Correlation of cutaneous immunoreactants in lesional skin with the serological disorders and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus

Nano-encapsulated anandamide reduces inflammatory cytokines in vitro and lesion severity in a murine model of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune skin disease which occurs independently and in conjunction with systemic lupus erythematosus. Drug development for CLE is severely lacking. Anandamide (AEA) is a primary endocannabinoid which exhibits immunomodulatory effects through mixed cannabinoid receptor agonism. We evaluated AEA as topical treatment for CLE and assessed benefits of nanoparticle encapsulation (AEA-NP) on cutaneous drug penetration, delivery and biological activity. Compared to untreated controls, AEA-NP decreased IL-6 and MCP-1 in UVB-stimulated keratinocytes (p < 0.05) in vitro. In BALB/c mice, AEA-NP displayed improved cutaneous penetration, extended release and persistence of AEA in the follicular unit extending to the base after 24 h. Utilizing the MRL-lpr lupus murine model, twice weekly treatment of lesions with topical AEA-NP for 10 weeks led to decreased clinical and histologic lesion scores compared to unencapsulated AEA and untreated controls (p < 0.05). Prophylactic application of AEA-NP to commonly involved areas on MRL-lpr mice similarly resulted in decreased clinical and histologic scores when compared to controls (p < 0.05), and reduced C3 and IBA-1 in lesional tissue (p < 0.05). The demonstrated clinical and immunomodulatory effects of treatment with AEA support its potential as therapy for CLE. This work also suggests that encapsulation of AEA improves penetration and treatment efficacy. Future studies will be conducted to assess full therapeutic potential.

Assessment of Clinical and Laboratory Use of the Cutaneous Direct Immunofluorescence Assay

Importance

Dermatologists submit direct immunofluorescence (DIF) biopsies on a daily basis, using an assay detecting immunoreactant deposition with a panel that has traditionally comprised immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgA, IgM, C3, and fibrin, with or without albumin antibodies.

Objectives

To evaluate and compare the frequency of immunoreactants in DIF biopsies submitted over an 8-year period and assess use by dermatologists based on clinical impression.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A quality improvement study was conducted in a community outreach reference laboratory associated with a large academic medical center. Results of 2050 consecutive DIF skin biopsies submitted to the laboratory between April 1, 2012, and June 12, 2020, were analyzed by final pathologic diagnosis and antibody subtype positivity, in comparison with clinical impression. Biopsies in which the submitting physician had not performed the biopsy were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Histopathologic findings and the results of DIF biopsies using the standard 6-antibody panel were evaluated in correlation with the submitted clinical diagnosis to assess immunoreactivity of the assay.

Results

Of 2050 DIF biopsies submitted, 367 (17.9%) were positive; IgG, IgA, and C3 alone identified all primary immunobullous disease cases (pemphigoid, pemphigus, linear IgA, and dermatitis herpetiformis), and IgA, C3, and fibrin antibodies alone identified all vasculitis cases. A panel of IgG, IgA, IgM, and fibrin identified all cases of lupus erythematosus. DIF results were positive in less than half of cases of hematoxylin and eosin biopsy-confirmed lupus erythematosus (23 of 47 [49%]). A total of 247 biopsies were submitted for clinical diagnoses not optimally supported on DIF: lichen planus, porphyria, and connective tissue disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that there is a knowledge gap among dermatologists relating to the opportunity for high-value, cost-conscious use of DIF. The practice of reflexive antibody testing using a 6-antibody panel for all DIF biopsies is likely unnecessary. DIF protocols tailored to the clinical diagnosis may enhance cost-effectiveness without loss of test sensitivity or specificity.

Dermatologic Manifestations, Histologic Features and Disease Progression among Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Subtypes: A Prospective Observational Study in Asians

Introduction

Cutaneous manifestations are central to the primary diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, information on the clinical, histopathologic, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) features among subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), as well as longitudinal prospective observational study to evaluate the natural history and the progression to SLE, is lacking among Asians. Our objectives are to summarize the differences in the clinical, histopathologic, and DIF characteristics and serological profiles between various subtypes of CLE, and to provide its natural history and the association with disease activity in our Asian population.

Methods

A prospective observational study on CLE patients was performed between May 2016 and May 2020. Patients underwent full physical/dermatologic examination, skin biopsy for histology, and DIF. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores and laboratory data were evaluated. Time schedule and characteristics for resolution and/or the disease progression to SLE were recorded in subsequent follow-ups.

Results

Of 101 biopsy-proven CLE patients, 25 had acute CLE (ACLE), 8 had subacute CLE (SCLE), 39 had chronic CLE (CCLE) only, 22 had CCLE with SLE, and 7 had LE-nonspecific cutaneous lesions only. Patients with exclusive CLE showed lower female preponderance, serological abnormalities, and correlation to systemic disease. However, when CLE was accompanied with any LE-nonspecific cutaneous manifestations, they were associated with high antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer, renal, hematologic, joint involvement, and greater SLEDAI score. Of 207 biopsy sections, SCLE/CCLE regardless of systemic involvement showed significantly higher percentage of superficial/deep perivascular and perieccrine infiltration than ACLE. On DIF, deposition of multiple immunoreactants was associated with higher systemic disease. Approximately 10% of CLE-only patients later developed SLE but had mild systemic involvement.

