Comparison of efficacy of intensive versus mild pitavastatin therapy on lipid and inflammation biomarkers in hypertensive patients with dyslipidemia

A comprehensive review on the lipid and pleiotropic effects of pitavastatin

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are administered as first line therapy for hypercholesterolemia, both in primary and secondary prevention. There is a growing body of evidence showing that beyond their lipid-lowering effect, statins have a number of additional beneficial properties. Pitavastatin is a unique lipophilic statin with a strong effect on lowering plasma total cholesterol and triacylglycerol. It has been reported to have pleiotropic effects such as decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress, regulating angiogenesis and osteogenesis, improving endothelial function and arterial stiffness, and reducing tumor progression. Based on the available studies considering the risk of statin-associated muscle symptoms it seems to be also the safest statin. The unique lipid and non-lipid effects of pitavastatin make this molecule a particularly interesting option for the management of different human diseases. In this review, we first summarized the lipid effects of pitavastatin and then strive to unravel the diverse pleiotropic effects of this molecule.

Pitavastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Pitavastatin is the newest statin on the market, and the dose-related magnitude of effect of pitavastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of pitavastatin on the surrogate markers: LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. To compare the effect of pitavastatin on surrogate markers with other statins.  Secondary objectives To quantify the effect of various doses of pitavastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.  SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for trials up to March 2019: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2019), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCT and controlled before-and-after studies evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pitavastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from RCT and controlled before-and-after studies into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. Withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE) information was collected from the RCTs. We assessed all included trials using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of allocation (selection bias), blinding (performance bias and detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other potential sources of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-seven studies (five RCTs and 42 before-and-after studies) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pitavastatin in 5436 participants. The participants were of any age with and without cardiovascular disease, and pitavastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 1 mg to 16 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pitavastatin on blood HDL cholesterol, which was increased by 4% on average by pitavastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg/day to 16 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 33.3% to 54.7%, total cholesterol by 23.3% to 39.0% and triglycerides by 13.0% to 28.1%. For every two-fold dose increase, there was a 5.35% (95% CI 3.32 to 7.38) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 3.93% (95% CI 2.35 to 5.50) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 3.76% (95% CI 1.03 to 6.48) decrease in blood triglycerides. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to other statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. For the placebo group, there were no participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 109 subjects and for all doses of pitavastatin, there were three participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 262 subjects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pitavastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. There were not enough data to determine risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects due to pitavastatin.

Effects of intensive pitavastatin therapy on glucose control in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of intensive pitavastatin therapy on glucose control in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: Patients who had ACS with significant stenosis on initial coronary angiography and received successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China from August 2015 to January 2016 were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to receive pitavastatin (4 mg daily) or atorvastatin (20 mg daily). PCI was performed within 72 hours after admission according to the current clinical practice at the physician's discretion. The examinations of blood lipid levels and blood markers of glucose metabolism were performed at baseline and after 6-month follow-up using standard techniques. The inflammatory markers, including white blood cell, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and fibrinogen, were also assessed before PCI and 24 hours after PCI. An independent adverse event assessment committee evaluated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and any other adverse events. Results: A total of 132 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into the pitavastatin group (n = 65) or the atorvastatin group (n = 67), which had similar baseline characteristics and PCI procedural characteristics. For the inflammatory biomarkers at 24 hours after PCI, the fibrinogen level was significantly increased in the atorvastatin group; the hs-CRP levels were significantly increased in both groups, however, the hs-CRP level in the pitavastatin group was lower than that in the atorvastatin group. In addition, the blood lipid parameters (e.g., TC, LDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C and Apo B) were significantly decreased in both groups after 6-month follow-up (P < 0.01), but these parameters between the two groups had no significant difference. After 6-month follow-up, the FPG, IRI, HOMA-IR and HbA_1c levels were significantly decreased in the pitavastatin group (P < 0.05) but slightly increased in the atorvastatin group, indicating that the glucose homeostasis was improved in patients in the pitavastatin group but not in the atorvastatin group. Furthermore, the incidence of MACE was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). After 6-month antiplatelet treatment, the PAR value was significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.01), but the PAR value in the pitavastatin group was lower than that in the atorvastatin group. Conclusion: Pitavastatin therapy may improve the glucose homeostasis for patients with ACS undergoing PCI and has more favorable outcomes than atorvastatin therapy.