Regional intra-arterial vs. systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using localized trans-arterial micro perfusion of gemcitabine: combined analysis of RR1 and RR2

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) comprises 40% of pancreatic cancer diagnoses and has a relatively poor prognosis. Trans-arterial micro perfusion (TAMP)-mediated chemotherapy delivery to the primary tumor is a novel approach worthy of investigation. The RR1 (dose escalation) and RR2 (observational) studies examined the safety and preliminary efficacy of TAMP-delivered gemcitabine for LAPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RR1 and RR2 data were pooled. Both studies enrolled patients with LAPC with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. Participant data, including age, sex, race, stage, previous treatments, toxicity, disease progression, and death, were collected. Median number of cycles and average treatment dosage were calculated. Overall survival (OS) was determined for the whole group and separately for patients who received and did not receive previous treatments. Aims of the analysis were to assess procedure safety, OS, and evaluate factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

The median age of the 43 patients enrolled in RR1 and RR2 was 72 years (range, 51-88 years). Median OS for the 35 eligible patients with stage III disease was 12.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-54.2 months). Previous chemoradiation was associated with significantly longer OS [27.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-40.6 months)] compared to previous systemic chemotherapy [14.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-54.2 months)] or no prior treatment [7.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-35.4 months)] (P < .001). The most common adverse events were GI related (abdominal pain, emesis, and vomiting); the most common grade 3 toxicity was sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Study results indicate that TAMP-mediated gemcitabine delivery in patients with LAPC is potentially safe, feasible, and provides potential clinical benefits.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02237157 (RR1) and NCT02591082 (RR2).

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

GEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02635971.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

21/12/2015.

Intra-arterial Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Aggressive Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Scoping Review

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma refers to cancer of the pancreatic duct cells. It is normally diagnosed when it is at an advanced stage, making the prognosis poor. Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment approach for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer and has been shown to improve survival by eight to 16 weeks. However, it does not directly penetrate malignant tissue and has many side effects, such as hair loss, bone marrow suppression, and many gastrointestinal issues. A newer treatment modality, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC), focuses on targeting malignant tissue directly to improve survival and decrease systemic side effects. When IAC is used with gemcitabine (GEM) or FLEC (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, and carboplatin), the response rate for advanced pancreatic cancer is significantly improved. This literature review introduces the use of hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Feasibility of 125I brachytherapy combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

To evaluation the feasibility of Iodine-125 (¹²5I) brachytherapy combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A total of 72 cases with Stage III and IV were retrospectively reviewed. 23 cases receiving 125I brachytherapy were classified as Group A. 27 cases receiving arterial infusion chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin, GP) were classified as Group B and 22 cases receiving 125I brachytherapy combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy (GP) were classified as Group C. The evaluated indications were local control rate, survival rate, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, pain relief, and Karnofsky physical scores. Analysis of Variancep, Pearson chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for analysis. The local control rate of group A and group C was significantly higher than group B (P < .001). Pearson chi-square test showed statistical difference of the 3 groups (χ2 = 12.969, P = .044). The median survival of group A,B and C was 9 months, 6 months and 13 months, respectively. The survival time of group C was significantly higher than group B (χ2 = 5.403, P = .020). The Log rank test showed statistical difference in the survival curve of the 3 groups (χ2 = 6.501, P = .039). The difference of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 decline percentage between group B and C group was statistically significant (χ2 = 5.959, P = .015). Patients in group A and group C relieved form pain after treatment with statistically significant (P < .001). Pain relief was much more effective in patients who received 125I brachytherapy. Karnofsky physical scores after treatment were statistically higher than those before treatment in each group (P < .001). 125I brachytherapy maybe one of the effective, safe and feasible alternative treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. ¹²5I brachytherapy combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy was effective in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

The Evolving Role of Intra-arterial Chemotherapy in Adult and Pediatric Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

The development of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) was driven by an ambition to mitigate systemic side effects, enhance the bioavailability of drugs, and optimize the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. While the initial research on IAC primarily examined its effectiveness in treating various liver malignancies, the application of this treatment has undergone significant advancements since its introduction. The primary objective of this article is to examine the current range of utilization of IAC, both with and without radiotherapy, while also evaluating the results of relevant clinical trials. Furthermore, this article explores potential future advancements and opportunities in this field. From the scoping review of available articles, it can be concluded that IAC is an effective treatment alternative and, sometimes, a better first-line option, but there is a need for more evidence to make IAC a regular treatment option available for patients.

