Improvement of internal tumor volumes of non-small cell lung cancer patients for radiation treatment planning using interpolated average CT in PET/CT

Comparison of Hypermetabolic and Hypoxic Volumes Delineated on [18F]FDG and [18F]Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

The high rates of failure in the radiotherapy target volume suggest that patients with stage II or III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should receive an increased total dose of radiotherapy. 2-Deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) and [¹⁸F]fluoromisonidazole ([¹⁸F]FMISO) (hypoxia) uptake on pre-radiotherapy positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) have been independently reported to identify intratumor subvolumes at higher risk of relapse after radiotherapy. We have compared the [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO volumes defined by PET/CT in NSCLC patients included in a prospective study.

PROCEDURES

Thirty-four patients with non-resectable lung cancer underwent [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO PET/CT before (pre-RT) and during radiotherapy (around 42 Gy, per-RT). The criteria were to delineate 40 % and 90 % SUVmax thresholds on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (metabolic volumes), and SUV > 1.4 on pre-RT [¹⁸F]FMISO PET/CT (hypoxic volume). The functional volumes were delineated within the tumor volume as defined on co-registered CTs.

RESULTS

The mean pre-RT and per-RT [¹⁸F]FDG volumes were not statistically different (30.4 cc vs 22.2; P = 0.12). The mean pre-RT SUVmax [¹⁸F]FDG was higher than per-RT SUVmax (12.7 vs 6.5; P < 0.0001). The mean [¹⁸F]FMISO SUVmax and volumes were 2.7 and 1.37 cc, respectively. Volume-based analysis showed good overlap between [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO for all methods of segmentation but a poor correlation for Jaccard or Dice Indices (DI). The DI maximum was 0.45 for a threshold at 40 or 50 %.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FMISO uptake is low in NSCLC, making it possible to envisage different management strategies as the studies in progress show.

FDG and FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer

Background

Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the reference treatment for non-resectable locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Increasing radiotherapy total dose in the whole tumour volume has been shown to be deleterious. Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) offers the potential to identify smaller and biologically meaningful target volumes that could be irradiated with larger doses without compromising Organs At Risk (OAR) tolerance. This study investigated four scenarios, based on ¹⁸FDG and ¹⁸F-miso PET/CT, to delineate the target volumes and derive radiotherapy plans delivering up to 74Gy.

Method

Twenty-one NSCLC patients, selected from a prospective phase II trial, had ¹⁸FDG- and ¹⁸F-miso PET/CT before the start of radiotherapy and ¹⁸FDG PET/CT during the radiotherapy (42Gy). The plans were based planned on a standard plan delivering 66 Gy (plan 1) and on three different boost strategies to deliver 74Gy total dose in pre-treatment ¹⁸FDG hotspot (70% of SUV_max) (plan 2), pre-treatment ¹⁸F-miso target (SUV_max > 1.4) (plan 3) and per-treatment ¹⁸FDG residual (40% of SUV_max). (plan 4).

Results

The mean target volumes were 4.8 cc (± 1.1) for ¹⁸FDG hotspot, 38.9 cc (± 14.5) for ¹⁸F-miso and 36.0 cc (± 10.1) for per-treatment ¹⁸FDG. In standard plan (66 Gy), the mean dose covering 95% of the PTV (D95%) were 66.5 (± 0.33), 66.1 (± 0.32) and 66.1 (± 0.32) Gy for ¹⁸FDG hotspot, ¹⁸F-miso and per-treatment ¹⁸FDG. In scenario 2, the mean D95% was 72.5 (± 0.25) Gy in ¹⁸FDG hotspot versus 67.9 (± 0.49) and 67.9 Gy (± 0.52) in ¹⁸F-miso and per-treatment ¹⁸FDG, respectively. In scenario 3, the mean D95% was 72.2 (± 0.27) Gy to ¹⁸F-miso versus 70.4 (± 0.74) and 69.5Gy (± 0.74) for ¹⁸FDG hotspot and per-treatment ¹⁸FDG, respectively. In scenario 4, the mean D95% was 73.1 (± 0.3) Gy to ¹⁸FDG per-treatment versus 71.9 (± 0.61) and 69.8 (± 0.61) Gy for ¹⁸FDG hotspot and ¹⁸F-miso, respectively. The dose/volume constraints to OARs were matched in all scenarios.

Conclusion

Escalated doses can be selectively planned in NSCLC target volumes delineated on ¹⁸FDG and ¹⁸F-miso PET/CT functional images. The most relevant strategy should be investigated in clinical trials.

Trial registration

(RTEP5, NCT01576796, registered 15 june 2012)

Volumes Learned: It Takes More Than Size to "Size Up" Pulmonary Lesions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review the current understanding and capabilities regarding use of imaging for noninvasive lesion characterization and its relationship to lung cancer screening and treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our review of the state of the art was broken down into questions about the different lung cancer image phenotypes being characterized, the role of imaging and requirements for increasing its value with respect to increasing diagnostic confidence and quantitative assessment, and a review of the current capabilities with respect to those needs.

