Association of X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 Arg194Trp, Arg399Gln and Arg280His polymorphisms with head and neck cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

The XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism was associated with the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma development: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is a DNA repair gene. Various studies have examined the association between XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) susceptibility with contradictory results. So, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether variants of this polymorphism increase the HNSCC risk or not.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty three studies consisting of 14282 subjects (6012 cases and 8270 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were associated with increased HNSCC risk and the associations were significant based on heterozygous and dominant models (heterozygous model: OR = 1.182, 95%CI = 1.015-1.377, P = 0.032; homozygous model: OR = 1.274, 95%CI = 0.940-1.727, P = 0.119; dominant model: OR = 1.194, 95%CI = 1.027-1.388, P = 0.021; recessive model: OR = 1.181, 95%CI = 0.885-1.576, P = 0.119). There were significant associations between variants of this polymorphism and HNSCC risk based on Asian ethnicity under dominant model, hospital control source under different genetic models, PCR-RFLP genotyping method under dominant model and oral cavity tumor site under heterozygous and dominant models.

OBJECTIVE

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is a DNA repair gene. Various studies have examined the association between XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) susceptibility with contradictory results. So, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether variants of this polymorphism increase the HNSCC risk or not.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literatures published till April 2022 was conducted using Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. The heterogeneity was assessed with the I-Square statistic. A random effects model or fixed effects model was used to analyze the data. Data were reported by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The p value was considered significant if p < .05.

RESULTS

Thirty three studies consisting of 14 282 subjects (6012 cases and 8270 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were associated with increased HNSCC risk and the associations were significant based on heterozygous and dominant models (heterozygous model: OR = 1.182, 95%CI = 1.015-1.377, p = .032; homozygous model: OR = 1.274, 95%CI = 0.940-1.727, p = .119; dominant model: OR = 1.194, 95%CI = 1.027-1.388, p = .021; recessive model: OR = 1.181, 95%CI = 0.885-1.576, p = .119). There were significant associations between variants of this polymorphism and HNSCC risk based on Asian ethnicity under dominant model, hospital control source under different genetic models, PCR-RFLP genotyping method under dominant model and oral cavity tumor site under heterozygous and dominant models.

CONCLUSION

Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were significantly associated with increased risk of HNSCC development based on heterozygous and dominant genetic models.

Survival association of XRCC1 for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that X-ray repair cross-complementary group 1 (XRCC1) is one of the susceptibility factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. However, its clinical prognostic impact remains controversial. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between XRCC1 and the survival outcomes in HNSCC patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items or Systematic Reviews Meta Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, literature searches were systematically performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with manual retrieval. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected to estimate the correlation between XRCC1 and the survival outcomes of HNSCC patients. Results: Ten studies including 1995 HNSCC patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis indicated that XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC1 high protein expression were significantly correlated with poor overall survival with HR of 1.31 (95% CIs: 1.03-1.66, p = 0.027) and 2.32 (95% CIs: 1.55-3.48 p = 0.000) in HNSCC patients. In addition, our results demonstrated that XRCC1 was significantly associated with poor progression-free survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CIs: 1.15-1.75, p = 0.001) in HNSCC patients. ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated that XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC1 high protein expression increase the risk of poor survival for HNSCC patients. XRCC1 is a potential therapeutic target for HNSCC.

The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects

BACKGROUND

Accumulated evidence shows that DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer (HNC) as a major DNA repair gene. However, the results from previous studies have been conflictive and inconsistent. In order to more accurately estimate and integrate the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC risk, we conducted a meta-analysis including 14586 subjects.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, literatures were collected up until September 15, 2020 through multifarious retrieval strategies by searching through electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CNKI. The association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC was analyzed through calculating summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies consisting of 6025 cases and 8561 controls were identified and analyzed. No significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk was found under the allelic (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07, P = 0.35), homozygous (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.81-1.21, P = 0.91), heterozygous (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13, P = 0.91), dominant (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.29, P = 0.67) or recessive (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08, P = 0.35) genetic models in the overall comparison. In addition, subgroup analyses according to tumor site also displayed no significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk. However, subgroup analyses based on ethnicity indicated that HNC risk was significantly related to Arg399Gln genetic heterozygous model (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and dominant model (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.02-1.60, P = 0.04) in Caucasians populations.