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy can be minimized by pressurized regional intravascular delivery in an orthotopic murine pancreatic cancer model

PURPOSE

There is a great need to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy used in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Here we explore if regional pressurized delivery of oxaliplatin can minimize peripheral neuropathy in mice.

METHODS

We used an orthotopic PDAC mouse model and delivered a single dose of oxaliplatin through the portal vein using a pressure-enabled system (pancreatic retrograde venous infusion, PRVI). We analyzed the effects of PRVI on tumor burden and peripheral neuropathy using histopathological and functional assays.

RESULTS

Tumor weights in mice treated with 2 mg/kg oxaliplatin using PRVI were significantly lower than in mice treated with the same dose systemically. This resulted in reduced peripheral neuropathy signatures in PRVI mice compared to the 20 mg/kg systemic dose required to achieve similar tumor control.

CONCLUSION

Regional delivery of highly cytotoxic agents using PRVI can reduce the therapeutic dose of these drugs, thereby lowering toxic side effects.

A Patient With Stage III Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Intra-Arterial Infusion FOLFIRINOX: Impressive Tumoral Response and Death due to Legionella pneumophila Infection: A Unique Case Report

Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have very poor prognosis, whereby at a follow-up of 5 years, the mortality rate is very similar to the incidence rate. Globally, around 10% of patients are amenable to radical surgery at the time of diagnosis, which represents the only chance of cure or long-term survival for these patients. Almost 40% of patients with PDAC show locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). LAPC is not a metastatic disease, although it is not amenable to radical surgery. For these patients, systemic induction chemotherapy with intravenous FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, folic acid, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) regimen is administered, with the aim of conversion to surgery, although the conversion rate remains low, at approximately 10% to 15%. Pancreatic arterial chemotherapy has been explored to overcome the intrinsic tumor pancreatic resistance to systemic chemotherapy, where an intra-arterial port-a-cath is placed by means of interventional oncology techniques under angiographic guidance in the operating theater. Here, we treated a patient with an intra-arterially modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. Three courses were administered, and the patient experienced no adverse events. At the end of the third course, the patient rapidly developed lung failure due to nosocomial Legionella pneumophila infection, despite the impressive pathological tumor response shown in the autopsy report. This is a first and unique report that demonstrates that pancreatic intra-arterial FOLFIRINOX can be safe and efficacious. We believe that this preliminary result will be confirmed in the next patients to be enrolled and that it provides a glimmer of hope for patients with this lethal disease.

Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. The few available therapeutic options are characterized by low efficacy and high toxicity due to the intrinsic chemoresistance of this tumor type. To improve clinical results, some clinical trials have evaluated regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC. The pancreatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutics has the aim of obtaining higher local concentrations of drugs and, at the same time, of limiting systemic toxicity. This therapeutic approach has already been successfully evaluated for the treatment of several types of tumors. Regarding advanced pancreatic cancers, only a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of this treatment, with very promising results. Therefore, in this review, we summarize literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration for the treatment of advanced PC to deepen knowledge on this topic.

Abstract

Advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very poor prognosis due to its chemoresistant nature. Nowadays, only a few therapeutic options are available for PC, and the most effective ones are characterized by low response rates (RRs), short progression-free survival and overall survival, and severe toxicity. To improve clinical results, small series studies have evaluated loco-regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC, demonstrating its dose-dependent sensitivity towards the tumor. In fact, pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) chemotherapy allows higher local concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents, sparing healthy tissues with a lower rate of adverse events compared to systemic chemotherapy. This therapeutic approach has already been evaluated in different types of tumors, especially in primary and metastatic liver cancers, with favourable results. With regard to advanced PC, a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of PAI with promising results, especially in terms of RRs compared to systemic chemotherapy. However, clear evidence about its efficacy has not been established yet nor have the underlying mechanisms leading to its success. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration in terms of techniques, drug pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced PC.

