Crystal structure of ATV(ORF273), a new fold for a thermo- and acido-stable protein from the Acidianus two-tailed virus

Viruses of archaea: Structural, functional, environmental and evolutionary genomics

Viruses of archaea represent one of the most enigmatic parts of the virosphere. Most of the characterized archaeal viruses infect extremophilic hosts and display remarkable diversity of virion morphotypes, many of which have never been observed among viruses of bacteria or eukaryotes. The uniqueness of the virion morphologies is matched by the distinctiveness of the genomes of these viruses, with ∼75% of genes encoding unique proteins, refractory to functional annotation based on sequence analyses. In this review, we summarize the state-of-the-art knowledge on various aspects of archaeal virus genomics. First, we outline how structural and functional genomics efforts provided valuable insights into the functions of viral proteins and revealed intricate details of the archaeal virus-host interactions. We then highlight recent metagenomics studies, which provided a glimpse at the diversity of uncultivated viruses associated with the ubiquitous archaea in the oceans, including Thaumarchaeota, Marine Group II Euryarchaeota, and others. These findings, combined with the recent discovery that archaeal viruses mediate a rapid turnover of thaumarchaea in the deep sea ecosystems, illuminate the prominent role of these viruses in the biosphere. Finally, we discuss the origins and evolution of archaeal viruses and emphasize the evolutionary relationships between viruses and non-viral mobile genetic elements. Further exploration of the archaeal virus diversity as well as functional studies on diverse virus-host systems are bound to uncover novel, unexpected facets of the archaeal virome.

The wonderful world of archaeal viruses

This review presents a personal account of research on archaeal viruses and describes many new viral species and families, demonstrating that viruses of Archaea constitute a distinctive part of the virosphere and display morphotypes that are not associated with the other two domains of life, Bacteria and Eukarya. I focus primarily on viruses that infect hyperthermophilic members of the phylum Crenarchaeota. These viruses' distinctiveness extends from their morphotypes to their genome sequences and the structures of the proteins they encode. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying the interactions of these viruses with their hosts also have unique features. Studies of archaeal viruses provide new perspectives concerning the nature, diversity, and evolution of virus-host interactions. Considering these studies, I associate the distinctions between bacterial and archaeal viruses with the fundamental differences in the envelope compositions of their host cells.

Unification of the globally distributed spindle-shaped viruses of the Archaea

Viruses with spindle-shaped virions are abundant in diverse environments. Over the years, such viruses have been isolated from a wide range of archaeal hosts. Evolutionary relationships between them remained enigmatic, however. Here, using structural proteins as markers, we define familial ties among these "dark horses" of the virosphere and segregate all spindle-shaped viruses into two distinct evolutionary lineages, corresponding to Bicaudaviridae and Fuselloviridae. Our results illuminate the utility of structure-based virus classification and bring additional order to the virosphere.

Archaeal viruses, not archaeal phages: an archaeological dig

Viruses infect members of domains Bacteria, Eukarya, and Archaea. While those infecting domain Eukarya are nearly universally described as "Viruses", those of domain Bacteria, to a substantial extent, instead are called "Bacteriophages," or "Phages." Should the viruses of domain Archaea therefore be dubbed "Archaeal phages," "Archaeal viruses," or some other construct? Here we provide documentation of published, general descriptors of the viruses of domain Archaea. Though at first the term "Phage" or equivalent was used almost exclusively in the archaeal virus literature, there has been a nearly 30-year trend away from this usage, with some persistence of "Phage" to describe "Head-and-tail" archaeal viruses, "Halophage" to describe viruses of halophilic Archaea, use of "Prophage" rather than "Provirus," and so forth. We speculate on the root of the early 1980's transition from "Phage" to "Virus" to describe these infectious agents, consider the timing of introduction of "Archaeal virus" (which can be viewed as analogous to "Bacterial virus"), identify numerous proposed alternatives to "Archaeal virus," and also provide discussion of the general merits of the term, "Phage." Altogether we identify in excess of one dozen variations on how the viruses of domain Archaea are described, and document the timing of both their introduction and use.

A survey of protein structures from archaeal viruses

Viruses that infect the third domain of life, Archaea, are a newly emerging field of interest. To date, all characterized archaeal viruses infect archaea that thrive in extreme conditions, such as halophilic, hyperthermophilic, and methanogenic environments. Viruses in general, especially those replicating in extreme environments, contain highly mosaic genomes with open reading frames (ORFs) whose sequences are often dissimilar to all other known ORFs. It has been estimated that approximately 85% of virally encoded ORFs do not match known sequences in the nucleic acid databases, and this percentage is even higher for archaeal viruses (typically 90%–100%). This statistic suggests that either virus genomes represent a larger segment of sequence space and/or that viruses encode genes of novel fold and/or function. Because the overall three-dimensional fold of a protein evolves more slowly than its sequence, efforts have been geared toward structural characterization of proteins encoded by archaeal viruses in order to gain insight into their potential functions. In this short review, we provide multiple examples where structural characterization of archaeal viral proteins has indeed provided significant functional and evolutionary insight.