevention Programme (PPP), along with a Controlled Distribution System (CDS) is required. The challenges of PPPs in particular for a generic manufacturer have been described, including Raising of awareness, and education; Special aspects of data collection and evaluation; Ethically and socially relevant aspects, and Utilising existing information technology and infrastructure. This paper highlights the risks of unplanned pregnancies, provides information on the regulatory background, and regulatory expectations. Our aim is to provide insights and practical learnings that have impacted operational risk management with the teratogenic phthalimides. Opportunities are presented that may support the implementation of harmonised approaches for PPP and CDS using existing IT-systems across countries and companies.

Comparative analysis of the use and control of thalidomide in Brazil and different countries: is it possible to say there is safety?

INTRODUCTION

One of the biggest drug disasters in history has not prevented thalidomide from being used to treat various clinical conditions. Currently, Brazil has a worrying scenario: high consumption of the drug and, cases of pregnant women using thalidomide, even after adopting restrictive legislation.

AREAS COVERED

This review of the literature and legislation sought to comparatively analyze the monitoring of thalidomide use in Brazil and other countries that use this drug. Finally, we discuss the differences between the countries.

EXPERT OPINION

This analysis allows us to think beyond the safe use of thalidomide, but the safety provided by any type of monitoring system. It seems that out-patients that use unsafe drugs are exposed to some degree of risk. To improve safety, more extensive improvements are needed than monitoring systems related to the use of thalidomide. Its safe use depends on a drastic reduction in the incidence of leprosy and Erythema Nodosum Leprosum in the world; investment in research and development of safe and effective therapeutic alternatives to thalidomide; improvement of health systems and their health surveillance systems, particularly in primary health care; awareness of health professionals and patients for greater responsibility in the use of medicines, especially thalidomide.