Current status of non-surgical treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the 7th leading cause of death due to cancer in industrialized countries and the 11th most common cancer globally, with 458918 new cases (2.5% of all cancers) and 432242 deaths (4.5% of all cancer deaths) in 2018. Unfortunately, 80% to 90% of the patients present with unresectable disease, and the reported 5-year survival rate range between 10% and 25%, even after successful resection with tumor-free margins. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and minimally invasive image-guided procedures that have emerged over the past years, are used for the management of non-operable PC. This review focuses on currently available non-surgical options of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Regional Delivery of Anti-PD-1 Agent for Colorectal Liver Metastases Improves Therapeutic Index and Anti-Tumor Activity

Metastatic liver tumors have presented challenges with the use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), with only limited success. We hypothesize that regional delivery (RD) of CPIs can improve activity in the liver and minimize systemic exposure, thereby reducing immune-related adverse events (irAE). Using a murine model of colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM), we confirmed high levels of PD-L1 expression on the tumor cells and liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells (L-MDSC). In vivo, we detected improved LM response at 3 mg/kg on PTD7 via portal vein (PV) regional delivery as compared to 3 mg/kg via tail vein (TV) systemic delivery (p = 0.04). The minimal effective dose at PTD7 was 5 mg/kg (p = 0.01) via TV and 0.3 mg/kg (p = 0.02) via PV. We detected 6.7-fold lower circulating CPI antibody levels in the serum using the 0.3 mg/kg PV treatment compared to the 5 mg/kg TV cohort (p < 0.001) without increased liver toxicity. Additionally, 3 mg/kg PV treatment resulted in increased tumor cell apoptotic signaling compared to 5 mg/kg TV (p < 0.05). Therefore, RD of an anti-PD-1 CPI therapy for CRCLM may improve the therapeutic index by reducing the total dose required and limiting the systemic exposure. These advantages could expand CPI indications for liver tumors.

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Percutaneous Management Using Ablation, Brachytherapy, Intra-arterial Chemotherapy, and Intra-tumoral Immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive neoplasms, bearing a terrible prognosis. Stage III tumors, also known as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), are unresectable, and current palliative chemotherapy regimens have only modestly improved survival in these patients. At this stage of disease, interventional techniques may be of value and further prolong life. The aim of this review was to explore current literature on locoregional percutaneous management for LAPC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Locoregional percutaneous interventional techniques such as ablation, brachytherapy, and intra-arterial chemotherapy possess cytoreductive abilities and have the potential to increase survival. In addition, recent research demonstrates the immunomodulatory capacities of these treatments. This immune response may be leveraged by combining the interventional techniques with intra-tumoral immunotherapy, possibly creating a durable anti-tumor effect. This multimodality treatment approach is currently being examined in several ongoing clinical trials. The use of certain interventional techniques appears to improve survival in LAPC patients and may work synergistically when combined with immunotherapy. However, definitive conclusions can only be made when large prospective (randomized controlled) trials confirm these results.

Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery Approach in the Pancreas with Retrograde Venous Infusion of Lipiodol with Ex Vivo Analysis

Purpose

To determine the safety and feasibility of pancreatic retrograde venous infusion (PRVI) utilizing a microvalvular infusion system (MVI) to deliver ethiodized oil (lipiodol) by means of the Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD) approach.

Methods

Utilizing transhepatic access, mapping of the pancreatic body and head venous anatomy was performed in 10 swine. PEDD was performed by cannulation of veins in the head (n = 4) and body (n = 10) of the pancreas with a MVI (Surefire® Infusion System (SIS), Surefire Medical, Inc (DBA TriSalus™ Life Sciences)) followed by infusion with lipiodol. Sets of animals were killed either immediately (n = 8) or at 4 days post-PRVI (n = 2). All pancreata were harvested and studied with micro-CT and histology. We also performed three-dimensional volumetric/multiplanar imaging to assess the vascular distribution of lipiodol within the glands.

