1
|
Zhimulev I, Vatolina T, Levitsky V, Tsukanov A. Developmental and Housekeeping Genes: Two Types of Genetic Organization in the Drosophila Genome. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4068. [PMID: 38612878 PMCID: PMC11012173 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25074068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
We developed a procedure for locating genes on Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes and described three types of chromosome structures (gray bands, black bands, and interbands), which differed markedly in morphological and genetic properties. This was reached through the use of our original methods of molecular and genetic analysis, electron microscopy, and bioinformatics data processing. Analysis of the genome-wide distribution of these properties led us to a bioinformatics model of the Drosophila genome organization, in which the genome was divided into two groups of genes. One was constituted by 65, in which the genome was divided into two groups, 62 genes that are expressed in most cell types during life cycle and perform basic cellular functions (the so-called "housekeeping genes"). The other one was made up of 3162 genes that are expressed only at particular stages of development ("developmental genes"). These two groups of genes are so different that we may state that the genome has two types of genetic organization. Different are the timings of their expression, chromatin packaging levels, the composition of activating and deactivating proteins, the sizes of these genes, the lengths of their introns, the organization of the promoter regions of the genes, the locations of origin recognition complexes (ORCs), and DNA replication timings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Zhimulev
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia;
| | - Tatyana Vatolina
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia;
| | - Victor Levitsky
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (V.L.); (A.T.)
| | - Anton Tsukanov
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (V.L.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Direct Regulation of DNA Repair by E2F and RB in Mammals and Plants: Core Function or Convergent Evolution? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13050934. [PMID: 33668093 PMCID: PMC7956360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13050934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Retinoblastoma (RB) proteins and E2F transcription factors partner together to regulate the cell cycle in many eukaryotic organisms. In organisms that lack one or both of these proteins, other proteins have taken on the essential function of cell cycle regulation. RB and E2F also have important functions outside of the cell cycle, including DNA repair. This review summarizes the non-canonical functions of RB and E2F in maintaining genome integrity and raises the question of whether such functions have always been present or have evolved more recently. Abstract Members of the E2F transcription factor family regulate the expression of genes important for DNA replication and mitotic cell division in most eukaryotes. Homologs of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor inhibit the activity of E2F factors, thus controlling cell cycle progression. Organisms such as budding and fission yeast have lost genes encoding E2F and RB, but have gained genes encoding other proteins that take on E2F and RB cell cycle-related functions. In addition to regulating cell proliferation, E2F and RB homologs have non-canonical functions outside the mitotic cell cycle in a variety of eukaryotes. For example, in both mammals and plants, E2F and RB homologs localize to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and directly promote repair by homologous recombination (HR). Here, we discuss the parallels between mammalian E2F1 and RB and their Arabidopsis homologs, E2FA and RB-related (RBR), with respect to their recruitment to sites of DNA damage and how they help recruit repair factors important for DNA end resection. We also explore the question of whether this role in DNA repair is a conserved ancient function of the E2F and RB homologs in the last eukaryotic common ancestor or whether this function evolved independently in mammals and plants.
Collapse
|
3
|
Caligiuri I, Toffoli G, Giordano A, Rizzolio F. pRb controls estrogen receptor alpha protein stability and activity. Oncotarget 2013; 4:875-83. [PMID: 23900261 PMCID: PMC3757244 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A cross talk between the Estrogen Receptor (ESR1) and the Retinoblastoma (pRb) pathway has been demonstrated to influence the therapeutic response of breast cancer patients but the full mechanism remains poorly understood. Here we show that the N-terminal domain of pRb interacts with the CD domain of ESR1 to allow for the assembly of intermediate complex chaperone proteins HSP90 and p23. We demonstrated that a loss of pRb in human/mouse breast cells decreases the expression of the ESR1 protein through the proteasome pathway. Our work reveals a novel regulatory mechanism of ESR1 basal turnover and activity and an unanticipated relationship with the pRb tumor suppressor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Caligiuri
- 1 Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 2 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena Italy
- 3 Division of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Biology and Translational Research, National Cancer Institute and Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Aviano (PN)
| | - Giuseppe Toffoli
- 3 Division of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Biology and Translational Research, National Cancer Institute and Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Aviano (PN)
| | - Antonio Giordano
- 1 Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 2 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena Italy
| | - Flavio Rizzolio
- 1 Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3 Division of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Biology and Translational Research, National Cancer Institute and Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Aviano (PN)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deciphering the retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation code. Trends Biochem Sci 2012; 38:12-9. [PMID: 23218751 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2012] [Revised: 10/20/2012] [Accepted: 10/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Multisite phosphorylation modulates the function of regulatory proteins with complex signaling properties and outputs. The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) is inactivated by cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) phosphorylation in normal and cancer cell cycles, so understanding the molecular mechanisms and effects of Rb phosphorylation is imperative. Rb functions in diverse processes regulating proliferation, and it has been speculated that multisite phosphorylation might act as a code in which discrete phosphorylations control specific activities. The idea of an Rb phosphorylation code is evaluated here in light of recent studies of Rb structure and function. Rb inactivation is discussed with an emphasis on how multisite phosphorylation changes Rb structure and associations with protein partners.
