1
|
Zietz A, Kaufmann JE, Wiesner K, Fischer SK, Wiegert M, Verhagen-Kamerbeek WD, Rottenberger Y, Schwarz A, Peters N, Gensicke H, Medlin F, Möller JC, Bujan B, Bonati LH, Arnold M, Schaedelin S, Müri RM, Hemkens LG, Michel P, Lyrer PA, Held JP, Ford GA, Luft AR, Traenka C, Engelter ST. Enhancement of STroke REhabilitation with Levodopa (ESTREL): Rationale and design of a randomized placebo-controlled, double blind superiority trial. Eur Stroke J 2024:23969873241255867. [PMID: 38853524 DOI: 10.1177/23969873241255867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Novel therapeutic approaches are needed in stroke recovery. Whether pharmacological therapies are beneficial for enhancing stroke recovery is unclear. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter involved in motor learning, reward, and brain plasticity. Its prodrug levodopa is a promising agent for stroke recovery. AIM AND HYPOTHESIS To investigate the hypothesis that levodopa, in addition to standardized rehabilitation therapy based on active task training, results in an enhancement of functional recovery in acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients compared to placebo. DESIGN ESTREL (Enhancement of Stroke REhabilitation with Levodopa) is a randomized (ratio 1:1), multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial. PARTICIPANTS 610 participants (according to sample size calculation) with a clinically meaningful hemiparesis will be enrolled ⩽7 days after stroke onset. Key eligibility criteria include (i) in-hospital-rehabilitation required, (ii) capability to participate in rehabilitation, (iii) previous independence in daily living. INTERVENTION Levodopa 100 mg/carbidopa 25 mg three times daily, administered for 5 weeks in addition to standardized rehabilitation. The study intervention will be initiated within 7 days after stroke onset. COMPARISON Matching placebo plus standardized rehabilitation. OUTCOMES The primary outcome is the between-group difference of the Fugl-Meyer-Motor Assessment (FMMA) total score measured 3 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported health and wellbeing (PROMIS 10 and 29), patient-reported assessment of improvement, Rivermead Mobility Index, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and as measures of harm: mortality, recurrent stroke, and serious adverse events. CONCLUSION The ESTREL trial will provide evidence of whether the use of Levodopa in addition to standardized rehabilitation in stroke patients leads to better functional recovery compared to rehabilitation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaelle Zietz
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Josefin E Kaufmann
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karin Wiesner
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandro Kevin Fischer
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martina Wiegert
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wilma Dj Verhagen-Kamerbeek
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yannik Rottenberger
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anne Schwarz
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nils Peters
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Stroke Center, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Gensicke
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Bartosz Bujan
- Neurorehabilitation, Klinik Lengg Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leo H Bonati
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Department, Rheinfelden Rehabilitation Clinic, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Arnold
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Schaedelin
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - René M Müri
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Pragmatic Evidence Lab, Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRIC-B), Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrik Michel
- Stroke Center, Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe A Lyrer
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jeremia P Held
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Rehabilitation Triemli Zurich, Valens Clinics, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gary A Ford
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andreas R Luft
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Cereneo, Center for Neurology and Rehabilitation, Vitznau, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Traenka
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan T Engelter
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020; 120:123-158. [PMID: 33202256 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Dopamine (DA) plays a key role in reward processing and is implicated in psychological disorders such as depression, substance use, and schizophrenia. The role of DA in reward processing is an area of highly active research. One approach to this question is drug challenge studies with drugs known to alter DA function. These studies provide good experimental control and can be performed in parallel in laboratory animals and humans. This review aimed to summarize results of studies using pharmacological manipulations of DA in healthy adults. 'Reward' is a complex process, so we separated 'phases' of reward, including anticipation, evaluation of cost and benefits of upcoming reward, execution of actions to obtain reward, pleasure in response to receiving a reward, and reward learning. Results indicated that i) DAergic drugs have different effects on different phases of reward; ii) the relationship between DA and reward functioning appears unlikely to be linear; iii) our ability to detect the effects of DAergic drugs varies depending on whether subjective, behavioral, imaging measures are used.
