1
|
Li X, Zheng J, Luo D, Liu R. The optimal dose of indacaterol for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2024; 16:344-355. [PMID: 38410541 PMCID: PMC10894365 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Background The optimal dose of indacaterol for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was in debate. We did this network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of three dosages (75, 150, and 300 μg) of indacaterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Methods We searched studies from inception until January 20, 2023 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database. All studies comparing different doses of indacaterol for COPD were included in this network meta-analysis. Outcomes were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), exacerbation rate, St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), transitional dyspnea index (TDI), and adverse events. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated by R software with gemtc package. Results Finally, a total of 10 studies (4,991 patients) were finally included in this network meta-analysis. Indacaterol 75 μg (WMD: 0.07; 95% CrI: 0.05-0.08), indacaterol 150 μg (WMD: 0.13; 95% CrI: 0.12-0.14), and indacaterol 300 μg (WMD: 0.22; 95% CrI: 0.22-0.23) were all more effective than the placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. Indacaterol 75 μg (OR: 0.80; 95% CrI: 0.53-1.21), indacaterol 150 μg (OR: 0.59; 95% CrI: 0.45-0.78), indacaterol 300 μg (OR: 0.35; 95% CrI: 0.26-0.46) were more effective than the placebo in terms of exacerbation rate, and the difference was statistically significant. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) showed that indacaterol 300 μg ranked first, indacaterol 150 μg ranked second, indacaterol 75 μg ranked third, and placebo ranked the last for FEV1, SGRQ, TDI, exacerbation rate. There was no significant difference among the adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusions Considering the network meta-analysis and rankings, 300 μg indacaterol is superior to the other two dosages in treating patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. However, the quality of available evidence limits the formation of powerful conclusions regarding the comparative efficacy or safety of different doses of indacaterol used to treat COPD. Higher-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required for further research in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodan Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China
| | - Juan Zheng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China
| | - Dan Luo
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China
| | - Rujian Liu
- Department of Physical Examination, People’s Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Optimization of Long-Acting Bronchodilator Dose Ratios Using Isolated Guinea Pig Tracheal Rings for Synergistic Combination Therapy in Asthma and COPD. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15080963. [PMID: 36015111 PMCID: PMC9416144 DOI: 10.3390/ph15080963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The co-administration of a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), has been shown to be beneficial in the management of non-communicable chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The resulting relaxation of the airways can be synergistically enhanced, reducing symptoms and optimizing lung function. This provides an insight into more effective treatments. In this study, the LABAs formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FOR) and indacaterol maleate (IND) were each associated with tiotropium bromide monohydrate (TIO) to assess their synergistic potential. This was done using an appropriate ex vivo model of isolated perfused guinea pig tracheal rings, and pharmacological models of drug interaction. Among the dose ratios studied for both types of combination, a higher synergistic potential was highlighted for FOR/TIO 2:1 (w/w). This was done through three steps by using multiple additions of drugs to the organ baths based on a non-constant dose ratio and then on a constant dose ratio, and by a single addition to the organ baths of specific amounts of drugs. In this way, the synergistic improvement of the relaxant effect on the airways was confirmed, providing a basis for improving therapeutic approaches in asthma and COPD. The synergy found at this dose ratio should now be confirmed on a preclinical model of asthma and COPD by assessing lung function.