Collapse
|
5
|
Herr A, Longworth M, Ji JY, Korenjak M, Macalpine DM, Dyson NJ. Identification of E2F target genes that are rate limiting for dE2F1-dependent cell proliferation. Dev Dyn 2012; 241:1695-707. [PMID: 22972499 DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.23857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microarray studies have shown that the E2F transcription factor influences the expression of many genes but it is unclear how many of these targets are important for E2F-mediated control of cell proliferation. RESULTS We assembled a collection of mutant alleles of 44 dE2F1-dependent genes and tested whether these could modify visible phenotypes caused by the tissue-specific depletion of dE2F1. More than half of the mutant alleles dominantly enhanced de2f1-dsRNA phenotypes suggesting that the in vivo functions of dE2F1 can be limited by the reduction in the level of expression of many different targets. Unexpectedly, several mutant alleles suppressed de2f1-dsRNA phenotypes. One of the strongest of these suppressors was Orc5. Depletion of ORC5 increased proliferation in cells with reduced dE2F1 and specifically elevated the expression of dE2F1-regulated genes. Importantly, these effects were independent of dE2F1 protein levels, suggesting that reducing the level of ORC5 did not interfere with the general targeting of dE2F1. CONCLUSIONS We propose that the interaction between ORC5 and dE2F1 may reflect a feedback mechanism between replication initiation proteins and dE2F1 that ensures that proliferating cells maintain a robust level of replication proteins for the next cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabel Herr
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Vatolina TY, Demakov SA. Banding patterns in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes correlate with DNA-binding protein occupancy. Bioessays 2012; 34:498-508. [PMID: 22419120 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The most enigmatic feature of polytene chromosomes is their banding pattern, the genetic organization of which has been a very attractive puzzle for many years. Recent genome-wide protein mapping efforts have produced a wealth of data for the chromosome proteins of Drosophila cells. Based on their specific protein composition, the chromosomes comprise two types of bands, as well as interbands. These differ in terms of time of replication and specific types of proteins. The interbands are characterized by their association with "active" chromatin proteins, nucleosome remodeling, and origin recognition complexes, and so they have three functions: acting as binding sites for RNA pol II, initiation of replication and nucleosome remodeling of short fragments of DNA. The borders and organization of the same band and interband regions are largely identical, irrespective of the cell type studied. This demonstrates that the banding pattern is a universal principle of the organization of interphase polytene and non-polytene chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor F Zhimulev
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor belongs to a cellular pathway that plays a crucial role in restricting the G1-S transition of the cell cycle in response to a large number of extracellular and intracellular cues. Research in the last decade has highlighted the complexity of regulatory networks that ensure proper cell cycle progression, and has also identified multiple cellular functions beyond cell cycle regulation for RB and its two family members, p107 and p130. Here we review some of the recent evidence pointing to a role of RB as a molecular adaptor at the crossroads of multiple pathways, ensuring cellular homeostasis in different contexts. In particular, we discuss the pro- and anti-tumorigenic roles of RB during the early stages of cancer, as well as the importance of the RB pathway in stem cells and cell fate decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Viatour
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kurzbauer MT, Schlögelhofer P. Retinoblastoma protein goes green: the role of RBR in Arabidopsis meiosis. EMBO J 2011; 30:631-3. [PMID: 21326173 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Therese Kurzbauer
- Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Z, Higgins JD, Hui JTL, Li J, Franklin FCH, Berger F. Retinoblastoma protein is essential for early meiotic events in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 2011; 30:744-55. [PMID: 21217641 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2010] [Accepted: 11/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We have analysed the role of RBR (retinoblastoma related), the Arabidopsis homologue of the tumour suppressor Retinoblastoma protein (pRb), during meiosis. We characterise the rbr-2 mutation, which causes a loss of RBR in male meiocytes. The rbr-2 plants exhibit strongly reduced fertility, while vegetative growth is generally unaffected. The reduced fertility is due to a meiotic defect that results in reduced chiasma formation and subsequent errors in chromosome disjunction. Immunolocalisation studies in wild-type meiocytes reveal that RBR is recruited as foci to the chromosomes during early prophase I in a DNA double-strand-break-dependent manner. In the absence of RBR, expression of several meiotic genes is reduced. The localisation of the recombinases AtRAD51 and AtDMC1 is normal. However, localisation of the MutS homologue AtMSH4 is compromised. Additionally, polymerisation of the synaptonemal complex protein AtZYP1 is abnormal. Together, these data indicate that loss of RBR during meiosis results in a reduction of crossover formation and an associated failure in chromosome synapsis. Our results indicate that RBR has an important role in meiosis affecting different aspects of this complex process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Chen
- Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mendoza-Maldonado R, Paolinelli R, Galbiati L, Giadrossi S, Giacca M. Interaction of the retinoblastoma protein with Orc1 and its recruitment to human origins of DNA replication. PLoS One 2010; 5:e13720. [PMID: 21085491 PMCID: PMC2976706 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2010] [Accepted: 10/05/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is a crucial regulator of cell cycle progression by binding with E2F transcription factor and repressing the expression of a variety of genes required for the G1-S phase transition. Methodology/Principal Findings Here we show that Rb and E2F1 directly participate in the control of initiation of DNA replication in human HeLa, U2OS and T98G cells by specifically binding to origins of DNA replication in a cell cycle regulated manner. We show that, both in vitro and inside the cells, the largest subunit of the origin recognition complex (Orc1) specifically binds hypo-phosphorylated Rb and that this interaction is competitive with the binding of Rb to E2F1. The displacement of Rb-bound Orc1 by E2F1 at origins of DNA replication marks the progression of the G1 phase of the cell cycle toward the G1-S border. Conclusions/Significance The participation of Rb and E2F1 in the formation of the multiprotein complex that binds origins of DNA replication in mammalian cells appears to represent an effective mechanism to couple the expression of genes required for cell cycle progression to the activation of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramiro Mendoza-Maldonado
- Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Laura Galbiati
- Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
| | - Sara Giadrossi
- Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
| | - Mauro Giacca
- Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Faculty of Medicine, Trieste, Italy
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ljungman M. The DNA damage response--repair or despair? ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 2010; 51:879-889. [PMID: 20818630 DOI: 10.1002/em.20597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The term "the DNA damage response" (DDR) encompasses a sophisticated array of cellular initiatives set in motion as cells are exposed to DNA-damaging events. It has been known for over half a century that all organisms have the ability to restore genomic integrity through DNA repair. More recent discoveries of signal transduction pathways linking DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis have greatly expanded our views of how cells and tissues limit mutagenesis and tumorigenesis. DNA repair not only plays a pivotal role in suppressing mutagenesis but also in the reversal of signals inducing the stress response. If repair is faulty or the cell is overwhelmed by damage, chances are that the cell will despair and be removed by apoptosis. This final fate is determined by intricate cellular dosimeters that are yet to be fully understood. Here, key findings leading to our current view of DDR are discussed as well as potential areas of importance for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mats Ljungman
- Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rizwani W, Alexandrow M, Chellappan S. Prohibitin physically interacts with MCM proteins and inhibits mammalian DNA replication. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1621-9. [PMID: 19377303 DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.10.8578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Prohibitin, a tumor suppressor protein, has been shown to repress E2F-mediated transcription and arrest cell cycle progression. while prohibitin has been proposed to regulate cell cycle progression by repressing transcriptional targets of E2F1, it is not clear whether other mechanisms are also involved in mediating the growth arrest. Here we demonstrate that prohibitin can function as a potent inhibitor of DNA replication by interacting with members of Minichromosome maintenance complex of proteins (MCM2-7). The data presented here indicates that prohibitin can physically interact with MCM2, MCM5 and MCM7 in in vitro GST binding assays as well as in MCF-7 cells as seen by immunoprecipitation-western blot experiments. The association was cell cycle dependent, and more pronounced 4-8 hours after serum stimulation of quiescent cells. Prohibitin associated more robustly with MCM2 and MCM5 compared to MCM7, suggesting that prohibitin mainly interacts with the regulatory subunits of the MCM complex. Confirming these results, prohibitin was found to co-localize with MCM2, MCM5 and MCM7 in MCF-7 cells, as seen by double immunofluorescence experiments. Further, Prohibitin strongly inhibited DNA replication in an in vitro replication assay. These results strongly suggest that prohibitin effectively represses replication by interacting with the components of mammalian replication machinery and this might contribute to the growth regulatory properties of prohibitin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wasia Rizwani