CONCLUSION

The results from this meta-analysis suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants (Arg/Gln and Arg/Arg+Arg/Gln) may contribute to high HNC risk among Caucasians. Further well-designed studies and larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings.

Assessment on the influence of TLR4 and DNA repair genes in laryngeal cancer susceptibility: a selective examination in a Romanian case control study

Background: Tumor characterization through the study of molecular biology has become an invaluable tool in understanding cancer development and evolution due to its relationship with chromosomal mutations, alterations or aberrations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the involvement of genes such as TLR-4 and DNA repair pathways (XRCC1 and XPD) in laryngeal cancer susceptibility in a Romanian population. Method: We performed a case-control study on 157 laryngeal cancer patients and 101 healthy controls. Genetic testing was carried out using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism. Results: We identified the Gln allele of the XPDLys751Gln polymorphism as an individual risk factor in laryngeal cancer development (Gln vs Lys, adjusted OR=1.65, 95%CI=1.13–2.40, P=0.008). Subjects with the mutant homozygote variant (Gln/Gln) had a two fold increase in cancer risk (adjusted OR=2.18, 95%CI=1.06–4.47, p=0.028) when compared to the reference wild type genotype (Lys/Lys). Stratification by sex and age, identified males under 62 years as the most susceptible group with an almost three fold risk (adjusted OR=2.94, 95%CI=1.31–6.59, p=0.007) for the dominant model (Lys/Gln+Gln/Gln). No associations were found for TLR-4Thr399Ile, XRCC1Arg194Trp and XRCC1Arg399Gln. Conclusion: The results of the study show that the XPDLys751Gln polymorphism may be among other independent risk factors for developing laryngeal cancer where as TLR-4Thr399Ile, XRCC1Arg194Trp and XRCC1 Arg399Gln show no such association. However, we consider the relative small number of the subjects selected for this analyses a possible limitation towards the real influence the obtain results may pertain in laryngeal cancer evolution.

COX-2 rs689466, rs5275, and rs20417 polymorphisms and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of adjusted and unadjusted data

Background

Numerous case–control studies have been performed to investigate the association between three cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) polymorphisms (rs20417 (−765G > C), rs689466 (−1195G > A), and rs5275 (8473 T > C)) and the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association.

Methods

We searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 20, 2015 (last updated on May 12, 2016). Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Odds ratios (ORs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association. All statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) 5.2 software.

Results

Finally 8 case–control studies were included in this meta-analysis. For unadjusted data, an association with increased risk was observed in three genetic models in COX-2 rs689466 polymorphism; however, COX-2 rs5275 and rs20417 polymorphisms were not related to HNSCC risk in this study. The pooled results from adjusted data all revealed non-significant association between these three polymorphisms and risk of HNSCC. We also found a similar result in the subgroup analyses, based on both unadjusted data and adjusted data.

Conclusion

Current results suggest that COX-2 rs689466, rs5275, and rs20417 polymorphisms are not associated with HNSCC. Further large and well-designed studies are necessary to validate this association.