Collapse
|
3
|
Welling DB, Jackler RK. Reflections on the Last 25 Years of the American Otological Society and Thoughts on its Future. Otol Neurotol 2019. [PMID: 29533378 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review contributions of the American Otological Society (AOS) over the most recent quarter century (1993-2018) and to comment on possible future evolution of the field during the quarter century to come. METHODS Retrospective review of selected topics from the AOS transactions, distinguished lectureships over the past 25 years, and selective reflection by the authors. Speculation on potential advances of the next quarter century derived from emerging topics in the current literature and foreseeable trends in science and technology are also proffered for consideration (and possible future ridicule). RESULTS Integration of multiple disciplines including bioengineering, medical imaging, genetics, molecular biology, physics, and evidence based medicine have substantially benefitted the practice of otology over the past quarter century. The impact of the contributions of members of the AOS in these developments cannot be over estimated. CONCLUSIONS Further scientific advancement will certainly accelerate change in the practice of otologic surgery and medicine over the coming decade in ways that will be marvelous to behold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bradley Welling
- Harvard Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert K Jackler
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferdinand NK, Czernochowski D. Motivational Influences on Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Control Across the Adult Lifespan. Front Psychol 2018; 9:1018. [PMID: 29997541 PMCID: PMC6028708 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive control refers to the ability to regulate cognitive processing according to the tasks at hand, especially when these are demanding. It includes maintaining and updating relevant information in working memory, inhibiting irrelevant information, and flexibly switching between tasks. Performance monitoring denotes the processing of feedback from the environment and the detection of errors or other unexpected events and signals when cognitive control needs to be exerted. These two aspects of behavioral adaptation critically rely on the integrity of the frontal lobes, which are known to show pronounced age-related performance decrements. By contrast, there is evidence that processing of rewards remains relatively intact across the adult lifespan. Hence, motivation may play an important role in modulating or even counteracting age-related changes in cognitive control functions. To answer this question, neuroscientific data can be particularly useful to uncover potential underlying mechanisms beyond behavioral outcome. The aims of this article are twofold: First, to review and systematize the extant literature on how motivational incentives can modulate performance monitoring and cognitive control in young and older adults. Second, to demonstrate that important pieces of empirical data are currently missing for the evaluation of this central question, specifically in old age. Hence, we would like to stimulate further research uncovering potential mechanisms underlying motivation-cognition interactions in young and in particular in older adults and investigating whether or not those can help to ameliorate age-related impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Czernochowski
- Center for Cognitive Science, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weis T, Krick CM, Reith W, Lachmann T. Is it still speech? Different processing strategies in learning to discriminate stimuli in the transition from speech to non-speech including feedback evaluation. Brain Cogn 2018; 125:1-13. [PMID: 29800729 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Processing of speech was investigated by using stimuli gradually changing from speech (vowels) to non-speech (spectral rotated vowels). Stimuli were presented in descending levels of vocalization blends, from pure speech to non-speech, through step-wise combinations, resulting in ambiguous versions of the sounds. Participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task: categorization of sounds were made according to whether they contained more speech or non-speech. Performance feedback was presented visually on each trial. Reaction times (RT) after sound presentation, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data during auditory and visual processing, were analyzed. RT data suggested individual differences with a distinct group, good performers, functioning better in distinguishing stimuli with a higher degree of ambiguous blends compared to poor performers, who were not able to distinguish these stimuli correctly. fMRI data confirmed this finding. During auditory stimulation, good performers showed neural activation in the ventral auditory pathway, including the primary auditory cortex and the anterior superior temporal sulcus (responsible for speech processing). Poor performers, in contrast, showed neural activation in the dorsal auditory pathway, including the bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Group differences were also found for visual feedback processing. Differences observed between the groups were interpreted as reflecting different neural processing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Weis
- Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Christoph M Krick
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Reith
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Lachmann
- Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany; University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The “highs and lows” of the human brain on dopaminergics: Evidence from neuropharmacology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
7
|