Results

A total of 14 pancreatic veins were successfully infused with an average of 1.7 (0.5–2.0) mL of lipiodol. No notable change in serum chemistries was seen at 4 days. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of lipiodol deposition was statistically increased both within the organ in target relative to non-target pancreatic tissue and compared to extra pancreatic tissue (p < 0.05). Histological evaluation demonstrated no evidence of pancreatic edema or ischemia.

Conclusions

PEDD using the RVI approach for targeted pancreatic infusions is technically feasible and did not result in organ damage in this pilot animal study.

Pressure-enabled delivery of gemcitabine in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model

BACKGROUND

We describe the use of pancreatic retrograde venous infusion in an orthotopic murine model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and hypothesize that pancreatic retrograde venous infusion delivery of gemcitabine will increase concentrations of gemcitabine in the tumor and the subsequent tumor response to treatment.

METHODS

Murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (KPC4580P) was transplanted onto the pancreatic tail of C57BL/6J mice. Groups (n = 15) of mice were assigned to sham laparotomy and 100 mg/kg intraperitoneal infusion of gemcitabine (systemic gemcitabine), pancreatic venous isolation with pancreatic retrograde venous infusion of 100 mg/kg gemcitabine, or pancreatic retrograde venous infusion with saline infusion. Tumor pressures were recorded during pancreatic retrograde venous infusion. Mice were killed at 1 hour or 7 days after infusion.

RESULTS

Baseline tumor pressures were 45 ± 8 mm Hg, and pancreatic retrograde venous infusion increased tumor pressures by 29 ± 6 mm Hg (P < .01). Pancreatic retrograde venous infusion gemcitabine mice had greater tumor gemcitabine concentrations compared with systemic gemcitabine (127 vs 19 ng/mg; P < .01) and lesser tumor volumes compared with both systemic gem and pancreatic retrograde venous infusion with saline (274 vs 857 vs 629 mm³; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic retrograde venous infusion increased tumor pressures greater than baseline, improved gemcitabine delivery, and increased the treatment response. These findings suggest that pressurized, regional delivery overcomes the increased pressure barrier in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Additional preclinical studies with cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic agents and clinical trials using pressure-enabled drug delivery with pancreatic retrograde venous infusion devices are underway.

Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the most common bladder cancer. Many studies have reported that intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) could effectively reduce the recurrence rate of NMIBC. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of IAC combined with IVC for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases will be searched for eligible studies published without language restrictions from their inception up August 31, 2019. Subgroup analysis will be mainly explored in study design, types of chemotherapy drugs, and sample size. Cochrane Collaboration Risk of bias Tool will be applied in evaluating the quality of enrolled articles. Statistical analysis will be carried out by the Stata version 14.0 software.

RESULTS

The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse reactions and toxicity grade coded by common toxicity criteria for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will provide latest evidence to verify whether IAC combined with IVC is more effective and safer than IVC alone for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019146847.

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy versus isolated upper abdominal perfusion for advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study on 454 patients

Purpose

The treatment of pancreatic carcinoma remains a challenge as prognosis is poor, even if confined to a single anatomical region. A regional treatment of pancreatic cancer with high drug concentrations at the tumor site may increase response behaviour. Intra-arterial administration of drugs generates homogenous drug distribution throughout the entire tumor volume.

Methods

We report on treatment outcome of 454 patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (WHO stage III: 174 patients, WHO stage IV: 280 patients). Patients have been separated to two different treatment protocols. The first group (n = 233 patients) has been treated via angiographically placed celiac axis catheters. The second group (n = 221 patients) had upper abdominal perfusion (UAP) with stopflow balloon catheters in aorta and vena cava. Both groups have been treated with a combination of cisplatin, adriamycin and mitomycin.

Results

For stage III pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 8 and 12 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. For stage IV pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 7 and 8.5 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. Resolution of ascites has been reached in all cases by UAP treatment. Toxicity was generally mild, WHO grade I or II, toxicity grade III or IV was only noted in patients with severe systemic pretreatment. The techniques, survival data and detailed results are demonstrated.

