Acute beneficial hemodynamic effects of a novel 3D-echocardiographic optimization protocol in cardiac resynchronization therapy

The impact of multipole pacing on left ventricular function in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy - A real-time three-dimensional echocardiography approach

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is standard of care in heart failure (HF), however this technique is associated with a non-responder rate of 30%. Multipole pacing (MPP) with a quadripolar lead may optimize CRT and responder rate by creating two electrical wave fronts in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium simultaneously in order to reduce mechanical dyssynchrony. The objective of this study was to investigate the acute impact of MPP on LV function by assessing systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) via real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE).

METHODS

In 41 consecutive patients (87.8% male; mean age 66.0 ± 12.7 years) who received CRT defibrillators with a quadripolar LV lead, RT3DE datasets were acquired the day after implantation under the following pacing configurations: Baseline AAI, conventional biventricular pacing using distal or proximal LV poles and MPP. Datasets were analyzed in paired samples evaluating SDI and LVEF depending on programmed pacing modality.

RESULTS

MPP resulted in statistically significant reduction of SDI compared to baseline (6.3%; IQR 4.4-7.8 and 9.9%; IQR 8.0-12.7; p < 0.001) and to conventional biventricular pacing using distal (7.6%; IQR 6.5-9.1; p < 0.001) or proximal (7.4%; IQR 6.2-8.8; p < 0.001) LV poles respectively. MPP yielded significant increase in LVEF compared to baseline (30.6%; IQR 25.8-37.5 and 27.2%; IQR 21.1-33.6; p < 0.001) and to conventional biventricular pacing configuration with distal (28.1%; IQR 22.1-34.5; p < 0.001) or proximal (28.6%; IQR 23.2-34.9; p < 0.001) LV poles respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multipole pacing improves mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricular myocardium as assessed by SDI and LVEF.

The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Many patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy; however, approximately 30% of patients do not experience significant clinical improvement with this treatment. AV and VV delay optimization techniques have included echocardiography, device-based algorithms, and several other novel noninvasive techniques. Using these techniques to optimize device settings has been shown to improve hemodynamic function acutely; however, the long-term clinical benefit is limited. In most cases, an empiric AV delay with simultaneous biventricular or left ventricular pacing is adequate. The value of optimization of these intervals in "nonresponders" still requires further investigation.

Meta-analysis of effects of optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with heart failure

The contribution of postimplant optimization of device settings to the beneficial effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure is uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of CRT optimization on the improvement of left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. We undertook a systemic review of the evidence from a search of relevant controlled clinical studies in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-minute walk distance, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score at follow-up were assessed; the primary outcome was ejection fraction. A random-effects model was used to combine weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A metaregression was undertaken to assess the impact of potential covariates. Data were collated from 13 studies enrolling 1,431 patients (919 optimized and 669 controls). Pooled analysis demonstrated that the optimization procedure resulted in a significant increase in LVEF (WMD 2.6%, 95% CI 0.8 to 4.4, p = 0.001) as compared with a nonoptimized CRT. No improvements with the optimization of CRT were seen in 6-minute walk distance and quality of life (WMD 12 m, 95% CI 23 to 48, p = 0.49, and 3.6, 95% CI 2.2 to 9.5, p = 0.22, respectively); however, this part of the analysis was performed using limited data. Thus, these collated data suggest that the optimization of CRT leads to a significant but small improvement in LVEF in patients with heart failure. Additional, adequately powered studies are needed to evaluate the effects of this procedure on exercise tolerance and quality of life.

Three-dimensional echocardiographic optimization improves outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy compared to ECG optimization: a randomized comparison

AIMS

There is little consensus on optimal atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to examine a novel combination of Doppler echocardiography (DE) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for individualized AV- and VV-interval optimization compared to conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) optimization.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 77 patients (male: 57, age: 68 ± 10 years) with severely reduced ejection fraction (EF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, and wide QRS complex (>120 ms) have been included. Patients were randomized to either AV- and VV-interval optimization using DE and 3DE (group 1, n = 39) or ECG (group 2, n = 38). 3DE was performed in all patients for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) dimensions, EF and systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI), and NYHA class obtained before CRT and after 3 months. Primary endpoint of the study was clinical response to CRT, defined as a reduction of NYHA class by ≥1 score. Secondary endpoints were change of EF, LV volumes, and SDI.

RESULTS

There were significantly more responders in group 1 (82%) than in group 2 (58%, P = 0.021). Similarly, group 1 showed a larger increase in EF (7.0 ± 6.0% vs 3.4 ± 5.6%, P = 0.015) and a more pronounced reduction of SDI (-4.5 ± 5.9% vs -1.5 ± 5.6%, P = 0.039) than group 2.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional ECG optimization, this novel echocardiographic optimization protocol resulted in a significantly higher response rate, improved LV systolic function, and may be used to select the optimal AV and VV intervals in CRT.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy optimisation strategies: systematic classification, detailed analysis, minimum standards and a roadmap for development and testing

In this article an international group of CRT specialists presents a comprehensive classification system for present and future schemes for optimising CRT. This system is neutral to the measurement technology used, but focuses on little-discussed quantitative physiological requirements. We then present a rational roadmap for reliable cost-effective development and evaluation of schemes. A widely recommended approach for AV optimisation is to visually select the ideal pattern of transmitral Doppler flow. Alternatively, one could measure a variable (such as Doppler velocity time integral) and "pick the highest". More complex would be to make measurements across a range of settings and "fit a curve". In this report we provide clinicians with a critical approach to address any recommendations presented to them, as they may be many, indistinct and conflicting. We present a neutral scientific analysis of each scheme, and equip the reader with simple tools for critical evaluation. Optimisation protocols should deliver: (a) singularity, with only one region of optimality rather than several; (b) blinded test-retest reproducibility; (c) plausibility; (d) concordance between independent methods; and (e) transparency, with all steps open to scrutiny. This simple information is still not available for many optimisation schemes. Clinicians developing the habit of asking about each property in turn will find it easier to win now down the broad range of protocols currently promoted. Expectation of a sophisticated enquiry from the clinical community will encourage optimisation protocol-designers to focus on testing early (and cheaply) the basic properties that are vital for any chance of long term efficacy.