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kornmann O, Mucsi J, Kolosa N, Bandelli L, Sen B, Satlin LC, D'Andrea P. Efficacy and safety of inhaled once-daily low-dose indacaterol acetate/mometasone furoate in patients with inadequately controlled asthma: Phase III randomised QUARTZ study findings. Respir Med 2019; 161:105809. [PMID: 32056721 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global initiative for asthma (GINA) 2019 recommends adding a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as a maintenance controller therapy in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Indacaterol acetate (IND, a LABA) in combination with mometasone furoate (MF, an ICS) is under development for the treatment of these patients. OBJECTIVE This phase III QUARTZ was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy and parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg once daily (o.d.) versus MF 200 μg o.d. in adult and adolescent patients with inadequately controlled asthma. METHODS Eligible patients (n = 802) were randomised (1:1) to receive either low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg o.d. via Breezhaler® or MF 200 μg o.d. via Twisthaler® for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and key secondary endpoint was Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) treatment difference after 12-week treatment. Other secondary endpoints included ACQ-7 responder analysis, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire total score, rescue medication use, daily symptom score, nighttime awakenings and rate of exacerbations, evaluated over 12-week treatment. Safety was also assessed including serious asthma outcomes. RESULTS Low-dose IND/MF significantly improved trough FEV1 (least squares mean treatment difference [LSMTD]: 0.182 L; p < 0.001) and ACQ-7 (LSMTD: -0.218; p < 0.001) versus MF at Week 12. Improvements in all other secondary endpoints favoured low-dose IND/MF. Safety was comparable. CONCLUSION These results support the use of low-dose IND/MF 150/80 μg o.d. as a potential therapy for adult and adolescent patients with inadequately controlled asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Kornmann
- IKF Pneumologie Frankfurt, Clinical Research Centre Respiratory Diseases, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa C Satlin
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
| | - Peter D'Andrea
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ridolo E, Pellicelli I, Gritti B, Incorvaia C. Patient-reported outcomes and considerations in the management of COPD: focus on indacaterol/glycopyrronium bromide. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:145-150. [PMID: 30679906 PMCID: PMC6338236 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s166704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Dual bronchodilation with long-acting beta-2 agonists and muscarinic antagonists is recommended in patients with severe to very severe COPD. Among dual bronchodilator combinations, indacaterol/glycopyrronium combination (IGC) received evidence of higher efficacy and good safety compared with monotherapy with either drug as well as with tiotropium. In randomized controlled trials, the primary outcome is usually the change in mean FEV1 resulting from treatment. However, the functional aspects that influence the physician's choice of the type of management may not be considered important by the patient, based on his perception of the disease. To address such issue, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed in recent studies. They include patient's perception of breathlessness, physical functioning, global health status, quality of life, use of rescue medications, and patient's report of COPD exacerbations. PRO data from the studies showed a clear improvement in patients' awareness of a better control of the disease in patients treated with IGC. In addition, the latest literature on two important issues influencing patient's preference and adherence, ie, the once-daily administration and the device to be used, confirmed the effectiveness of IGC and the ability of its device (Breezhaler®) to result in patient's satisfaction, ease of use, less handling errors, and self-assurance to have inhaled the entire dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erminia Ridolo
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy,
| | - Irene Pellicelli
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy,
| | - Bruna Gritti
- Cardiac/Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milne S, Hammans C, Watson S, Farah CS, Thamrin C, King GG. Bronchodilator Responses in Respiratory Impedance, Hyperinflation and Gas Trapping in COPD. COPD 2018; 15:341-349. [PMID: 29799289 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2018.1458217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
Hyperinflation, gas trapping and their responses to long-acting bronchodilator are clinically important in COPD. The forced oscillation technique (FOT) measures of respiratory system resistance and reactance are sensitive markers of bronchodilator response in COPD. The relationships between changes in resistance and reactance, and changes in hyperinflation and gas trapping, following long-acting bronchodilator (LA-BD) have not been studied. 15 subjects with mild-moderate COPD underwent FOT, spirometry then body plethysmography, before and 2 hours after a single 150 microg dose of the LA-BD indacaterol. Hyperinflation was quantified as the inspiratory capacity to total lung capacity ratio (IC/TLC), and gas trapping as residual volume to TLC ratio (RV/TLC). At baseline, FOT parameters were moderately correlated with IC/TLC (|r| 0.53-0.73, p < 0.05). At 2 hours post-LA-BD, there were moderate correlations between change in FOT and change in RV/TLC (|r| 0.60-0.82, p < 0.05). Baseline FOT parameters also correlated with the subsequent post-LA-BD change in both IC/TLC (|r| 0.54-0.62, p < 0.05) and RV/TLC (|r| 0.57-0.76, p < 0.05). FOT impedance reflects hyperinflation and gas trapping in COPD, and the potential for long-acting bronchodilator responsiveness. These results provide us with further insight into the physiological mechanisms of action of long-acting bronchodilator treatment, and may be clinically useful for predicting treatment responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Milne
