A divalent ion is crucial in the structure and dominant-negative function of ID proteins, a class of helix-loop-helix transcription regulators

Prediction of the binding location between the nuclear inhibitor of DNA binding and differentiation 2 (ID2) and HSPA5

Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), also termed HSPA5, was widely studied in cancer. It was recently approved that GRP78 has nuclear localization potential that sheds light on its role in cancer development. The inhibitor of DNA binding and differentiation 2 (ID2) is the nuclear component that associates with GRP78. The interaction between these two proteins is not understood clearly. In the current study, the binding pattern of GRP78/ID2 is predicted using computational methods. Protein-protein docking is used along with molecular dynamics simulation. The substrate binding domain β of GRP78 can stably interact with the loop region (C42-S60) of ID2 as predicted in this study. This paves the way for a possible destabilizer for this association and cancer eradication.

Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide (FAD) and Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate (PLP) Bind to Sox9 and Alter the Expression of Key Pancreatic Progenitor Transcription Factors

Cofactor flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), a compound with flavin moiety and a derivative of riboflavin (vitamin B₂), is shown to bind to Sox9 (a key transcription factor in early pancreatic development) and, subsequently, induce a large increase in markers of pancreatic development, including Ngn3 and PTF1a. Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), the active form of vitamin B₆, also binds to Sox9 and results in a similar increase in pancreatic development markers. Sox9 is known to be specifically important for pancreatic progenitors. Previously, there was no known link between FAD, PLP, or other co-factors and Sox9 for function. Thus, our findings show the mechanism by which FAD and PLP interact with Sox9 and result in the altered expression of pancreatic progenitor transcription factors involved in the pancreas development.

Regulated interaction of ID2 with the anaphase-promoting complex links progression through mitosis with reactivation of cell-type-specific transcription

Tissue-specific transcriptional activity is silenced in mitotic cells but it remains unclear whether the mitotic regulatory machinery interacts with tissue-specific transcriptional programs. We show that such cross-talk involves the controlled interaction between core subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and the ID2 substrate. The N-terminus of ID2 is independently and structurally compatible with a pocket composed of core APC/C subunits that may optimally orient ID2 onto the APCCDH1 complex. Phosphorylation of serine-5 by CDK1 prevented the association of ID2 with core APC, impaired ubiquitylation and stabilized ID2 protein at the mitosis-G1 transition leading to inhibition of basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH)-mediated transcription. The serine-5 phospho-mimetic mutant of ID2 that inefficiently bound core APC remained stable during mitosis, delayed exit from mitosis and reloading of bHLH transcription factors on chromatin. It also locked cells into a "mitotic stem cell" transcriptional state resembling the pluripotent program of embryonic stem cells. The substrates of APCCDH1 SKP2 and Cyclin B1 share with ID2 the phosphorylation-dependent, D-box-independent interaction with core APC. These results reveal a new layer of control of the mechanism by which substrates are recognized by APC.

Lineage tracing reveals the dynamic contribution of Id2+ progenitor cells to branching morphogenesis

Branching morphogenesis is an important process in shaping the arborized structures of several organs. However, the driving force that directs this process from progenitor pools remains incompletely understood. In this lineage tracing study, we investigated the role of Id2+ embryonic progenitor cells in branching organs such as the pancreas, kidney, mammary gland, thyroid gland, and salivary gland. We found that a subset of Id2+ distal progenitor cells in the embryonic pancreas and kidney can give rise to multiple lineages of progeny cells during branching morphogenesis. Id2-labelled cells also supported the postnatal development of the mammary glands. However, Id2+ cells did not contribute to the development of the salivary and thyroid glands. We found the Id2+ cells located in the tip progenitor pools of pancreas and kidney have self-renewal potential and contribute descendents to multiple epithelial cell lineages. Our findings enrich the current model of distal progenitor pools driving branching morphogenesis and provide a new marker to investigate the regularity of branching in these organs.

