1
|
Thng DKH, Hooi L, Siew BE, Lee KY, Tan IJW, Lieske B, Lin NS, Kow AWC, Wang S, Rashid MBMA, Ang C, Koh JJM, Toh TB, Tan KK, Chow EKH. A functional personalised oncology approach against metastatic colorectal cancer in matched patient derived organoids. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:52. [PMID: 38413740 PMCID: PMC10899621 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00543-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently occurring cancer. Progression on to an advanced metastatic malignancy (metCRC) is often indicative of poor prognosis, as the 5-year survival rates of patients decline rapidly. Despite the availability of many systemic therapies for the management of metCRC, the long-term efficacies of these regimens are often hindered by the emergence of treatment resistance due to intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity. Furthermore, not all systemic therapies have associated biomarkers that can accurately predict patient responses. Hence, a functional personalised oncology (FPO) approach can enable the identification of patient-specific combinatorial vulnerabilities and synergistic combinations as effective treatment strategies. To this end, we established a panel of CRC patient-derived organoids (PDOs) as clinically relevant biological systems, of which three pairs of matched metCRC PDOs were derived from the primary sites (ptCRC) and metastatic lesions (mCRC). Histological and genomic characterisation of these PDOs demonstrated the preservation of histopathological and genetic features found in the parental tumours. Subsequent application of the phenotypic-analytical drug combination interrogation platform, Quadratic Phenotypic Optimisation Platform, in these pairs of PDOs identified patient-specific drug sensitivity profiles to epigenetic-based combination therapies. Most notably, matched PDOs from one patient exhibited differential sensitivity patterns to the rationally designed drug combinations despite being genetically similar. These findings collectively highlight the limitations of current genomic-driven precision medicine in guiding treatment strategies for metCRC patients. Instead, it suggests that epigenomic profiling and application of FPO could complement the identification of novel combinatorial vulnerabilities to target synchronous ptCRC and mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dexter Kai Hao Thng
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lissa Hooi
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bei En Siew
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai-Yin Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Jse-Wei Tan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bettina Lieske
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Norman Sihan Lin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Wang
- Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Chermaine Ang
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jasmin Jia Min Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tan Boon Toh
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Edward Kai-Hua Chow
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Q, Li S. Gemcitabine Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2022; 132:2379-2387. [PMID: 35238403 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare tumor volume reduction after induction chemotherapy (IC) with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) and docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) and to evaluate the influence on subsequent radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective clinical study. METHODS Patients who received GP or DP IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to control the balance between the GP and DP groups. RESULTS A total of 41 patients treated with GP and 53 patients treated with DP were enrolled. After matching, 33 sub-pairs of 66 patients were generated in the post-PSM cohort. As compared with DP, GP was superior in its gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx (GTVnx) reduction (28.88% vs. 18.73%; P = .014) but equivalent in its gross tumor volume of the lymph nodes (GTVnd) reduction (37.58% vs. 29.79%; P = .229). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that the chemotherapy regimen was an independent factor associated with the reduction in GTVnx (P = .011). The GP group exhibited advantages in the dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume of high-risk volume and low-risk volume (PTV1 and PTV2), lenses, temporal lobes, and parotid glands. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that chemotherapy regimen was an independent factor associated with the dosimetric parameters of PTV1, PTV2, lenses, temporal lobes, and parotid glands. CONCLUSION GP regimen achieves a greater GTVnx reduction than DP regimen and has an advantage in the dosimetry of subsequent CCRT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 132:2379-2387, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Chen
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Department of Geriatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shan Li
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morand du Puch CB, Vanderstraete M, Giraud S, Lautrette C, Christou N, Mathonnet M. Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept. Am J Cancer Res 2021; 11:9538-9556. [PMID: 34646385 PMCID: PMC8490527 DOI: 10.7150/thno.55954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
As complex and heterogeneous diseases, cancers require a more tailored therapeutic management than most pathologies. Recent advances in anticancer drug development, including the immuno-oncology revolution, have been too often plagued by unsatisfying patient response rates and survivals. In reaction to this, cancer care has fully transitioned to the “personalized medicine” concept. Numerous tools are now available tools to better adapt treatments to the profile of each patient. They encompass a large array of diagnostic assays, based on biomarkers relevant to targetable molecular pathways. As a subfamily of such so-called companion diagnostics, chemosensitivity and resistance assays represent an attractive, yet insufficiently understood, approach to individualize treatments. They rely on the assessment of a composite biomarker, the ex vivo functional response of cancer cells to drugs, to predict a patient's outcome. Systemic treatments, such as chemotherapies, as well as targeted treatments, whose efficacy cannot be fully predicted yet by other diagnostic tests, may be assessed through these means. The results can provide helpful information to assist clinicians in their decision-making process. We explore here the most advanced functional assays across oncology indications, with an emphasis on tests already displaying a convincing clinical demonstration. We then recapitulate the main technical obstacles faced by researchers and clinicians to produce more accurate, and thus more predictive, models and the recent advances that have been developed to circumvent them. Finally, we summarize the regulatory and quality frameworks surrounding functional assays to ensure their safe and performant clinical implementation. Functional assays are valuable in vitro diagnostic tools that already stand beyond the “proof-of-concept” stage. Clinical studies show they have a major role to play by themselves but also in conjunction with molecular diagnostics. They now need a final lift to fully integrate the common armament used against cancers, and thus make their way into the clinical routine.