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia.,b Department of Respiratory Medicine , Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District , Concord , NSW , Australia.,c Department of Respiratory Medicine , Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District , St Leonards , NSW , Australia
| | - Christoph Hammans
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Stella Watson
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Claude S Farah
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia.,b Department of Respiratory Medicine , Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District , Concord , NSW , Australia.,d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Macquarie University , North Ryde , NSW , Australia
| | - Cindy Thamrin
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Gregory G King
- a The Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Airway Physiology and Imaging Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical School , University of Sydney , NSW , Australia.,c Department of Respiratory Medicine , Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District , St Leonards , NSW , Australia.,e Centre of Research Excellence in Severe Asthma , New Lambton , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cazzola M, Rogliani P. Comparative effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Comp Eff Res 2017; 6:627-636. [PMID: 28840753 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2017-0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium has been the first long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination to be approved as a maintenance treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Comparative effectiveness studies indicate that it is constantly superior to a LAMA or a LABA alone or even a LABA/inhaled corticosteroid combination, regardless of the drugs used. However, definitive data documenting the benefit of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination over these consolidated therapies are still absent in a real-world setting, although the results of pivotal randomized controlled trials show that this is the case. Therefore, in addition to the large body of evidence already available supporting the use of indacaterol/glycopyrronium, pragmatic observational studies or ad hoc designed trials should be planned to collect data that could confirm the high effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium even in the real-life clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Horita N, Miyazawa N, Kojima R, Inoue M, Ishigatsubo Y, Kaneko T. Uso crónico de teofilina y mortalidad en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: un metaanálisis. Arch Bronconeumol 2016; 52:233-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2015.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Revised: 02/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Olodaterol (Striverdi(®) Respimat(®)) is an inhaled long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) indicated as a once-daily maintenance bronchodilator therapy in adults with COPD. Several well-designed phase III trials have assessed use of the drug over 6 or 48 weeks in this patient population. In these studies, once-daily olodaterol improved lung function relative to placebo over 48 weeks of treatment, with such improvements being achieved and maintained within the 24-h dosage interval, supporting its once-daily administration. In addition, combined analyses of 48-week trials indicated that olodaterol reduces rescue medication use and may also improve dyspnoea and health-related quality of life, and crossover studies showed improvements in exercise endurance after 6 weeks of treatment with the drug. Pooled analyses of crossover studies assessing 24-h bronchodilation after 6 weeks of therapy indicated that once-daily olodaterol has a 24-h bronchodilatory profile generally similar to that of once-daily tiotropium bromide and twice-daily formoterol. Olodaterol was generally well tolerated and had an acceptable cardiovascular and respiratory adverse event profile. However, further longer-term and active comparator-controlled studies would be beneficial, including trials powered to assess COPD exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma D Deeks