Black KJ, Piccirillo ML, Koller JM, Hseih T, Wang L, Mintun MA. Levodopa effects on [ (11)C]raclopride binding in the resting human brain. F1000Res 2015; 4:23. [PMID: 26180632 PMCID: PMC4490799 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.5672.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Synaptic dopamine (DA) release induced by amphetamine or other experimental manipulations can displace [
11C]raclopride (RAC*) from dopamine D2-like receptors. We hypothesized that exogenous levodopa might increase dopamine release at striatal synapses under some conditions but not others, allowing a more naturalistic assessment of presynaptic dopaminergic function. Presynaptic dopaminergic abnormalities have been reported in Tourette syndrome (TS). Objective: Test whether levodopa induces measurable synaptic DA release in healthy people at rest, and gather pilot data in TS. Methods: This double-blind crossover study used RAC* and positron emission tomography (PET) to measure synaptic dopamine release 4 times in each of 10 carbidopa-pretreated, neuroleptic-naïve adults: before and during an infusion of levodopa on one day and placebo on another (in random order). Five subjects had TS and 5 were matched controls. RAC* binding potential (BP
ND) was quantified in predefined anatomical volumes of interest (VOIs). A separate analysis compared BP
ND voxel by voxel over the entire brain. Results: DA release declined between the first and second scan of each day (p=0.012), including on the placebo day. Levodopa did not significantly reduce striatal RAC* binding and striatal binding did not differ significantly between TS and control groups. However, levodopa’s effect on DA release differed significantly in a right midbrain region (p=0.002, corrected), where levodopa displaced RAC* by 59% in control subjects but
increased BP
ND by 74% in TS subjects. Discussion: Decreased DA release on the second scan of the day is consistent with the few previous studies with a similar design, and may indicate habituation to study procedures. We hypothesize that mesostriatal DA neurons fire relatively little while subjects rest, possibly explaining the non-significant effect of levodopa on striatal RAC* binding. The modest sample size argues for caution in interpreting the group difference in midbrain DA release with levodopa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Black
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Radiology, and Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Marilyn L Piccirillo
- School of Arts and Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA ; Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan M Koller
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Tiffany Hseih
- School of Arts and Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lei Wang
- Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, and Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mark A Mintun
- Departments of Radiology, Psychiatry, Bioengineering, and Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA ; Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dopamine-Induced Dissociation of BOLD and Neural Activity in Macaque Visual Cortex. Curr Biol 2014; 24:2805-11. [PMID: 25456449 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
9
|
Huang Y, Mylius J, Scheich H, Brosch M. Tonic effects of the dopaminergic ventral midbrain on the auditory cortex of awake macaque monkeys. Brain Struct Funct 2014; 221:969-77. [PMID: 25433449 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0950-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 11/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
This study shows that ongoing electrical stimulation of the dopaminergic ventral midbrain can modify neuronal activity in the auditory cortex of awake primates for several seconds. This was reflected in a decrease of the spontaneous firing and in a bidirectional modification of the power of auditory evoked potentials. We consider that both effects are due to an increase in the dopamine tone in auditory cortex induced by the electrical stimulation. Thus, the dopaminergic ventral midbrain may contribute to the tonic activity in auditory cortex that has been proposed to be involved in associating events of auditory tasks (Brosch et al. Hear Res 271:66-73, 2011) and may modulate the signal-to-noise ratio of the responses to auditory stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Huang
- Special Laboratory Primate Neurobiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Judith Mylius
- Special Laboratory Primate Neurobiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Henning Scheich
- Emeritus Group Lifelong Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.,Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael Brosch
- Special Laboratory Primate Neurobiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.,Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
This psychophysics study investigated whether prior auditory conditioning influences how a sound interacts with visual perception. In the conditioning phase, subjects were presented with three pure tones ( = conditioned stimuli, CS) that were paired with positive, negative or neutral unconditioned stimuli. As unconditioned reinforcers we employed pictures (highly pleasant, unpleasant and neutral) or monetary outcomes (+50 euro cents, −50 cents, 0 cents). In the subsequent visual selective attention paradigm, subjects were presented with near-threshold Gabors displayed in their left or right hemifield. Critically, the Gabors were presented in synchrony with one of the conditioned sounds. Subjects discriminated whether the Gabors were presented in their left or right hemifields. Participants determined the location more accurately when the Gabors were presented in synchrony with positive relative to neutral sounds irrespective of reinforcer type. Thus, previously rewarded relative to neutral sounds increased the bottom-up salience of the visual Gabors. Our results are the first demonstration that prior auditory conditioning is a potent mechanism to modulate the effect of sounds on visual perception.