Backbone distortions in lactam-bridged helical peptides

Side‐chain‐to‐side‐chain cyclization is frequently used to stabilize the α‐helical conformation of short peptides. In a previous study, we incorporated a lactam bridge between the side chains of Lys‐i and Asp‐i+4 in the nonapeptide 1Y, cyclo‐(2,6)‐(Ac‐VKRLQDLQY‐NH₂), an artificial ligand of the inhibitor of DNA binding and cell differentiation (ID) protein with antiproliferative activity on cancer cells. Herein, we show that only the cyclized five‐residue segment adopts a helical turn whereas the C‐terminal residues remain flexible. Moreover, we present nine 1Y analogs arising from different combinations of hydrophobic residues (leucine, isoleucine, norleucine, valine, and tyrosine) at positions 1, 4, 7, and 9. All cyclopeptides except one build a lactam‐bridged helical turn; however, residue‐4 reveals less helix character than the neighboring Arg‐3 and Gln‐5, especially with residue‐4 being isoleucine, valine, and tyrosine. Surprisingly, only two cyclopeptides exhibit helix propagation until the C‐terminus, whereas the others share a remarkable outward tilting of the backbone carbonyl of the lactam‐bridged Asp‐6 (>40° deviation from the orientation parallel to the helix axis), which prevents the formation of the H‐bond between Arg‐3 CO and residue‐7 NH: As a result, the propagation of the helix beyond the lactam‐bridged sequence becomes unfavorable. We conclude that, depending on the amino‐acid sequence, the lactam bridge between Lys‐i and Asp‐i+4 can stabilize a helical turn but deviations from the ideal helix geometry are possible: Indeed, besides the outward tilting of the backbone carbonyls, the residues per turn increased from 3.6 (typical of a regular α‐helix) to 4.2, suggesting a partial helix unwinding.

Discovery of novel ID2 antagonists from pharmacophore-based virtual screening as potential therapeutics for glioma

Glioma, especially the most aggressive type glioblastoma multiforme, is a malignant cancer of the central nervous system with a poor prognosis. Traditional treatments are mainly surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which is still far from satisfactory. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to find new therapeutic agents. Serving as an inhibitor of differentiation, protein ID2 (inhibitor of DNA binding 2) plays an important role in neurogenesis, neovascularization and malignant development of gliomas. It has been shown that ID2 affects the malignant progression of gliomas through different mechanisms. In this study, a pharmacophore-based virtual screening was carried out and 16 hit compounds were purchased for pharmacological evaluations on their ID2 inhibitory activities. Based on the cytotoxicity of these small-molecule compounds, two compounds were shown to effectively inhibit the viability of glioma cells in the micromolar range. Among them, AK-778-XXMU was chosen for further study due to its better solubility in water. A SPR (Surface Plasma Resonance) assay proved the high affinity between AK-778-XXMU and ID2 protein with the K_D value as 129 nM. The plausible binding mode of ID2 was studied by molecular docking and it was found to match AGX51 very well in the same binding site. Subsequently, the cancer-suppressing potency of the compound was characterized both in vitro and in vivo. The data demonstrated that compound AK-778-XXMU is a potent ID2 antagonist which has the potential to be developed as a therapeutic agent against glioma.

Id proteins: emerging roles in CNS disease and targets for modifying neural stemcell behavior

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) are found in the adult brain and spinal cord, and endogenous or transplanted NSPCs contribute to repair processes and regulate immune responses in the CNS. However, the molecular mechanisms of NSPC survival and integration as well as their fate determination and functionality are still poorly understood. Inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) proteins are increasingly recognized as key determinants of NSPC fate specification. Id proteins act by antagonizing the DNA-binding activity of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, and the balance of Id and bHLH proteins determines cell fate decisions in numerous cell types and developmental stages. Id proteins are central in responses to environmental changes, as they occur in CNS injury and disease, and cellular responses in adult NSPCs implicate Id proteins as prime candidates for manipulating stemcell behavior. Here, we outline recent advances in understanding Id protein pleiotropic functions in CNS diseases and propose an integrated view of Id proteins and their promise as potential targets in modifying stemcell behavior to ameliorate CNS disease.