- Springer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, 0754, Auckland, New Zealand,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park J, Lee JS, Rhee C, Oh YM. Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30:1453-8. [PMID: 26425042 PMCID: PMC4575934 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the effects of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a meta-analysis with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indacaterol in stable COPD patients. The symptom severity was defined using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). We analyzed patients treated with 150 µg (n = 945) and 300 µg (n = 832) out of 3,325 patients who completed the SGRQ from five RCTs. After a 12-week treatment of 150 µg indacaterol, cough improvement was reported in 36.5% (316/866) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 32.2% (259/804) patients treated with placebo (Relative Ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.29). Phlegm improvement was reported in 31.0% (247/798) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 30.6% (225/736) of patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.18). Dyspnea improvement was reported in 39.5% (324/820) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 31.5% (237/753) patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = 0.001, I(2) = 55.1%). Only dyspnea improvement was significant compared to placebo even at the 300 µg indacaterol dose. Compared to placebo, a 12-week treatment of the long-acting beta-agonist, indacaterol might not have a significant effect on cough or phlegm in stable COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinkyeong Park
- Department of Critical Care, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Su Lee
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Clinical Research Center for Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chinkook Rhee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon-Mok Oh
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Clinical Research Center for Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horita N, Kaneko T. Role of combined indacaterol and glycopyrronium bromide (QVA149) for the treatment of COPD in Japan. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10:813-22. [PMID: 25960646 PMCID: PMC4410821 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s56067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Once-daily dual-bronchodilator therapy with combined indacaterol and glycopyrronium bromide in one device (Ultibro, Breezhaler), often called QVA149, was first approved in 2013 in Japan and Europe. As of November 2014, more than 40 countries had approved this medication except for the USA. This is the first dual bronchodilator in one device. Now, the Breezhaler is the only device that can provide long-acting muscarinic antagonist (glycopyrronium bromide), long-acting beta agonist (indacaterol), and a combination of the two medications (QVA149). The choice among the three medications allows a patient to use the same inhalation device even when the regimen is changed from single-bronchodilator therapy to dual-bronchodilator therapy. In addition, the quick bronchodilation effect and once-daily administration can improve patient adherence to medical treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To our knowledge, as of November 2014, the safety and the efficacy of QVA149 have been evaluated in 14 randomized controlled trials. The 14 trials generally showed good safety profiles, and there were better or not-inferior bronchodilator effects of QVA149 when compared with placebo, or other inhaled medication. According to the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines, QVA149 is a combination of the two first-line bronchodilators. Our meta-analysis indicated that QVA149 is superior to the salmeterol-fluticasone combination to treat COPD in respect of the frequency of adverse effects, exacerbation, pneumonia, and improvement of trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Thus, we believe that QVA149 can be a key medication for COPD treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Horita
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kaneko
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kankaanranta H, Harju T, Kilpeläinen M, Mazur W, Lehto JT, Katajisto M, Peisa T, Meinander T, Lehtimäki L. Diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the finnish guidelines. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2015; 116:291-307. [PMID: 25515181 PMCID: PMC4409821 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim initiated and managed the update of the Finnish national guideline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Finnish COPD guideline was revised to acknowledge the progress in diagnosis and management of COPD. This Finnish COPD guideline in English language is a part of the original guideline and focuses on the diagnosis, assessment and pharmacotherapy of stable COPD. It is intended to be used mainly in primary health care but not forgetting respiratory specialists and other healthcare workers. The new recommendations and statements are based on the best evidence available from the medical literature, other published national guidelines and the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) report. This guideline introduces the diagnostic approach, differential diagnostics towards asthma, assessment and treatment strategy to control symptoms and to prevent exacerbations. The pharmacotherapy is based on the symptoms and a clinical phenotype of the individual patient. The guideline defines three clinically relevant phenotypes including