Physical analyses of E. coli heteroduplex recombination products in vivo: on the prevalence of 5' and 3' patches

RecBCD enzyme: mechanistic insights from mutants of a complex helicase-nuclease

SUMMARYRecBCD enzyme is a multi-functional protein that initiates the major pathway of homologous genetic recombination and DNA double-strand break repair in Escherichia coli. It is also required for high cell viability and aids proper DNA replication. This 330-kDa, three-subunit enzyme is one of the fastest, most processive helicases known and contains a potent nuclease controlled by Chi sites, hotspots of recombination, in DNA. RecBCD undergoes major changes in activity and conformation when, during DNA unwinding, it encounters Chi (5'-GCTGGTGG-3') and nicks DNA nearby. Here, we discuss the multitude of mutations in each subunit that affect one or another activity of RecBCD and its control by Chi. These mutants have given deep insights into how the multiple activities of this complex enzyme are coordinated and how it acts in living cells. Similar studies could help reveal how other complex enzymes are controlled by inter-subunit interactions and conformational changes.

Recombinational repair in the absence of holliday junction resolvases in E. coli

Cells possess two major DNA damage tolerance pathways that allow them to duplicate their genomes despite the presence of replication blocking lesions: translesion synthesis (TLS) and daughter strand gap repair (DSGR). The TLS pathway involves specialized DNA polymerases that are able to synthesize past DNA lesions while DSGR relies on Recombinational Repair (RR). At least two mechanisms are associated with RR: Homologous Recombination (HR) and RecA Mediated Excision Repair (RAMER). While HR and RAMER both depend on RecFOR and RecA, only the HR mechanism should involve Holliday Junctions (HJs) resolvase reactions. In this study we investigated the role of HJ resolvases, RuvC, TopIII and RusA on the balance between RAMER and HR in E. coli MG1655 derivatives. Using UV survival measurements, we first clearly establish that, in this genetic background, topB and ruvC define two distinct pathways of HJ resolution. We observed that a recA mutant is much more sensitive to UV than the ruvC topB double mutant which is deficient in HR because of its failure to resolve HJs. This difference is independent of RAMER, the SOS system, RusA, and the three TLS DNA polymerases, and may be accounted for by Double Strand Break repair mechanisms such as Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing, Single Strand Annealing, or Break Induced Replication, which are independent of HJ resolvases. We then used a plasmid-based assay, in which RR is triggered by a single blocking lesion present on a plasmid molecule, to establish that while HR requires topB, ruvC or rusA, RAMER is independent of these genes and, as expected, requires a functional UvrABC excinuclease. Surprisingly, analysis of the RR events in a strain devoid of HJ resolvases reveals that the UvrABC dependent repair of the single lesion present on the plasmid molecule can generate an excision track potentially extending to dozens of nucleotides.

Modelling of crowded polymers elucidate effects of double-strand breaks in topological domains of bacterial chromosomes

Using numerical simulations of pairs of long polymeric chains confined in microscopic cylinders, we investigate consequences of double-strand DNA breaks occurring in independent topological domains, such as these constituting bacterial chromosomes. Our simulations show a transition between segregated and mixed state upon linearization of one of the modelled topological domains. Our results explain how chromosomal organization into topological domains can fulfil two opposite conditions: (i) effectively repulse various loops from each other thus promoting chromosome separation and (ii) permit local DNA intermingling when one or more loops are broken and need to be repaired in a process that requires homology search between broken ends and their homologous sequences in closely positioned sister chromatid.

Mu insertions are repaired by the double-strand break repair pathway of Escherichia coli

Mu is both a transposable element and a temperate bacteriophage. During lytic growth, it amplifies its genome by replicative transposition. During infection, it integrates into the Escherichia coli chromosome through a mechanism not requiring extensive DNA replication. In the latter pathway, the transposition intermediate is repaired by transposase-mediated resecting of the 5′ flaps attached to the ends of the incoming Mu genome, followed by filling the remaining 5 bp gaps at each end of the Mu insertion. It is widely assumed that the gaps are repaired by a gap-filling host polymerase. Using the E. coli Keio Collection to screen for mutants defective in recovery of stable Mu insertions, we show in this study that the gaps are repaired by the machinery responsible for the repair of double-strand breaks in E. coli—the replication restart proteins PriA-DnaT and homologous recombination proteins RecABC. We discuss alternate models for recombinational repair of the Mu gaps.

Transposon activity shapes genome structure and evolution. The movement of these elements generates target site duplications as a result of staggered cuts in the target made initially by the transposase. For replicative transposons, the single-stranded gaps generated after the initial strand transfer event are filled by target-primed replication. However, the majority of known transposable elements transpose by a non-replicative mechanism. Despite a wealth of information available for the mechanism of transposase action, little is known about how the cell repairs gaps left in the wake of transposition of these majority elements. Phage Mu is unique in using both replicative and non-replicative modes of transposition. Our study finds that during its non-replicative pathway, the gaps created by Mu insertion are repaired by the primary machinery for double-strand break repair in E. coli, not by gap-filling polymerases as previously thought. This first report of specific host processes involved in repair of transposon insertions in bacteria is likely to have a broad significance, given also that double-strand break repair pathways have been implicated in repair of the retroviral and Line retroelement insertions.