Id2 Represses Aldosterone-Stimulated Cardiac T-Type Calcium Channels Expression

Aldosterone excess is a cardiovascular risk factor. Aldosterone can directly stimulate an electrical remodeling of cardiomyocytes leading to cardiac arrhythmia and hypertrophy. L-type and T-type voltage-gated calcium (Ca2+) channels expression are increased by aldosterone in cardiomyocytes. To further understand the regulation of these channels expression, we studied the role of a transcriptional repressor, the inhibitor of differentiation/DNA binding protein 2 (Id2). We found that aldosterone inhibited the expression of Id2 in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and in the heart of adult mice. When Id2 was overexpressed in cardiomyocytes, we observed a reduction in the spontaneous action potentials rate and an arrest in aldosterone-stimulated rate increase. Accordingly, Id2 siRNA knockdown increased this rate. We also observed that CaV1.2 (L-type Ca2+ channel) or CaV3.1, and CaV3.2 (T-type Ca2+ channels) mRNA expression levels and Ca2+ currents were affected by Id2 presence. These observations were further corroborated in a heart specific Id2- transgenic mice. Taken together, our results suggest that Id2 functions as a transcriptional repressor for L- and T-type Ca2+ channels, particularly CaV3.1, in cardiomyocytes and its expression is controlled by aldosterone. We propose that Id2 might contributes to a protective mechanism in cardiomyocytes preventing the presence of channels associated with a pathological state.

ID2 and GJB2 promote early-stage breast cancer progression by regulating cancer stemness

PURPOSE

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive form of breast cancer which could progress to or recur as invasive breast cancer. The underlying molecular mechanism of DCIS progression is yet poorly understood, and appropriate biomarkers to distinguish benign form of DCIS from potentially invasive tumor are urgently needed.

METHODS

To identify the key regulators of DCIS progression, we performed gene-expression analysis of syngeneic breast cancer cell lines MCF10A, DCIS.com, and MCF10CA and cross-referenced the targets with patient cohort data.

RESULTS

We identified ID2 as a critical gene for DCIS initiation and found that ID2 promoted DCIS formation by enhancing cancer stemness of pre-malignant cells. ID2 also plays a pivotal role in survival of the aggressive cancer cells. In addition, we identified INHBA and GJB2 as key regulators for the transition of benign DCIS to aggressive phenotype. These two genes regulate migration, colonization, and stemness of invasive cancer cells. Upregulation of ID2 and GJB2 predicts poor prognosis after breast-conserving surgery. Finally, we found a natural compound Helichrysetin as ID2 inhibitor which suppresses DCIS formation in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that ID2 is a key driver of DCIS formation and therefore is considered to be a potential target for prevention of DCIS, while INHBA and GJB2 play vital roles in progression of DCIS to IDC and they may serve as potential prognosis markers.

The Recombinant Inhibitor of DNA Binding Id2 Forms Multimeric Structures via the Helix-Loop-Helix Domain and the Nuclear Export Signal

The inhibitor of DNA binding and cell differentiation 2 (Id2) is a helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein that acts as negative dominant regulator of basic-HLH transcription factors during development and in cancer. The structural properties of Id2 have been investigated so far by using synthetic or recombinant fragments reproducing single domains (N-terminus, HLH, C-terminus): the HLH domain tends to dimerize into a four-helix bundle, whereas the flanking regions are flexible. In this work, the intact protein was expressed in E. coli, solubilized from inclusion bodies with urea, purified and dissolved in water at pH~4. Under these conditions, Id2 was obtained with both cysteine residues disulfide-bonded to β-mercaptoethanol that was present during the solubilization process. Moreover, it existed in a self-assembled state, in which the N-terminus remained highly flexible, while the HLH domain and, surprisingly, part of the C-terminus, which corresponds to the nuclear export signal (NES), both were involved in slowly tumbling, rigid structures. The protein oligomers also formed twisted fibrils that were several micrometers long and up to 80 nm thick. These results show that self-assembly decreases the backbone flexibility of those two protein regions (HLH and NES) that are important for interaction with basic-HLH transcription factors or for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling.

Reduction of cancer cell viability by synergistic combination of photodynamic treatment with the inhibition of the Id protein family

The inhibitor of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are dominant negative regulators of the helix-loop-helix transcription factor family and play a key role during development as well as in vascular disorders and cancer. In fact, impairing the Id-protein activity in cancer cells reduces cell growth and even chemoresistance. Recently, we have shown that a synthetic Id-protein ligand (1Y) consisting of a cyclic nonapeptide can reduce the viability of the two breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D and of the bladder cancer cells T24 to about 50% at concentrations ≥100μM. Moreover, the cyclopeptide displays both proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects on MCF-7 cells. Herein, we show that the cyclopeptide does not induce cell death at the dose of 5μΜ, but it still inhibits MCF-7 and T24 cell proliferation, which correlates with an increased protein level of the cell-cycle regulator p27^Kip1. Furthermore, 1Y-pretreated MCF-7, T47D, and T24 cells are more susceptible than untreated cells to the phototoxic effects of the three photosensitizers meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin, porfimer sodium, and hypericin, which are applied in photodynamic therapy (PDT). The combination of the Id-protein ligand with each of the light-activated photosensitizers shows synergistic effects on the reduction of cell viability. In conclusion, an Id-protein ligand with moderate cancer cell killing activity at concentrations ≥100μM can be applied at a 20-fold lower and barely toxic dose to raise the sensitivity of cancer cells towards phototoxicity associated with photodynamic treatment. This suggests the potential benefit of targeting the Id proteins in combined drug approaches for cancer therapy.

ID3 regulates the MDC1-mediated DNA damage response in order to maintain genome stability

MDC1 plays a critical role in the DNA damage response (DDR) by interacting directly with several factors including γ-H2AX. However, the mechanism by which MDC1 is recruited to damaged sites remains elusive. Here, we show that MDC1 interacts with a helix–loop–helix (HLH)-containing protein called inhibitor of DNA-binding 3 (ID3). In response to double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the genome, ATM phosphorylates ID3 at serine 65 within the HLH motif, and this modification allows a direct interaction with MDC1. Moreover, depletion of ID3 results in impaired formation of ionizing radiation (IR)-induced MDC1 foci, suppression of γ-H2AX-bound MDC1, impaired DSB repair, cellular hypersensitivity to IR, and genomic instability. Disruption of the MDC1–ID3 interaction prevents accumulation of MDC1 at sites of DSBs and suppresses DSB repair. Thus, our study uncovers an ID3-dependent mechanism of recruitment of MDC1 to DNA damage sites and suggests that the ID3–MDC1 interaction is crucial for DDR.

MDC1 is a key component of the DNA damage response and interacts with several factors such as γ-H2AX. Here the authors show that MDC1 interacts with ID3, facilitating MDC1 recruitment to sites of damage and repair of breaks.

Eicosapentaenoic acid modulates the synergistic action of CREB1 and ID/E2A family members in the rat pup brain and mouse embryonic stem cells

The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular mechanism by which eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may exert neuroprotective effects through an "EPA-cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB)" signaling pathway. The current study reveals that EPA modulates the exquisite interplay of interaction of CREB1 with the inhibitor of DNA binding (ID) and E2A family members, thereby delivering mechanistic insights into specific neural differentiation program. In this scenario, our work provides evidence for the capability of CREB1 to sequester ID:E2A family members in brain tissues and neural differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) through formation of a [CREB1]2:ID2:E47 tetrameric complex.In essence, the molecular function of CREB1 is to dynamically regulate the location-specific assembly or disassembly of basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH):HLH protein complexes to mediate the activation of neural/glial target genes. Together, these findings support the one-to-many binding mechanism of CREB1 and indicate that EPA treatment potentiates the integration of CREB dependent signaling with HLH/bHLH transcriptional network, adding specificity to the CREB1-mediated gene regulation during neural/glial differentiation. Our current research on the EPA-CREB axis could reveal new molecular targets for treating neurogenerative disease.

Impact of the amino acid sequence on the conformation of side chain lactam-bridged octapeptides

Synthetic helical peptides are valuable scaffolds for the development of modulators of protein-protein interactions involving helical motifs. Backbone-to-side chain or side chain-to-side chain constraints have been and still are intensively exploited to stabilize short α-helices. Very often, these constraints have been combined with backbone modifications induced by Cα-tetrasubstituted, β-, or γ-amino acids, which facilitate the α-peptide or α/β/γ-peptide adopting an α-helical conformation. In this work, we investigated the helical character of octapeptides that were cyclized by a Lys-Asp-(i,i + 4)-lactam bridge. We started with two sequences extracted from the helix-loop-helix region of the Id proteins, which are inhibitors of cell differentiation during development and in cancer. Nineteen analogs containing the lactam bridge at different positions and displaying different amino acid core triads (i + 1,2,3) as well as outer residues were prepared by solid-phase methodology. Their conformation in water and water/2,2,2-trifluoroethanol mixtures was investigated by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The cyclopeptides could be grouped in helix-prone and non-helix-prone structures. Both the amino acid core triad (i + 1,2,3) and the pendant residues positively or negatively affected the formation of a helical structure. Computational studies based on the NMR-derived helical structure of a cyclopeptide containing Aib at position (i + 2) of the triad were generally in agreement with the secondary structure propensity of the cyclopeptides observed by CD spectroscopy. In conclusion, the Lys-Asp-(i,i + 4)-lactam bridge may succeed or fail in the stabilization of short helices, depending on the primary structure. Moreover, computational methods may be valuable tools to discriminate helix-prone from non-helix-prone peptide-based macrolactams. Copyright © 2017 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The Id-protein family in developmental and cancer-associated pathways