the low and high exacerbation risk phenotypes and the neglected asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). These clinical phenotypes can help clinicians to identify patients that respond to specific pharmacological interventions. For the low exacerbation risk phenotype, pharmacotherapy with short-acting β2 -agonists (salbutamol, terbutaline) or anticholinergics (ipratropium) or their combination (fenoterol-ipratropium) is recommended in patients with less symptoms. If short-acting bronchodilators are not enough to control symptoms, a long-acting β2 -agonist (formoterol, indacaterol, olodaterol or salmeterol) or a long-acting anticholinergic (muscarinic receptor antagonists; aclidinium, glycopyrronium, tiotropium, umeclidinium) or their combination is recommended. For the high exacerbation risk phenotype, pharmacotherapy with a long-acting anticholinergic or a fixed combination of an inhaled glucocorticoid and a long-acting β2 -agonist (budesonide-formoterol, beclomethasone dipropionate-formoterol, fluticasone propionate-salmeterol or fluticasone furoate-vilanterol) is recommended as a first choice. Other treatment options for this phenotype include combination of long-acting bronchodilators given from separate inhalers or as a fixed combination (glycopyrronium-indacaterol or umeclidinium-vilanterol) or a triple combination of an inhaled glucocorticoid, a long-acting β2 -agonist and a long-acting anticholinergic. If the patient has severe-to-very severe COPD (FEV1 < 50% predicted), chronic bronchitis and frequent exacerbations despite long-acting bronchodilators, the pharmacotherapy may include also roflumilast. ACOS is a phenotype of COPD in which there are features that comply with both asthma and COPD. Patients belonging to this phenotype have usually been excluded from studies evaluating the effects of drugs both in asthma and in COPD. Thus, evidence-based recommendation of treatment cannot be given. The treatment should cover both diseases. Generally, the therapy should include at least inhaled glucocorticoids (beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, ciclesonide, fluticasone furoate, fluticasone propionate or mometasone) combined with a long-acting bronchodilator (β2 -agonist or anticholinergic or both).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannu Kankaanranta
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Seinäjoki Central HospitalSeinäjoki, Finland
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of TampereTampere, Finland
| | - Terttu Harju
- Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University HospitalOulu, Finland
| | | | - Witold Mazur
- Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinki, Finland
| | - Juho T Lehto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of TampereTampere, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University HospitalTampere, Finland
| | - Milla Katajisto
- Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinki, Finland
| | | | - Tuula Meinander
- Finnish Medical Society DuodecimHelsinki, Finland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University HospitalTampere, Finland
| | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of TampereTampere, Finland
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University HospitalTampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0119948. [PMID: 25799171 PMCID: PMC4370711 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2014] [Accepted: 01/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Two once-daily inhaled bronchodilators, indacaterol and tiotropium, are widely used as first-line therapy in stable COPD patients. This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12. Four RCTs were eligible for inclusion (three RCTs with moderate-to-severe COPD patients and one RCT with only severe COPD patients). Trough FEV1 at weeks 12 and 26 were not significantly different between indacaterol and tiotropium by the standardized mean difference with 0.014 (95% CI, -0.036, 0.063, I2= 23.5%) and with 0.037 (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.133, I2= 0%) along with differences in means of 0.003L and 0.014L, respectively. Indacaterol and tiotropium also showed similar St. George`s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores and percentages of patients with SGRQ improvement (≥ 4 units) at week 26. The incidences of nasopharyngitis, serious cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events were not different between indacaterol and tiotropium, while those of cough (OR = 1.68, P < 0.001, and RR = 1.63) and COPD worsening (OR = 1.18, P = 0.003, and RR = 1.12) were higher for indacaterol than tiotropium. However, when one study with only severe COPD patients was removed from the meta-analysis, the difference in the incidence of COPD worsening between indacaterol and tiotropium became non-significant (OR = 1.13, P = 0.204, and RR = 1.09). The clinical efficacy and serious adverse events between indacaterol and tiotropium were equivocal in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Cough is a common complaint associated with indacaterol, and COPD worsening needs to be carefully monitored in severe COPD patients when treated with indacaterol.
