1
|
Claassen MA, Papies EK. Representational shifts: increasing motivation for bottled water through simulation-enhancing advertisements. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2209. [PMID: 37946180 PMCID: PMC10634071 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17109-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its numerous health benefits, consumers' daily water consumption is below recommend levels while soft drink consumption remains high. Previous research has shown that the degree to which drinks are cognitively represented in terms of consumption and enjoyment (i.e., through simulations of consumption and reward) predicts desire and intake. Here, we examined whether simulation-enhancing advertisements that frame water in terms of consumption and reward change cognitive representations and increase motivation for a fictitious bottled water. METHODS In three pre-registered online experiments (Nexp1 = 984; Nexp2 = 786; Nexp3 = 907), UK participants viewed three advertisements that either highlighted the rewarding consumption experience of water (e.g., "Refresh all your senses with this smooth, cool water"; simulation-enhancing ads), the health consequences of drinking water (e.g., "This water takes care of your health"; health-focused ads), or control ads. We assessed cognitive representations of the bottled water with a semantic feature production task, and we coded the words used as consumption and reward features or positive long-term health consequences features. We assessed motivation through ratings of the attractiveness of the water (Exp. 1 only), desire to drink it, and willingness to pay for it (WTP). RESULTS In line with our hypotheses, participants represented the bottled water more in terms of consumption and reward after viewing simulation-enhancing advertisements, and more in terms of positive long-term health consequences after viewing health-focused advertisements. There was no direct effect of advertisement condition on motivation ratings. However, significant indirect effects showed that simulation-enhancing advertisements increased desire and WTP through the proportion of consumption and reward features, whereas health-focused advertisements increased motivation through an increase in the proportion of positive long-term health consequences features. The effects through consumption and reward were stronger. CONCLUSIONS These findings are consistent with research suggesting that the experience of immediate reward from drinking water underlies intake. Public health interventions should emphasize the enjoyment of drinking water, rather than the long-term health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Almudena Claassen
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klink U, Härtling V, Schüz B. Perspectives on Healthy Eating of Adult Populations in High-Income Countries: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Int J Behav Med 2023:10.1007/s12529-023-10214-w. [PMID: 37670167 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-023-10214-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how individuals currently perceive healthy eating is essential for developing food policies and dietary recommendations that improve the health and well-being of populations. The purpose of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to systematically outline the views and understandings of healthy eating, focusing on how foods are classified as healthy and unhealthy and what meanings are attached to food and eating by the general adult population in high-income countries. METHODS A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted and yielded 24 relevant primary qualitative studies of generally healthy, community-dwelling adults. RESULTS Thematic synthesis of the included studies identified three analytic themes: constructions of healthy and unhealthy eating, considerations on dietary recommendations, and meanings attached to food and eating. Study participants generally understood what constitutes a healthy and unhealthy diet which was in line with dietary recommendations, but those of lower socioeconomic status exhibited gaps in nutrition knowledge. Participants expressed diverse opinions on dietary recommendations, including skepticism and a lack of trust. Food and eating were associated with various meanings, including pleasure, stress relief, and feelings of guilt. Moral, health, and sociocultural considerations also played a role in dietary behaviors. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that improving population diet requires considering how dietary recommendations are phrased and communicated to ensure that healthy eating is associated with pleasure and immediate well-being. This review provides valuable insights for developing consumer-oriented, practicable, and acceptable food policies and dietary recommendations that effectively improve population health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urte Klink
- Department of Prevention and Health Promotion, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany.
| | - Victoria Härtling
- Department of Prevention and Health Promotion, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schüz
- Department of Prevention and Health Promotion, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Santos-Antonio G, Bravo-Rebatta F, Velarde-Delgado P, Aramburu A. [Effects of front-of-package nutritional labeling of food and beverages: synopsis of systematic reviewsEfeitos da rotulagem nutricional frontal de alimentos e bebidas: sumário de estudos de revisão sistemática]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2019; 43:e62. [PMID: 31456819 PMCID: PMC6692502 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2019.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objetivos. Sintetizar la información disponible sobre el efecto del etiquetado nutricional frontal en la elección, compra y consumo de alimentos y bebidas, y el estado nutricional de los consumidores, e identificar los factores que influyen en su efectividad. Métodos. Se realizó una sinopsis de revisiones sistemáticas (RS) conforme a las recomendaciones PRISMA. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en Medline (Pubmed), The Cochrane Library, LILACS, EBSCOhost y Scopus, limitada a estudios publicados en español o inglés sin restricción por fecha de publicación. La calidad metodológica se evaluó utilizando la herramienta AMSTAR 2. Resultados. Se incluyeron siete RS. El etiquetado frontal facilitó la elección de alimentos saludables y tuvo un efecto variable sobre las dimensiones de consumo y compra. Ninguna RS evaluó el efecto sobre el estado nutricional. El costo y sabor, los hábitos alimentarios, el nivel educativo y los sistemas dominantes de procesamiento de información en el consumidor influyeron en su efectividad. La mayoría de RS mostraron limitaciones metodológicas y un nivel de confianza críticamente bajo. Conclusiones. El etiquetado frontal tuvo efecto positivo en la elección de alimentos saludables, con resultados variables en las dimensiones de compra y consumo. Se necesitan estudios locales con una adecuada calidad metodológica para identificar el formato de etiquetado más efectivo en cada país. Su implementación como política de salud pública debe acompañarse de estrategias para mejorar el acceso a alimentos saludables, promover la actividad física y brindar educación nutricional a los consumidores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Santos-Antonio
- Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Instituto Nacional de Salud Lima Perú Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú
| | - Fernando Bravo-Rebatta
- Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Instituto Nacional de Salud Lima Perú Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú
| | - Patricia Velarde-Delgado
- Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Instituto Nacional de Salud Lima Perú Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú
| | - Adolfo Aramburu
- Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición Instituto Nacional de Salud Lima Perú Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vilaro MJ, Barnett TE, Mathews A, Pomeranz J, Curbow B. Income differences in social control of eating behaviors and food choice priorities among southern rural women in the US: A qualitative study. Appetite 2016; 107:604-612. [PMID: 27612560 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Revised: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The role of social influences on rural women's food choice is not well understood. Rural adults experience high rates of obesity and poor diet quality prompting exploration of how social factors influence food choice in this population. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 women in rural North Central Florida. Women were purposively sampled and stratified by race and income. Lower income was defined as household income at or below 185% of the federal poverty level (FPL). Women at or below 185% poverty level (BPL) experienced direct social control of their eating behaviors, which occurred when social network members explicitly regulated or otherwise sanctioned eating behaviors or food choices. Women above 185% of the federal poverty level (APL) internalized social norms and self-regulated their eating behaviors to maintain healthy habits. APL women described choosing foods for health reasons whereas BPL women offered a variety of reasons including taste, convenience, family history, price, health, and routine. Findings suggest that women in different income groups have different social influences working to help them regulate eating behaviors as well as diverse priorities influencing their food choices. Future interventions to promote healthy eating may be more effective by incorporating social network members and framing intervention messages so they are consistent with priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Vilaro
- Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions, 1225 Center Drive, P.O. Box 100175 HSC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0175, USA.
