A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit data

Association of perioperative immunonutrition with anastomotic leak among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within a robust enhanced recovery after surgery program

BACKGROUND

Immunonutrition supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of surgical infectious complications; however, its effect on decreasing anastomotic leak rates, in the context of an otherwise robust Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program, remains unclear. This study aims to assess the association between perioperative immunonutrition supplementation and anastomotic leak in an elective Enhanced Recovery After Surgery colorectal surgical population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-institution cohort study consisting of adult patients enrolled in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway and undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2018 to 2023. Immunonutrition supplementation was defined as a 10-day perioperative supply of commercially available nutritional shakes. Relevant demographic covariates, preoperative characteristics, and operative methods were identified and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the association of immunonutrition with anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

A total of 708 patients were included in the study, of which n = 400 (56.5%) received perioperative immunonutrition. Patients who received immunonutrition were more likely to be older (median age 57.9 vs 55.7), male (52.7% vs 44.8%), have a higher body mass index (27.7 vs 26.3), and less likely to be current smokers (9.8% vs 16.2%). On adjusted analysis, there was no association between immunonutrition use and anastomotic leak (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.45, 2.08), 30-day readmission (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.60, 1.57), or length of stay (β = .40, 95% confidence interval = -0.06, 0.86) CONCLUSION: We did not observe an association between perioperative immunonutrition supplementation and postoperative anastomotic leak, suggesting that the role of immunonutrition within a comprehensive Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program for elective colorectal surgery may warrant further evaluation.

Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgeries at the Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital

Aim We reviewed surgical outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer resections in Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital between April 2019 and March 2020. Methods Clinical characteristics of 141 patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer at the district hospital were assessed and reported, including tumor site, disease stage, and type of surgical resection performed. We reviewed 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality, postoperative complications, return to the theater, and extended hospital stay data for these patients. The results of our review across measured outcomes were compared to the national average from the National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA) Report. Results Clinical data and health outcomes for 141 patients with colorectal cancer resections within the index year were reviewed. The mean age at diagnosis was 68.9 (12.5) years. Among the patients, 61 (43.3%) were female, and 59 (41.8%) had Stage III and IV colorectal cancer. Around 95 (67.4%) had the colon as the primary tumor site, while 46 (32.6%) had the primary tumor site in the rectum. Of the patients, 17 (12.1%) had emergency surgeries, and 124 (87.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Right hemicolectomy was the most common operation performed in 58 patients (41.1%). The average length of stay was 7.8 (6.6) days; the length of stay was similar for both colonic and rectal resections. Low 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of (1/141) 0.71% and (2/141) 1.4%, respectively, were observed compared to the 90-day United Kingdom (UK) national average mortality rate of 2.7% in 2019/20. Around 30 (21.3%) of the patients developed postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery. Only six out of 30 postoperative complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade III. Conclusion Surgical outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer in our district general hospital are similar to or lower than the national averages estimated by NBOCA. To further strengthen surgical care delivery and improve patient outcomes in the United Kingdom, there is a need to improve surgical techniques and quality improvement processes.

Quality indicators in surgical oncology: systematic review of measures used to compare quality across hospitals

BACKGROUND

Measurement and reporting of quality indicators at the hospital level has been shown to improve outcomes and support patient choice. Although there are many studies validating individual quality indicators, there has been no systematic approach to understanding what quality indicators exist for surgical oncology and no standardization for their use. The aim of this study was to review quality indicators used to assess variation in quality in surgical oncology care across hospitals or regions. It also sought to describe the aims of these studies and what, if any, feedback was offered to the analysed groups.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies published between 1 January 2000 and 23 October 2023 that applied surgical quality indicators to detect variation in cancer care at the hospital or regional level.

RESULTS

A total of 89 studies assessed 91 unique quality indicators that fell into the following Donabedian domains: process indicators (58; 64%); outcome indicators (26; 29%); structure indicators (6; 7%); and structure and outcome indicators (1; 1%). Purposes of evaluating variation included: identifying outliers (43; 48%); comparing centres with a benchmark (14; 16%); and supplying evidence of practice variation (29; 33%). Only 23 studies (26%) reported providing the results of their analyses back to those supplying data.