Collapse
|
13
|
Geake JB, Dabscheck EJ, Wood‐Baker R, Cates CJ. Indacaterol, a once-daily beta2-agonist, versus twice-daily beta₂-agonists or placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1:CD010139. [PMID: 25575340 PMCID: PMC6464646 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010139.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indacaterol is an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist that is administered once daily and has been investigated as a treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Four different doses have been investigated (75 mcg, 150 mcg, 300 mcg and 600 mcg). The relative effects of different doses of once-daily indacaterol in the management of patients with COPD are uncertain. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of indacaterol versus placebo and alternative twice-daily long-acting beta2-agonists for the treatment of patients with stable COPD. SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR), handsearched respiratory journals and meeting abstracts and searched the Novartis trials registry and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the most recent search was 8 November 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials comparing indacaterol at any dose versus placebo or alternative long-acting beta2-agonists. Trials were required to be of at least 12 weeks' duration and had to include adults older than 18 years with a confirmed spirometric diagnosis of COPD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (JBG, EJD) independently assessed for possible inclusion all citations identified as a result of the search. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or, if required, through resolution by a third review author (RWB). One review author (JBG) extracted data from trials identified by the search and entered these data into Review Manager 5.1 for statistical analysis. Data entry was cross-checked by a second review author (EJD, CJC). MAIN RESULTS A total of 13 trials with 9961 participants were included in the review. Ten trials with a total of 8562 participants involved an indacaterol versus placebo comparison. Five trials with a total of 4133 participants involved an indacaterol versus twice-daily beta2-agonist comparison. The comparator beta2-agonists were salmeterol, formoterol and eformoterol. One of these trials, with a total of 90 participants, provided no data that could be used in this review. Two trials included both indacaterol versus placebo and indacaterol versus twice-daily beta2-agonist comparisons. Trials were between 12 weeks and 52 weeks in duration. Overall the quality of the evidence was strong, and risk of significant bias was minimal in most of the included studies. Enrolled participants had stable COPD across a range of spirometric severities. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was generally between 30% and 80% predicted, and a mean FEV1 of approximately 50% was predicted in most studies. Patients with concurrent respiratory disease, including asthma, were excluded. Concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids was permitted.The primary objectives were to compare trough FEV1 at the end of dosing, exacerbation rates and quality of life. Significant adverse events, mortality and dyspnoea were included as secondary outcomes. Compared with placebo, a significant and clinically relevant improvement in trough FEV1 was noted with indacaterol (mean difference (MD) 149.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 137.09 to 161.12). In addition, compared with placebo, a significant improvement in mean St George Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) score (MD -3.60, 95% CI -4.36 to -2.83) was reported, and the proportion of participants experiencing clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ score was significantly greater (odds ratio (OR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.84). Compared with twice-daily beta2-agonists, a small but statistically significant increase in trough FEV1 was seen with indacaterol (MD 61.71 mL, 95% CI 41.24 to 82.17). Differences between indacaterol and twice-daily beta2-agonists in mean SGRQ scores (MD -0.81, 95% CI -2.28 to 0.66) and in the proportions of participants achieving clinically relevant improvements in SGRQ scores (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.32) were not statistically significant, but the confidence intervals are too wide to permit the conclusion that the treatments were equivalent. Data were insufficient for analysis of differences in exacerbation rates for both placebo and twice-daily beta2-agonist comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For patients with stable COPD, use of indacaterol versus placebo results in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in lung function and quality of life. The clinical benefit for lung function is at least as good as that seen with twice-daily long-acting beta2-agonists. The comparative effect on quality of life remains uncertain, as important differences cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Geake
- The Prince Charles HospitalDepartment of Thoracic MedicineChermsideQueenslandAustralia4032
| | - Eli J Dabscheck
- Alfred HospitalAllergy Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3181
| | | | - Christopher J Cates
- St George's, University of LondonPopulation Health Research InstituteCranmer TerraceLondonUKSW17 0RE