Conclusions

Responsiveness of pancreatic cancer to regional chemotherapy is drug exposure dependent. The isolated perfusion procedure is superior to intra-arterial infusion in survival times.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03019-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anaphylactoid hypersensitivity reaction from intra-arterial cetuximab: Clinical considerations and management

Intra-arterial infusion of drugs shows promising results in terms of safety and efficacy. Intra-arterial cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody treatment, is currently being tested for its use in head and neck cancers. We present the case of a 45-year-old Asian male who developed an anaphylactoid hypersensitivity reaction, manifesting itself in the form of bronchospasm, tachycardia, and hypotension, during intra-arterial infusion of cetuximab. The symptoms were quickly diagnosed, and the patient was treated accordingly. Despite the safety profile of cetuximab and the decreased risk of systemic effects with intra-arterial infusion versus intravenous infusion, severe hypersensitivity reactions are still a risk in intra-arterial cetuximab infusions. Consequently, proper planning and care must be taken to prophylactically prevent and in the case of a reaction, treat the reaction accordingly. The case presented herein is, to the best of our knowledge, the first recorded moderate-to-severe infusion reaction in a patient receiving intra-arterial cetuximab treatment for head and neck cancer.

HIFU is safe, effective, and feasible in pancreatic cancer patients: a monocentric retrospective study among 523 patients

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) in treating unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Patients and methods

A total of 523 unresectable PDAC patients were recruited from December 30, 2007 to January 30, 2015 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Among them, 347 received HIFU combined with GEM (with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy [RIAC] or with systemic chemotherapy) and the remaining patients received GEM only. Postoperative complications were observed, and overall survival was recorded.

Results

The median overall survival of patients who received HIFU combined with GEM vs GEM alone was 7.4 vs 6.0 months (P=0.002); the 6-month, 10-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates for patients in these two groups were 66.3% vs 47.5% (P<0.0001), 31.12% vs 15.9% (P<0.0001), 21.32% vs 13.64% (P=0.033), and 2.89% vs 2.27% (P=0.78), respectively. In the combined therapy group, the most obvious survival benefits were obtained among patients who received HIFU plus RIAC and systemic chemotherapy (used in the intervals between RIAC treatments). There were no severe complications in patients undergoing HIFU treatment.

Conclusion

We demonstrated the survival benefit of HIFU among PDAC patients treated with GEM. The benefit was most obvious in PDAC patients treated with HIFU plus RIAC and systemic chemotherapy.

Development of apratoxin S10 (Apra S10) as an anti-pancreatic cancer agent and its preliminary evaluation in an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model

Despite the significant progress in the field of cancer therapeutics, the incidence of pancreatic cancer (PC) has continuously increased. One possible mechanism for this increasing burden is impaired drug delivery and drug resistance resulting from a unique tumor microenvironment and genetic mutations. Apratoxins are potent anticancer agents and cotranslational translocation inhibitors with potential therapeutic applications to treat cancers with active secretory pathways. Here, we developed apratoxin S10 (Apra S10) as an anti-pancreatic cancer agent which potently inhibited the growth of both established and patient-derived primary pancreatic cancer cells. We validated its mechanism of action on pancreatic cancer cells by demonstrating the downregulation of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and inhibition of growth factor and cytokine secretion. Apra S10 also inhibited a number of cytokines secreted by stromal cells, suggesting that Apra S10 not only inhibited pancreatic cancer cell secretion, but also reduced the level of factors secreted by other cell types active within the tumor microenvironment. As Apra S10 tissue distribution indicated its high enrichment in pancreas tissue, an orthotopic pancreatic patient-derived xenograft mouse model that closely mimics the human pancreatic tumor microenvironment was for the first time used in apratoxin studies. Apra S10 showed promising antitumor effect in this pancreatic cancer model and this effect was mediated through anti-proliferation properties.

Prognostic value of glypican-1 for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer following regional intra-arterial chemotherapy

Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) is a potential alternative treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) with fewer adverse effects than other treatment options. However, specific biomarkers to determine the prognosis of patients with APC have thus far, been unsatisfactory. Glypican-1 (GPC1) in exosomes has been identified as an early diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the presence of GPC1 in extracellular vesicles (EVs) could serve as a predictor of RIAC outcome for patients with APC. EVs in circulation were isolated and the percentage of GPC1⁺ EVs was measured using flow cytometry. Compared with healthy individuals, the levels of GPC1⁺ EVs were significantly increased in patients with APC (P<0.01). Following RIAC treatment, the percentage of GPC1⁺ EVs was decreased (P=0.023). Furthermore, patients with APC exhibiting a greater decrease of GPC1⁺ EVs experienced improved overall survival (OS) rates. In summary, the present study provides insights into identifying GPC1 as a novel prognostic biomarker for patients with APC following RIAC treatment.