CONCLUSION

Comparisons of quality in surgical oncology within and among hospitals and regions have been undertaken in high-income countries. Quality indicators tended to be process measures and reporting focused on identifying outlying hospitals. Few studies offered feedback to data suppliers.

Relationships between multiple patient safety outcomes and healthcare and hospital-related risk factors in colorectal resection cases: cross-sectional evidence from a nationwide sample of 232 German hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Studies analysing colorectal resections usually focus on a specific outcome (eg, mortality) and/or specific risk factors at the individual (eg, comorbidities) or hospital (eg, volume) level. Comprehensive evidence across different patient safety outcomes, risk factors and patient groups is still scarce. Therefore the aim of this analysis was to investigate consistent relationships between multiple patient safety outcomes, healthcare and hospital risk factors in colorectal resection cases.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

German inpatient routine care data of colorectal resections between 2016 and 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

We analysed 54 168 colon resection and 20 395 rectum resection cases treated in German hospitals. The German Inpatient Quality Indicators were used to define colon resections and rectum resections transparently.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Additionally to in-hospital death, postoperative respiratory failure, renal failure and postoperative wound infections we included multiple patient safety outcomes as primary outcomes/dependent variables for our analysis. Healthcare (eg, weekend surgery), hospital (eg, volume) and case (eg, age) characteristics served as independent covariates in a multilevel logistic regression model. The estimated regression coefficients were transferred into ORs.

RESULTS

Weekend surgery, emergency admissions and transfers from other hospitals were significantly associated (ORs ranged from 1.1 to 2.6) with poor patient safety outcome (ie, death, renal failure, postoperative respiratory failure) in colon resections and rectum resections. Hospital characteristics showed heterogeneous effects. In colon resections hospital volume was associated with insignificant or adverse associations (postoperative wound infections: OR 1.168 (95% CI 1.030 to 1.325)) to multiple patient safety outcomes. In rectum resections hospital volume was protectively associated with death, renal failure and postoperative respiratory failure (ORs ranged from 0.7 to 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer from other hospital and emergency admission are constantly associated with poor patient safety outcome. Hospital variables like volume, ownership or localisation did not show consistent relationships to patient safety outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN10188560.

Textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as a composite measure for quality of care: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome is a composite measure of combined outcome indicators, which has been suggested to be of additional value over single outcome parameters in clinical auditing of surgical treatment. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome after rectal cancer surgery as short-term marker for quality of care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2019 and registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit were included. Textbook outcome was achieved when the following criteria were met: 30-day and primary hospital admission survival, no reintervention, tumour-free margins, no postoperative complications, a hospital stay of less than 14 days and no readmission. Hospital variation was evaluated in case-mix corrected funnel-plots. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated factors with textbook outcome.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 20,521 patients who underwent primary rectal cancer surgery, of whom 56.3% achieved textbook outcome. Postoperative complications were the main contributor to not achieving textbook outcome. Case-mix corrected funnel plots demonstrated that underperforming hospitals in 2012-2015 were no underperformers in 2016-2019 anymore. Female sex, laparoscopic surgery, and rectal resection without defunctioning stoma creation were positively associated with textbook outcome.

CONCLUSION

Textbook outcome after rectal cancer resection is mainly driven by postoperative complications. Although textbook outcome showed some discriminating value for identifying underperforming hospitals, it does not fit the plan-do-check-act cycle of clinical auditing. In our opinion, textbook outcome has little added value to the current outcome indicators for rectal cancer surgery.

Implementing new surgical technology: a national perspective on case volume requirement for proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision

Background

Early data suggest that transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a safe alternative to the abdominal approach for rectal cancer. This study aims to understand the approach to the management of rectal cancer in Canada and to ascertain perspectives on introducing TaTME.