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagner S, Beger NT, Matschos S, Szymanski A, Przybylla R, Bürtin F, Prall F, Linnebacher M, Mullins CS. Tumour-Derived Cell Lines and Their Potential for Therapy Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184717. [PMID: 34572946 PMCID: PMC8471446 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poor. Patients and physicians are in need of individual therapies and precise response predictions. We investigated the predictive capacity of primary tumour material for treatment response of metastases. Mutational landscapes of primary tumours and corresponding metastases of 10 CRC patients were compared. Cell line characteristics and chemosensitivity were investigated pairwise for primary and metastatic tumours of four patients. PDX models of one patient were treated in vivo for proof of concept. Driver mutations did not differ between primaries and metastases, while the latter accumulated additional mutations. In vitro chemosensitivity testing revealed no differences for responses to 5-FU and oxaliplatin between primary and metastatic cell lines. However, irinotecan response differed significantly: the majority of metastases-derived cell lines was less sensitive to irinotecan than their matching primary counterpart. Therapy recommendations based on these findings were compared to clinical treatment response and mostly in line with the predicted outcome. Therefore, primary tumour cell models seem to be a good tool for drug response testing and conclusion drawing for later metastases. With further data from tumour-derived cell models, such predictions could improve clinical treatment decisions, both recommending likely effective therapeutic options while excluding ineffective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Wagner
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Nicola T. Beger
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Stephanie Matschos
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Antonia Szymanski
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Randy Przybylla
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Florian Bürtin
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| | - Friedrich Prall
- Institute of Pathology, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Michael Linnebacher
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-381-494-6043
| | - Christina S. Mullins
- Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.W.); (N.T.B.); (S.M.); (A.S.); (R.P.); (F.B.); (C.S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ng TSC, Gunda V, Li R, Prytyskach M, Iwamoto Y, Kohler RH, Parangi S, Weissleder R, Miller MA. Detecting Immune Response to Therapies Targeting PDL1 and BRAF by Using Ferumoxytol MRI and Macrin in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Radiology 2020; 298:123-132. [PMID: 33107799 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is aggressive with a poor prognosis, partly because of the immunosuppressive microenvironment created by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Purpose To understand the relationship between TAM infiltration, tumor vascularization, and corresponding drug delivery by using ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI and macrin in an ATC mouse model. Materials and Methods ATC tumors were generated in 6-8-week-old female B6129SF1/J mice through intrathyroid injection to model orthotopic tumors, or intravenously to model hematogenous metastasis, and prospectively enrolled randomly into treatment cohorts (n = 94 total; August 1, 2018, to January 15, 2020). Mice were treated with vehicle or combined serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) kinase inhibitor (BRAFi) and anti-PDL1 antibody (aPDL1). A subset was cotreated with therapies, including an approximately 70-nm model drug delivery nanoparticle (DDNP) to target TAM, and an antibody-neutralizing colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). Imaging was performed at the macroscopic level with ferumoxytol-MRI and microscopically with macrin. Genetically engineered BrafV600E/WT p53-null allografts were used and complemented by a GFP-transgenic derivative and human xenografts. Tumor-bearing organs were processed by using tissue clearing and imaged with confocal microscopy and MRI. Two-tailed Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison (≥five per group). Results TAM levels were higher in orthotopic thyroid tumors compared with pulmonary metastatic lesions by 79% ± 23 (standard deviation; P < .001). These findings were concordant with ferumoxytol MRI, which showed 136% ± 88 higher uptake in thyroid lesions (P = .02) compared with lung lesions. BRAFi and aPDL1 combination therapy resulted in higher tumor DDNP delivery by 39% ± 14 in pulmonary lesions (P = .004). Compared with the untreated group, tumors following BRAFi, aPDL1, and CSF1R-blocking antibody combination therapy did not show greater levels of TAM or DDNP (P = .82). Conclusion In a mouse model of anaplastic thyroid cancer, ferumoxytol MRI showed 136% ± 88 greater uptake in orthotopic thyroid tumors compared with pulmonary lesions, which reflected high vascularization and greater tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) levels. Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf inhibitor and anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody elicited higher local TAM levels and 43% ± 20 greater therapeutic nanoparticle delivery but not higher vascularization in pulmonary tumors. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Luker in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S C Ng
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Viswanath Gunda
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Ran Li
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Mark Prytyskach
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Yoshiko Iwamoto
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Rainer H Kohler
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Sareh Parangi
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Ralph Weissleder
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| | - Miles A Miller