Current prospects and challenges of nanomedicine delivery in prostate cancer therapy

Management of prostate cancer is currently being pursued by systemic delivery of anticancer drugs, but it has drawbacks like nonspecific distribution, decreased bioavailability, coupled with adverse side effects. These problems have been resolved using nanomedicine-based anticancer drug delivery to improve the therapeutic index with higher drug dose and reduced nonspecific distribution. Targeting prostate tumor by delivering nanomedicine through locoregional route is more effective, than the systemic delivery, which can decrease systemic exposure of the therapeutics significantly. Therefore, in this article, we have reviewed the current prospects and challenges of prostate cancer therapy using nanomedicine, by providing a comprehensive description of advantages and limitations of the systemic route and locoregional route. Eventually, we have emphasized on the need for localized prostate cancer therapy developments using nanomedicines.

Safety Study of Targeted and Localized Intra-Arterial Delivery of Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: This is a first-in-man safety study in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using a targeted intra-arterial delivery catheter (RenovoCath™).

Methods: Twenty patients were enrolled in a four-stage dose escalation of intra-arterial, locally delivered gemcitabine, at doses up to 1000 mg/m². Patients' symptoms and laboratory values were monitored for safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included the effect on tumor size, tumor markers, and survival.

Results: One hundred one treatments were administered to 20 patients. Five patients dropped out early due to adverse events or withdrawing consent. Serious adverse events and complications were as follows: sepsis (n = 3), grade 3 neutropenia (n = 3), guide-mediated vascular dissection (n = 3), and pulmonary toxicity (n = 1). There were no cases of elevated liver or pancreatic enzymes. All sepsis cases occurred in patients with biliary stent/drains, prompting the addition of periprocedural treatment with antibiotics, which effectively prevented further sepsis in the study. Efficacy analysis was limited to 15 patients who received more than two treatments. Fifty-eight percent of these patients had a reduction in CA 19-9 tumor markers, 3 patients had tumor progression, 1 had partial response, and 11 showed disease stability. The survival rate at 12 months was 60%.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate feasibility of localized and selective intra-arterial chemotherapy delivery to the pancreas utilizing the RenovoCath. With gemcitabine, this approach is safe, with the sole prerequisite of perioperative antibiotics for patients with prior biliary drainage/stent. Efficacy results suggest a survival benefit when compared to historical control, especially in patients with prior radiation therapy.

Gemcitabine-Based Regional Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The present study was carried out to investigate the prognostic factors in patients who received intra-arterial infusion for advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, the detailed procedure of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy was described. A total of 354 patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were recruited from January 2012, to April 2015, at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Demographic and clinic characteristics of the patients were extracted from electronic medical records. Restricted cubic spline was used to assess the nonliner regression between baseline CA19-9 value and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between overall survival and clinical characteristics. Of all 354 included patients, 230 (65%) were male (male/female ratio = 1.8), and 72 (20%) patients were diagnosed with detectable distant metastases. Pretreatment CA19-9 value of patients with metastases was significantly higher as compared to those with locally advanced cancer (median: 922.30 vs 357.00 U/mL, P = 0.0090). Totally 274 patients completed 1 cycle of intra-arterial infusion, whereas 80 patients received 2 or more cycles of the chemotherapy. For all the 354 patients, median OS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.0, 8.0 months) with a 6-, 12-, and 18-month survival rate of 0.48, 0.28, and 0.18, respectively. The median OS of patients, who received 1 cycle of intra-arterial infusion therapy, was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.0, 8.0 months), which was similar to 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.0, 9.0 months) in patients who received 2 or more cycles. Restricted cubic spline revealed the nonline association between baseline CA19-9 and prognosis. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that age, CA19-9 baseline, CA19-9 value, and tumor location were significantly associated with the OS. In conclusion, the gemcitabine-based RIAC presented a potential treatment method for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Young age, pretreatment CA19-9 value <1000 U/mL, and tumor located at the head of pancreas indicated better response to the regional intra-arterial chemotherapy and better overall survival.