| | - Tracey E Barnett
- Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions, 1225 Center Drive, P.O. Box 100175 HSC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0175, USA
| | - Anne Mathews
- Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 110370, 359 FSHN Bldg., 572 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32611-0370, USA
| | - Jamie Pomeranz
- Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions, 1225 Center Drive, P.O. Box 100175 HSC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0175, USA
| | - Barbara Curbow
- Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions, 1225 Center Drive, P.O. Box 100175 HSC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0175, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoogeveen HR, Jolij J, ter Horst GJ, Lorist MM. Brain Potentials Highlight Stronger Implicit Food Memory for Taste than Health and Context Associations. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154128. [PMID: 27213567 PMCID: PMC4877055 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasingly consumption of healthy foods is advised to improve population health. Reasons people give for choosing one food over another suggest that non-sensory features like health aspects are appreciated as of lower importance than taste. However, many food choices are made in the absence of the actual perception of a food's sensory properties, and therefore highly rely on previous experiences of similar consumptions stored in memory. In this study we assessed the differential strength of food associations implicitly stored in memory, using an associative priming paradigm. Participants (N = 30) were exposed to a forced-choice picture-categorization task, in which the food or non-food target images were primed with either non-sensory or sensory related words. We observed a smaller N400 amplitude at the parietal electrodes when categorizing food as compared to non-food images. While this effect was enhanced by the presentation of a food-related word prime during food trials, the primes had no effect in the non-food trials. More specifically, we found that sensory associations are stronger implicitly represented in memory as compared to non-sensory associations. Thus, this study highlights the neuronal mechanisms underlying previous observations that sensory associations are important features of food memory, and therefore a primary motive in food choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen R. Hoogeveen
- Top Institute Food and Nutrition, P.O. Box 557 6700 AN, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Neuroimaging Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 2, 9713 AW, Groningen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Jacob Jolij
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gert J. ter Horst
- Top Institute Food and Nutrition, P.O. Box 557 6700 AN, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Neuroimaging Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 2, 9713 AW, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monicque M. Lorist
- Neuroimaging Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 2, 9713 AW, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Forwood SE, Ahern AL, Hollands GJ, Ng YL, Marteau TM. Priming healthy eating. You can't prime all the people all of the time. Appetite 2015; 89:93-102. [PMID: 25636234 PMCID: PMC4544036 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the context of a food purchasing environment filled with advertising and promotions, and an increased desire from policy makers to guide individuals toward choosing healthier foods, this study tests whether priming methods that use healthy food adverts to increase preference for healthier food generalize to a representative population. METHODS In two studies (Study 1 n = 143; Study 2 n = 764), participants were randomly allocated to a prime condition, where they viewed fruit and vegetable advertisements, or a control condition, with no advertisements. A subsequent forced choice task assessed preference between fruits and other sweet snacks. Additional measures included current hunger and thirst, dietary restraint, age, gender, education and self-reported weight and height. RESULTS In Study 1, hunger reduced preferences for fruits (OR (95% CI) = 0.38 (0.26-0.56), p <0.0001), an effect countered by the prime (OR (95% CI) = 2.29 (1.33-3.96), p = 0.003). In Study 2, the effect of the prime did not generalize to a representative population. More educated participants, as used in Study 1, chose more fruit when hungry and primed (OR (95% CI) = 1.42 (1.13-1.79), p = 0.003), while less educated participants' fruit choice was unaffected by hunger or the prime. CONCLUSION This study provides preliminary evidence that the effects of adverts on healthy eating choices depend on key individual traits (education level) and states (hunger), do not generalize to a broader population and have the potential to increase health inequalities arising from food choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanna E Forwood
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Amy L Ahern
- Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth J Hollands
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yin-Lam Ng
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Theresa M Marteau
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuijer RG, Boyce JA, Marshall EM. Associating a prototypical forbidden food item with guilt or celebration: Relationships with indicators of (un)healthy eating and the moderating role of stress and depressive symptoms. Psychol Health 2014; 30:203-17. [DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2014.960414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|