Inhibitors of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are members of the large family of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors, but they lack any DNA-binding motif. During development, the Id proteins play a key role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell differentiation by modulating different cell-cycle regulators both by direct and indirect mechanisms. Several Id-protein interacting partners have been identified thus far, which belong to structurally and functionally unrelated families, including, among others, the class I and II bHLH transcription factors, the retinoblastoma protein and related pocket proteins, the paired-box transcription factors, and the S5a subunit of the 26 S proteasome. Although the HLH domain of the Id proteins is involved in most of their protein-protein interaction events, additional motifs located in their N-terminal and C-terminal regions are required for the recognition of diverse protein partners. The ability of the Id proteins to interact with structurally different proteins is likely to arise from their conformational flexibility: indeed, these proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions that, in the case of the HLH region, undergo folding upon self- or heteroassociation. Besides their crucial role for cell-fate determination and cell-cycle progression during development, other important cellular events have been related to the Id-protein expression in a number of pathologies. Dysregulated Id-protein expression has been associated with tumor growth, vascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, chemoresistance and stemness, as well as with various developmental defects and diseases. Herein we provide an overview on the structural properties, mode of action, biological function and therapeutic potential of these regulatory proteins.

The Id-protein family in developmental and cancer-associated pathways

Inhibitors of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are members of the large family of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors, but they lack any DNA-binding motif. During development, the Id proteins play a key role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell differentiation by modulating different cell-cycle regulators both by direct and indirect mechanisms. Several Id-protein interacting partners have been identified thus far, which belong to structurally and functionally unrelated families, including, among others, the class I and II bHLH transcription factors, the retinoblastoma protein and related pocket proteins, the paired-box transcription factors, and the S5a subunit of the 26 S proteasome. Although the HLH domain of the Id proteins is involved in most of their protein-protein interaction events, additional motifs located in their N-terminal and C-terminal regions are required for the recognition of diverse protein partners. The ability of the Id proteins to interact with structurally different proteins is likely to arise from their conformational flexibility: indeed, these proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions that, in the case of the HLH region, undergo folding upon self- or heteroassociation. Besides their crucial role for cell-fate determination and cell-cycle progression during development, other important cellular events have been related to the Id-protein expression in a number of pathologies. Dysregulated Id-protein expression has been associated with tumor growth, vascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, chemoresistance and stemness, as well as with various developmental defects and diseases. Herein we provide an overview on the structural properties, mode of action, biological function and therapeutic potential of these regulatory proteins.

Self-recognition behavior of a helix-loop-helix domain by a fragment scan

The inhibitors of DNA binding Id1-4 are helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins that exert their biological function by interacting with members of the basic-HLH (bHLH) transcription-factor family. The HLH domains of the Id and bHLH proteins allow both self- and hetero-association. Due to their abnormal expression in cancer cells, the Id proteins are potential protein targets for cancer treatment. Suitable Id-protein inactivators should promote self-association and/or prevent hetero-association. In this work we evaluated the ability of the Id-protein HLH domain to recognize itself in form of short sequences extracted from the helical and loop regions. We performed a peptide scan of the Id1 HLH domain 64-106 based on three-residue overlapping octapeptides. Interaction of each octapeptide with the natively folded Id1 HLH domain was investigated by CD and fluorescence spectroscopy. The results from both techniques showed that the helix-based but not the loop-based octapeptides interacted with the Id1 HLH domain in the low-micromolar range. In contrast, a nitrotyrosine-containing analog of the Id1 HLH region, which was unable to reproduce the native-like conformation, quenched only the 2-amino-benzoyl-(Abz)-labeled loop-based octapeptides. This opposite self-recognition pattern suggests that the short helix-based and loop-based sequences should be able to distinguish different folding states of the Id1 HLH domain. This feature may be biologically relevant, as the Id proteins are predicted to behave as intrinsically disordered proteins, being in equilibrium between rapidly exchanging monomeric conformations and structurally better-defined homo-/heterodimers displaying the parallel four-helix bundle.