Methods

Surgeons were invited to complete a survey that asked about their management practices relating to rectal cancer and their opinions regarding TaTME.

Results

Ninety-four surgeons completed the survey (38% response rate). The number of rectal cancer cases handled annually by surgeons varied widely (1–80 cases, median 15 cases). Twenty-seven percent of respondents performed TaTME at the time of the survey, and 43% of those who did not said they planned on learning the technique. Surgeons who performed TaTME felt that a higher annual volume of rectal cancer cases was required to maintain proficiency than did non-TaTME surgeons (median 20 cases [interquartile range (IQR) 15–25 cases] v. 15 cases [IQR 10–20 cases]). Surgeons who performed TaTME also felt that a higher annual volume of TaTME cases was required to maintain proficiency (median 12 cases [IQR 10–19 cases] v. 9 cases [IQR 5–10 cases]).

Conclusion

These findings help define the current practice environment for rectal cancer surgeons in Canada and highlight the complex issues associated with learning TaTME.

Outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: Results from a population-based study in Queensland, Australia, using quality indicators

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide, and rates are continuing to rise. Surgery is the primary treatment for CRC, and our aim was to examine clinical outcomes following major resection using a series of established quality indicators and to identify factors associated with poor clinical outcomes.

METHOD

This population-based retrospective study included 4321 patients with diagnosed with CRC in 2012 and 2014 in Queensland, Australia, who underwent a major resection. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, extended hospital stay (>21 days), and 30- and 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was conducted to establish factors independently associated with each outcome of interest.

RESULTS

Overall, in-hospital mortality was 1.5%, 3.0% had an unplanned readmission, 8% had an extended hospital stay, and 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality was 1.6% and 3.1%, respectively. After adjustment, we found that factors such as older age, presence of comorbidities, emergency admission, and stoma formation were significantly associated with poorer outcomes with these findings being consistent across each of the outcomes of interest. In addition to these factors, the risk of 90-day mortality was significantly elevated for patients with advanced stage disease (OR = 1.95, CI 1.35-2.82). Sex, primary site, hospital volume, residential location, nor socioeconomic status was found to be associated with any of the outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the risk of poorer clinical outcomes for CRC patients in Queensland, Australia, is low. There is however a subgroup of patients at particularly elevated risk of poorer outcomes following CRC. Strategies to reduce the poorer clinical outcomes this group of patients experience should be explored.

Surgeon perceived most important factors to achieve the best hospital performance on colorectal cancer surgery: a Dutch modified Delphi method

OBJECTIVES

Hospital variation in risk-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery has been shown. However, explanatory factors are not sufficiently clear. The objective of this study was to identify factors perceived by gastrointestinal surgeons as important to achieve excellent casemix-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

Based on literature and experts' opinion, 86 factors associated with serious complications, failure to rescue and mortality were listed. These were presented to gastrointestinal surgeons through two web-based surveys and an expert meeting. Participants were asked to choose their top 10 of most important factors.

PARTICIPANTS

Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons (n=52) of different hospitals and different hospital types (general/teaching/academic).

RESULTS

Of 31 invited experts for the first survey and meeting, 71% responded. Of 130 invited surgeons, 34 responded to the second survey. Factors deemed important were: procedural hospital volume (46% in top 10), specialised surgeons performing surgery, (elective 87%, emergency 60% and reoperations 62% in top 10), accessibility of, and daily ward rounds by specialised surgeons (41% and 38% in top 10), preoperative screening for malnutrition (57% in top 10), a protocol for recognition of anastomotic leakage and rapid reintervention (54% and 49% in top 10).

CONCLUSION

Procedural hospital volume, specialisation of surgeons, screening for malnutrition, early recognition of complications followed by rapid action were perceived as most important factors to achieve good outcomes by gastrointestinal surgeons.

Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Numerous hospitals worldwide are considering setting minimum volume standards for colorectal surgery. This study aims to examine the association between hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Two investigators independently reviewed six databases from inception to May 2016 for articles that reported outcomes according to hospital and/or surgeon volume. Eligible studies included those in which assessed the association hospital or surgeon volume with outcomes for the surgical treatment of colon and/or rectal cancer. Random effects models were used to pool the hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between hospital/surgeon volume with outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 47 articles pooled (1,122,303 patients, 9,877 hospitals and 9,649 surgeons). The meta-analysis demonstrated that there is a volume-outcome relationship that favours high volume facilities and high volume surgeons. Higher hospital and surgeon volume resulted in reduced 30-day mortality (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78-0.87, P<0.001 & HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.80-0.89, P<0.001 respectively) and intra-operative mortality (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.86, P<0.001 & HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.40-0.62, P<0.001 respectively). Post-operative complication rates depended on hospital volume (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, P<0.05), but not surgeon volume except with respect to anastomotic leak (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37-0.94, P<0.01). High volume surgeons are associated with greater 5-year survival and greater lymph node retrieval, whilst reducing recurrence rates, operative time, length of stay and cost. The best outcomes occur in high volume hospitals with high volume surgeons, followed by low volume hospitals with high volume surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

High volume by surgeon and high volume by hospital are associated with better outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. However, this relationship is non-linear with no clear threshold of effect being identified and an apparent ceiling of effect.

Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics

BACKGROUND

To answer the question whether minimum caseloads need to be stipulated in the German S3 (or any other) guidelines for colorectal cancer, we analyzed the current representative literature. The question is important regarding medical quality as well as health economics and policy.

METHODS

A literature research was conducted in PubMed for papers concerning 'colon cancer' (CC), 'rectal cancer' (RC), and 'colorectal cancer' (CRC), with 'results', 'quality', and 'mortality' between the years 2000 and 2016 being relevant factors. We graded the recommendations as 'pro', 'maybe', or 'contra' in terms of a significant correlation between hospital volume (HV) or surgeon volume (SV) and treatment quality. We also listed the recommended numbers suggested for HV or SV as minimum caseloads and calculated and discussed the socio-economic impact of setting minimum caseloads for CRC.

RESULTS

The correlations of caseloads of hospitals or surgeons turned out to be highly controversial concerning the influence of HV or SV on short- and long-term surgical treatment quality of CRC. Specialized statisticians made the point that the reports in the literature might not use the optimal biometrical analytical/reporting methods. A Dutch analysis showed that if a decision towards minimum caseloads, e.g. >50 for CRC resections, would be made, this would exclude a lot of hospitals with proven good treatment quality and include hospitals with a treatment quality below average. Our economic analysis envisioned that a yearly loss of EUR <830,000 might ensue for hospitals with volumes <50 per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Caseload (HV, SV) definitely is an inconsistent surrogate parameter for treatment quality in the surgery of CC, RC, or CRC. If used at all, the lowest tolerable numbers but the highest demands for structural, process and result quality in the surgical/interdisciplinary treatment of CC and RC must be imposed and independently controlled. Hospitals fulfilling these demands should be medically and socio-economically preferred concerning the treatment of CC and RC patients.

Preoperative Immunonutrition and Elective Colorectal Resection Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials demonstrate the efficacy of arginine-enriched nutritional supplements (immunonutrition) in reducing complications after surgery. The effectiveness of preoperative immunonutrition has not been evaluated in a community setting.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine whether immunonutrition before elective colorectal surgery improves outcomes in the community at large.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study with a propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness evaluation.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in Washington State hospitals in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program from 2012 to 2015.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgeons used a preoperative checklist that recommended that patients take oral immunonutrition (237 mL, 3 times daily) for 5 days before elective colorectal resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serious adverse events (infection, anastomotic leak, reoperation, and death) and prolonged length of stay were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred seventy-five patients (mean age 59.9 ± 15.2 years, 56% female) underwent elective colorectal surgery. Patients receiving immunonutrition more commonly were in a higher ASA class (III-V, 44% vs 38%; p = 0.01) or required an ostomy (18% vs 14%; p = 0.02). The rate of serious adverse events was 6.8% vs 8.3% (p = 0.25) and the rate of prolonged length of stay was 13.8% vs 17.3% (p = 0.04) in those who did and did not receive immunonutrition. After propensity score matching, covariates were similar among 960 patients. Although differences in serious adverse events were nonsignificant (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.16), prolonged length of stay (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.01 p = 0.05) was lower in those receiving immunonutrition.

