Expression of the T cell receptor αβ on a CD123+ BDCA2+ HLA-DR+ subpopulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The impact of supraphysiologic serum estradiol levels on peri-implantation embryo development and early pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization cycles

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of elevated serum estradiol levels (EE2-defined as levels > 90th percentile) on the day of hCG administration during IVF on oocyte fertilization, embryo development, implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates.

METHODS

A total of 2,995 consecutive IVF cycles in 1,889 patients with non-donor oocyte retrieval resulting in fresh embryo transfer between 1/1/2005 and 12/31/2011 were analyzed. Cycles were stratified by serum E2 level on the day of hCG administration into those with levels >90th percentile and ≤ 90th percentile. Rates of normal fertilization, embryo development, positive pregnancy test, implantation, clinical pregnancy and spontaneous miscarriage were compared.

RESULTS

Serum estradiol above the 90th percentile on the day of hCG administration was associated with a significantly lower rate of normal fertilization (68.6 ± 20 vs. 71.6 ± 21, p = 0.02) when compared with patients with a lower serum estradiol threshold. The proportion of embryos that progressed from 2PN to 6-8 cell on day 3 was not different between the two groups. Although rates of positive pregnancy test (55.2 % vs. 57 %), implantation (26.4 % vs. 28.5 %) and clinical pregnancy (45.5 % vs. 49.4 %) were lower in patients with a higher estradiol threshold, these differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no difference in the spontaneous miscarriage rates between the two groups (8.4 % vs. 7.1 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum estradiol levels above the 90th percentile on the day of hCG administration is associated with lower oocyte fertilization rate; however, such levels do not impact embryo development, implantation, clinical pregnancy or spontaneous miscarriage rates.

Recognizing and reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of head and neck cancer

The estimated annual incidence of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer is 39,000 in the United States and 260,000 cases worldwide. Despite significant advances in surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year survival rate for locally advanced head and neck tumors remains at 50 %. With further intensification of existing treatment limited by the already significant morbidity of multi-modality treatment, there is a clear need for novel therapeutic strategies [1]. Accumulating evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is highly immunosuppressive, mediated by soluble and cell-associated inhibitory mediators and recruitment of host immunosuppressive cells. Thus, understanding and reversing the specific mechanisms underlying tumor-mediated immunosuppression in HNSCC is an important approach to generating an effective antitumor immune response, either as a component of immune-based therapy or as a complement to conventional treatment approaches. This article outlines significant immune-suppressive mechanisms in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment and potential approaches to enhancing the antitumor immune response.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells and cancer

Cancer develops in a complex microenvironment comprising cancer cells, stromal cells, and host immune cells with their soluble products. The counteracting host-protective and tumor-promoting roles of different immune cell populations have been elegantly clarified in the last decade by pertinent genetically modified mouse models. Among cells with a potential role in cancer immunity, PDCs might represent important players as a result of their capacity to bring together innate and adaptive immunity. This review summarizes current knowledge about the role of PDCs in cancer immunity. PDCs have been documented in primary and metastatic human neoplasms; however, the clinical significance of this finding is still unknown. Once into the tumor bed, PDCs can be hijacked by the tumor microenvironment and lose their propensity to produce the required amount of endogenous I-IFN. However, when properly reprogrammed (i.e., by TLR agonists), PDCs might mediate tumor rejection in a clinical setting. Tumor rejection, at least partially, is driven by I-IFN and seems to require a cross-talk with other innate immune cells, including IFN DCs. The latter evidence, although still limited to skin cancers, can provide a leading model for developing adjuvant immune therapy for other neoplasms. To this end, the generation of appropriate mouse models to modulate the frequency and activation state of murine PDCs will also be of remarkable importance.