Magnetic resonance evaluation of multiple myeloma at 3.0 Tesla: how do bone marrow plasma cell percentage and selection of protocols affect lesion conspicuity?

Does chemical shift imaging offer a biomarker for the diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in multiple myeloma?: A cross-sectional study

To investigate whether chemical shift imaging (CSI) is useful for differentiating myelomatous infiltration from hematopoietic bone marrow (BM) and for quantitatively assessing disease severity.In this retrospective study, spinal MRI, including a sagittal iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation T2 fast spin-echo sequence, was performed on 76 myeloma patients (45 men, 67.0 ± 11.4 years; 31 women, 66.5 ± 11.0 years) and 30 control subjects (20 men, 67.0 ± 8.4 years; 10 women, 67.0 ± 9.2 years). The fat-signal fraction (FF) and mean signal dropout ratio (DR) were calculated from lumbar BM that contained no focal lesions. The BM plasma cell percentage (BMPC%) and serological data were obtained. As DR is highest when FF = 50%, the patients were divided into 2 groups: a water-dominant group (FF < 50%) and a fat-dominant group (FF > 50%).Serum monoclonal protein (M protein), β2-microglobulin, and BMPC% were significantly higher in the water-dominant group than in the fat-dominant group. In the water-dominant group, DR correlated significantly with BMPC% and M protein, whereas in the control group, DR showed a weak correlation with age but no correlation with other clinical factors. No significant differences in any clinical data were seen between high and low DR.CSI proved ineffective for differentiating myelomatous infiltration from hematopoietic BM. For myeloma patients with relatively high BM cellularity, a small signal drop on opposed-phase images indicated a higher tumor burden. For BM with relatively low cellularity, disease severity was not reflected by CSI.

Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times

OBJECTIVE

To identify the whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) image type(s) with the highest value for assessment of multiple myeloma, in order to optimise acquisition protocols and read times.

METHODS

Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced Dixon images [fat-only (FO) and water-only (WO)], post contrast Dixon [fat-only plus contrast (FOC) and water-only plus contrast (WOC)] and diffusion weighted images (DWI) of the pelvis from all 30 patients were randomised and read by three experienced readers. For each image type, each reader identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions. Each identified lesion was compared with a composite reference standard achieved by review of a complete imaging dataset by a further experienced consultant radiologist to determine truly positive lesions. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were determined. Time to read each scan set was recorded. Confidence for a diagnosis of myeloma was scored using a Likert scale. Conspicuity of focal lesions was assessed in terms of percent contrast and contrast to noise ratio (CNR).

RESULTS

Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were significantly higher when compared to other image types for DWI (P<0.0001 to 0.003), followed by WOC (significant for sensitivity (P<0.0001 to 0.004), true positives (P = 0.003 to 0.049) and positive predictive value (P< 0.0001 to 0.006)). There was no statistically significant difference in these metrics between FO and FOC. Percent contrast was highest for WOC (P = 0.001 to 0.005) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was highest for DWI (P = 0.03 to 0.05). Reading times were fastest for DWI across all observers (P< 0.0001 to 0.014).

DISCUSSION

Observers detected more myeloma lesions on DWI images and WOC images when compared to other image types. We suggest that these image types should be read preferentially by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency.

Diagnostic utility of whole body Dixon MRI in multiple myeloma: A multi-reader study

OBJECTIVE

To determine which of four Dixon image types [in-phase (IP), out-of-phase (OP), fat only (FO) and water-only (WO)] is most sensitive for detecting multiple myeloma (MM) focal lesions on whole body MRI (WB-MRI) images.

METHODS

Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced IP, OP, FO and WO Dixon images were generated and read by four radiologists. On each image type, each radiologist identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions in the bony pelvis. Each identified lesion was compared with a reference standard consisting of pre- and post-contrast Dixon and diffusion weighted imaging (read by a further consultant radiologist) to determine whether the lesion was truly positive. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were compared across the four Dixon image types.

RESULTS

Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were all significantly higher on FO images than on IP images (p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

FO images are more sensitive than other Dixon image types for MM focal lesions, and should be preferentially read by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency.