Autoantibodies and Sjogren's Syndrome in multiple sclerosis, a reappraisal

Relevance of antinuclear antibody in diagnosis and characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis rely upon clinical and paraclinical data that are supportive of MS in the absence of a better explanation. Patients referred for consideration of a MS diagnosis often undergo an extensive serologic workup including antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing, even when an individual already meets diagnostic criteria for MS. It is unclear whether ANA serostatus is associated with clinical outcomes in MS. The present study aims to determine if ANA seropositivity in those referred with concern for MS differs in those who meet 2017 revised McDonald criteria compared to those who did not receive a diagnosis of MS. Associations between ANA seropositivity and clinical or radiological phenotype of MS patients are also explored.

METHODS

The cohort included people at least 18 years old, referred to our tertiary care MS center with concern for MS (regardless of prior diagnosis) who had an ANA test with known titer completed within one year of first evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) charts were manually reviewed, and MRIs underwent blinded review by a radiologist with training in neuroradiology. Diagnosis of MS was determined by a neuroimmunologist and was based on 2017 revised McDonald Criteria. Results are reported as odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex at birth, race, smoking history, personal history of comorbid autoimmune conditions, and family history of autoimmunity. Within the MS cohort, similar analytical models were performed to assess association between ANA and clinical and radiological characteristics.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 258 patients was analyzed (out of 542 referrals): 106 nonMS and 152 with MS. There was no association between MS (vs. nonMS) diagnosis and ANA status (ANA positive n = 74) in the multivariable models (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.82, 2.72, p = 0.20). Among those with MS, there was no association of ANA seropositivity with the odds of atypical brain MRI features, number of cardinal MRI areas involved, location of MRI lesions, or of having an atypical presentation of first demyelinating event. Black race (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.27, 6.26, p = 0.01) and family history of autoimmunity (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.09, 3.98, p = 0.03) were independently associated with increased odds of ANA positivity. Within the MS cohort analysis, progressive MS (PMS; vs relapsing-remitting MS), a covariate in the model, appeared to be at higher odds of being ANA positive (OR 3.6, 95 % CI 1.03, 13.05, p = 0.046) but only when assessing mean area of cardinal MS locations.

CONCLUSIONS

While ANA testing does not appear to be useful in distinguishing MS from non-MS, it remains less clear as to whether it may be associated with differences in the clinical course of MS (relapsing-remitting vs progressive). Future studies should aim to systematically evaluate whether those who are ANA positive are more likely, in well-designed and representative prospective cohorts, to be diagnosed with or develop progressive MS. Whether a positive ANA early in MS is associated with increased risk over time of developing or diagnosing another systemic autoimmune disease would also be of interest.

Laboratory evaluation for the differential diagnosis of possible multiple sclerosis in the United States: A physician survey

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence and lack of guidelines for diagnostic laboratory evaluation of patients with possible multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To survey neurologists on their practice of laboratory testing in patients with possible MS.

METHODS

An online survey was developed to query the frequency of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies ordered in the routine evaluation of patients with possible MS, and in three hypothetical clinical cases. Non-MS specialist neurologists who evaluate patients for MS in their practice were invited to participate by MedSurvey (a medical market research company).

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 190 neurologists. A mean of 17.2 (SD: 17.0) tests in serum and CSF were reported "always" ordered in the evaluation of patients with possible MS. CSF oligoclonal bands was the most frequently selected ("always" among 73.7% of participants). Antinuclear antibody (43.2%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (34.2%), and thyroid stimulating hormone (31.6%) were also among the most frequently ordered.

DISCUSSION

Extensive laboratory evaluations are often completed in the evaluation of possible MS. However, many of these tests have poor specificity and false positive results could yield unnecessary increased costs, diagnostic delay, and potentially misdiagnosis. Further research is needed to identify optimal laboratory approaches for possible MS.

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: an updated consensus approach

Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis-many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.

Limited diagnostic utility of serologic testing for neurologic manifestations of systemic disease in the evaluation of suspected multiple sclerosis: A single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

The clinical evaluation of a new diagnosis of MS typically includes serologic testing to evaluate for its many mimics, yet there is little data to guide approaches to such testing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate for the frequency and clinical significance of serologic testing for MS diagnostic evaluations.

METHODS

In a single MS subspeciality center retrospective study, new patient evaluations for MS over the course of a year were identified, and the results of serologic testing and diagnostic evaluation extracted. Retrospective longitudinal diagnostic assessment was performed to confirm the accuracy of initial serological testing assessments.