A systematic gene-gene and gene-environment interaction analysis of DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, and oral cancer risk

Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide with a high mortality rate. Biomarkers that anticipate susceptibility, prognosis, or response to treatments are much needed. Oral cancer is a polygenic disease involving complex interactions among genetic and environmental factors, which require multifaceted analyses. Here, we examined in a dataset of 103 oral cancer cases and 98 controls from Taiwan the association between oral cancer risk and the DNA repair genes X-ray repair cross-complementing group (XRCCs) 1-4, and the environmental factors of smoking, alcohol drinking, and betel quid (BQ) chewing. We employed logistic regression, multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR), and hierarchical interaction graphs for analyzing gene-gene (G×G) and gene-environment (G×E) interactions. We identified a significantly elevated risk of the XRCC2 rs2040639 heterozygous variant among smokers [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-12.1] and alcohol drinkers [adjusted OR=5.7, 95% CI=1.4-23.2]. The best two-factor based G×G interaction of oral cancer included the XRCC1 rs1799782 and XRCC2 rs2040639 [OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.66-6.13]. For the G×E interaction, the estimated OR of oral cancer for two (drinking-BQ chewing), three (XRCC1-XRCC2-BQ chewing), four (XRCC1-XRCC2-age-BQ chewing), and five factors (XRCC1-XRCC2-age-drinking-BQ chewing) were 32.9 [95% CI=14.1-76.9], 31.0 [95% CI=14.0-64.7], 49.8 [95% CI=21.0-117.7] and 82.9 [95% CI=31.0-221.5], respectively. Taken together, the genotypes of XRCC1 rs1799782 and XRCC2 rs2040639 DNA repair genes appear to be significantly associated with oral cancer. These were enhanced by exposure to certain environmental factors. The observations presented here warrant further research in larger study samples to examine their relevance for routine clinical care in oncology.

Impact of polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene XRCC1 and their role in the risk of prostate cancer

Objective:

We conducted a case-control study to examine the role of XRCC1 codons 194 (Arg>Trp), 280 (Arg>His) and 399 (Arg>Gln) polymorphisms in the risk of prostate cancer.

Methods:

This study included 572 consecutive primary prostate cancer patients and 572 controls between January 2011 and January 2014. The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was performed to detect XRCC1 codons 194 (Arg>Trp), 280 (Arg>His) and 399 (Arg>Gln) polymorphisms.

Results:

Compared with the control subjects, the prostate cancer cases had a habit of cigarette smoking (χ²=18.13, P<0.001) and a family history of cancer (χ²=25.23, P<0.001). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the subjects carrying Trp/Trp genotype were more likely to greatly increase the prostate cancer when compared with Arg/Arg genotype, and the adjusted OR was 2.04(1.24-3.41). We did not find significant association between XRCC1 194 (Arg>Trp) polymorphism and clinical stage and Gleason score of prostate cancer (P>0.05).

Conclusion:

Our results show an increased risk for prostate cancer in individuals with XRCC1 194 (Arg>Trp) polymorphism, and a significant interaction between XRCC1 194 (Arg>Trp) polymorphism and tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and family history of cancer.

Worldwide Distribution of Four SNPs in X-Ray and Repair and Cross-Complementing Group 1 (XRCC1)

PURPOSE

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) repairs single-strand breaks in DNA. Several reports have shown the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Arg194Trp, Pro206Pro, Arg280His, Arg399Gln) in XRCC1 to diseases. Limited population data are available regarding SNPs in XRCC1, especially in African populations. In this study, genotype distributions of four SNPs in worldwide populations were examined and compared with those reported previously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four SNPs (Arg194Trp, Pro206Pro, Arg280His, Arg399Gln) in XRCC1 from genomic DNA samples of 10 populations were evaluated by using polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

RESULTS

The frequency of the minor allele corresponding to the Trp allele of XRCC1Arg194Trp was higher in Asian populations than in African and Caucasian populations. As for XRCC1Pro206Pro, Africans showed higher minor allele frequencies than did Asian populations, except for Tamils and Sinhalese. XRCC1 Arg280His frequencies were similar among Africans and Caucasians but differed among Asian populations. Similarly, lower mutant XRCC1 Arg399Gln frequencies were observed in Africans.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to show the existence of a certain genetic heterogeneity in the worldwide distribution of four SNPs in XRCC1.