Conclusion

Our findings support that each CLE subtype has a diverse and unique character. Comprehensive understanding of the differences among CLE subtypes is important for achieving the correct diagnosis and providing appropriate disease monitoring and management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-020-00471-y.

Presence of Cutaneous Complement Deposition Distinguishes between Immunological and Histological Features of Bullous Pemphigoid-Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study

The practical implications of complement deposition in direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy and its influence on the disease phenotype are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate whether the presence of complement deposition in DIF microscopy gives rise to differences in the morphological, immunological, and histological characteristics of patients with BP (bullous pemphigoid). We performed a retrospective study encompassing patients with BP in a specialized tertiary referral center. Logistic regression model was utilized to identify variables independently associated with complement deposition. The study included 233 patients with BP, of whom 196 (84.1%) demonstrated linear C3 deposition along the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) in DIF analysis. BP patients with C3 deposition had higher mean (SD) levels (645.2 (1418.5) vs. 172.5 (243.9) U/mL; p < 0.001) and seropositivity rate (86.3% vs.64.9%; p = 0.002) of anti-BP180 NC16A and less prevalent neutrophilic infiltrate in lesional skin specimens (29.8% vs. 52.4%; p = 0.041). C3 deposition was found positively associated with the detection of anti-BP180 NC16A autoantibodies (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.38–13.05) and inversely associated with the presence of neutrophils in lesional skin (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.09–8.33). To conclude, complement deposition influences the immunological and histological features of BP. These findings are in line with experimental data describing the pathogenic role of complement in BP.

Practical Direct Immunofluorescence

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.

Direct immunofluorescence findings in livedoid vasculopathy: a 10-year study and literature review

BACKGROUND

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) findings in patients with livedoid vasculopathy (LV) may have benefits for disease differentiation when clinical presentations and/or histopathological findings are inconclusive.

AIM

To investigate DIF findings in patients with a clinical and histopathological diagnosis of LV.

METHODS

DIF findings of 62 patients with LV were analysed, and the published literature in the PubMed database was also reviewed and summarized.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated deposition of immunoreactants in blood vessels (BVs) in 59 of the 62 patients (95.2%), and almost all cases were positive for a combination of multiple immunoreactants. Complement C3 and IgM formed the most common combination. The most common pattern was deposition in BVs and at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) (59.3%), followed by deposition in BVs alone (40.7%). Immunoreactant deposition in BVs involved superficial BVs with or without deep BVs. The median age of patients with positive DIF findings was significantly higher than that of patients with negative DIF findings for LV (P < 0.03). More recent lesions (present for < 6 months) had a significantly higher percentage of positive results than older lesions (present for ≥ 6 months) (85.2% vs. 14.8%, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In both the present study and in the published literature, DIF study in patients with LV showed positive immunoreactants ranging from 42.9% to 100%. C3 and IgM were the most common immunoreactants deposited in BVs, while the most common pattern was immunoreactant deposition in BVs and at the DEJ. Older patients and those with more recent lesions (< 6 months) had a significantly higher percentage of positive DIF results for LV than did younger patients and those with older lesions (≥ 6 months).

An Update on the Pathogenesis of Skin Damage in Lupus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is characterized by broad and varied clinical forms ranging from a localized skin lesion to a life-threatening form with severe systemic manifestations. The overlapping between cutaneous LE (CLE) and systemic LE (SLE) brings difficulties to physicians for early accurate diagnosis and sometimes may lead to delayed treatment for patients. We comprehensively review recent progress about the similarities and differences of the main three subsets of LE in pathogenesis and immunological mechanisms, with a particular focus on the skin damage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on the mechanisms contributing to the skin damage in lupus have shown a close association of abnormal circulating inflammatory cells and abundant production of IgG autoantibodies with the skin damage of SLE, whereas few evidences if serum autoantibodies and circulating inflammatory cells are involved in the pathogenesis of CLE, especially for the discoid LE (DLE). Till now, the pathogenesis and molecular/cellular mechanism for the progress from CLE to SLE are far from clear. But more and more factors correlated with the differences among the subsets of LE and progression from CLE to SLE have been found, such as the mutation of IRF5, IFN regulatory factors and abnormalities of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs), Th1 cells, and B cells, which could be the potential biomarkers for the interventions in the development of LE. A further understanding in pathogenesis and immunological mechanisms for skin damage in different subsets of LE makes us think more about the differences and cross-links in the pathogenic mechanism of CLE and SLE, which will shed a light in predictive biomarkers and therapies in LE.