RESULTS

150 patients had 823 serologic tests. 40 (5%) tests were positive, and resulted in 117 additional serologic tests, 10 radiographs, and 2 biopsies. 77 (51%) patients were diagnosed with a non-demyelinating disorder. Serologic testing results did not change any diagnosis, yet in some patients, it resulted in unnecessary additional testing and diagnostic delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Serologic testing in the clinical assessment for routine MS resulted in unnecessary diagnostic delay, additional testing, and considerable healthcare cost.

[Neuroimmunology and rheumatology: overlap and differential diagnoses]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They may cause inflammation in the brain, spinal cord and optic nerve. Both conditions must be differentiated from CNS manifestations of other systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome, autoinflammtory diseases and sarcoidosis, since amongst others myelitis and optic nerve inflammation may also occur in these conditions. Nevertheless, coexistence of MS or NMOSD with rheumatic disorders such as SLE or Sjögren's syndrome has also been reported especially in NMOSD. Since the therapeutic approach is different it is important to determine a clear diagnosis. In addition some drugs used in rheumatic disease such as anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics may induce inflammatory disease of the CNS and should be avoided in MS. An interdisciplinary approach between neuroimmunology and rheumatology is important for optimal care and treatment in such patients.

Do elevated autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis matter?

OBJECTIVES

The incidence and clinical impact of serum autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are controversially discussed. The aim of the study was to reassess the value of elevated serum autoantibodies in our MS study cohort.

MATERIAL & METHODS

In total, 176 MS patients were retrospectively analyzed for coexistence and clinical impact of increased serum autoantibody levels.

RESULTS

The 18.8% of the MS cohort showed elevated serum autoantibody levels, but only 10.2% of all MS patients were diagnosed with a further autoimmune disease (AI). Patients with elevated serum autoantibodies (AABS) were not significantly more often diagnosed with a clinical manifest AI as compared to patients with negative autoantibodies (P = 0.338). MS patients with disease duration of more than 10 years showed no significant increase of positive autoantibodies as compared to patients with a more recent disease onset (P = 1). MS patients with elevated serum autoantibodies did not exhibit a significantly worse disease course (P = 0.428).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, elevated serum autoantibodies do not have the potential to serve as a prognostic tool for disease severity in patients with MS Since MS patients with positive serum AABS did not significantly more often suffer from clinical manifest AIs than MS patients with negative serum AABS, the role of routine testing of serum AABS in MS patients should be critically called into question.

[Neuroimmunology and rheumatology: overlap and differential diagnoses]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They may cause inflammation in the brain, spinal cord and optic nerve. Both conditions must be differentiated from CNS manifestations of other systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome, autoinflammtory diseases and sarcoidosis, since amongst others myelitis and optic nerve inflammation may also occur in these conditions. Nevertheless, coexistence of MS or NMOSD with rheumatic disorders such as SLE or Sjögren's syndrome has also been reported especially in NMOSD. Since the therapeutic approach is different it is important to determine a clear diagnosis. In addition some drugs used in rheumatic disease such as anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics may induce inflammatory disease of the CNS and should be avoided in MS. An interdisciplinary approach between neuroimmunology and rheumatology is important for optimal care and treatment in such patients.

Autoimmunity and autoinflammation: A systems view on signaling pathway dysregulation profiles

INTRODUCTION

Autoinflammatory and autoimmune disorders are characterized by aberrant changes in innate and adaptive immunity that may lead from an initial inflammatory state to an organ specific damage. These disorders possess heterogeneity in terms of affected organs and clinical phenotypes. However, despite the differences in etiology and phenotypic variations, they share genetic associations, treatment responses and clinical manifestations. The mechanisms involved in their initiation and development remain poorly understood, however the existence of some clear similarities between autoimmune and autoinflammatory disorders indicates variable degrees of interaction between immune-related mechanisms.