RESULTS

The preponderance of the literature has so far been focused on the measurement of lesion size, with increasing contributions being made to determine the formal performance of scanners, measurement tools, and human operators in terms of bias and variability. Concurrently, an increasing number of investigators are reporting utility and predictive value of measures other than size, and sensitivity and specificity is being reported. Relatively little has been documented on quantitative measurement of non-size features with corresponding estimation of measurement performance and reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight of the evidence suggests characterization of pulmonary lesions built on quantitative measures adds value to the screening for, and treatment of, lung cancer. Advanced image analysis techniques may identify patterns or biomarkers not readily assessed by eye and may also facilitate management of multidimensional imaging data in such a way as to efficiently integrate it into the clinical workflow.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients previously treated with conventional radiotherapy: a review

Lung cancer continues to be one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and is the leading cause of death in both men and women. Presently, local control rates are quite poor. Improvements in imaging and radiation treatment delivery systems however have provided radiation oncologists with new tools to better target these tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is one such technique that has shown efficacy as upfront treatment for lung cancer. In addition, more recent studies have demonstrated some effectiveness in recurrent tumors in prior irradiated fields as well. This review summarizes seven recent studies of re-irradiation with SBRT in patients with thoracic recurrences treated previously with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Combined, 140 patients were included. The median initial thoracic radiation doses ranged from 50-87.5 Gy and median re-irradiation dose ranged from 40-80 Gy. Local control rates varied from 65-92%. Re-irradiation was well tolerated with few grade 4 and 5 complications (observed in one study). Currently, based on these published reports, re-irradiation with SBRT appears feasible for in-field thoracic recurrences, though caution must be taken in all cases of retreatment.

Respiratory motion reduction in PET/CT using abdominal compression for lung cancer patients

Purpose

Respiratory motion causes substantial artifacts in reconstructed PET images when using helical CT as the attenuation map in PET/CT imaging. In this study, we aimed to reduce the respiratory artifacts in PET/CT images of patients with lung tumors using an abdominal compression device.

Methods

Twelve patients with lung cancer located in the middle or lower lobe of the lung were recruited. The patients were injected with 370 MBq of ¹⁸F-FDG. During PET, the patients assumed two bed positions for 1.5 min/bed. After conducting free-breathing imaging, we obtained images of the patients with abdominal compression by applying the same setup used in the free-breathing scan. The differences in the standardized uptake value (SUV)_max, SUV_mean, tumor volume, and the centroid of the tumors between PET and various CT schemes were measured.

Results

The SUV_max and SUV_mean derived from PET/CT imaging using an abdominal compression device increased for all the lesions, compared with those obtained using the conventional approach. The percentage increases were 18.1% ±14% and 17% ±16.8% for SUV_max and SUV_mean, respectively. PET/CT imaging combined with abdominal compression generally reduced the tumor mismatch between CT and the corresponding attenuation corrected PET images, with an average decrease of 1.9±1.7 mm over all the cases.

Conclusions

PET/CT imaging combined with abdominal compression reduces respiratory artifacts and PET/CT misregistration, and enhances quantitative SUV in tumor. Abdominal compression is easy to set up and is an effective method used in PET/CT imaging for clinical oncology, especially in the thoracic region.

Normalization of ventilation data from 4D-CT to facilitate comparison between datasets acquired at different times

Purpose

The 4D-CT data used for comparing a patient’s ventilation distributions before and after lung radiotherapy are acquired at different times. As a result, an additional variable – the tidal volume (TV) – can alter the results. Therefore, in this paper we propose to normalize the ventilation to the same TV to eliminate that uncertainty.

Methods

Absolute ventilation (AV) data were generated for 6 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases before and after treatment, using the direct geometric algorithm and diffeomorphic morphons deformable image registration (DIR). Each pair of AV distributions was converted to TV-normalized, percentile ventilation (PV) and low-dose well-ventilated-normalized ventilation (LDWV) distributions. The ventilation change was calculated in various dose regions based on the treatment plans using the DIR-registered before and after treatment data sets. The ventilation change based on TV-normalized ventilation was compared with the AV as well as the data normalized by PV and LDWV.

Results

AV change may be misleading when the TV differs before and after treatment, which was found to be up to 6.7%. All three normalization methods produced a similar trend in ventilation change: the higher the dose to a region of lung, the greater the degradation in ventilation. In low dose regions (<5 Gy), ventilation appears relatively improved after treatment due to the relative nature of the normalized ventilation. However, the LDWV may not be reliable when the ventilation in the low-dose regions varies. PV exhibited a similar ventilation change trend compared to the TV-normalized in all cases. However, by definition, the ventilation distribution in the PV is significantly different from the original distribution.

Conclusion

Normalizing ventilation distributions by the TV is a simple and reliable method for evaluation of ventilation changes.