- From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Suite 5.210, Boston, MA 02114 (T.S.C.N., R.L., M.P., Y.I., R.H.K., R.W., M.A.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.S.C.N.); Departments of Surgery (V.G., S.P.) and Radiology (R.L., R.W., M.A.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Céspedes MV, Unzueta U, Aviñó A, Gallardo A, Álamo P, Sala R, Sánchez-Chardi A, Casanova I, Mangues MA, Lopez-Pousa A, Eritja R, Villaverde A, Vázquez E, Mangues R. Selective depletion of metastatic stem cells as therapy for human colorectal cancer. EMBO Mol Med 2019; 10:emmm.201708772. [PMID: 30190334 PMCID: PMC6180303 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201708772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Selective elimination of metastatic stem cells (MetSCs) promises to block metastatic dissemination. Colorectal cancer (CRC) cells overexpressing CXCR4 display trafficking functions and metastasis‐initiating capacity. We assessed the antimetastatic activity of a nanoconjugate (T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU) that selectively delivers Floxuridine to CXCR4+ cells. In contrast to free oligo‐FdU, intravenous T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU selectively accumulates and internalizes in CXCR4+ cancer cells, triggering DNA damage and apoptosis, which leads to their selective elimination and to reduced tumor re‐initiation capacity. Repeated T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU administration in cell line and patient‐derived CRC models blocks intravasation and completely prevents metastases development in 38–83% of mice, while showing CXCR4 expression‐dependent and site‐dependent reduction in foci number and size in liver, peritoneal, or lung metastases in the rest of mice, compared to free oligo‐FdU. T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU induces also higher regression of established metastases than free oligo‐FdU, with negligible distribution or toxicity in normal tissues. This targeted drug delivery approach yields potent antimetastatic effect, through selective depletion of metastatic CXCR4+ cancer cells, and validates metastatic stem cells (MetSCs) as targets for clinical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Virtudes Céspedes
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ugutz Unzueta
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Aviñó
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Gallardo
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Álamo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rita Sala
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Isolda Casanova
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Antònia Mangues
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Lopez-Pousa
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramón Eritja
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Villaverde
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain .,Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Vázquez
- CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain.,Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramón Mangues
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain .,CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
To resect or not to resect: The hamletic dilemma of primary tumor resection in patients with asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 132:154-160. [PMID: 30447921 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary tumor resection (PTR) in advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been a matter of intense debate for long time. With the advances in systemic treatments, this practice has decreased over the years, although it remains still pervasive. Although the removal of primary tumor has been extensively interrogated both in retrospective and prospective studies, it still remains a clinical conundrum. There are many arguments for and against PTR in CRC both from the preclinical and the clinical point of view. Two scoring models have been published aiming at identifying patients who are suitable candidate for PTR, but they deserve further investigations in larger datasets. While awaiting the results of ongoing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on this controversial topic, both upfront systemic treatment and PTR followed by chemotherapy should be considered valid options in patients with asymptomatic mCRC. Clinical selection and a shared-decision making approach are the keys to success.
Collapse
|
8
|
Systemic Versus Local Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasis: What to Choose and When? J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 47:223-31. [DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9818-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
9
|
Bounaix Morand du Puch C, Nouaille M, Giraud S, Labrunie A, Luce S, Preux PM, Labrousse F, Gainant A, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Le Brun-Ly V, Valleix D, Guillaudeau A, Mesturoux L, Coulibaly B, Lautrette C, Mathonnet M. Chemotherapy outcome predictive effectiveness by the Oncogramme: pilot trial on stage-IV colorectal cancer. J Transl Med 2016; 14:10. [PMID: 26791256 PMCID: PMC4721000 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0765-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major public concern. While conventional chemotherapeutic regimens have proved useful against advanced/metastatic diseases, progresses are to be made to effectively cure the large portion of patients not benefiting from these treatments. One direction to improve response rates is to develop chemosensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) efficiently assisting clinicians in treatment selection process, an already long preoccupation of oncologists and researchers. Several methods have been described to this day, none achieving yet sufficient reliability for recommended use in the clinical routine. Methods
We led a pilot study on 19 metastatic CRC patients evaluating capacity of the Oncogramme, a standardized process using tumor ex vivo models, to provide chemosensitivity profiles and predict clinical outcome of patients receiving standard CRC chemotherapeutics. Oncogramme responses were categorized according to the method of percentiles to assess sensitivity, specificity and concordance. Results We report from a primary analysis a success rate of 97.4 %, a very good sensitivity (84.6 %), a below-average specificity (33.3 %), along with a global agreement of 63.6 % and a concordance between Oncogramme results and patients’ responses (Kappa coefficient) of 0.193. A supplementary analysis, focusing on CRC patients with no treatment switch over a longer time course, demonstrated improvement in specificity and concordance. Conclusions Results establish feasibility and usefulness of the Oncogramme, prelude to a larger-scale trial. Advantages and drawbacks of the procedure are discussed, as well as the place of CSRAs within the future arsenal of methods available to clinicians to individualize treatments and improve patient prognosis. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov database, registration number: NCT02305368 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0765-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Nouaille
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM 1435, Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Stéphanie Giraud
- Oncomedics SAS, ESTER technopole, 1 avenue d'Ester, 87069, Limoges, France.