METHODS

Our study aims at contributing to a holistic, pathway-centered view on the inflammatory condition of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. We have evaluated similarities and specificities of pathway activity changes in twelve autoimmune and autoinflammatory disorders by performing meta-analysis of publicly available gene expression datasets generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, using a bioinformatics pipeline that integrates Self Organizing Maps and Pathway Signal Flow algorithms along with KEGG pathway topologies.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results reveal that clinically divergent disease groups share common pathway perturbation profiles. We identified pathways, similarly perturbed in all the studied diseases, such as PI3K-Akt, Toll-like receptor, and NF-kappa B signaling, that serve as integrators of signals guiding immune cell polarization, migration, growth, survival and differentiation. Further, two clusters of diseases were identified based on specifically dysregulated pathways: one gathering mostly autoimmune and the other mainly autoinflammatory diseases. Cluster separation was driven not only by apparent involvement of pathways implicated in adaptive immunity in one case, and inflammation in the other, but also by processes not explicitly related to immune response, but rather representing various events related to the formation of specific pathophysiological environment. Thus, our data suggest that while all of the studied diseases are affected by activation of common inflammatory processes, disease-specific variations in their relative balance are also identified.

Multiple Autoantibodies and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and autoantibodies.

METHODS

Blood samples of 108 NMOSD patients and 38 controls were collected from January 2012 to August 2014. Immunological parameters, including anti-aquaporin 4, antinuclear, anti-ribonucleoprotein, anti-SM, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La and anti-ribosomal P-protein autoantibodies were examined.

RESULTS

The NMOSD group exhibited a significantly higher percentage of anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies compared with the control group (76.9 vs. 0.0%, p = 0). The positive rates for antinuclear and anti-SSA antibodies in the NMOSD group were also higher than in the control group (35.2 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.001; 13.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.044). In total, 36.1% of the patients in the NMOSD group were seropositive for autoantibodies but only 8.3% were diagnosed with definite systemic autoimmune disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

NMOSD is closely associated with elevated autoantibodies, particularly antinuclear and anti-SSA/Ro antibodies. NMOSD rarely coexists with organ-specific autoimmune diseases.

Humoral Responses to Diverse Autoimmune Disease-Associated Antigens in Multiple Sclerosis

To compare frequencies of autoreactive antibody responses to endogenous disease-associated antigens in healthy controls (HC), relapsing and progressive MS and to assess their associations with clinical and MRI measures of MS disease progression.

Should we systematically test patients with clinically isolated syndrome for auto-antibodies?

Background:

Several autoimmune diseases (ADs) can mimic multiple sclerosis (MS). For this reason, testing for auto-antibodies (auto-Abs) is often included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Objective:

The purpose was to study how useful it was to systematically determine antinuclear-antibodies, anti-SSA and anti-SSB in a non-selected cohort of CIS patients, regarding the identification of other ADs that could represent an alternative diagnosis.

Methods:

From a prospective CIS cohort, we selected 772 patients in which auto-Ab levels were tested within the first year from CIS. Baseline characteristics of auto-Ab positive and negative patients were compared. A retrospective revision of clinical records was then performed in the auto-Ab positive patients to identify those who developed ADs during follow-up.

Results:

One or more auto-Ab were present in 29.4% of patients. Only 1.8% of patients developed other ADs during a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. In none of these cases the concurrent AD was considered the cause of the CIS. In all cases the diagnosis of the AD resulted from the development of signs and/or symptoms suggestive of each disease.

Conclusion:

Antinuclear-antibodies, anti-SSA and anti-SSB should not be routinely determined in CIS patients but only in those presenting symptoms suggestive of other ADs.

A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: overview

Background:

Comorbidity is an area of increasing interest in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective:

The objective of this review is to estimate the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in people with MS and assess the quality of included studies.

Methods:

We searched the PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Knowledge databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved articles. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts. One reviewer abstracted data using a standardized form and the abstraction was verified by a second reviewer. We assessed study quality using a standardized approach. We quantitatively assessed population-based studies using the I² statistic, and conducted random-effects meta-analyses.

Results:

We included 249 articles. Study designs were variable with respect to source populations, case definitions, methods of ascertainment and approaches to reporting findings. Prevalence was reported more frequently than incidence; estimates for prevalence and incidence varied substantially for all conditions. Heterogeneity was high.

Conclusion:

This review highlights substantial gaps in the epidemiological knowledge of comorbidity in MS worldwide. Little is known about comorbidity in Central or South America, Asia or Africa. Findings in North America and Europe are inconsistent. Future studies should report age-, sex- and ethnicity-specific estimates of incidence and prevalence, and standardize findings to a common population.

A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune disease in multiple sclerosis

Background:

As new therapies emerge which increase the risk of autoimmune disease it is increasingly important to understand the incidence of autoimmune disease in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective:

The purpose of this review is to estimate the incidence and prevalence of comorbid autoimmune disease in MS.

Methods:

The PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Knowledge databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved articles were searched, and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers. The data were abstracted by one reviewer using a standardized data collection form, and the findings were verified by a second reviewer. We assessed quality of the included studies using a standardized approach and conducted meta-analyses of population-based studies.

Results:

Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. We observed substantial heterogeneity with respect to the populations studied, methods of ascertaining comorbidity, and reporting of findings. Based solely on population-based studies, the most prevalent autoimmune comorbidities were psoriasis (7.74%) and thyroid disease (6.44%). Our findings also suggest an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease, likely uveitis and possibly pemphigoid.

Conclusion:

Fewer than half of the studies identified were of high quality. Population-based studies that report age, sex and ethnicity-specific estimates of incidence and prevalence are needed in jurisdictions worldwide.

Frequency of autoantibodies and connective tissue diseases in Chinese patients with optic neuritis

Background

Optic neuritis (ON) is often associated with other clinical or serological markers of connective tissue diseases (CTDs). To date, the effects of autoantibodies on ON are not clear.

Purpose

To assess the prevalence, clinical patterns, and short outcomes of autoantibodies and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) involvement in Chinese ON patients and evaluate the relationship between ON, including their subtypes, and autoantibodies.

Methods

A total of 190 ON patients were divided into recurrent ON (RON), bilateral ON (BON), and isolated monocular ON (ION). Demographic, clinical, and serum autoantibodies data were compared between them with and without SS involvement. Serum was drawn for antinuclear antibody (ANA), extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (SSA/SSB), rheumatoid factor (RF), anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (A-ds DNA), anticardiolipin antibody (ACLs), anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI) and Aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was used to evaluate the atrophy of the optic nerve.

Results

68 patients (35.79%) had abnormal autoantibodies, 26(13.68%) patients met diagnostic criteria for CTDs, including 15(7.89%) patients meeting the criteria for SS. Antibodies including SSA/SSB 23 (30.26%) (p1 and p 2<0.001) and AQP4–Ab10 (13.16%) (p1 = 0.044, p2 = 0.01) were significantly different in patients in the RON group when compared with those in the BON (P1 = RON VS ION) and ION (p2 = RON VS ION) groups. SS was more common in RON patients (p1 = 0.04, p2 = 0.028). There was no significant difference between SSA/SSB positive and negative patients in disease characteristics or severity. Similar results were obtained when SS was diagnosed in SSA/SSB positive patients.

Conclusion

RON and BON were more likely associated with abnormal autoantibodies; furthermore, AQP4 antibody, SSA/SSB and SS were more common in the RON patients. AQP4 antibodydetermination is crucial in RON patients who will develop NMO. However, when compared with other autoantibodies, SSA/SSB detected in patients was not significantly associated with disease characteristics or severity.

From the nucleus to the plasma membrane: translocation of the nuclear proteins histone H3 and lamin B1 in apoptotic microglia

Nuclear autoantibodies have been found in patients with autoimmune diseases. One possible source for nuclear antigens are apoptotic cells. However, the mechanism of how apoptotic cells make nuclear factors accessible to the immune system is still elusive. In the present study, we investigated the redistribution of nuclear components after UV irradiation in the microglial cell line BV-2 and in primary mouse microglia at the ultrastructural level. We used transmission electron microscopy-coupled electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) to measure phosphorus as an indicator for nucleic acids and immunogold labeling to detect histone H3 and lamin B1 in apoptotic cells. EELS revealed elevated concentrations of phosphorus in nuclear and cytoplasmic condensed chromatin compared to the remaining cytoplasm. Furthermore, immunolabeling of lamin B1 and histone H3 was detected in apoptotic microglia not only in the nucleus, but also in the cytoplasm, and even at the plasma membrane. Confocal images of apoptotic microglia, which were not previously permeabilized, showed patches of histone H3 and lamin B1 labeling at the cell surface. The pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (carbobenzoxy-valyl-alanyl-aspartyl-[O-methyl]-fluoromethylketone) prevented the occurrence of cytoplasmic condensed chromatin in apoptotic microglia. Our findings indicate that nuclear components leak from the nucleus into the cytoplasm in apoptotic microglia. At least histone H3 and lamin B1 reach the cell surface, this may promote autoreactive processes.