LIMITATIONS

Patient compliance with the intervention was not measured. Residual confounding, including surgeon-level heterogeneity, may influence estimates of the effect of immunonutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in prolonged length of stay, likely related to fewer complications, support the use of immunonutrition in quality improvement initiatives related to elective colorectal surgery. This population-based study supports previous trials of immunonutrition, but shows a lower magnitude of benefit, perhaps related to compliance or a lower rate of adverse events, highlighting the value of community-based assessments of comparative effectiveness.

The Importance of Integrating Clinical Relevance and Statistical Significance in the Assessment of Quality of Care--Illustrated Using the Swedish Stroke Register

Background

When profiling hospital performance, quality inicators are commonly evaluated through hospital-specific adjusted means with confidence intervals. When identifying deviations from a norm, large hospitals can have statistically significant results even for clinically irrelevant deviations while important deviations in small hospitals can remain undiscovered. We have used data from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) to illustrate the properties of a benchmarking method that integrates considerations of both clinical relevance and level of statistical significance.

Methods

The performance measure used was case-mix adjusted risk of death or dependency in activities of daily living within 3 months after stroke. A hospital was labeled as having outlying performance if its case-mix adjusted risk exceeded a benchmark value with a specified statistical confidence level. The benchmark was expressed relative to the population risk and should reflect the clinically relevant deviation that is to be detected. A simulation study based on Riksstroke patient data from 2008–2009 was performed to investigate the effect of the choice of the statistical confidence level and benchmark value on the diagnostic properties of the method.

Results

Simulations were based on 18,309 patients in 76 hospitals. The widely used setting, comparing 95% confidence intervals to the national average, resulted in low sensitivity (0.252) and high specificity (0.991). There were large variations in sensitivity and specificity for different requirements of statistical confidence. Lowering statistical confidence improved sensitivity with a relatively smaller loss of specificity. Variations due to different benchmark values were smaller, especially for sensitivity. This allows the choice of a clinically relevant benchmark to be driven by clinical factors without major concerns about sufficiently reliable evidence.

Conclusions

The study emphasizes the importance of combining clinical relevance and level of statistical confidence when profiling hospital performance. To guide the decision process a web-based tool that gives ROC-curves for different scenarios is provided.

Validation in colorectal procedures of a useful novel approach for the use of C-reactive protein in postoperative infectious complications

AIM

Our aim was to validate a novel use of C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to identify postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, and to compare the predictive value in this setting against white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of CRP, NLR and WBC measurements in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. CRP, NLR and WBC were recorded on the second postoperative day and on the day of infectious complication (patients who developed infectious complications) or within 3 days prior to discharge (subjects with no complications). The test for detecting infectious complications consisted of comparing the value of the inflammatory marker on the day on which a complication was suspected against the value recorded on the second postoperative day. The test was considered positive if a given value was higher than the registered peak at postoperative day 2. Factors influencing the postoperative peak CRP were also studied.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients were retrospectively studied. Patients whose CRP value was higher than on the second postoperative day had a diagnostic accuracy for infectious complications of up to 94.4% and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of up to 97.4%, 93.4%, 85.7% and 99.1%, respectively. Poorer results were observed when WBC count and NLR were used rather than CRP measurement. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that surgical procedure and approach, as well as additional resections, were independent factors for 48 h peak CRP.

CONCLUSION

C-reactive protein is a better parameter than WBC count and NLR for detecting infectious complications. Our proposed methodology presents good diagnostic accuracy and performance and could potentially be used for any surgical procedure.