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fast transmission from the dopaminergic ventral midbrain to the sensory cortex of awake primates. Brain Struct Funct 2014; 220:3273-94. [PMID: 25084746 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0855-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Motivated by the increasing evidence that auditory cortex is under control of dopaminergic cell structures of the ventral midbrain, we studied how the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra affect neuronal activity in auditory cortex. We electrically stimulated 567 deep brain sites in total within and in the vicinity of the two dopaminergic ventral midbrain structures and at the same time, recorded local field potentials and neuronal discharges in cortex. In experiments conducted on three awake macaque monkeys, we found that electrical stimulation of the dopaminergic ventral midbrain resulted in short-latency (~35 ms) phasic activations in all cortical layers of auditory cortex. We were also able to demonstrate similar activations in secondary somatosensory cortex and superior temporal polysensory cortex. The electrically evoked responses in these parts of sensory cortex were similar to those previously described for prefrontal cortex. Moreover, these phasic responses could be reversibly altered by the dopamine D1-receptor antagonist SCH23390 for several tens of minutes. Thus, we speculate that the dopaminergic ventral midbrain exerts a temporally precise, phasic influence on sensory cortex using fast-acting non-dopaminergic transmitters and that their effects are modulated by dopamine on a longer timescale. Our findings suggest that some of the information carried by the neuronal discharges in the dopaminergic ventral midbrain, such as the motivational value or the motivational salience, is transmitted to auditory cortex and other parts of sensory cortex. The mesocortical pathway may thus contribute to the representation of non-auditory events in the auditory cortex and to its associative functions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lou Y, Luo W, Zhang G, Tao C, Chen P, Zhou Y, Xiong Y. Ventral tegmental area activation promotes firing precision and strength through circuit inhibition in the primary auditory cortex. Front Neural Circuits 2014; 8:25. [PMID: 24688459 PMCID: PMC3960576 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The activation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) can rebuild the tonotopic representation in the primary auditory cortex (A1), but the cellular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the firing patterns and membrane potential dynamics of neurons in A1 under the influence of VTA activation using in vivo intracellular recording. We found that VTA activation can significantly reduce the variability of sound evoked responses and promote the firing precision and strength of A1 neurons. Furthermore, the compressed response window was caused by an early hyperpolarization as a result of enhanced circuit inhibition. Our study suggested a possible mechanism of how the reward system affects information processing in sensory cortex: VTA activation strengthens cortical inhibition, which shortens the response window of post-synaptic cortical neurons and further promotes the precision and strength of neuronal activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Lou
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Wenzhi Luo
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
- Battalion Cadet Brigade 7, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Guangwei Zhang
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Can Tao
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Penghui Chen
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Ying Xiong
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical UniversityChongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weis T, Brechmann A, Puschmann S, Thiel CM. Feedback that confirms reward expectation triggers auditory cortex activity. J Neurophysiol 2013; 110:1860-8. [PMID: 23904492 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00128.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Associative learning studies have shown that the anticipation of reward and punishment shapes the representation of sensory stimuli, which is further modulated by dopamine. Less is known about whether and how reward delivery activates sensory cortices and the role of dopamine at that time point of learning. We used an appetitive instrumental learning task in which participants had to learn that a specific class of frequency-modulated tones predicted a monetary reward following fast and correct responses in a succeeding reaction time task. These fMRI data were previously analyzed regarding the effect of reward anticipation, but here we focused on neural activity to the reward outcome relative to the reward expectation and tested whether such activation in the reward reception phase is modulated by L-DOPA. We analyzed neural responses at the time point of reward outcome under three different conditions: 1) when a reward was expected and received, 2) when a reward was expected but not received, and 3) when a reward was not expected and not received. Neural activity in auditory cortex was enhanced during feedback delivery either when an expected reward was received or when the expectation of obtaining no reward was correct. This differential neural activity in auditory cortex was only seen in subjects who learned the reward association and not under dopaminergic modulation. Our data provide evidence that auditory cortices are active at the time point of reward outcome. However, responses are not dependent on the reward itself but on whether the outcome confirmed the subject's expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Weis
- Biological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|