Meta-analyses of treatment standards for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the most lethal common cancer with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 6-7% (across all stages). The only potential curative therapy is surgical resection in those with localized disease. Adjuvant (postoperative) therapy confers a survival advantage over postoperative observation alone. Neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy offers the potential to downstage initially unresectable tumors for resection, sterilize resection margins and decrease locoregional recurrence, and identify a subset of patients with aggressive disease for whom surgery will not be beneficial. Induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation chemoradiation is another recommended approach in those with locally advanced disease. For those who cannot be downstaged, cannot tolerate surgery, or were diagnosed with metastatic disease, treatment remains palliative with chemotherapy being a critical component of this approach. Recently, intensive combination chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival rates in comparison to gemcitabine alone in advanced disease. The past few decades have afforded an accumulation of high-level evidence regarding neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative therapies in pancreatic cancer. There are numerous reviews discussing recent retrospective studies, prospective studies and randomized controlled trials in each of these areas. However, reviews of optimal and recommended treatment strategies across all stages of pancreatic cancer that focus on the highest levels of hierarchical evidence, such as meta-analyses, are limited. The discussion of novel therapeutics is beyond the scope of this review. However, an extensive and the most current collection of meta-analyses of first-line systemic and locoregional treatment options for all stages of pancreatic cancer to date has been accumulated.

Current therapeutic strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer: A review for clinicians

Pancreatic cancer (PC) would become the second leading cause of cancer death in the near future, despite representing only 3% of new cancer diagnosis. Survival improvement will come from a better knowledge of risk factors, earlier diagnosis, better integration of locoregional and systemic therapies, as well as the development of more efficacious drugs rising from a deeper understanding of disease biology. For patients with unresectable, non-metastatic disease, combined strategies encompassing primary chemotherapy and radiation seems to be promising. In fit patients, new polychemotherapy regimens can lead to better outcomes in terms of slight but significant survival improvement associated with a positive impact on quality of life. The upfront use of these regimes can also increase the rate of radical resections in borderline resectable and locally advanced PC. Second line treatments showed to positively affect both overall survival and quality of life in fit patients affected by metastatic disease. At present, oxaliplatin-based regimens are the most extensively studied. Nonetheless, other promising drugs are currently under evaluation. Presently, in addition to surgery and conventional radiation therapy, new locoregional treatment techniques are emerging as alternative options in the multimodal approach to patients or diseases not suitable for radical surgery. As of today, in contrast with other types of cancer, targeted therapies failed to show relevant activity either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and, thus, current clinical practice does not include them. Up to now, despite the fact of extremely promising results in different tumors, also immunotherapy is not in the actual therapeutic armamentarium for PC. In the present paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the current state of the art of clinical practice and research in PC aiming to offer a guide for clinicians on the most relevant topics in the management of this disease.

Transarterial infusion with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and the safety of transarterial infusion (TAI) with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). After celiac arteriogram and super-mesenteric arteriography, 1000 mg/m gemcitabine and 100 mg/m oxaliplatin were infused through 4- or 5-Fr catheters in arteries supplying blood to the tumor. In cases in which the blood-supplying artery could be selectively catheterized, the infusion was performed through a 3-Fr catheter placed in the tumor-supplying artery. Therapeutic courses were repeated every 4 weeks. The tumor response, the overall survival, and adverse effects were monitored. Thirty-two patients with unresectable PC were enrolled in this study, including 20 male and 12 female patients. A total of 105 cycles of TAI (mean=3.3 cycles/patient) were performed. Of 32 patients, partial remission was achieved in eight (25.0%), stable disease in 13 (40.6%), and progressive disease in 11 (34.4%). The overall response rate was 25.0%. The median survival time was 10.0 months (range=4-21 months). Grade III-IV toxicity, vomiting, occurred with a rate of 21.9%. Grade I-II neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral nerve toxicity, elevated serum transaminases levels, and serum total bilirubin were observed. TAI with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is well tolerated and highly effective in patients with unresectable PC.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a mono-institutional retrospective analysis

Background

To evaluate the role of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), and the prognostic factors in the setting of multidisciplinary approach strategies.

