Association of Fas -1377 G/A polymorphism with susceptibility to cancer

Fas and FasL promoter polymorphisms and susceptibility to HBV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Apoptosis is a universal cellular defense mechanism against senescent, damaged, genetically mutated, or virally-infected cells. It also is critical for the maintenance of liver health. Fas and FasL system act as a major death pathway that triggers apoptosis cascade in the liver. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the relationship between four major polymorphisms of Fas and FasL genes with susceptibility to or clearance of HBV infection. All the eligible studies were extracted from PubMed and Scopus with no date and language restriction. ORs with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the strength of the association based on the following genetic models: (1) the allelic, (2) the homozygote, (3) the dominant, and (4) the recessive models. Totally 7 related articles were included in this meta-analysis; 5 studies of 7 related articles investigated FasL -844C/T (rs763110) polymorphism, 4 studies investigated FasL IVS2nt-124, 6 studies investigated Fas -670 A/G (rs1800682), and 4 studies investigated Fas -1377 A/G (rs2234767) polymorphism. This meta-analysis showed that there is no statistically significant association between the risk or clearance of HBV infection and four studied Fas and FasL polymorphisms in their allelic comparison or genetic models. Fas -670, Fas -1377, FasL -124, and FasL -844 polymorphisms did not show any significant association with the clearance or risk of HBV infection. Therefore, it seems that susceptibility to HBV infection or clearance of it is not affected by Fas and FasL genetic polymorphisms. But, to reach a definitive conclusion, further studies with a larger sample size of different ethnicity are still needed.

Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender

We investigated risk association of oral cancers (tongue and buccal mucosa cancers) with FAS (-1377G > A and FAS -670 A > G) and FASL (-844 T > C) SNPs, in males and females. A case-control study of 535 oral cancer and 525 control subjects was performed. SNPs were detected in the genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood using PCR-RFLP. We report FASL -844 T > C SNPs increased risk for buccal mucosa cancer in females but not in males. On the other hand, FAS genotypes did not alter the risk of the cancers in both females and males. However, co-occurrence of FAS -1377 GA and -670 GG, FAS -1377 AA and -670 GG genotypes, and combined genotypes of FAS and FASL (FAS -1377 AA + FAS -670 GG + FASL -844 CC) alter male susceptibility towards tongue cancer. In females, combined genotypes of FAS (-1377GA and -670 AA) were found to be a risk factor of buccal mucosa cancer (OR = 3.27, CI = 1.28-8.36; P ≤ 0.01). FASL variants (GA and AA) increased tongue cancer risk in females who were tobacco users compared to non-tobacco users. In conclusion, SNPs of the FAS and FASL might alter risk of tongue and buccal mucosa cancers differentially, in a gender-dependent manner.

Association between Fas/FasL polymorphism and susceptibility to leukemia: a meta-analysis

The polymorphisms in Fas/FasL system were proposed to be associated with susceptibility to leukemia, but recent studies reported controversial findings. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between Fas gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to leukemia. We carried out a literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI databases for studies on the associations between Fas/FasL gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to leukemia. The associations were assessed by odds ratio (OR) together with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 7 literatures and 14 studies with a total of 8787 subjects were eventually included into our meta-analysis. Overall, there was no association between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to leukemia. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, there was also no association between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to leukemia in Asians and Caucasians. In addition, there was also a significant association between Fas-1377G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to leukemia in ALL patients, the A allele seemed to be a protective factor in ALL risk. In summary, more studies with large sample size are needed to provide further evidence for association between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to leukemia.