| | - Anaïs Labrunie
- Centre d'Épidémiologie, de Biostatistique et de Méthodologie de la Recherche, Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Sandrine Luce
- Centre d'Épidémiologie, de Biostatistique et de Méthodologie de la Recherche, Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Pierre-Marie Preux
- Centre d'Épidémiologie, de Biostatistique et de Méthodologie de la Recherche, Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - François Labrousse
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'anatomopathologie, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Alain Gainant
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service de chirurgie digestive, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges, France.
| | - Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'oncologie médicale, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Valérie Le Brun-Ly
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'oncologie médicale, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Denis Valleix
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service de chirurgie viscérale, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Angélique Guillaudeau
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'anatomopathologie, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Laura Mesturoux
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'anatomopathologie, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | - Béma Coulibaly
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service d'anatomopathologie, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
| | | | - Muriel Mathonnet
- Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Limoges Dupuytren, service de chirurgie digestive générale et endocrinienne, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France. .,Université de Limoges, Institut 145 GEIST, EA 3842 "Homéostasie cellulaire et pathologies", Facultés de médecine et de pharmacie, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges Cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Skvortsov S, Arnold CR, Debbage P, Lukas P, Skvortsova I. Proteomic approach to understand metastatic spread. Proteomics Clin Appl 2015; 9:1069-77. [DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Revised: 04/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergej Skvortsov
- Laboratory for Experimental and Translational Research on Radiation Oncology (EXTRO-Lab); Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; Innsbruck Medical University; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Christoph R. Arnold
- Laboratory for Experimental and Translational Research on Radiation Oncology (EXTRO-Lab); Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; Innsbruck Medical University; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Paul Debbage
- Department of Anatomy; Histology and Embryology; Innsbruck Medical University; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Peter Lukas
- Laboratory for Experimental and Translational Research on Radiation Oncology (EXTRO-Lab); Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; Innsbruck Medical University; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Ira Skvortsova
- Laboratory for Experimental and Translational Research on Radiation Oncology (EXTRO-Lab); Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; Innsbruck Medical University; Innsbruck Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ye Q, Ding SF, Wang ZA, Feng J, Tan WB. Influence of ribosomal protein L39-L in the drug resistance mechanisms of lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:4995-5000. [PMID: 24998577 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.12.4995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer constitutes a key pressure on public health regardless of the economy state in different countries. As a kind of highly malignant epithelial tumor, lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma can occur in any part of the body, such as salivary gland, submandibular gland, trachea, lung, breast, skin and lacrimal gland. Chemotherapy is one of the key treatment techniques, but drug resistance, especially MDR, seriously blunts its effects. As an element of the 60S large ribosomal subunit, the ribosomal protein L39-L gene appears to be documented specifically in the human testis and many human cancer samples of different origins. MATERIALS AND METHODS Total RNA of cultured drug-resistant and susceptible lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cells was seperated, and real time quantitative RT-PCR were used to reveal transcription differences between amycin resistant and susceptible strains of lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cells. Viability assays were used to present the amycin resistance difference in a RPL39-L transfected lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cell line as compared to control vector and null-transfected lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cell lines. RESULTS The ribosomal protein L39-L transcription level was 6.5-fold higher in the drug-resistant human lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cell line than in the susceptible cell line by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. The ribosomal protein L39-L transfected cells revealed enhanced drug resistance compared to plasmid vector-transfected or null-transfected cells as determined by methyl tritiated thymidine (3H-TdR) incorporation. CONCLUSIONS The ribosomal protein L39-L gene could possibly have influence on the drug resistance mechanism of lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Ye
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, China E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|