Methods

63 patients with LAPC and MPC receiving IMRT in our institution were retrospectively identified. Information on patient baseline, treatment characteristics and overall survival (OS) time were collected. Data of pain relief and toxicity were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the prognostic factors.

Results

All patients received IMRT with a median dose of 46.0 Gy. The median OS for LAPC and MPC patients were 15.7 months and 8.0 months, respectively (p = 0.029). Symptomatic improvements were observed in the 44 patients with abdominal/back pain after radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), particularly in those with severe pain. Only 13.9% and 14.8% cases presented Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities in RT and CCRT group, while no cases developed Grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities in both groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumors located in pancreas body/tail (HR 0.28, p = 0.008), pretreatment CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL (HR 0.36, p = 0.029) and concurrent chemotherapy (HR 0.37, p = 0.016) were independent favorable predictors for OS.

Conclusions

CCRT further improved OS for LAPC and MPC with acceptable toxicities, and use of RT markedly alleviated pain. Tumors located in pancreas body/tail, pretreatment CA19-9 level of < 1000 U/mL and CCRT were associated with better OS. However, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy did not show any survival benefit in our study.

Duodenal ischemia and upper GI bleeding are dose-limiting toxicities of 24-h continuous intra-arterial pancreatic perfusion of gemcitabine following vascular isolation of the pancreatic head: early results from the Regional Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (RECLAP) study

BACKGROUND

Regional chemotherapy is used successfully in the treatment of both primary and secondary malignancies, in particular of the peritoneal surface and the liver, and is currently explored as an attractive approach for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To establish the feasibility and toxicity of regional intra-arterial gemcitabine delivered as a 24-h continuous infusion to the pancreas as a novel treatment option for patients with locally advanced PDAC a phase I clinical trial was conducted.

METHODS

Between April 2011 and September 2013 six patients with biopsy confirmed, borderline or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and having received at least one line of systemic chemotherapy, underwent vascular redistribution of the inflow to the head of the pancreas by arterial coil embolization followed by perfusion catheter placement within the splenic artery. Patients were treated with increasing doses of gemcitabine administered by continuous splenic arterial infusion over 24 h with inter-patient and intra-patient dose escalation scheme. The primary endpoint was toxicity of the intra-arterial gemcitabine regimen and to establish the maximum tolerated dose.

RESULTS

Catheter placement and gemcitabine infusion was successful in all patients enrolled to date (n = 6). Four out of six patients experienced catheter tip migration requiring replacement or revision. Patients received a median of four doses of 24-h gemcitabine infusion. Two patients developed grade 3 and 4 duodenal ischemia and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Median overall survival was 15.3 months and median time to progression was 3 months. Three patients (50 %, n = 3/6) progressed systemically. Two patients had stable disease >4 months following treatment and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

While technically feasible to treat locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, prolonged regional pancreatic perfusion with gemcitabine following pancreatic arterial redistribution carries a high risk for gastrointestinal toxicity. Shorter infusion schedules with frequent on treatment evaluations should be considered for future clinical trials.

Loco-regional cancer drug therapy: present approaches and rapidly reversible hydrophobization (RRH) of therapeutic agents as the future direction

Insufficient drug uptake by solid tumors remains the major problem for systemic chemotherapy. Many studies have demonstrated anticancer drug effects to be dose-dependent, although dose-escalation studies have resulted in limited survival benefit with increased systemic toxicities. One solution to this has been the idea of loco-regional drug treatments, which offer dramatically higher drug concentrations in tumor tissues while minimizing systemic toxicity. Although loco-regional delivery has been most prominent in cancers of the liver, soft tissues and serosal peritoneal malignancies, survival benefits are very far from desirable. This review discusses the evolution of loco-regional treatments, the present approaches and offers rapidly reversible hydrophobization of drugs as the new future direction.