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahlander J, Bosco G. The RB/E2F pathway and regulation of RNA processing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 384:280-3. [PMID: 19401190 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2009] [Accepted: 04/19/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) is inactivated in a majority of cancers. RB restricts cell proliferation by inhibiting the E2F family of transcription factors. The current model for RB/E2F function describes its role in regulating transcription at gene promoters. Whether the RB or E2F proteins might play a role in gene expression beyond transcription initiation is not well known. This review describes evidence that points to a novel role for the RB/E2F network in the regulation of RNA processing, and we propose a model as a framework for future research. The elucidation of a novel role of RB in RNA processing will have a profound impact on our understanding of the role of this tumor suppressor family in cell and developmental biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ahlander
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1007 East Lowell Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ahlander J, Bosco G. Sqd interacts with the Drosophila retinoblastoma tumor suppressor Rbf. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 383:363-7. [PMID: 19364495 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2009] [Accepted: 04/03/2009] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) serves as a scaffold to coordinate binding of numerous proteins, including E2F and histone deacetylases, through its C-terminal domain. The amino-terminal half of RB has few known binding partners and its function is not well understood. We used the amino-terminal domain of the Drosophila retinoblastoma tumor suppressor Rbf (RbfN) to identify novel binding partners by immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry. Our experiment revealed that the RNA-binding protein Squid (Sqd) is a putative interacting partner of RbfN. Western blot confirmed that Sqd interacts with the amino-terminal domain of Rbf. We observed that Sqd colocalizes with RbfN in Drosophila salivary gland cells. We also show that double RNAi knockdown of Rbf and Sqd in the eye results in an extensive loss of eye bristles, suggesting that Rbf and Sqd function in a common pathway. We conclude from our studies that Rbf physically and genetically interacts with Sqd. We propose that the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor may play a novel role in RNA processing through interaction with RNA-binding proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ahlander
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The proteins of the origin recognition complex are found throughout all eukaryotes and have roles beyond that of DNA replication. Origin recognition complex (ORC) proteins were first discovered as a six-subunit assemblage in budding yeast that promotes the initiation of DNA replication. Orc1-5 appear to be present in all eukaryotes, and include both AAA+ and winged-helix motifs. A sixth protein, Orc6, shows no structural similarity to the other ORC proteins, and is poorly conserved between budding yeast and most other eukaryotic species. The replication factor Cdc6 has extensive sequence similarity with Orc1 and phylogenetic analysis suggests the genes that encode them may be paralogs. ORC proteins have also been found in the archaea, and the bacterial DnaA replication protein has ORC-like functional domains. In budding yeast, Orc1-6 are bound to origins of DNA replication throughout the cell cycle. Following association with Cdc6 in G1 phase, the sequential hydrolysis of Cdc6 - then ORC-bound ATP loads the Mcm2-7 helicase complex onto DNA. Localization of ORC subunits to the kinetochore and centrosome during mitosis and to the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis has been observed in metazoan cells and, along with phenotypes observed following knockdown with short interfering RNAs, point to additional roles at these cell-cycle stages. In addition, ORC proteins function in epigenetic gene silencing through interactions with heterochromatin factors such as Sir1 in budding yeast and HP1 in higher eukaryotes. Current avenues of research have identified roles for ORC proteins in the development of neuronal and muscle tissue, and are probing their relationship to genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard P Duncker
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|