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Overington JD, Huang YC, Abramson MJ, Brown JL, Goddard JR, Bowman RV, Fong KM, Yang IA. Implementing clinical guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: barriers and solutions. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6:1586-96. [PMID: 25478199 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.11.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Accepted: 11/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex chronic lung disease characterised by progressive fixed airflow limitation and acute exacerbations that frequently require hospitalisation. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of COPD are now widely available. However, the uptake of these COPD guidelines in clinical practice is highly variable, as is the case for many other chronic disease guidelines. Studies have identified many barriers to implementation of COPD and other guidelines, including factors such as lack of familiarity with guidelines amongst clinicians and inadequate implementation programs. Several methods for enhancing adherence to clinical practice guidelines have been evaluated, including distribution methods, professional education sessions, electronic health records (EHR), point of care reminders and computer decision support systems (CDSS). Results of these studies are mixed to date, and the most effective ways to implement clinical practice guidelines remain unclear. Given the significant resources dedicated to evidence-based medicine, effective dissemination and implementation of best practice at the patient level is an important final step in the process of guideline development. Future efforts should focus on identifying optimal methods for translating the evidence into everyday clinical practice to ensure that patients receive the best care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff D Overington
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yao C Huang
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael J Abramson
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Juliet L Brown
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - John R Goddard
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rayleen V Bowman
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kwun M Fong
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ian A Yang
- 1 School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia ; 3 Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matera MG, Rogliani P, Cazzola M. Indacaterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 16:107-15. [PMID: 25418284 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.983076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The need for a rapid onset of action and a long duration of the broncholytic effect is the likely reason for the development of new long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) that are fast acting and have true 24 h duration of action. Indacaterol is the archetype of once-daily LABAs and already marketed as a maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). AREAS COVERED Meta-analyses of published data or pooled analyses of primary data provide good insight into the clinical role of indacaterol in COPD. EXPERT OPINION The choice of the once-daily bronchodilator to start treatment in a patient with COPD mainly depends on the outcome of interest. Indacaterol is more effective than tiotropium if we consider symptoms or health-related quality of life as the primary outcome. Moreover, in symptomatic patient indacaterol should be preferred to tiotropium because of its rapid onset of action. By contrast, tiotropium appears to be more effective than indacaterol if exacerbations are the expected primary outcome. However, as indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination (QVA149) shows superior efficacy compared to glycopyrronium and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD, a fundamental question regarding the use of indacaterol that requires clarification is whether it is preferable to start immediately with QVA149 rather than using indacaterol alone.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wedzicha JA, Dahl R, Buhl R, Schubert-Tennigkeit A, Chen H, D'Andrea P, Fogel R, Banerji D. Pooled safety analysis of the fixed-dose combination of indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149), its monocomponents, and tiotropium versus placebo in COPD patients. Respir Med 2014; 108:1498-507. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Revised: 07/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
17
|
Zafar MA, Droege C, Foertsch M, Panos RJ. Update on ultra-long-acting β agonists in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2014; 23:1687-701. [PMID: 25139313 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2014.942730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For the last two decades, long-acting β agonists (LABAs) have been a cornerstone in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They relax airway smooth muscle and augment expiratory airflow, which reduces hyperinflation and improves dyspnea, functional capacity and quality of life. In recent years, Indacaterol, a LABA with an ultra-long duration of action (ultra-LABA), which only requires once-daily dosing, was approved by the FDA. The clinical efficacy of indacaterol is comparable, and, in some aspects better, than the currently available LABAs. AREAS COVERED This article reviews the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety and potential role of the ultra-LABAs in COPD management. EXPERT OPINION Ultra-LABAs are effective bronchodilators with a prolonged duration of action. By decreasing dosing frequency, ultra-LABAs potentially may improve respiratory medication adherence, which is associated with better survival and less healthcare utilization. In addition to their salubrious benefits, β agonists may produce untoward effects. Increased mortality and hospitalizations among patients with left ventricular heart failure, who were treated with β agonists, has caused concern about their use in patients with COPD and heart disease. Further experience and testing will determine the optimal role of ultra-LABAs in the management of COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ahsan Zafar
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine , 1 Albert Sabin Way, MSB Room 6053, Mail Location 0564, Cincinnati, OH 45267 , USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|